Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

DONATE

The Essence of Christianity
GA 68a

20 February 1908, Cassel

Translator Unknown

39. The Origin of Evil

Ladies and Gentlemen,

There are world riddles which not only meet us when we turn our attention to the great events of life, but which meet us at every touch and turn in everyday life. We could bring forward many such riddles of life, one such is that which shall occupy us today: the question of the origin of evil. It is one of those riddles which meet us in everyday life but which can only find an answer if we go back to the sources and origin of life. Such a question especially shows us in the way it has been treated by man since ancient times that really it can only fruitfully be approached by what we call spiritual science or the theosophical world view. Without that important insight in the world, without that penetration to the sources of existence which can flow to us through this stream of cultural life, an answer is not possible. Hence you will have to undertake with me a really wide path to the sources of existence in order to penetrate this, in a certain connection, everyday enigma. He who only regards the world with that mood flowing out of materialism which follows the course of actions only with the senses cannot find an answer to this question in the remotest degree.

Evil arises for us, but of course not in its real sense, in the inferior being in human life. The wise person who is also a believer asks how it is reconcilable with a wise ordering of the world which one also calls providence, that this providence lets man sink to what we call evil—that the Godhead lets man become evil in order then to punish him. Not merely the simple believer understands it thus but we hear the same in a poem which the young Goethe composed when he calls these words to a divine spirituality:

Thou let'st the poor man come to grief,
Then leavest him to his pain.

This question becomes really impenetrable to one who stands on less religious ground. Without a soul-spiritual basis we come to no ordered concept of evil, let alone any connection with the cosmic spirit. Since man was able to think, the leaders of man, the thinkers, have tried to solve the question: Whence comes evil? What meaning has it?

We must look back for once into that past age of Persian myths and the continuous conflict of Ormuzd against the evil powers already designated as Ahriman, a continuous fighter against the good. Ahriman is there shown us as the force which in conflict causes a strengthening of the good spirit. If with a great leap we immerse ourselves in the deep meaning of a German thinker, Jakob Böhme, then we find his writings and the continuous course of his life entirely filled with the question as to the origin of evil. Jakob Böhme says that a multiplicity only arises out of a unity, but the multiplicity must be guided however only by the will of the unity, as for example the two hands, which if they are not directed by one will are separate members. Without this guiding unity we can create no great work. These hands can storm against each other, they can mangle each other. The possibility is just then given when that which we call freedom is given to the two. As long as the two hands are determined by the personality, and as long as one will rule them, they will not turn against each other.

And here a feeling already flows into Jakob Böhme that evil has something to do with love. When the Divine Being flowing through the world so loves the world that it extends Being to everything and holds nothing back, in order to give to the multiplicity as great a freedom as possible then the many can strive against each other.

We could speak at length about this if we let the thinkers pass before us, we could bring forward many examples from the great epochs but we would always get only a kind of philosophical answer. Today however we do not want philosophical answers, and so without deviation we would occupy ourselves with the spiritual world in order to get a firm point for the answering of our question. In order not to expand our mode of observation too far I should like at once to go to the heart of the matter, and for this we must bring quite briefly the nature of man before the soul. We are clear that evil must have something to do with human nature.

If we consider man from the standpoint of what the eyes see and the hands grasp then we only have but one part of human nature in the sense of spiritual science. We only see the physical part of man which he has in common with all apparently lifeless beings. Everything to be found in the human body is also existing there, only of course these mineral forces exist in man in quite a special manner. They are so complicatedly interwoven) so manifoldly built up that the physical body would fall asunder through its own physical laws unless something penetrated it like water penetrates a sponge, something which combats in each man in each moment all disturbances in the physical body. We call this fighter the etheric or life body. In each one of you the physical body would be exposed in every moment to decay unless that fighter, that victor which we call the etheric or life body were in you. Man has this in common with the whole of living nature, this fighter is there in everything that lives. In the moment when at death the physical body is separated from the etheric body then it follows physical laws, it decays and passes over into lifeless nature. The etheric body is something that is regarded by science today as something impossible. Yet we cannot enter further into that but must bring forth the matter only sketchily. Besides the etheric body man has a third member of his being. For one whose spiritual eyes are opened this third member is always visible. You can present this third member logically to yourselves.

We ask ourselves—Are the physical and etheric bodies everything? A simple consideration is enough to show that there is really something existing which stands far nearer to man than his bones, muscles, blood and nerves. Something lies quite close as a reality that is the sum of what we call feelings, instincts, passions. That belongs to us in reality and is existing in the same space where blood, muscles, nerves, exist. We have this part of human nature in common only with the animals, not with the plants.

Now there is a fourth member through which man is the crown of creation. The fourth member of his being is that which enables him to comprise everything which is in him, in the name ‘I’. This name ‘I’ is a name which already hides the secret nature of his being in the distinction which it shows compared with all other names which we have in language. Each person can call a chair “chair”, a table “table” etc., yet the name ‘I’ no one can hear from outside, it must come from one’s own soul. Each object can have its name resounding to us from outside, the ‘I’ can only be heard coming from oneself. All world views which were built on what we call spiritual science have always felt this. In the old Hebraic religion you find for this intimate name of the soul the unutterable Name of God. Why is it so called? If the soul is to hear her true name then something speaks in the soul which can be united with the soul without penetrating it through any organ from outside. The ‘I’ must resound from out of the soul itself. A spark of divine being is in the soul in which it utters its own name ‘I’.

That which a distorted philosophy has also wanted to find is the true significance of the word “Jahve”, the unutterable name of the divine soul-part in man. This was also meant when, in ancient Egypt, the veiled image of Sais was referred to. We can read the inscriptions: “I am Who was, Who is, and Who will be. My veil no mortal has lifted.” An investigator, a German romanticist said something correct out of an extraordinary instinct although he did not go deep enough: “No mortal has lifted the veil, we must become immortal.”

It was the view of the great Egyptian priestly magi that the ‘I’ was veiled but that the coverings must fall away. No other can solve the nature of the ‘I’ than the ‘I’ itself when it becomes conscious of its true nature by descending into its own depths where it grasps itself in its own immortality; then it knows what is concealed behind the veil. Of course only the very few today are inclined to gaze into the nature of the ‘I’, the utterance of Fichte still holds good: Most people would sooner regard themselves as a piece of lava in the moon than as an ‘I’. Since Fichte we have seen the coarse materialism flow into the culture of the 19th century. People today are very satisfied when they can partially know something physical and demonstrate it materialistically. They regard themselves as being more like a piece of lava in the moon than an ‘I’. It would be nonsensical to speak of the higher members of man's nature if in the sense of spiritual investigation one were to speak of the fourth member as a mere phenomenon of the physical body. Naturally spiritual investigation must have something in this sphere which must appear very stupid to a person who so often thinks today that everything must rest on the basis of scientific facts. That which occurs in the etheric body, the astral body and the ‘I’ is not the effect of the physical body but the reverse. What transpires in the physical and etheric bodies is the work of the astral body. Only when one gradually raises oneself to this view is one able to answer this question.

Just consider for example processes which meet us every day. Something arouses in us the feeling of shame. There is something in me of which I desire my environment should see nothing—I blush. Another process is the feeling of fear, noticeable through pallor. With shame a stream of blood rises to the head. With fear the blood recedes back from the head into the inner part of the body. What has happened? A soul process works on the body. Each of these events appears as the result of a soul process. They are indications of how soul working plays into the material. These effects in what is material are not so easily perceptible today. They have more or less withdrawn because of the mighty transformations which the physical body has undergone (as compared with earlier forms of existence). But the further we go back in human evolution all the more do spiritual influences get the upper hand.

There are indeed people today who go so far as to deny the working of the soul on the material body. One might not think that people exist with such materialistic views but there is in America a theological school which calls itself pragmatism. They have brought their views to an expression which reveals the grotesqueness of the materialism advocated therein. We need merely bring this utterance for once to our mind: “Man does not weep because he is sad, but he is sad because he weeps.” It is obvious here how the materialistic world view comes into contradiction with the healthy human understanding.

It is a fact that must appear natural to us that such consequences are drawn, and they appear today in numerous spheres; only they do not come to the surface in such grotesque fashion. If we now keep firm that physical processes are effects of the spiritual-psychic then it will no longer appear wrong to us if, going back into very ancient times of human evolution we find these effects are all the more significant the further we go back, so that we have to reckon with far-reaching spiritual influences in ancient times of human evolution which today are concealed.

You know perhaps that the theosophical view says that human existence runs its course in repeated earth lives. We will only bring that forward briefly. Man goes through many earth lives in his evolutionary path to ever higher perfection. We say in spiritual investigation that everything that lives is subject to transformation. Everything in the world is subject to such transformation, not only man but also mighty worlds are subject to continual change. Just as when we regard the single human being and say “That which transpires in the present life between birth and death is the result of former incarnations,” so we can look to a whole heavenly body and we only understand such a body in the sense of spiritual science when we know that it has acquired in former lives that which it has become today. We also say of the earth and planets that they have passed through other incarnations. As the spiritually highly developed man can look back to former earth lives so earlier planetary conditions can be perceived from the standpoint of spiritual science. We point back to the previous planetary condition of the earth, and this pre-earth is called in spiritual science Cosmos of Wisdom.

A glance at what is around you can make clear to you why we look back to this pre-earth as the cosmos of wisdom. Just regard man’s physical body. Look at one piece. Take a piece of the thigh bone which is composed of countless scaffoldings and members. It is an artistically constructed structure built with wonderful wisdom. It is so constructed through engineering art full of wisdom that the thigh bone, in spite of its relatively small strength, is able to carry the upper body. No engineer is able to construct such a bridge-like structure with such wisdom, and whoever looks at this wonderful human structure knows what great wisdom is contained in it. We know however also that other members of man are not yet so wise. We need merely think how the passions and impulses of the astral body work. What we eat and drink often contain heart poisons, and yet the heart is built so full of wisdom that it can bear these attacks for decades. Everywhere we find this Wisdom spread out. In the structure of the body we find this wisdom everywhere, in each blossom, in each animal, and we see how the world is penetrated by this wisdom.

Let us look at the beaver and his dam, building it with marvellous art—if one measures the angles then one will find they are quite exactly measured. So we could observe bit by bit everything that surrounds us. Could we now extract this wisdom from out the world unless it were there within it? The materialistic mood denies that the wisdom which man draws out is in the phenomena. But a natural thinking would tell you that something which man extracts from nature must be contained in it. As little as one can drink water from a glass if none is in it, just as little can one extract wisdom from the world if none is in it. But this wisdom is there and spiritual science knows that this wisdom was in all things at the beginning of earth evolution. Thus in a plant seed for example was a beech; as a proof of this we see a beech tree grows from it and not an oak. The earth carried the wisdom which meets us today already when the things around us were still in germ. Just as truly as the seed comes not from the earth but from the plant, so truly the seed from which our earth was born arose from what the earth was previously. That was the cosmos of wisdom. That which you see today in each leaf, in each organ in man's form, in everything spread out around you, slowly and gradually arose, formed itself member by member and only appeared after wisdom had struggled with wisdom. We had an embodiment on the previous stage of our earth where the wisdom of things was worked out in which, so to say, the things in their wisdom were worked over. What has our earth, to which this Wisdom has come over, for a task? It has its special mission. Just as its predecessor developed the wisdom which surrounds us today bit by bit, similarly our earth today develops bit by hit another cosmic force, and this force is love. Therefore in spiritual investigation we call the earth the Cosmos of Love. The evolution of the earth so runs its course that love appears as a force becoming more and more dominant, and when the earth will have reached its goal then everything will be penetrated by the force of love. Hence we call the earth the cosmos of love. Just as on the previous cosmos the beginning was made with un-wisdom and only gradually was the form of wisdom worked out, so this earth runs its course so that gradually love is worked out. Then when the earth has reached its goal love will be spread out everywhere, everything will be permeated with love, and the earth will have beings on it who will find love just as we find wisdom in everything that surrounds us. Those who will be on the new embodiment of the earth will stand wonderingly before love, just as we stand in wonderment before wisdom. Our earth has the holy mission of letting flow the impulse of love into things. The impulse is here to fulfil this mission, to make it deed. Thus we have to think of the structure of our earth as the cultivation of love going through the entire earth evolution of man. If we see this then we have a handle for understanding today's question, only we must be clear that man is not the only being around us. You know the spiritual investigator does not speak of the spiritual worlds as of something far off in the clouds, but he speaks of them in a natural and self understood way. A person born blind who has his eyes opened suddenly sees everything flooded with light and radiance. He sees a new world around him which was existing before just as light and colours existed before his eyes were opened. In this world which only an unlogical thinking can deny, other beings are existing with other forms of spirituality than man has. We can form an idea of these spiritual beings by bringing to mind that man is in a continual evolution. He must ascend ever higher and higher. In each incarnat-ion he experiences something, he becomes an ever more perfect being.

What perspectives thus open out? We see the great ideals of Man, the Man of the future elevated like a God. We see that as man today stands higher than animal and plant thus will the future man stand to his present existence. Spiritual science knows already today that beings stand above man at his present stage in evolution who are as perfect as we will be in a far future. They are beings highly exalted above man and who long ago passed through the stage we are at today, who have a purely spiritual life and no longer have need to descend to a physical body. Thus we see as man begins his earthly existence, as he leads over what was existing of him from the cosmos of wisdom, then not only he enters the cosmos of love but also higher spiritual guiding beings.

Who are these? The same as those who let their wisdom flow into the cosmos of wisdom. The same as those who built that cosmos of wisdom out of their creative wisdom. What we have finished before us today has been created by these beings. They are the possessors of productive wisdom. They have put in their wisdom. Because previously in the cosmos of wisdom they developed creatively in reference to wisdom, they have acquired the power of letting love trickle as it were on the earth to all earth men, and bit by bit this love flows to the earth. We need merely cast a brief glance at this earth, then we see how love gradually developed. It appears to us in ancient times in the narrowest limits. Who loved each other in ancient times? At first only small groups of those blood-related. Then we see love spread beyond the narrowest blood relationship. The circle love draws together becomes ever wide. At first we see marriage only between those closely related. Then love spreads to a whole tribe, and then in the Old Testament the whole people is loved, and he who does not belong to the people is foreign. The way is far but we have taken the great step where love is led over from the principle of blood relationship into the spiritual, to the great brother-bond which should span the earth to the Christ-Principle. This is referred to in the utterance: Who does not forsake father and mother, brother and sister and follow Me … etc.

This utterance is not to be taken literally. It refers to the fact that love should leave the narrow circle of blood relationship and become spiritual. It should embrace each soul; that is the great mission of Christianity, to make love more and more spiritual until it reaches the form of an all embracing love with which the whole earth should be permeated, so that the beings of the next world will find this love in all things as we have found wisdom. So we see that during earth existence the mission is fulfilled in that what man has brought over from the pre-earth is permeated with love. The assimilation of love is the task man has to develop in the earthly course of the human race. Thus we can see that a whole force which leads men together, progresses ever further into ever widening circles.

That is possible only to love. Let us go back once more from the cosmos of love to the cosmos of wisdom. What was existing of man at the transition? That which I described as the four members of his being making man the crown of creation was not yet existing at the beginning of our earth evolution, only the beginnings of the physical, etheric and astral bodies. But just as a seed decays and yet rises again letting a plant arise, so man disappears at the transition from the cosmos of wisdom to the cosmos of love, to arise again on our present earth and gradually the ‘I’ develops. This I must be there as the counterpart to the force of love. Love has other conditions of existence than wisdom. Wisdom can run where all the single members are dependent on each other. Wisdom can rule where a being in love holds sway. But if love is to pass from one being to another that can only happen where it is a free gift which must be there as a Father force.

Only such beings have the force for love who have the divine force for the ever greater acquirement of freedom.

The I is the counter-pole of love. The I impressed itself in the same measure as love impressed itself. That could only happen gradually in evolution. In the beginning blood speaks, the blood which is related to the loved being. Here love appears to us at the most primitive stage. Love develops more and more to a soul-spiritual force, and therewith the ‘I’ makes itself free. But in order to understand the true evolution of man within the cosmos of love we must keep one thing in mind. We must see that in the cosmos things go on as in a school. Here some always remain behind. similarly this happens in the cosmos. Those beings of whom we have spoken who stand exaltedly above man, those created in productive wisdom could pass over to love. But some remained behind who did not reach the final goal of the cosmos of wisdom, who did not finish their task. They still had to work at wisdom and could not yet stream out love which was not yet given to them.

They are beings who stand between the exalted beings and man. Spiritual science calls them the Luciferic beings under the dominion of Lucifer. One may laugh but just as, for example, magnetic forces are around us, so are the luciferic. They extend into the cosmos of love from out of the cosmos of wisdom. They were the beings who endowed man with their small wisdom. They created the subjective, intellectual wisdom of man in the ‘I’ which first became impregnated as it were therewith. An independence was given to this I which only suited it on the cosmos of wisdom if this love-filled wisdom had reached a definite stage. Thus the ‘I’ got a force which it should now transform in independence. Only in the measure in which the Christ principle illuminated it did the ‘I’ become capable of placing itself in harmony with all the forces of its environment on the earth. Before this approach to the Christ ideal is attained such beings again and again take firm hold in man, who are the opposing powers of the ‘I’. Their force is a separating force which will separate the ‘I’ too soon. The Luciferic beings lead a conflict against everything which brings men together.

This force has also its good task. It hinders man falling into, as it were, a primeval mash of love. Just as man had to be prepared for love, so earlier they had to be prepared for wisdom. Thus this luciferic principle is to be seen as the principle of illumination of independence. So we have two forces which lead humanity in two different directions and therewith we have the principle of the independent I which consolidates itself out of this conflict. Without this independence love would not be possible; without this independence the origin of evil would not be possible; love makes evil necessary. Hence comes the principle of love which arises from the spirits of love, and the principle of wisdom which arises from the spirits of wisdom. Both lead us from soul to soul, spirit to spirit, I to I. Evil rests on this spiritual fact. The possibility of evil was given with the possibility of love. Only because the God of the earth is the God of Love, and beings became independent I-men was the origin of evil possible. Love made evil possible.

Man first attains free love and true greatness through the Luciferic powers, and only thereby he takes the forces of evil into himself. The forces of love must penetrate the whole earth, must have overcome evil, have converted it as it were by the end of the earth's course. We see that what man owes to evil is a good. He owes to evil freedom. The origin of evil lies in the Luciferic principle as lies also the origin of freedom, with which is given the possibility of the development of love.

If we think of the earth without everything evil then only a tiny force of love is necessary to overcome the forces of evil. The forces of love grow because they have the task of transforming the existing evil in love. Thus we really see something of what Böhme felt, that evil strengthens the mission of love. Thus we see together with the origin of evil the meaning of evil, and if we consider evil spiritually scientifically then we see evil justified in a certain way. Then wherever it meets us we regard it with other feelings.

If this penetrates our feelings then it makes quite a different impression on us, not for one who just grasps it speculatively but for one who grasps it theosophically. If we have quiet hours and elevate our spirit to the great riddles then we must experience something so mighty that in evil we yet feel the good. Thus we permeate ourselves with feelings which then go with us in life at every step. We face the whole world thinking, feeling and acting, and that is most essential. Oh, we will become mild if we see what formerly enraged us. These feelings which result as the foundation from those quiet hours constitute the theosophical life. We shall consider this tomorrow even more applied to daily life. Today we have only been able to indicate the function of evil in fleeting outline.

We have attained the view that we are short-sighted if we bring forward as an objection to the evil, the wisdom, the love, the spirit of the world. We have seen that this spirit of love powerfully flows through the world, and is such a good spirit that once it brought evil into the world in order to bring about the most effective, beneficial good.

39. Der Ursprung Des Bösen

Meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden! Es gibt Welträtsel, die uns nicht nur dann entgegentreten, wenn wir den Blick auf die großen Ereignisse des Lebens richten, sondern welche uns auf Schritt und Tritt im Alltagsleben auftauchen. Viele derartige Lebensrätsel könnten wir anführen, eines ist dasjenige, welches uns heute beschäftigen soll: die Frage nach dem Ursprung des Bösen. Es ist eines derjenigen Rätsel, welche uns im Alltagsleben begegnen, welche ihre Antwort aber nur finden können, wenn wir zu den Quellen und Ursprüngen des Lebens zurückgehen. Gerade eine solche Frage zeigt uns in der Art, wie sie seit alten Zeiten von der Menschheit behandelt worden ist, dass sie eigentlich nur fruchtbar irgendwie in Angriff genommen werden kann in dem, was wir Geisteswissenschaft oder theosophische Weltanschauung nennen. Ohne jene gewichtigen Ausblicke in die Welt, ohne das Eindringen in die Quellen des Daseins, die uns durch diese Strömung im Kulturleben erfließen kann, ist eine Antwort nicht möglich. Daher werden Sie mit mir einen recht weiten Gang zu den Quellen des Daseins unternehmen müssen, um diese in gewisser Beziehung alltägliche Rätselfrage zu durchschauen. Derjenige, der nur mit der aus dem Materialismus fließenden Gesinnung die Welt anschaut, der den Verlauf der Handlungen mit den Sinnen verfolgt, der kann nicht im Entferntesten eine Beantwortung dieser Frage finden.

Das Böse taucht uns auf, allerdings nicht in seinem eigentlichen Sinn, im untergeordneten Dasein, im menschlichen Leben. Der Weise, der ein gläubiger Mensch ist, fragt sich: Wie ist es verträglich mit einer weisen Weltordnung, die man auch Vorsehung nennt, dass diese Vorsehung den Menschen bis zu dem, was wir das Böse nennen, sinken lässt, dass die Gottheit den Menschen böse werden lässt, um ihn dann zu strafen? Nicht nur der naiv gläubige Mensch fasst das so auf, sondern wir hören dasselbe auch in dem Gedicht, das der junge Goethe verfasst hat, als er die Worte einer göttlichen Geistigkeit entgegenruft:

Ihr lasst den Armen schuldig werden,
Dann überlasst ihr ihn der Pein!

Derjenige, welcher auf weniger religiösem Boden steht, ist dieser Frage erst recht nicht zugänglich. Ohne eine seelisch-geistige Grundlage kommen wir zu keinem geordneten Begriff des Bösen, geschweige denn zu einem Zusammenhang mit dem Weltengeiste. Seit Menschen denken können, haben die Führer der Menschen, die Denker, die Frage: Woher rührt das Böse, was hat es für eine Bedeutung? —- zu lösen versucht.

Wir müssen einmal zurückblicken in die Zeit der Vergangenheit, wo in persischen Mythen schon der fortdauernde Kampf gegen die bösen Gewalten verzeichnet ist, die dem Ormuzd den Ahriman entgegengesetzt haben, als einen fortdauernden Kämpfer gegen das Gute. Ahriman wird uns dort gezeigt als die Kraft, die im Kampfe den guten Geist erstarken lässt.

Wenn wir uns mit einem großen Sprung hinüberversetzen in den tiefen Sinn deutscher Denker, zu Jakob Böhme, so finden wir in seinen Schriften und in der Folgezeit sein ganzes Leben ausgefüllt mit jener Frage nach dem Ursprung des Bösen. Jakob Böhme sagt, dass eine Vielheit nur aus einer Einheit entsteht, die Vielheit aber nur durch den Willen der Einheit gelenkt werden muss; wie zum Beispiel zwei Hände, wenn sie nicht dirigiert werden von einem Willen, getrennte Glieder sind; ohne diese lenkende Einheit können wir kein großes Werk schaffen. Diese Hände können gegeneinander wüten, sie können sich zerfleischen. Die Möglichkeit ist grade dann gegeben, wenn den zweien das gegeben wird, was wir Freiheit nennen. Solange die beiden Hände von der Persönlichkeit abgestimmt und so lange sie ein Wille beherrscht, werden sie sich nicht gegeneinander wenden.

Und hier fließt Jakob Böhme schon eine Empfindung ein, dass das Böse etwas zu tun hat mit der Liebe. Wenn das die Welt durchflutende Gotteswesen die Welt so liebt, dass es allen Wesen alles hinreicht und nichts zurückbehält, um den vielen eine möglichst große Freiheit zu geben, dann können die vielen gegeneinander streben.

Wir könnten, wenn wir die Denker Revue passieren lassen wollten, noch lange darüber reden, noch manche Beispiele aus großen Epochen heranziehen, wir würden aber immer nur eine Art philosophischer Antwort bekommen. Heute wollen wir uns aber nicht mit philosophischen Fragen, sondern ohne Umschweife mit den Tatsachen der geistigen Welt befassen, um die Anhaltspunkte zu gewinnen zur Beantwortung unserer Frage. Ich möchte, um die Betrachtungsweise nicht zu weit auszudehnen, gleich in die Mitte der Sache gehen, und da müssen wir uns ganz kurz das Wesen des Menschen vor die Seele hinstellen. Wir sind uns klar, dass das Böse mit der menschlichen Natur etwas zu tun haben muss.

Wenn wir den Menschen von dem Standpunkt aus betrachten, was Augen sehen, Hände greifen können, so haben wir nur einen Teil der menschlichen Wesenheit im Sinne der Geisteswissenschaft. Wir sehen nur den physischen Teil des Menschen, welchen dieser mit allen scheinbar leblosen Wesen gemein hat. Alles, was im Menschenleib zu finden ist, ist auch dort vorhanden, nur sind diese mineralischen Kräfte freilich im Menschen in einer ganz besonderen Art vorhanden: Sie sind so kompliziert ineinandergefügt, so mannigfaltig aufgebaut, dass der physische Leib durch seine eigenen physischen Gesetze zerfallen würde, wenn ihn nicht etwas durchdränge, wie das Wasser den Schwamm durchdringt, etwas, was in jedem Menschen in jedem Augenblick ein Kämpfer ist gegen alle Störungen im physischen Leibe. Diesen Kämpfer nennen wir den Ätherleib oder Lebensleib. In jedem von Ihnen ist der physische Leib in jedem Augenblick dem Zerfall ausgesetzt, wenn in Ihnen nicht wäre jener Kämpfer, jener Sieger, den wir Ätherleib oder Lebensleib nennen. Diesen hat der Mensch gemeinsam mit der ganzen lebendigen Natur; in allem, was da lebt, ist dieser Kämpfer. In dem Augenblicke, wo im Tode der physische Körper vom Ätherleib getrennt wird, da folgt er den physischen Gesetzen, er zerfällt und geht in die leblose Welt über. Der Ätherleib ist etwas, was von der heutigen Wissenschaft als etwas Unmögliches angesehen wird. Doch wir können uns darauf nicht weiter einlassen, sondern müssen die Sache nur skizzenhaft anführen.

Über den Ätherleib hinaus hat der Mensch ein drittes Glied seiner Wesenheit. Dies dritte Glied seiner Wesenheit ist für den, dem die geistigen Augen geöffnet sind, jederzeit sichtbar. Sie können sich dies dritte Glied logisch vorstellen. Wir fragen uns: Ist das, was physischer Leib und Lebensleib ist, alles? Eine einfache Erwägung genügt; es ist wirklich etwas vorhanden, was dem Menschen viel näher steht als seine Knochen, Muskeln, Blut und Nerven. Etwas liegt als Wirklichkeit ganz nahe, das ist die Summe von dem, was wir die Summe von Gefühlen, Instinkten, Leidenschaften nennen, das gehört uns in Wirklichkeit an, und das ist in denselben Räumen vorhanden, wo Blut, Muskeln, Nerven vorhanden sind. Diesen Teil der menschlichen Wesenheit haben wir nur mit den Tieren gemein, nicht mit den Pflanzen.

Nun gibt es noch ein viertes Glied, durch welches der Mensch die Krone der Schöpfung ist. Das vierte Glied seiner Wesenheit ist das, was ihn befähigt, alles, was in ihm ist, zusammenzufassen in den Namen «Ich». Dieser Name «Ich» ist ein Name, welcher das Geheimnisvolle seines Wesens schon verbirgt hinter dem Unterschied, welchen er aufweist gegenüber allen anderen Namen welche wir in der deutschen Sprache haben. Einen Stuhl kann jeder «Stuhl» nennen, einen Tisch «Tisch» und so weiter, doch den Namen «Ich» kann niemand von außen hören, er muss aus der eigenen Seele tönen. Jedes Ding kann seinen Namen von außen uns zutönen, das «Ich» kann er nur von sich selbst hören. Das haben diejenigen Weltanschauungen immer gefühlt, welche auf dem, was wir die Geisteswissenschaft nennen, aufgebaut waren. In der alttestamentlichen, hebräischen Religion finden Sie für diesen intimen Namen der Seele den unausgesprochenen Namen Gottes. Warum wird der nun so genannt? Soll die Seele ihren wahren Namen hören, dann spricht etwas in der Seele, das mit dieser Seele verbunden sein kann, ohne dass es eindringt durch irgendwelche Organe von außen: Es muss das Ich aus der eigenen Seele tönen. Ein Funke des göttlichen Seins ist in der Seele, indem sie ihren Namen «Ich» ausspricht.

Was eine vertrackte Philosophie auch hat finden wollen, die wahre Bedeutung des Wortes «Jahve» ist: «der unaussprechliche Name des göttlichen Seelenteils im Menschen». Und so war es auch gemeint, als darauf hingewiesen wurde im alten Ägypten mit dem verschleierten Bilde von Sais. Wir können die Aufschrift lesen: «Ich bin, der da war, der da ist und der da sein wird. Meinen Schleier hat noch kein Sterblicher gelüftet.» Ein Forscher, ein deutscher Romantiker, hat aus einem merkwürdigen Instinkt etwas Richtiges gesagt, obwohl er nicht tief gegangen ist: Kein Sterblicher hat den Schleier gehoben; wir müssen Unsterbliche werden.

Es war die Meinung der großen ägyptischen Priesterweisen, dass das Ich eingehüllt war, dass aber die Hüllen abfallen. Das Wesen des Ich kann niemand enträtseln als das Ich selbst, wenn es sich der wahren Natur bewusst wird. Indem es hinuntersteigt in die eigenen Tiefen und Abgründe, ergreift es sich in seiner eigenen Unsterblichkeit; dann weiß es, was hinter dem Schleier verborgen ist. Allerdings die wenigsten Menschen sind heute geneigt, in das Wesen des Ich hineinzublicken, es gilt noch heute der Ausspruch Fichtes: Die meisten Menschen würden sich lieber für ein Stück Lava im Monde halten als für ein Ich. Seit Fichte haben wir den groben Materialismus hineinfluten sehen in die Kultur des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Die Menschen sind heute sehr zufrieden, wenn sie etwas Physisches teilweise kennen und materialistisch nachweisen können. Sie halten sich dem Stück Lava im Monde ähnlicher als dem Ich. Es wäre unsinnig, von den höheren Gliedern der Menschennatur zu reden, wenn im Sinne der geistigen Forschung von dem vierten Teil so zu sprechen wäre, dass er irgendwie eine Erscheinung des physischen Körpers wäre. Selbstverständlich muss die geistige Forschung auf diesem Gebiete etwas haben, was einem Menschen, der heute vielfach glaubt, dass alle sich auf den Boden der naturwissenschaftlichen Tatsachen zu stellen haben, sehr dumm erscheinen muss: Dasjenige, was vorgeht im Ätherleib, Astralleib und Ich, ist nicht die Wirkung des physischen Leibes, sondern umgekehrt. Das, was im physischen und Ätherleib vorgeht, das sind Werke des astralischen Leibes. Nur wenn man sich nach und nach zu dieser Anschauung aufschwingt, ist man imstande, diese Frage zu beantworten.

Beobachten Sie zum Beispiel zwei Vorgänge, die alle Tage an uns herantreten. Irgendetwas setzt uns in den Zustand des Schamgefühls; es ist irgendetwas an mir, von dem es mir am liebsten wäre, wenn meine Umgebung nichts davon sähe; ich erröte. Ein anderer Vorgang ist das Angstgefühl, welches sich durch Erblassen bemerkbar macht. Beim Schamgefühl wallt ein Blutstrom in die Haut, bei der Angst tritt das Blut aus der Haut zurück in das Körperinnere. Was ist da geschehen? Ein seelischer Vorgang lässt das Blut zurückweichen, ein seelischer Vorgang wirkt auf den Körper. Jeder dieser Vorgänge erscheint Ihnen als Folge eines seelischen Vorganges. Das sind Hinweise, in denen sich die seelische Einwirkung im Materiellen abspielt. Diese Erkenntnisse im Materiellen sind heute sozusagen nicht mehr so leicht zu erkennen; sie sind mehr oder weniger zurückgetreten gegen die mächtigen Gestaltungen, die der physische Leib, im Gegensatz zu früheren Daseinsformen, angenommen hat. Aber je weiter wir zurückgehen in der Menschheitsentwicklung, desto mehr gewinnen die geistigen Momente das Übergewicht.

Es gibt heute sogar Menschen, die so weit gehen, die Wirkung des Seelischen auf den materiellen Körper zu leugnen. Man sollte es nicht glauben, dass es Menschen gibt mit so materialistischen Anschauungen, aber es gibt in Amerika eine theologische Richtung, welche sich «Pragmatismus» nennt. Sie hat es zu einem Ausspruch gebracht, welcher das Groteske des darin vertretenen Materialismus zeigt. Wir brauchen uns nur den einen Ausspruch einmal vor die Seele zu führen: «Der Mensch weint nicht, weil er traurig ist, sondern er ist traurig, weil er weint.» Hier ist handgreiflich, wie die materialistische Weltanschauung in Widerspruch gekommen ist mit dem gesunden Menschenverstand.

Es ist Tatsache, dass es uns natürlich erscheinen muss, dass solche Konsequenzen heraustreten, die heute in unzähligen Gebieten vorkommen, nur tritt es nicht in so grotesker Weise an die Oberfläche. Wenn wir das nun festhalten, dass physische Vorgänge Wirkungen sind des Geistig-Seelischen, dann wird es uns nicht mehr schlimm erscheinen, wenn wir beim Zurückgehen in Vorzeiten der Entwicklung erfahren, dass diese Wirkungen umso bedeutender sind, je weiter wir zurückgehen, sodass wir in Urzeiten der Menschheitsentwicklung mit weitgehenden geistigen Einflüssen zu rechnen haben, die heute verborgen sind.

Sie wissen vielleicht, dass die theosophische Weltanschauung ausspricht, dass das Menschendasein in wiederholten Erdenleben verläuft. Das wollen wir nur kurz anführen: Der Mensch geht durch viele Erdenleben hindurch in seinem Entwicklungsgang zu immer höherer Vollkommenheit. Wir sprechen in der Geistesforschung davon, dass das, was lebt, in Umwandlung begriffen ist. Alles in der Welt ist in einer solchen Umwandlung begriffen, nicht nur der Mensch, sondern auch große Welten sind in fortwährender Umwandlung begriffen. So, wie, wenn wir den einzelnen Menschen betrachten, wir sagen: Das, was sich im gegenwärtigen Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod abspielt, ist die Wirkung früherer Verkörperungen, so können wir auf einen ganzen Himmelskörper blicken; und geisteswissenschaftlich verstehen wir einen solchen Körper nur dann, wenn wir wissen, dass er das, was er heute geworden ist, sich erworben hat in früheren Leben. Wir sprechen auch von der Erde und den Planeten, dass sie durch andere Verkörperungen hindurchgegangen sind. Wie der geistig hochentwickelte Mensch zurücksehen kann auf frühere Erdenleben, so lassen sich auch frühere planetarische Zustände übersehen vom Standpunkt der Geisteswissenschaft. Wir weisen zurück auf den vorhergehenden planetarischen Zustand der Erde, und diese Vorerde bezeichnen wir in der Geisteswissenschaft mit «Kosmos der Weisheit».

Ein Blick auf das, was um Sie herum ist, kann Ihnen erklärlich machen, warum wir auf die Vorerde als den Kosmos der Weisheit zurückblicken. Sehen Sie sich den Menschen an, den physischen Leib, betrachten Sie seine Teile. Nehmen Sie ein Stück Oberschenkelknochen, der zusammengesetzt ist aus unzähligen Balken und Gliedern. Er ist ein künstlich zusammengesetztes Gerüst, mit wunderbarer Weisheit aufgebaut. Er ist durch weisheitsvollste Ingenieurkunst so zusammengefügt, dass der Oberschenkelknochen trotz seiner verhältnismäßig geringen Stärke imstande ist, den Oberkörper zu tragen. Kein Ingenieur ist imstande, einen Brückenbau so weise auszuführen; und wer den menschlichen Wunderbau betrachtet, weiß, welche große Weisheit darin enthalten ist.

Wir wissen aber auch, dass andere Glieder des Menschen noch nicht so weise sind. Wir brauchen uns nur zu denken, wie die Leidenschaften und Triebe des Astralleibes wirken. In dem, was wir essen und trinken, sind oft Herzgifte enthalten, und doch ist das Herz so weisheitsvoll gebaut, dass es jahrzehntelang die Attacken ertragen kann, und überall da finden wir ausgebreitet Weisheit. In dem Bau des Körpers —- wir finden diese Weisheit überall, in jeder Blüte, in jedem Tier, und wir sehen, wie durchflutet die ganze Welt von dieser Weisheit ist. Sehen wir uns zum Beispiel den Biber an und seinen Bau, wie er mit merkwürdiger Kunst seine Dämme baut, und misst man die Winkel, so wird man finden, dass sie ganz genau bemessen sind.

So könnten wir Stück um Stück alles, was uns umgibt, betrachten. Könnten wir selbst nun diese Weisheit aus der Welt herausholen, wenn sie nicht darin wäre? Die materielle Gesinnung leugnet, dass die Weisheit, welche der Mensch herausholt, hineingelegt ist in die Erscheinungen. Ein natürliches Denken wird Ihnen sagen, dass etwas, was ein Mensch aus der Natur herausholt, in ihr enthalten sein muss. Ebenso wenig, wie man Wasser aus einem Glase trinken kann, wenn keins darinnen ist, ebenso wenig kann man Weisheit aus der Welt holen, wenn keine darinnen ist. Aber diese Weisheit ist darin, und die Geisteswissenschaft weiß, dass die Weisheit darin war in allen Dingen beim Beginn der Erdenentwicklung. So war in dem Pflanzenkeim zum Beispiel eine Buche; und als Beweis dafür sehen wir, dass eine Buche daraus wächst und keine Eiche.

Die Weisheit, die uns heute entgegentritt, sie trug die Erde schon, als alle Dinge, die um uns herum sind, noch im Samen waren. So wahr der Samen nicht aus der Erde, sondern von der Pflanze stammt, so wahr ist, dass der Same, aus dem unsere Erde geboren ist, aus dem stammt, was die Erde vorher gewesen ist, das ist der Kosmos der Weisheit. Das, was Sie heute sehen in jedem Blatt, in jedem Organ der menschlichen Gliederung, was Sie ausgebreitet sehen, ist langsam und allmählich entstanden, hat sich Glied für Glied gebildet und ist erst hervorgetreten, nachdem Weisheit mit Weisheit gekämpft hatte. Auf der Vorerde unserer Erde hatten wir eine Verkörperung, wo die Weisheit der Dinge ausgearbeitet wurde, in der sozusagen die Dinge in ihrer Weisheit vorgearbeitet sind.

Unsere Erde, welche die Weisheit überkommen hat, was hat sie für eine Aufgabe? Sie hat ihre besondere Mission; so wahr, wie die Vorerde die Weisheit, die uns heute umgibt, Stück für Stück ausgebildet hat, so wahr bildet heute unsere Erde Glied für Glied eine andere kosmische Kraft aus, und diese Kraft ist die Liebe. Deshalb nennen wir in der Geistesforschung die Erde den «Kosmos der Liebe». Die Entwicklung der Erde verläuft so, dass die Liebe als Kraft heraustritt und immer mehr überhandnimmt, und wenn die Erde an ihrem Ziele angelangt ist, so wird alles von der Kraft der Liebe durchdrungen sein, darum nennen wir die Erde den Kosmos der Liebe. Ebenso, wie auf dem vorhergehenden Kosmos der Anfang gemacht wurde mit Unweisheit und nach und nach erst die Gestalt der Weisheit ausgearbeitet wurde, so verläuft auch diese Erde so, dass nach und nach die Liebe sich ausarbeitet; dann, wenn die Erde an ihrem Ziel angelangt sein wird, dann wird die Liebe sich überall ausgebreitet haben und alles wird durchtränkt sein von Liebe, und die Erde wird Wesen auf sich sehen, die ebenso die Liebe finden werden, wie wir die Weisheit finden in allem, was uns umgibt. Diejenigen, die auf der neuen Verkörperung der Erde sind, werden bewundernd stehen vor der Liebe, wie wir bewundernd stehen vor der Weisheit. Unsere Erde hat die heilige Mission, den Drang der Liebe den Dingen einzuflößen. Dieser Drang ist da, diese Mission zu erfüllen, zur Tat zu machen.

So haben wir uns den Ausbau unserer Erde zu denken als den durch die ganze Erdenentwicklung des Menschen hindurchgehenden Ausbau der Liebe. Wenn wir dies einsehen, so haben wir eine Handhabe zum Verständnis der heutigen Frage. Nur müssen wir uns klar sein, dass der Mensch nicht das einzige Wesen ist, was um uns herum ist. Sie wissen, dass der Geistesforscher nicht spricht von den geistigen Welten als von etwas, was in einem fernen Kuckucksheim ist, sondern er spricht davon im natürlichsten und selbstverständlichsten Sinne. Ebenso wie ein Blindgeborener, dem die Augen geöffnet werden, sieht er plötzlich alles durchflutet von Licht und Glanz. Er sieht eine neue Welt um sich, die immer vorhanden war, wie Licht und Farbe immer vorhanden waren, bevor ihm die Augen geöffnet waren. In dieser Welt, die nur unlogisches Denken ableugnen kann, sind noch andere Wesenheiten vorhanden, mit anderen Formen der Geistigkeit als der Mensch sie hat. Wir können uns eine Vorstellung von diesen geistigen Wesen machen, indem wir uns vor Augen führen, dass der Mensch in einer fortwährenden Entwicklung begriffen ist, wie er immer höher und höher kommen muss und dass er in jeder Verkörperung etwas erfährt und erlebt; er wird ein immer vollkommeneres Wesen.

Welche Perspektive erhebt sich da? Wir sehen die großen Ideale der Menschen; den Menschen der Zukunft ... erhaben wie ein Gott ... [Lücken in der Mitschrift]. Wir sehen, dass, wie der heutige Mensch über Tier und Pflanze steht, so wird der zukünftige zu seinem heutigen Dasein stehen. Die Geisteswissenschaft weiß schon heute — es ist unleugbar, dass Wesen über dem Menschen in seiner jetzigen Entwicklungsstufe stehen, die so vollkommen sind, wie wir sein werden in ferner Zukunft. Es sind Wesen, die hoch erhaben über dem Menschen sind und die die Stufe, welche wir heute einnehmen, schon vor langer Zeit durchgemacht haben, die ein rein geistiges Leben haben, die nicht mehr nötig haben, bis zu einem physischen Leibe herunterzusteigen. So sehen wir, als der Mensch sein Erdendasein beginnt, als er das, was von ihm vorhanden war vom Kosmos der Weisheit herüberführte, da betritt nicht nur er den Kosmos der Liebe, sondern auch höhere geistige leitende Wesenheiten.

Wer sind diese? Dieselben sind es, die ihre Weisheit haben hineinfließen lassen in den Kosmos der Weisheit, dieselben, die aufgebaut haben aus ihrer schaffenden Weisheit heraus diesen «Kosmos der Weisheit». Was wir heute fertig vor uns haben, geschaffen ist es worden von diesen Wesenheiten. Sie sind die Besitzer der produktiven Weisheit; sie haben ihre Weisheit hineingelegt. Diese Wesenheiten haben sich dadurch, dass sie sich vorher auf dem Kosmos der Weisheit als schöpferisch in Bezug auf die Weisheit entwickelt haben, eine Fähigkeit erworben, dass sie auf der Erde sozusagen einträufeln die Liebe allen Erdenmenschen, und Stück für Stück fließt diese Liebe auf die Erde ein. Wir brauchen nur einen kurzen Blick auf diese Erde zu werfen, da sehen wir, wie sich die Liebe so nach und nach entwickelt - sie tritt uns in uralten Zeiten in engsten Grenzen entgegen. Wer liebte sich in uralten Zeiten? - Zunächst nur kleine Gruppen Blutsverwandte. Weiter sehen wir die Liebe sich über die engste Blutsverwandtschaft hinaus ausbreiten, immer weiter wird der Kreis, den die Liebe zieht, wir sehen zunächst nur die engsten Verwandten sich heiraten, wie dann die Liebe sich ausdehnt über einen ganzen Stamm, wie dann im Alten Testament das ganze Volk geliebt wird und wie jeder, der nicht zum Volk gehört, fremd ist. Weit ist der Weg, aber wir haben den großen Schritt gemacht, wo die Liebe von dem Prinzip der Blutsverwandtschaft hinübergeführt wird in das Geistige bis zu dem großen Bruderbund, der die Erde umspannen soll, bis zu dem Christusprinzip. Darauf bezieht sich auch der Spruch:

Wer nicht verlässt Vater und Mutter, Bruder und Schwester und folget mir nach, et cetera. (Lk 14,26; Mt 19,29)

Dieser Spruch ist nicht buchstäblich aufzufassen, der Ausspruch bezieht sich darauf, dass die Liebe heraustreten soll aus dem engen Kreis der Blutsverwandtschaft und geistig werden muss, und umfassen Seele um Seele. Das ist die große Mission des Christentums: Die Liebe immer geistiger zu gestalten, bis sie hinunterdringen wird zu der Gestalt der allumfassenden Liebe, mit der die ganze Erde durchtränkt werden soll, sodass die Wesen der nächsten Welt diese Liebe finden werden in allen Dingen, wie wir die Weisheit gefunden haben. So sehen wir, dass während des Erdendaseins die Mission sich erfüllt, dass das, was der Mensch hinübergebracht hat von der Vorerde, durchdrungen wird von der Liebe. Die Aneignung der Liebe ist das, was der Mensch im Erdenlauf an seinem ganzen Geschlecht zu entwickeln die Aufgabe hat. So können wir sehen, dass eine ganze Kraft, welche die Menschen zusammenführt, immer weiter schreitet und immer größere Kreise zieht.

Das ist der Liebe allein möglich. Gehen wir noch einmal zurück von dem Kosmos der Liebe zum Kosmos der Weisheit. Was ist vom Menschen da bei dem Übergang vorhanden? Wie ich ihn beschrieben habe als das vierte Glied seiner Wesenheit, was den Menschen zur Krone der Schöpfung macht, das war beim Beginn unserer Erdenentwicklung noch nicht vorhanden, nur die Anlage des physischen Leibes, des Äther- und des Astralleibes. Aber ebenso, wie ein Samenkorn verfault und doch wieder aufgeht und eine Pflanze entstehen lässt, so verschwinden die Menschen beim Übergang vom Kosmos der Weisheit zum Kosmos der Liebe und erscheinen wieder auf der jetzigen Erde, und es wurde nach und nach heranentwickelt das Ich. Und dieses Ich musste da sein als Gegenpol der Kraft der Liebe. Liebe hat andere Daseinsbedingungen als Weisheit. Weisheit kann da walten, wo alle einzelnen Glieder voneinander abhängig sind, Weisheit kann da walten, wo ein Wesen der Liebe regiert. Soll Liebe von einem Wesen zum andern gehen, so kann das nur da sein, wo sie eine freie Gabe ist, die da sein muss wie eine Vaterkraft.

Nur Wesen, welche die göttliche Kraft zum Immerweitergewinnen der Freiheit haben, nur solche Wesen haben die Kraft zur Liebe. Das Ich ist der Gegenpol der Liebe. In demselben Maße, wie sich die Liebe ausprägte, prägte sich das Ich aus. Nach und nach im Werden konnte das nur geschehen. Anfänglich spricht das Blut, das Blut, welches verwandt ist einem geliebten Wesen. Es erscheint uns die Liebe in der primitivsten Stufe. Immer mehr entwickelt sich die Liebe zu einer seelisch-geistigen Kraft, und immer mehr macht sich das Ich dabei frei. Nur müssen wir, um die wahre Entwicklung des Menschen innerhalb des Kosmos der Liebe zu verstehen, auf eines Rücksicht nehmen. Wir müssen darauf sehen, dass es im Kosmos zugeht wie in einer Schule: Es bleiben da immer einige sitzen; so geht es auch im Kosmos zu. Diejenigen Wesen, von welchen wir gesprochen haben, welche erhaben über dem Menschen dastehen, diese schufen in produktiver Weisheit und konnten übergehen zu der Liebe. Es blieben aber einige zurück, die nicht das Endziel des Kosmos der Weisheit erlangten, welche noch nicht fertig waren mit ihrer Aufgabe; sie hatten noch zu schaffen an der Weisheit, sie konnten noch keine Liebe ausströmen; ihnen war sie noch nicht gegeben.

Es sind Wesen, die zwischen den erhabenen Wesen stehen und den Menschen. Sie bezeichnet die Geisteswissenschaft als die luziferischen Wesen, unter der Herrschaft Luzifers. — Mag man lachen. Aber ebenso wie es zum Beispiel magnetische Kräfte um uns herum gibt, ebenso gibt es auch die luziferischen. Sie reichen hinein aus dem Kosmos der Weisheit in den Kosmos der Liebe. Sie waren es, welche den Menschen begabten mit ihrer kleinen Weisheit, sie schufen die subjektive intellektuelle Weisheit des Menschen im Ich, das zunächst sozusagen imprägniert wurde. Diesem Ich war eine Selbstständigkeit gegeben, die ihm nur ziemte auf dem Kosmos der Weisheit, wenn diese liebeerfüllte Weisheit eine bestimmte Stufe erreicht hatte. So bekam das Ich eine Kraft, die es jetzt in Selbstständigkeit verwandeln soll.

Erst in dem Maße, als das Christusprinzip hervorleuchtete, wurde das Ich fähig, sich in Einklang zu versetzen mit allen Kräften seiner Umgebung auf der Erde. Bevor diese Annäherung an das Ideal des Christus erreicht ist, setzen sich immer wieder solche Wesenheiten fest im Menschen, welche die entgegengesetzte Kraft des Ich sind. Die Kraft ist eine trennende Kraft, welche das Ich zu früh abtrennen will. Gegen alles das, was die Menschen zusammenführt, führen die luziferischen Wesenheiten einen Kampf. Diese Kraft hat auch ihre gute Aufgabe, sie verhindert, dass die Menschen sozusagen in einen Urbrei von Liebe zusammenfallen. Ebenso wie die Menschen auf die Liebe vorbereitet sein mussten, mussten sie früher auf die Weisheit vorbereitet werden. So ist dies luziferische Prinzip als das Prinzip der Erleuchtung, der Selbstständigmachung anzusehen.

Nun haben wir die zwei Kräfte, welche nach zwei verschiedenen Richtungen hin die Menschheit leiten, und damit haben wir auch das Prinzip des selbstständigen Ich, das aus diesem Kampf heraus sich festigt. Ohne diese Selbstständigkeit wäre die Liebe nicht möglich, ohne diese Selbstständigkeit wäre der Ursprung des Bösen nicht möglich; die Liebe macht das Böse nötig. Und daher kommt das Prinzip der Liebe, welches herrührt von den Geistern der Liebe, und das Prinzip der Weisheit, welches herrührt von den Geistern der Weisheit, welche beide uns von Seele zu Seele, Geist zu Geist, Ich zu Ich führen.

Auf dieser geistigen Tatsache beruht das Böse. Mit der Möglichkeit der Liebe war die Möglichkeit des Bösen gegeben. Nur dadurch, dass der Gott der Erde der Gott der Liebe ist und die Wesen selbstständige Ichmenschen wurden, nur dadurch war der Ursprung des Bösen möglich. Die Liebe machte das Böse möglich. Erst durch die luziferischen Kräfte gelangt der Mensch zur freien Liebe und zur wahren Größe, und nur dadurch nimmt er die Kräfte des Bösen in sich auf. Die Kraft der Liebe muss die ganze Erde durchdringen, muss das Böse überrungen, sozusagen bekehrt haben am Ende der Erdenlaufbahn. Wir sehen ein, dass es ein Gutes ist, was der Mensch dem Bösen verdankt, er verdankt dem Bösen die Freiheit. So ist im Luzifer-Prinzip, in dem der Ursprung des Bösen liegt, auch der Ursprung der Freiheit und damit die Möglichkeit der Entwicklung der Liebe gegeben.

Denken wir uns diese Erde ohne alles Böse, so gehört nur eine geringe Kraft der Liebe dazu, die Kräfte des Bösen zu überwinden, und die Kräfte der Liebe wachsen, weil sie die Aufgabe haben, das bestehende Böse in Liebe umzuwandeln. So sehen wir wirklich etwas von dem, was Böhme erfühlt hat, dass das Böse die Mission der Liebe stärkt, so sehen wir mit dem Ursprung des Bösen zugleich den Sinn des Bösen, und wenn wir geisteswissenschaftlich das Böse betrachten, so sehen wir das Böse in einer gewissen Weise gerechtfertigt, wir sehen es, wo es uns auch entgegentreten mag, mit anderen Gefühlen.

Leben wir aber mit den Gefühlen durchdrungen, da macht das für uns einen ganz anderen Eindruck, nicht für den, der sie spekulativ begriffen hat, sondern für den, der sie theosophisch begreift. Wenn wir stille Stunden haben und unseren Geist zu den großen Rätselfragen erheben, so müssen wir etwas so Gewaltiges erleben, dass wir im Bösen noch das Gute fühlen. So durchdringen wir uns mit Gefühlen, so fühlen Sie jeden Schritt des Lebens mit. Wir stehen der ganzen Welt denkend, handelnd und fühlend gegenüber, und das ist äußerst wesentlich. Oh, wie werden wir milde, wenn wir etwas sehen, was uns früher empörte. Diese Empfindungen, die als ein Bodensatz stiller Stunden sich ergeben, machen das theosophische Leben aus. Noch mehr auf das alltägliche Leben angewandt, soll dies morgen betrachtet werden. Heute haben wir die Funktion des Bösen in flüchtigen Skizzen nur andeuten können.

Wir haben die Anschauung gewonnen, dass wir kurzsichtig sind, wenn wir gegen das Böse, die Weisheit, die Liebe, den Geist der Welt irgendetwas einwenden wollen. Wir haben gesehen, dass dieser Geist der Liebe so gewaltig die Welt durchflutet, ein so guter Geist ist, dass er einst das Böse in die Welt gebracht hat, um ein möglichst Energisches, ein möglichst Gutes bewirken zu können.

Fragenbeantwortung

Frage: Wie verhalten sich die ersten Worte aus dem Johannesevangelium zum Christusprinzip?

Ich und der Vater sind eins. (Joh 10,30)
In meines Vaters Haus sind viele Wohnungen. (Joh 14,2)
Ehe denn Abraham war, bin ich. (Joh 8,58)

Rudolf Steiner: Im Lukasevangelium wird das Wort im selben Sinne angewandt wie im Beginn des Johannesevangeliums. (Lk 1,2)

Im Anfange des Alten Testaments:

Im Urbeginne schuf Gott die Welt. (1 Mos 1,1)

Im Anfange des Johannesevangeliums:

Im Urbeginne war das Wort, und das Wort war bei Gott,
und ein Gott war das Wort, et cetera. (Joh 1,1)

Der alte Jude sprach von der vorbereitenden Liebe, die durch die Christusliebe weiter fortgesetzt werden sollte.

«Mit Abraham fließt dasselbe Blut bis zu uns», sagte der alte Jude. «Ich und der Vater Abraham sind eins.» Das war ausgedrückt im Alten Testament.

Älter als alles ist das Ich, aus dem Schoße der Gottheit herabgestiegen in die drei Leiber auf der Erde. Dieses «Ich» als das Geistige ist älter als die Blutsliebe. Deshalb sagt Christus: «Ich und der Vater, das ist die Gottheit, sind eins.» (Joh 10,30) Ich finde in mir einen Quell, der zum Ewigen führt. Dies Ich hatte schon die Kraft, zu bewahren die Blutsliebe durch den Stammeinfluss.

Vor Abraham war das «Ich bin». (Joh 8,58) Das ist der wirkliche Sinn. Das Ich mit Aufgabe des Persönlichen. Das Ich wird als ein Individuelles sich in die Gottheit finden: Für jedes Ich ein separates Haus, separate Zelle.

Vor dem Physischen finden wir das Ich. Licht ist immer noch physisch. «Im Urbeginne war das Wort.» (Joh 1,1) Man könnte auch sagen: «Im Urbeginne war das ‹Ich bin›».

«Ich bin das Licht» (Joh 9,5) heißt: Ich bin der Bringer des Ich.

Und das «Ich bin» hat im Fleisch gewohnt: = Christus hat im Fleisch gewohnt.» (Joh 1,14)

39. The Origin of Evil

Ladies and gentlemen! There are mysteries of the world that confront us not only when we look at the great events of life, but which appear at every turn in our everyday lives. We could cite many such mysteries of life, but one in particular is what concerns us today: the question of the origin of evil. It is one of those mysteries that we encounter in everyday life, but which can only be answered if we go back to the sources and origins of life. The way in which this question has been addressed by humanity since ancient times shows us that it can only really be fruitfully tackled in what we call spiritual science or theosophical worldview. Without those weighty insights into the world, without delving into the sources of existence that can flow to us through this current in cultural life, an answer is not possible. Therefore, you will have to undertake a rather long journey with me to the sources of existence in order to understand this somewhat everyday mystery. Those who view the world solely from a materialistic perspective, who follow the course of events with their senses, cannot even begin to find an answer to this question.

Evil appears to us, but not in its true sense, in subordinate existence, in human life. The wise man, who is a believer, asks himself: How is it compatible with a wise world order, also called providence, that this providence allows man to sink to what we call evil, that the deity allows man to become evil in order to then punish him? It is not only the naively religious person who sees it this way; we hear the same thing in the poem written by the young Goethe when he calls out the words of a divine spirituality:

You let the poor become guilty,
Then you leave them to their torment!

Those who stand on less religious ground are even less receptive to this question. Without a spiritual foundation, we cannot arrive at an orderly concept of evil, let alone a connection with the world spirit. Ever since humans have been able to think, the leaders of humanity, the thinkers, have attempted to answer the question: Where does evil come from, what is its meaning? —-

We must look back to the past, where Persian myths already record the ongoing struggle against the forces of evil that opposed Ormuzd with Ahriman, as a constant fighter against good. Ahriman is shown to us there as the force that strengthens the good spirit in battle.

If we take a great leap forward into the profound thinking of German thinkers, to Jakob Böhme, we find in his writings and in the period that followed, his entire life filled with the question of the origin of evil. Jakob Böhme says that multiplicity arises only from unity, but that multiplicity must be guided by the will of unity; for example, two hands, if not directed by one will, are separate limbs; without this guiding unity, we cannot accomplish great works. These hands can rage against each other, they can tear each other apart. This possibility exists precisely when the two are given what we call freedom. As long as the two hands are coordinated by the personality and as long as they are controlled by one will, they will not turn against each other.

And here Jakob Böhme already senses that evil has something to do with love. If the divine being that floods the world loves the world so much that it gives everything to all beings and holds nothing back in order to give the many as much freedom as possible, then the many can strive against each other.

If we wanted to review the thinkers, we could talk about this at length, citing many examples from great epochs, but we would always only get a kind of philosophical answer. Today, however, we do not want to deal with philosophical questions, but rather, without further ado, with the facts of the spiritual world in order to gain clues for answering our question. In order not to stretch the point of view too far, I would like to go straight to the heart of the matter, and here we must briefly consider the nature of the human being. We are clear that evil must have something to do with human nature.

If we look at human beings from the point of view of what the eyes can see and the hands can grasp, we only have part of the human essence in the sense of spiritual science. We only see the physical part of the human being, which it has in common with all seemingly lifeless beings. Everything that can be found in the human body is also present there, but these mineral forces are of course present in human beings in a very special way: They are so intricately interwoven, so diversely structured, that the physical body would disintegrate according to its own physical laws if something did not permeate it, as water permeates a sponge, something that in every human being is constantly fighting against all disturbances in the physical body. We call this fighter the etheric body or life body. In each of you, the physical body is exposed to decay at every moment if it were not for that fighter, that victor, which we call the etheric body or life body. Human beings share this with all living nature; this fighter is present in everything that lives. At the moment when, in death, the physical body is separated from the etheric body, it follows the physical laws, decays, and passes into the lifeless world. The etheric body is something that is regarded as impossible by today's science. But we cannot go into this further, we can only sketch the matter out briefly.

Beyond the etheric body, human beings have a third member of their being. This third member of their being is visible at all times to those whose spiritual eyes are open. You can imagine this third member logically. We ask ourselves: Is the physical body and the life body all there is? A simple consideration suffices; there really is something that is much closer to human beings than their bones, muscles, blood, and nerves. Something lies very close at hand as reality, and that is the sum of what we call the sum of feelings, instincts, and passions. That belongs to us in reality, and it is present in the same spaces where blood, muscles, and nerves are present. We share this part of human nature only with animals, not with plants.

Now there is a fourth link through which man is the crown of creation. The fourth link in his nature is that which enables him to summarize everything that is in him in the name “I.” This name “I” is a name that already conceals the mystery of his being behind the difference it exhibits from all other names we have in the English language. Anyone can call a chair “chair,” a table “table,” and so on, but no one can hear the name “I” from outside; it must sound from one's own soul. Every thing can sound its name to us from outside, but the “I” can only hear it from within itself. This has always been felt by those worldviews that were based on what we call spiritual science. In the Old Testament Hebrew religion, you will find the unspoken name of God for this intimate name of the soul. Why is it called that? If the soul is to hear its true name, then something in the soul that can be connected to this soul speaks without penetrating through any organs from outside: the “I” must sound from within the soul itself. A spark of divine being is in the soul when it pronounces its name “I.”

Whatever a convoluted philosophy may have wanted to find, the true meaning of the word “Yahweh” is: “the unpronounceable name of the divine part of the soul in man.” And this was also the intention when it was pointed out in ancient Egypt with the veiled image of Sais. We can read the inscription: “I am the one who was, who is, and who will be. No mortal has yet lifted my veil.” A researcher, a German Romantic, said something correct out of a strange instinct, although he did not go into depth: No mortal has lifted the veil; we must become immortal.

It was the opinion of the great Egyptian priest-sages that the ego was veiled, but that the veils would fall away. No one can unravel the essence of the ego except the ego itself, when it becomes aware of its true nature. By descending into its own depths and abysses, it grasps its own immortality; then it knows what is hidden behind the veil. However, very few people today are inclined to look into the essence of the self; Fichte's statement still applies today: most people would rather consider themselves a piece of lava on the moon than a self. Since Fichte, we have seen crude materialism flood into the culture of the nineteenth century. People today are very satisfied if they can partially know something physical and prove it materialistically. They consider themselves more similar to a piece of lava on the moon than to the I. It would be nonsensical to speak of the higher members of human nature if, in the sense of spiritual research, the fourth part were to be described as somehow being a manifestation of the physical body. Of course, spiritual research in this field must have something that must seem very foolish to a person who today often believes that everyone must stand on the ground of scientific facts: what goes on in the etheric body, astral body, and I is not the effect of the physical body, but the other way around. What happens in the physical and etheric bodies are the works of the astral body. Only when one gradually rises to this view is one able to answer this question.

Observe, for example, two processes that we encounter every day. Something puts us in a state of shame; there is something about me that I would prefer my surroundings not to see; I blush. Another process is the feeling of fear, which manifests itself in paleness. When we feel shame, blood rushes to the skin; when we feel fear, the blood recedes from the skin back into the body. What has happened? A mental process causes the blood to recede; a mental process affects the body. Each of these processes appears to you as the result of a mental process. These are indications that the psychological influence is playing out in the material world. Today, these insights into the material world are, so to speak, no longer so easy to recognize; they have more or less receded in the face of the powerful forms that the physical body has taken on, in contrast to earlier forms of existence. But the further back we go in human development, the more the spiritual moments gain the upper hand.

Today, there are even people who go so far as to deny the effect of the soul on the physical body. It is hard to believe that there are people with such materialistic views, but there is a theological movement in America called “pragmatism.” It has produced a saying that shows the grotesqueness of the materialism it represents. We need only consider the following statement: “People do not cry because they are sad, but they are sad because they cry.” Here we see clearly how the materialistic worldview has come into conflict with common sense.

It is a fact that it must seem natural to us that such consequences, which occur today in countless areas, should come to the fore, but they do not surface in such a grotesque way. If we now hold fast to the idea that physical processes are effects of the spiritual-soul realm, then it will no longer seem terrible to us when, looking back into earlier stages of development, we learn that these effects are all the more significant the further back we go, so that in the primeval times of human development we must expect far-reaching spiritual influences that are hidden today.

You may know that the theosophical worldview states that human existence proceeds through repeated earthly lives. We will only mention this briefly: in the course of their development, human beings pass through many earthly lives on their way to ever higher perfection. In spiritual research, we speak of everything that lives as being in a state of transformation. Everything in the world is undergoing such a transformation; not only human beings, but also large worlds are in a state of constant transformation. Just as, when we look at the individual human being, we say: What takes place in the present life between birth and death is the effect of earlier incarnations, so we can look at an entire celestial body; and in spiritual science we can only understand such a body if we know that it has acquired what it has become today in earlier lives. We also speak of the Earth and the planets as having passed through other incarnations. Just as the spiritually highly developed human being can look back on previous Earth lives, so too can previous planetary states be overlooked from the standpoint of spiritual science. We refer back to the previous planetary state of the Earth, and in spiritual science we call this pre-Earth the “Cosmos of Wisdom.”

A look at what is around you can explain why we look back on the pre-Earth as the Cosmos of Wisdom. Look at the human being, the physical body, and consider its parts. Take a piece of the thigh bone, which is composed of countless beams and joints. It is an artificially assembled framework, constructed with wonderful wisdom. It is assembled with the most wise engineering so that the thigh bone, despite its relatively low strength, is able to support the upper body. No engineer is capable of building a bridge so wisely; and anyone who considers the marvelous structure of the human body knows what great wisdom it contains.

But we also know that other parts of the human body are not yet so wise. We need only think of how the passions and drives of the astral body work. What we eat and drink often contains toxins that are harmful to the heart, and yet the heart is so wisely constructed that it can withstand these attacks for decades, and everywhere we find wisdom spread out before us. In the construction of the body — we find this wisdom everywhere, in every flower, in every animal, and we see how the whole world is flooded with this wisdom. Let us look, for example, at the beaver and its lodge, how it builds its dams with remarkable skill, and if you measure the angles, you will find that they are very precisely calculated.

In this way, we could examine everything around us piece by piece. Could we ourselves extract this wisdom from the world if it were not there? The materialistic mindset denies that the wisdom that humans extract is contained within phenomena. Natural thinking will tell you that something that a human extracts from nature must be contained within it. Just as you cannot drink water from a glass if there is none in it, you cannot extract wisdom from the world if there is none in it. But this wisdom is there, and spiritual science knows that wisdom was present in all things at the beginning of the Earth's development. For example, a beech tree was present in the plant seed; and we see proof of this in the fact that a beech tree grows from it and not an oak tree.

The wisdom that confronts us today was already carried by the earth when all the things around us were still in seed form. Just as the seed does not come from the earth but from the plant, so it is true that the seed from which our earth was born comes from what the earth was before, which is the cosmos of wisdom. What you see today in every leaf, in every organ of the human structure, what you see spread out before you, came into being slowly and gradually, formed limb by limb, and only emerged after wisdom had fought with wisdom. On the pre-earth of our Earth, we had an embodiment where the wisdom of things was worked out, where, so to speak, things were pre-worked in their wisdom.

Our Earth, which has acquired wisdom, what is its task? It has its special mission; just as the pre-Earth developed the wisdom that surrounds us today, piece by piece, so today our Earth is developing another cosmic force, limb by limb, and this force is love. That is why we in spiritual research call the Earth the “cosmos of love.” The development of the earth proceeds in such a way that love emerges as a force and increasingly prevails, and when the earth has reached its goal, everything will be permeated by the power of love, which is why we call the earth the cosmos of love. Just as in the previous cosmos, where it began with ignorance and gradually developed into wisdom, so too is this Earth developing gradually into love; then, when the Earth has reached its goal, love will have spread everywhere and everything will be imbued with love, and the Earth will see beings who will find love just as we find wisdom in everything that surrounds us. Those who are on the new embodiment of the Earth will stand in awe of love, just as we stand in awe of wisdom. Our Earth has the sacred mission of instilling the urge of love into things. This urge is there to fulfill this mission, to put it into action.

So we have to think of the development of our Earth as the development of love throughout the entire earthly evolution of man. When we understand this, we have a handle on understanding today's question. But we must be clear that human beings are not the only beings around us. You know that spiritual researchers do not speak of the spiritual worlds as something that is in a distant fantasy world, but speak of them in the most natural and self-evident sense. Just as a person born blind, whose eyes are opened, suddenly sees everything flooded with light and brilliance. They see a new world around them that has always been there, just as light and color were always there before their eyes were opened. In this world, which only illogical thinking can deny, there are other beings with forms of spirituality different from those of human beings. We can form an idea of these spiritual beings by realizing that humans are in a state of constant development, that they must rise higher and higher, and that in each incarnation they learn and experience something; they become increasingly perfect beings.

What perspective does this open up? We see the great ideals of humanity; the humans of the future... sublime as a god ... [gaps in the transcript]. We see that, just as today's human beings stand above animals and plants, so will the human beings of the future stand above our present existence. Spiritual science already knows today — it is undeniable that there are beings above human beings in their present stage of development who are as perfect as we will be in the distant future. These are beings who are far above human beings and who passed through the stage we are at today long ago, who have a purely spiritual life and no longer need to descend into a physical body. So we see that when human beings begin their earthly existence, when they bring over what was available to them from the cosmos of wisdom, they not only enter the cosmos of love, but also higher spiritual guiding beings.

Who are these beings? They are the same ones who have poured their wisdom into the cosmos of wisdom, the same ones who have built this “cosmos of wisdom” out of their creative wisdom. What we have before us today has been created by these beings. They are the possessors of productive wisdom; they have poured their wisdom into it. By developing themselves creatively in relation to wisdom in the cosmos of wisdom, these beings have acquired the ability to instill love in all human beings on Earth, so to speak, and little by little this love flows into the Earth. We need only take a brief look at this Earth to see how love is gradually developing – in ancient times it encountered us within the narrowest of boundaries. Who loved each other in ancient times? – Initially only small groups of blood relatives. Then we see love spreading beyond the closest blood relations, the circle of love growing ever wider. At first, we see only the closest relatives marrying each other, then love spreading to an entire tribe, then in the Old Testament the whole people being loved and everyone who does not belong to the people being a stranger. The road is long, but we have taken the great step where love is transferred from the principle of blood relationship to the spiritual, to the great brotherhood that is to span the earth, to the Christ principle. This is also referred to in the saying:

Whoever does not leave father and mother, brother and sister, and follow me, et cetera. (Luke 14:26; Matthew 19:29)

This saying is not to be taken literally; it refers to the fact that love must step out of the narrow circle of blood relationship and become spiritual, embracing soul to soul. This is the great mission of Christianity: to make love ever more spiritual until it descends to the form of all-encompassing love, with which the whole earth is to be saturated, so that the beings of the next world will find this love in all things, as we have found wisdom. Thus we see that during earthly existence the mission is fulfilled, that what man has brought over from the pre-earth is permeated by love. The acquisition of love is what man has the task of developing in his entire race during his earthly life. Thus we can see that a whole force that brings people together is always progressing and drawing ever wider circles.

This is possible only through love. Let us return once more from the cosmos of love to the cosmos of wisdom. What is present in human beings at the transition? What I have described as the fourth member of their being, which makes human beings the crown of creation, was not yet present at the beginning of our earthly development, only the predisposition of the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body. But just as a seed rots and yet sprouts again and gives rise to a plant, so human beings disappear during the transition from the cosmos of wisdom to the cosmos of love and reappear on the present earth, and the ego was gradually developed. And this ego had to be there as the counterpole to the power of love. Love has different conditions of existence than wisdom. Wisdom can reign where all individual members are dependent on each other; wisdom can reign where a being of love rules. If love is to pass from one being to another, it can only be where it is a free gift that must be there like a father's power.

Only beings who have the divine power to continually gain freedom, only such beings have the power to love. The ego is the counterpole of love. To the same extent that love developed, the ego developed. Gradually, in the process of becoming, this could only happen. Initially, it is the blood that speaks, the blood that is related to a beloved being. Love appears to us in its most primitive form. Love increasingly develops into a spiritual force, and the ego becomes increasingly free in the process. However, in order to understand the true development of human beings within the cosmos of love, we must take one thing into consideration. We must realize that the cosmos is like a school: some always fail; the same is true in the cosmos. Those beings we have spoken of, who stand above human beings, created in productive wisdom and were able to transition to love. But some remained behind who did not attain the ultimate goal of the cosmos of wisdom, who were not yet finished with their task; they still had to work on wisdom, they could not yet radiate love; it had not yet been given to them.

These are beings who stand between the exalted beings and human beings. Spiritual science refers to them as the Luciferic beings, under the rule of Lucifer. — One may laugh. But just as there are magnetic forces around us, for example, so too are there Luciferic forces. They reach out from the cosmos of wisdom into the cosmos of love. It was they who endowed human beings with their little wisdom; they created the subjective intellectual wisdom of human beings in the ego, which was initially impregnated, so to speak. This ego was given an independence that was only appropriate to it in the cosmos of wisdom when this love-filled wisdom had reached a certain level. Thus, the ego gained a power that it must now transform into independence.

Only to the extent that the Christ principle shone forth did the ego become capable of harmonizing with all the forces of its environment on earth. Before this approximation to the ideal of Christ is achieved, beings that are the opposite force of the ego repeatedly establish themselves in human beings. This force is a divisive force that wants to separate the ego too early. The Luciferic beings wage war against everything that brings people together. This force also has its good purpose: it prevents people from collapsing, so to speak, into a primordial soup of love. Just as human beings had to be prepared for love, they also had to be prepared for wisdom in earlier times. Thus, this Luciferic principle can be seen as the principle of enlightenment, of becoming independent.

Now we have the two forces that guide humanity in two different directions, and with that we also have the principle of the independent ego, which is consolidated out of this struggle. Without this independence, love would not be possible; without this independence, the origin of evil would not be possible; love makes evil necessary. And hence comes the principle of love, which originates from the spirits of love, and the principle of wisdom, which originates from the spirits of wisdom, both of which lead us from soul to soul, spirit to spirit, I to I.

Evil is based on this spiritual fact. With the possibility of love came the possibility of evil. Only because the God of the earth is the God of love and beings became independent I-persons was the origin of evil possible. Love made evil possible. Only through the Luciferic forces does man attain free love and true greatness, and only through this does he absorb the forces of evil within himself. The power of love must permeate the whole earth, must have overcome evil, converted it, so to speak, at the end of the earth's career. We realize that what man owes to evil is a good thing; he owes freedom to evil. Thus, in the Lucifer principle, in which the origin of evil lies, there is also the origin of freedom and thus the possibility of the development of love.

If we imagine this earth without any evil, only a small force of love is needed to overcome the forces of evil, and the forces of love grow because they have the task of transforming existing evil into love. Thus we truly see something of what Böhme felt, that evil strengthens the mission of love; thus we see in the origin of evil at the same time the meaning of evil; and when we view evil from a spiritual scientific perspective, we see evil as justified in a certain way; we see it, wherever it may confront us, with different feelings.

But if we live imbued with feelings, it makes a completely different impression on us, not for those who have understood them speculatively, but for those who understand them theosophically. When we have quiet hours and lift our spirits to the great mysteries, we must experience something so powerful that we still feel the good in evil. In this way we permeate ourselves with feelings, and they accompany us at every step of life. We face the whole world thinking, acting, and feeling, and that is extremely important. Oh, how gentle we become when we see something that used to outrage us. These feelings, which arise as the residue of quiet hours, constitute theosophical life. Tomorrow we will consider this in more relation to everyday life. Today we have only been able to hint at the function of evil in brief sketches.

We have come to the conclusion that we are short-sighted if we want to object to evil, wisdom, love, or the spirit of the world. We have seen that this spirit of love so powerfully permeates the world, is such a good spirit, that it once brought evil into the world in order to be able to bring about the most energetic, the most good possible.

Question and answer

Question: How do the first words of the Gospel of John relate to the Christ principle?

I and the Father are one. (John 10:30)
In my Father's house are many mansions. (John 14:2)
Before Abraham was, I am. (John 8:58)

Rudolf Steiner: In the Gospel of Luke, the word is used in the same sense as at the beginning of the Gospel of John. (Luke 1:2)

At the beginning of the Old Testament:

In the beginning God created the world. (Genesis 1:1)

At the beginning of the Gospel of John:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God, et cetera. (John 1:1)

The old Jew spoke of the preparatory love that was to be continued through the love of Christ.

“The same blood flows from Abraham to us,” said the old Jew. “I and Father Abraham are one.” This was expressed in the Old Testament.

Older than everything is the I, descended from the bosom of the Godhead into the three bodies on earth. This “I” as the spiritual is older than blood love. That is why Christ says: “I and the Father, that is the Godhead, are one.” (John 10:30) I find within myself a source that leads to the eternal. This I already had the power to preserve blood love through the influence of the tribe.

Before Abraham was the “I am.” (John 8:58) That is the real meaning. The I with the task of the personal. The I will find itself as an individual in the Godhead: for each I a separate house, a separate cell.

Before the physical, we find the I. Light is still physical. “In the beginning was the Word.” (John 1:1) One could also say: “In the beginning was the ‘I am’.”

“I am the light” (John 9:5) means: I am the bringer of the I.

And the “I am” dwelt in the flesh: = Christ dwelt in the flesh." (John 1:14)