The Gospel of St. Matthew
GA 123
4 September 1910, Bern
Lecture IV
We have seen that there is a significant difference between knowledge of the spiritual world such as has existed through all the ages and the particular form of knowledge of the Divine-Spiritual to which the organic constitution of the Hebrews enabled them to aspire. Through their progenitor Abraham they had inherited a physical constitution in which there had been implanted an organ whereby, to, the extent possible through knowledge transmitted by way of the senses, men were to be able to have actual experience of the Divine-Spiritual, not merely vague inklings. Knowledge of the Divine-Spiritual has existed everywhere and at all times, but this knowledge of the Eternal was attained in the Mysteries, on the path of Initiation. A distinction must be made between knowledge acquired as the result of individual development through specially devised methods and knowledge of the spiritual world that is normal in some particular epoch and connected with the fulfilment of a definite mission in the evolution of humanity.
In Atlantis the normal form of knowledge was astral-clairvoyant perception of the Divine-Spiritual. But in the times of the ancient Hebrews the normal form of exoteric knowledge of the spiritual world became dependent upon a particular physical organ. It has already been said that in the people of Abraham this knowledge arose in the form of a feeling that the Divine was united with their inmost being. It was therefore inner knowledge, a realisation of the Divine in the deepest core of being that had been made possible.
But this inner realisation of the Divine-Spiritual did not immediately enable a man to say: When I sink into my own being, striving to fathom its depths, I find the drop of the Divine Spirit that can give me knowledge of the Divine-Spiritual by which the outer world too is permeated.—This experience was not immediately possible—not, indeed, until the appearance of Christ in the evolution of humanity. The Hebrew people could experience the Divine only through participating in their Folk-Spirit. When a man felt himself to be a member of his people as a whole, as distinct from a separate individuality, when he felt that through his blood he belonged to a sequence of generations—then he became aware of the presence of the Divine; his consciousness of Jahve lay in the Folk-consciousness, in the very blood of his people. Hence in the spiritual-scientific sense it is not correct to speak of the God Jahve or Jehovah merely as the God of Abraham. He is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob—he is the Being who passes on from generation to generation, manifesting himself in the Folk-consciousness in and through individual men.
The great advance of this form of knowledge to thc Christian form lies in the fact that the latter recognises in each single individual what ancient Hebrew knowledge could reach only by contemplation of the Folk-Spirit, of the Spirit flowing in the blood of the generations. Thus Abraham might have said: According to the covenant that has been made with me, I shall be the founder of a people through my descendants; in the blood flowing down the generations descending from me there will live the God we venerate as the Highest, who reveals himself to us in our Folk-consciousness.—This became the normal experience of that time.
As already said, at all times and through all the epochs there has existed higher knowledge of the Divine-Spiritual. This knowledge, acquired in the Mysteries, is not dependent upon any of the other, special forms of cognition. In ancient Atlantis every human being was endowed with a certain astral-etheric clairvoyance enabling him to gaze into the divine-spiritual ground of existence; by developing his inner faculties he could then acquire knowledge that was. available in the Mysteries or Oracles. Also during the epoch when the spiritual knowledge characteristic of the Hebrews was the normal form, it was still possible in certain sanctuaries for man to experience the Divine while out of the body but not while in the body as in the case of the people of Abraham; in the eternal part of his being a man could rise to vision of the Divine-Spiritual.
You can readily imagine that one thing was essential for Abraham. He had experienced the Divine-Spiritual in his own special way, through knowledge acquired by means of a physical organ; this was how he had learnt to know the supreme God. To become a living power in evolution, however, it was infinitely important for him to know that the God revealed in the Folk-consciousness of the Hebrew people was identical with the God venerated in the Mysteries of all ages as the creative Deity. It was therefore necessary for Abraham to be able to identify his God with the God revealed in the Mysteries, and that was only possible upon one very definite premise. Upon one very definite premise the certainty could be given him that the powers manifesting themselves in thc Folk-consciousness were identical with those manifesting in a higher form in the Mysteries. To understand what this certainty implied, we must turn our minds to a fact closely connected with the evolution of humanity.
In the book Occult Science you can read that in ancient Atlantis there were Initiates known as “Priests of the Oracles”—the actual names are not of essential significance. One of these great Initiates was the leader of all the Atlantean Oracles; he was the Initiate of the Sun-Oracle, in contrast to the subordinate Oracle-centres to which the Mercury-, Mars-, Jupiter-, Initiates, and so forth, belonged. I have said too that this great Initiate of the Sun-Oracle was also the leader of the civilizing colony which, having moved from the West across to the East, from Atlantis to the interior of Asia, spread out from there to inaugurate post-Atlantean culture and civilization. This mighty Initiate—for such he was, already at that time—withdrew to secret centres in the heart of Asia, and made it possible for the wise men known as the holy Rishis to become such illustrious Teachers of their people. And it was he, this great and mysterious Initiate, who conferred Initiation upon Zarathustra.
The Initiation conferred upon Zarathustra was not the same as that received by the Rishis, for their tasks were different. Through their Initiation the Rishis were able, when their inner faculties had further developed, to give utterance as it were out of themselves to the great secrets of existence. Thereby they became the illustrious Teachers of pre-Vedic, ancient Indian culture. Though their powers were awakened by means specially devised, they were otherwise on a par with the old Atlantean clairvoyant faculties, but they were distributed among the seven Rishis individually. Like the leaders of the several Oracle-centres, each of the seven Rishis had his own particular sphere and task. But a whole collegium spoke when any one of the seven voiced what he knew of the primeval wisdom. The great Sun-Initiate who brought the old Atlantean wisdom from the West across to the East passed it on in a particular form to those who were to become the bearers of post-Atlantean culture. He imparted it to Zarathustra in a different form, enabling him to speak in the way I have already indicated.
The Rishis declared that in order to reach the highest realm of divine-spiritual existence, everything in the surrounding world, everything presented to the outer senses, must be regarded as maya or illusion; man must turn away from this outer world and sink into his inner being: then there will dawn in him a world entirely different from the one out-spread before him in everyday life.—To ascend into the spheres of divine-spiritual existence by turning away from the illusory world of maya, by developing the inner life—such was the teaching of the Rishis of ancient India.
In contrast to this, Zarathustra did not teach men to turn away from what is outwardly manifest. He did not say: everything external is maya and we must turn away from it. He said : this maya is the revelation, the actual garment of divine-spiritual existence. We may not turn away from it—on the contrary, it is our duty to fathom it. We must conceive of the Sun's body of light as thc outer texture in which Ahura Mazdao lives and weaves!
In a certain sense, therefore, the gist of Zarathustra's teaching was the opposite of that given by the ancient Rishis. The essential significance of post-Indian civilization lay in the fact that its task was to impress upon the outer world the fruits of man's spiritual activity. As we heard, Zarathustra transmitted to Hermes and to Moses the greatest gifts that were his to bestow. In order that the wisdom of Moses might become fruitful in the right way and work as a seed, it had to take root in the people who were the descendants of Abraham. Abraham was the first into whom was implanted the organ for acquiring consciousness of Jahve; but it was essential for him to know that the God who could announce his presence inwardly to physical faculties of cognition, was speaking with the same voice as the eternal, all-pervading God of the Mysteries, save that he was revealing himself here in the form in which Abraham was able to understand him. It is not possible for a Being of such lofty rank as the great Atlantean Sun-Initiate to speak without more ado in words that are intelligible to those who live at some particular time and have a special mission. An Individuality as exalted as the great Sun-Initiate is one who leads an eternal existence, of whom it was truly said—indicating the hallmark of eternity—that he was without name or age, ‘without father, without mother, having neither beginning of days nor end of life’. (Heb. VII, 3). A figure of this eminence in the evolution of humanity is only able to manifest by assuming a form whereby he can establish relationship with those to whom he is to reveal himself. Thus in order to impart the necessary enlightenment to Abraham, the great Teacher of the Rishis and of Zarathustra assumed a form in which he bore the etheric body of Abraham's original forefather; it was the etheric body of Shem, the son of Noah, and it had been preserved as the etheric body of Zarathustra had been preserved for Moses. The great Initiate of the Sun-Mystery used the etheric body of Shem in order to reveal himself to Abraham and be understood by him. This meeting between Abraham and the great Sun-Initiate is referred to in the Old Testament as the meeting of Abraham with Melchisedek, or Malek-Zadek as it has become customary to call him—the ‘king and priest of the most high God’. (Gen. XIV, 18; Heb. V, 6, 1o ; VII, 1-3). It was a meeting of supreme, world-embracing significance. In order that Abraham should not be utterly dumbfounded, the great Sun-Initiate manifested himself in the etheric body of Shem, the progenitor of the Semites. And the Bible points, most significantly, to something that is unfortunately all too little understood, namely, to the source of that which Melchisedek was able to impart to Abraham. What was this? He could impart the mystery of Sun-existence which Abraham could naturally only under-stand in his own way. The same mystery lay behind the revelation that had been announced, as a prophecy, by Zarathustra.
To his chosen pupils Zarathustra spoke of Ahura Mazdao, the spiritual Being behind the Sun's body of light, saying in effect: Direct your gaze to a power that is behind the Sun, that is not yet united with the Earth but will onc day descend to the Earth and pour into Earth-evolution!—Realising that Zarathustra could only make a prophetic announcement that Christ, the Sun-Spirit, would come in a human body, we shall be aware that even greater profundities of the Sun-Mystery had to be revealed to those who were to prepare for and subsequently be instrumental in bringing about the incarnation of Christ on the Earth. This deeper revelation was made possible because, at the meeting referred to, the same Being who had been Zarathustra's Teacher brought influence to bear upon Abraham from the same source as that from which Christ's influence was eventually to pour. This again is indicated symbolically in the Bible where it is said that Melchisedek, king of Salem, this ‘priest of the most high God’, brought to Abraham bread and wine. (Gen. XVI, 18). Bread and wine were dispensed on another, later occasion—when for those who were believers the Christ-Mystery was given expression in the institution of Holy Communion. The emphasis laid upon the similarity of the sacrificial acts points to the fact that the source of the impulses given by Melchisedek and by Christ was one and the same.
Thus through Melchisedek an influence emanating from a Power that would subsequently come down to the Earth was to be brought to bear in advance upon Abraham, the great preparer of the later event. As the result of this meeting the realisation dawned upon Abraham that the source of the power he felt within him and venerated under the name of Jahve or Jehovah as the loftiest reality of which he could conceive, was also the source of the consciousness of the supreme, all-pervading Godhead—consciousness such as was gained by Initiates in the realm of earthly knowledge too. Abraham was now able to carry this consciousness to a further stage.—A new and different experience came to him. He realised that in actual fact the blood flowing through the generations of the Hebrew people was to contain something only to be compared with what was revealed in the Mysteries when clairvoyant vision was directed to the secrets of cosmic existence and the language of the Cosmos understood.
I have already spoken of how, in the Mysteries, secrets of the Cosmos were expressed in terms derived from the stars and constellations. There were times when the teachers in the Mysteries made use of words and images taken from the courses of the stars and their mutual relationships. Such images were a means of expressing what man experiences spiritually when he attains consciousness of the Divine-Spiritual.
What was it that the Mystery-wisdom was able to read in this stellar script? The secrets of the Godhead pervading the world! The order of the stars was the visible expression of the Godhead. Men turned their gaze to the heavens, saying: There the Godhead reveals himself; the order and harmonies of the stars are for us the manifestation of the Divine. According to this view, therefore, the God of all the worlds was made manifest in the order of the stars.
Thus if the same God were to be made manifest in a special way in the mission of the Hebrew people, the manifestation must necessarily be an expression of the same order as that governing the courses of the stars in the Cosmos. Through the blood of the generations as the outer instrument of the Jahve-revelation, there must be expressed the same order as that made manifest in the courses of the stars. To put it differently: in the sequence of the generations, in the blood-kinship of Abraham's descendants, there must be a mirror-image, a reflection, of the stellar script in the heavens. Hence the promise made to Abraham: The ordering of thy descendants shall be that of the stars in heaven! (Genesis, XXIII, 17.) Such is the correct version of the sentence that is usually rendered to mean that the descendants would be as numerous as the stars in heaven.—This implies number only and is not the true meaning. The true meaning is that the line of the descendants was to be in accordance with an order perceptible in the groupings of the stars, which in turn arc an expression of the speech of the Gods. Looking upwards, men beheld an order such as is manifest in the Zodiac. The positions and relation-ships of the planets in the Zodiac formed constellations from which was drawn the language used to proclaim the deeds of the Gods in the Universe. The firm bond demonstrated in the Zodiac and in the relations of the planets to the twelve constellations was to come to expression in the blood-kinship of the descendants of Abraham.
The twelve sons of Jacob, also the twelve tribes of the Hebrew people are therefore images of the twelve constellations of the Zodiac. Just as the language of the Gods is pressed in these twelve constellations, so does Jahve manifest himself in the blood flowing through the generations of the Hebrew people, divided into thc twelve tribes descending from the twelve sons of Jacob. Conditions established in the Zodiac are designated by the name of the planet concerned—Venus, Mercury, Sun, as the case may be. And we have heard how certain parallelisms can be drawn between particular periods in the historical life of the Hebrew people and the paths of the planets through the Zodiac. Thus there is a parallelism between the age of David, the royal minstrel, and Hermes or Mercury; similarly, between the period of the Babylonian captivity—when we see the form taken by the Jahve-revelation six centuries before our era as the result of a new impulse—and the planet Venus.
It was to be indicated to Abraham that there is a parallelism between the place of a personality such as David in the line of generations, and the position of Mercury in the Zodiac. The tribe of Judah corresponds to the constellation of Leo and the advent of David into that tribe would correspond, in the history of the Hebrew people, to the cosmic phenomenon of the occultation of Leo by Mercury (Mercury in Leo). Such occultations are indicated in many places: in the actual succession, in the conferments of kingly or priestly offices, in the battles or victories of one tribe or another, indeed in the whole history of the Hebrews. All this was implicit in the momentous words: Thy descendants shall be ordered in accordance with the harmony of the stars in heaven.—We must never accept the trivial interpretations so often placed upon records founded on occultism but realise their immense profundity.
Thus there is actual evidence of order prevailing in the generations enumerated in the Gospel of St. Matthew. This evangelist has shown how the blood of the body that was to receive the Zarathustra-Individuality was prepared in a very special way to be instrumental in bringing about the manifestation of Christ on the Earth.
What bad been achieved through the forty-two generations from Abraham to Joseph was that blood, blended in accordance with the laws of the stars and of the holy Mysteries, had finally been produced. In the composition of this blood—which was needed by the Zarathustra-Individuality for the fulfilment of his great mission—there was inner order and harmony, reflecting one of the most beautiful and significant principles manifest in the heavenly constellations. The blood available for Zarathustra was therefore an image of the Cosmos, having been prepared through generations in accordance with cosmic law. The basis of the record we now possess in a modified form in the Gospel of St. Matthew is this profound mystery of the evolution of a people as the image of cosmic evolution.
Those who were the first to know something of the sublime Christ-Mystery felt that the very blood of Jesus of Nazareth of whom the Gospel of St. Matthew tells was a reflected image of the Cosmos, of the Spirit holding sway in the Cosmos. And they expressed this secret by saying: The Spirit of the whole Cosmos lived in the blood wherein was to dwell the Ego who then became Jesus of Nazareth.—This physical body must therefore have been an imprint of the ruling Spirit of the Cosmos. Hence it was said originally that the power underlying the composition of the blood in the body of Zarathustra when incarnated as Jesus of Nazareth, was the Spirit of our whole Cosmos, the Spirit which, in the primal beginning, after the Sun had separated from the Earth, brooded over and permeated with warmth what had emerged into manifestation in the course of the evolution of worlds. From the lectures given in Munich to which reference has already been made, we know that the sentence with which Genesis begins—B'rescht bara elohim et haschamayim v'et et ha'aretz'—should not be translated into the trivial words of modern language which no longer convey the ancient meaning. Instead of ‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’, the rendering should convey the following meaning: In what has come over from Saturn, Sun and Moon, the Elohim pondered, in cosmic soul-activity, the outwardly manifesting and the inwardly active, throughout which darkness prevailed; but there spread out and into this, brooding over it, permeating it with warmth—as a hen radiates warmth into the egg—the creative Spirit of the Elohim, Ruach-Elohim.—This same Spirit created the heavenly order that is expressed in a certain way in the constellations of the stars. The original Initiates of the Christ-Mystery felt that the blend of blood in Jesus of Nazareth was an image of the work accomplished by Ruach-Elohim throughout the Cosmos. And of the blood that had been prepared in this way for the great event, they said: it was ‘created by the Spirit of the Universe, the spiritual Being called “Ruach” in that significant passage in Genesis beginning "B'reschit bara ...” ’.1See Genesis. Secrets of the Bible Story of Creation. Study of this cycle, particularly of the first two lectures, is indispensable in connection with the above passage.
Such is the sacred meaning, infinitely greater than any superficial interpretation, of ‘the conception by the Holy Spirit of the Universe’; it is also the basis of the saying: ‘And she who gave birth to this Being was filled with the power of the Spirit of the Universe.’—If we feel the sanctity of such a Mystery we shall realise that in this way of presenting it there is something infinitely higher than any of the exoteric interpretations of the Virgin Birth. Consideration of just two points in the Bible will enable us to avoid trivial interpretations of this ‘immaculate conception’. The one point is this: Why should the writer of St. Matthew's Gospel have enumerated the whole sequence of generations from Abraham to Joseph if he had wished to indicate that the birth of Jesus of Nazareth had no connection with this line of descent ? He is at pains to show how the blood was led down the generations from Abraham to Joseph; how, then, could he possibly have intended to indicate that the blood of Jesus of Nazareth had nothing to do with this blood? And the other point of which account must be taken is that in the Hebrew language the gender of ‘Ruach-Elohim’—rendered ‘Holy Spirit' ’ the Bible—is feminine.—We shall speak further of this. I only wanted now to call up a feeling of the sublimity and grandeur of the thought originally underlying this Mystery.
What took place at the beginning of our era, known only to wise men who were initiated into the secrets of cosmic existence, was expressed in the Aramaic language in the original record upon which the Gospel of St. Matthew is based. And it is possible to prove, not only through occultism but through actual philological investigation, that this record was already in existence in the year 71 A.D. The actual way in which the Gospels originated is set forth in my book Christianity as Mystical Fact.2Chapter VII. By proceeding with exactitude, however, it is possible to show, even through philology, that statements attributing a later date to the Gospel of St. Matthew are not correct, for there is evidence that an original Aramaic script of this Gospel was already extant in the year 71 A.D. comparatively short time, therefore, after the events in Palestine. But as I am concerned here with facts of spiritual science, not of philology, I will quote only one reference in Talmudist literature, the authenticity of which is accepted by Hebrew scholars.
There is a passage in this literature to the effect that Rabbi Gamaliel II was involved in a dispute with his sister over the estate left by their father who had been killed in a fight with the Romans in the year 7o. It is narrated that Rabbi Gamaliel II appeared at the time before a judge who, according to the account, was a so-called Jewish Christian. (Such men not uncommonly occupied offices in the judiciary courts set up by the Romans for the Jews.) A strange incident occurred during the proceedings. The dispute between the Rabbi and his sister was over the inheritance of their father's estate. And before a judge who certainly had some knowledge of Christianity, Rabbi Gamaliel insisted that according to Jewish Law it was only a son, not a daughter, who could inherit, and that the estate therefore passed to him. The judge replied that in the circle where he officiated, the Thora had been set aside, and that as Gamaliel was seeking justice and a verdict from him, he would not give judgment in accordance with Jewish Law but with the Law that had superseded the Thora. As already said, this happened in the year 71—the year after the death of the father of the litigants during the persecution of the Jews. Rabbi Gamaliel's only loophole now was to bribe the judge. This he did, and the following day the judge quoted from the original Aramaic script of St. Matthew's Gospel, to the effect that ‘Christ did not come into the world to destroy the Law of Moses but to fulfil it’. The judge believed he could still his conscience for deflecting the Law by maintaining that in allotting the estate to Gamaliel his judgment was in accordance with Christian tenets.
Here we have evidence that in the year 71 A.D. there existed an original Christian script from which words now contained in the Gospel of St. Matthew were taken. The passage in question was actually quoted in Aramaic and thus we have external proof that this original text of St. Matthew's Gospel, part of it at any rate, was then in existence. We have yet to consider the findings of occult investigation on the subject. The above episode has been quoted merely in order to show that when the aid of external scholarship is sought, it is not right to adopt the usual procedure which is to collect all the literature available for academic study but leave out of account the Talmudist writings which are exceedingly important for knowledge even of the exoteric aspect of these things.
Thus there are very good grounds for affixing a comparatively early date to the Gospel of St. Matthew. This alone provides certain exoteric proof that the men who participated in its compilation were living at no great distance of time from the actual happenings in Palestine; the outer circumstances in themselves, therefore, are evidence that nobody could simply have lied to people, saying that Christ Jesus did not live at the beginning of our era. For as not even half a century had yet elapsed, it was a matter of speaking to those who had been actual eye-witnesses and therefore could not be persuaded that certain events had never happened. Exoterically these things are important and they are mentioned here merely as evidence of that aspect of the subject.
We have seen how measures founded on mysteries of cos-mic existence were taken in the evolution of humanity in order to prepare from the 'filtered' blood of the Hebrew people—blood in which the order of the Cosmos itself prevailed—a body in which the great Initiate Zarathustra could reincarnate. For it is of the Zarathustra-Individuality, of him and no other, that the Gospel of Matthew speaks in the first place.
It must not be imagined that everything brought to light here from profound secrets of world-evolution took place quite openly, before thc eyes of all men. Even for contemporaries the events were veiled in deep mystery and comprehensible only to a very few Initiates. Hence it is understandable that such complete silence should have been maintained concerning what came to pass at that time as the greatest of all events in the evolution and history of humanity. And when historians to-clay, basing their views on the records available to them, point out that no mention whatever is made of this event, we shall not be at all surprised but on the contrary regard it as a matter of course.
Having characterized the part played by Zarathustra in the preparation of this great event, we must now consider the many other currents and influences at work immediately before and also immediately after the coming of the Christ, and all the happenings that took place around Him. Preparation for the event had been in process for a long time. We have heard that preparation for the development of the outer sheaths of Jesus of Nazareth had been made by Hermes and Moses as the emissaries of Zarathustra, and by Melchisedek, the bearer of the Sun-Mystery, but there had also been preparation in a different form, constituting as it were a subsidiary stream. But subsidiary though it was, it nevertheless played a part in the wider stream of happenings originating with Zarathustra. This contributory stream came slowly into existence in centres of which external history informs us by calling attention to certain religious sects where men, named by Philo the `Therapeutae', were endeavouring by inner paths to purify and develop their souls, to expel any elements cor-rupted by outer concerns and external knowledge, in order thereby to rise into the sphere of pure Spirit. An offshoot of the sect of the Therapeutae, where this subsidiary stream undenvent still further development, was the community of the Essenes in Asia. All these men in the sects both of the Therapeutae and the Essenes were under a common spiritual guidance. A brief account of them is contained in my book Christianity as Mystical Fact.3Chapter X. To have any exoteric knowledge of this spiritual guidance we must remind ourselves of the lectures given last year on the Gospel of St. Luke and published with that title.4Notably Lectures Two and Three. Reference was there made to the mystery of Gautama Buddha, the exoteric aspect of which is also presented in oriental writings, and it was said that one who is to attain Buddhahood in the course of evolution must, to begin with, be a Bodhisattva, as in the case of the Being known in history as the Buddha. He too was a Bodhisattva until the twenty-ninth year of his life as the son of King Suddhodana, and it was not until then that through his inner development he rose to Buddhahood. Many Bodhisattvas work in the course of the evolution of humanity and the Bodhisattva who became Buddha six hundred years before our era is one of those who guide and direct evolution. An individuality who rises from the rank of Bodhisattva to that of Buddha does not again incarnate in a physical body on the Earth. From the same lectures on the Gospel of St. Luke we have heard how from the day of the birth of the Jesus of the Nathan line of descent, the power of the Buddha radiated into the etheric body of this child. And we heard that this is not the same Jesus as the Jesus with whom the Gospel of St. Matthew is primarily concerned.
An ancient phase of evolution came to a conclusion svith this attainment of Buddhahood by the Bodhisattva, the son of King Suddhodana. In point of fact, this phase of evolution belonged to the same stream as that of the holy Rishis of India; but it was brought to a certain culmination when that Bodhisattva attained the rank of Buddhahood.
When a Bodhisattva becomes a Buddha, his successor takes his place. This is also narrated in the old Indian legend where it is said that in the spiritual realms, before descending to his final birth, the Bodhisattva who was born as the son of Suddhodana and then rose to Buddhahood, handed to his successor the crown belonging to the office of Bodhisattva. Thus since that time the Bodhisattva who then became Gautama Buddha has been succeeded by the new Bodhisattva who had a particular mission to fulfil in the history of mankind. The task allotted to him was the spiritual guidance of the movement represented in the doctrines of the Therapeutae and Essenes and it was in these communities that his influence worked. During the reign of King Alexander Jannaeus (about 103 to 76 B.c.), a certain Individuality was sent by this Bodhisattva into the communities of the Essenes to be their guide and leader. This Individuality—he is well-known in occultism and also in exoteric Talmudist literature—was the leader of the Essenes about a hundred years before the appearance of Christ Jesus on the Earth.5Appendix II, p. 236.
Thus a hundred years before our era there lived a personality who is not to be confused either with the Jesus of St. Luke's Gospel or with the Jesus of St. Matthew's Gospel; he was a leading figure in the Essene communities and is known in occultism as a herald of Christianity among them. He is also known in Talmudist literature under the name of Jesus, the son of Pandira, Jeshu ben Pandira. He was a great and noble personality, about whom inferior Jewish literature has woven all kinds of fables that have been recently revived, and he must not be confused, as some Talmudists have confused him, with the ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ of whom we are speaking in these lectures. This herald of Christianity among the Essenes is known to us too as Jesus, the son of Pandira; we also know that he was accused of blasphemy and heresy by those to whom the teachings of the Essenes were anathema, and after being stoned was hanged on a tree, in order to add to the punishment the stigma of infamy. This is an occult fact, also recorded in Talmudist literature.
In Jeshu ben Pandira we have to see a personality stand-ing under the guardianship of the present Bodhisattva. The facts are therefore clear.—A stream, as it were accessory to the main Christian stream, originated from the Buddha's successor, from the present Bodhisattva who later on will become the Maitreya Buddha and who sent his emissary into the Essene communities, where in executing his mission he achieved what we shall come to know in the following lectures.
The name ‘Jesus’ is that of the Individuality of whom the Gospels of St. Matthew and St. Luke tell; but it was also the name of that noble personality—regarding whom everything contained in inferior Jewish literature is calumny—who worked in the Essene community a hundred years before our era, was accused of blasphemy and heresy, stoned and finally hanged on a tree.
Vierter Vortrag
Nach dem, was wir gestern ausführen konnten, besteht ein großer, bedeutungsvoller Unterschied zwischen dem, was man die Erkenntnis der geistigen Welt durch alle Zeiten hindurch nennen kann, und jener Art von Erkenntnis der göttlich-geistigen Welt, wie sie angestrebt werden konnte aus der besonderen Beschaffenheit, aus der besonderen Organisation gerade des hebräischen Volkes. Wir haben darauf hingewiesen, daß dieses hebräische Volk schon in seinem Stammvater Abraham oder Abram eine ganz besondere Organisation erhalten hat, die darin bestand, daß dem menschlichen Organismus eingeordnet worden ist ein physisches Werkzeug, ein physisches Organ, um sozusagen durch die Mittel der Sinneserkenntnis, so weit das möglich ist, sich hinaufzuerheben zu einer gewissen - nicht nur Ahnung, sondern Erkenntnis des Göttlich-Geistigen. Erkenntnis des Göttlich-Geistigen gab es und gibt es überall und immer. Aber diese gleichsam ewige Erkenntnis des Göttlich-Geistigen wird erreicht auf dem Wege der Mysterieneinweihung, auf dem Wege der Initiation überhaupt. Von diesem, was durch eine besondere menschliche Entwickelung, was sozusagen auf künstlichem Wege innerhalb der Menschheitsevolution erreicht werden kann, müssen wir unterscheiden jene Erkenntnis der geistigen Welt, die für irgendeine Zeit die normale ist, sozusagen als besondere Mission in der Menschheitsentwickelung herauskommend. So könnten wir für die alte atlantische Zeit eine astralisch-hellseherische Wahrnehmung des Göttlich-Geistigen das Normale nennen. Für die Zeiten aber, in welchen das hebräische Volk blüht, ist die normale, das heißt die äußerliche, exoterische Erkenntnis der geistigen Welt diejenige, welche zustande kommt mit Hilfe eines besonderen physischen Organs durch jene Erkenntniskraft, die an ein solches physisches Organ gebunden ist. Und wir haben schon darauf hingewiesen, daß das Volk Abrahams zu dieser Erkenntnis in der Weise kam, daß es gleichsam das göttliche Dasein verschmolzen fühlte mit dem eigenen Inneren. Innenerkenntnis also, Ergreifen des Göttlichen im eigenen Innersten war es, was durch dieses Organ möglich geworden war.
Aber es ist dieses Ergreifen des Göttlich-Geistigen im Inneren durch diese Erkenntnis nicht gleich so möglich geworden, daß der einzelne Mensch hätte sagen können: Ich versenke mich in mein eigenes Inneres; ich suche dieses eigene Innere so tief zu erfassen, als ich es nur erfassen kann, und dann finde ich den Tropfen des göttlich-geistigen Daseins, der mir eine Erkenntnis geben kann von der Beschaffenheit dessen, was auch die äußere Welt an Göttlich-Geistigem durchlebt und durchwebt. - So war es nicht gleich. Das ist erst gekommen durch die Erscheinung, durch die Offenbarung des Christus innerhalb der Menschheitsentwickelung. Für das althebräische Volk war erst die Möglichkeit gegeben, im Volksgeiste das Göttliche zu erleben, wenn sich der einzelne fühlte als ein Glied des ganzen Volkes, nicht als eine einzelne Individualität. Wenn er sich mit dem Blut in eine herunterfließende Generationenreihe hineingehörig fühlte, dann fühlte er leben in dem Volksbewußtsein, in seinem Blut, das Gottes- oder Jahve-Bewußtsein. Wenn man daher zutreffend bezeichnen will im geisteswissenschaftlichen Sinne, kann man den Gott Jahve nicht dadurch bezeichnen, daß man sagen würde: Er ist der Gott Abrahams. Damit würde er nur ungenau bezeichnet sein. Sondern man muß sagen: Er ist der Gott Abrahams, Isaaks und Jakobs; er ist diejenige Wesenheit, die von Generation zu Generation fließt, die sich im Volksbewußtsein in Einzelmenschen, durch einzelne Menschen hindurch offenbart.
Das ist der Unterschied und der große Fortschritt von dieser Erkenntnis Abrahams, Isaaks und Jakobs zu der christlichen, daß die christliche Erkenntnis in der einzelnen Menschenindividualität dasselbe erkennt, was die althebräische Erkenntnis nur erreichen konnte durch Vertiefung in den Volksgeist, in den Geist, der in dem Blute der Generationen rann. So konnte Abraham sagen: Insofern mir verheiBen ist, der Begründer eines Volkes zu sein, das sich ausbreiten wird in den von mir abstammenden Generationen, wird leben in dem Blute, das durch sie hinunterrinnt, der Gott, den wir als den höchsten anerkennen; er offenbart sich uns im Bewußtsein unseres Volkes. - Das wurde das Normale.
Nun geht durch alle Zeiten hindurch ein höheres Erkennen des Göttlich-Geistigen: das Mysterienerkennen. Das ist nicht abhängig von jenen anderen, besonderen Formen. Man konnte in der Zeit der alten atlantischen Entwickelung durch ein gewisses astralisch-ätherisches Hellsehen hineinschauen in den göttlich-geistigen Untergrund des Daseins; man konnte sein Inneres entwickeln und zu einer Mysterien- oder Orakelerkenntnis kommen. Und auch in der Zeit, als die hebräische Erkenntnis das Normale war, konnte man in gewissen Stätten dadurch hinaufsteigen, daß man nicht im Leibe, wie die Abrahamiten, sondern außer dem Leibe das Göttliche erkannte; man konnte hinaufsteigen zu dem Göttlich-Geistigen unter dem Gesichtspunkt des Ewigen, indem der Mensch sein Ewiges erhob zum Anschauen des Göttlich-Geistigen.
Sie können sich nun leicht vorstellen, daß für Abraham eines notwendig war. Er lernte auf seine ganz besondere Art, auf dem Wege durch ein physisches Organ, durch physische Erkenntnis das GöttlichGeistige kennen. Er lernte auf diesem Wege den führenden Weltengott kennen. Wenn er sich lebendig in den Gesamtweg der Entwickelung hineinstellen wollte, dann war es für ihn unendlich wichtig, zu erkennen, daß der Gott, der sich im Volksbewußtsein kundtut, derselbe ist, der in den Mysterien zu allen Zeiten als die schöpferische und schaffende Gottheit anerkannt wurde. Also es mußte Abraham identifizieren können seinen Gott mit dem Gott der Mysterien. Das war nur unter einer ganz bestimmten Voraussetzung möglich. Unter einer ganz bestimmten Voraussetzung mußte ihm die Gewißheit gegeben werden, daß dieselben Kräfte im Volksbewußtsein sprechen, die in den Mysterien auf eine höhere Art sprechen. Wenn wir diese Gewißheit einsehen wollen, müssen wir uns eine Tatsache der Menschheitsentwickelung vor Augen führen.
In meiner «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß» können Sie nachlesen, daß es in der alten Atlantis Eingeweihte gegeben hat, die dort OrakelPriester genannt werden; auf den Namen kommt es nicht an. Ich habe auch darauf hingewiesen, daß einer dieser großen Initiierten der Führer aller atlantischen Orakel war, der Sonneneingeweihte, im Gegensatz zu den untergeordneten Orakelstätten der Atlantis, welche Merkur-, Mars-, Jupitereingeweihte und so weiter in sich bargen. Ich habe auch darauf hingewiesen, daß dieser große Sonneneingeweihte, der Führer des Sonnenorakels, auch der große Führer der bedeutungsvollen Kulturkolonie war, die sich vom Westen nach dem Osten, von der Atlantis nach dem Inneren Asiens, bewegt hat, um von dort auszustrahlen, zu inaugurieren die nachatlantische Kultur. In geheimnisvolle Stätten im Inneren Asiens zog sich dieser große Eingeweihte, der er damals schon war, zurück. Er gab zunächst denjenigen großen Weisen, die wir als die heiligen Rishis bezeichnen, die Möglichkeit, große Lehrer ihres Volkstums zu sein. Und er war es, dieser große, geheimnisvolle Initiierte, der auch dem Zarathustra oder Zoroaster seine Einweihung zuteil werden ließ.
Anders wurde allerdings dem Zarathustra, anders den indischen Rishis die Einweihung gegeben; denn sie hatten verschiedene Aufgaben. Den Rishis wurde eine solche Einweihung gegeben, daß sie sozusagen wie von selbst, wenn sie ihr Inneres weiter entwickelten, die großen Geheimnisse des Daseins aussprechen konnten. Dadurch wurden sie die großen Führer und Lehrer der vorvedischen, altindischen Kultur. Es war für sie noch etwas, was zwar auf künstlichem Wege erzeugt war, aber auf diesem Wege durchaus ähnlich war dem alten atlantischen Hellsehen, das nur einzeln auf die sieben Rishis verteilt war. Jeder der sieben Rishis hatte sein bestimmtes Gebiet. Wie die verschiedenen Orakelstätten ihr besonderes Gebiet hatten, so hatte jeder der sieben Rishis seine besondere Aufgabe. Und ein Kollegium sprach, wenn jeder der sieben Rishis sagte, was er wußte von der Urweisheit der Welt. Die hatten sie empfangen von dem großen Sonneneingeweihten, der hinausverpflanzt hatte von dem Westen nach dem Osten die alte atlantische Weisheit und sie eben in einer besonderen Weise weitergegeben hatte an die, welche die Träger der nachatlantischen Kultur werden sollten. In anderer Weise gab er sie dem Zarathustra, so daß Zarathustra so sprechen konnte, wie ich es auch angedeutet habe.
Die Rishis sagten: Um zum höchsten Göttlich-Geistigen zu kommen, muß man alles, was in der Umwelt ist, was sich den äußeren Sinnen darbietet, als Maja oder Illusion ansehen; man muß sich abwenden davon, ganz den Blick in das Innere versenken: dann geht eine andere Welt in einem auf als die, welche vor einem ist. - Also mit Abwendung von der illusionären Welt der Maja, mit der Entwickelung des eigenen Inneren hinaufzusteigen in die göttlich-geistigen Sphären, das war die Lehre der alten indischen Rishis. Anders Zarathustra. Er wandte sich nicht ab von dem, was sich äußerlich manifestiert. Er sagte nicht: Das Äußere ist Maja oder Illusion, von der wir uns abwenden müssen. Sondern er sagte: Diese Maja oder Illusion ist die Offenbarung, das wirkliche Kleid des göttlich-geistigen Daseins. Wir dürfen uns nicht von ihm abwenden, sondern im Gegenteil, wir müssen es erforschen. Wir müssen sehen im Sonnenlichtleib das äußere Gewebe, worinnen webt und lebt Ahura Mazdao!
So war in gewisser Weise der Standpunkt Zarathustras der entgegengesetzte von dem der alten Rishis. Es ist gerade die nachindische Kultur dadurch bedeutsam geworden, daß sie der Außenwelt einprägen sollte, was sich der Mensch durch sein geistiges Wirken erobern kann. Und wir haben auch gesehen, wie Zarathustra das Beste, was er zu geben hatte, übertragen hatte in der geschilderten Art an Moses und Hermes. Damit die Moses-Weisheit in der richtigen Weise fruchtbar werden konnte und als Samen aufgehen konnte, mußte sie hineingesenkt sein in das Volkstum, das zu seinem Stammvater Abraham hatte. Denn Abraham hatte zuerst das Organ in sich veranlagt, ein Jahvebewußtsein zu erwerben. Aber er mußte wissen, daß der Gott, der sich in seinem Inneren ankündigen konnte den physischen Erkenntniskräften, mit derselben Stimme spricht, mit welcher der ewige, alles durchwebende Gott der Mysterien spricht, nur daß er sich auf eine eingeschränkte Weise, nämlich wie Abraham ihn erkennen konnte, offenbarte.
Einer solchen bedeutsamen Wesenheit, wie es der große atlantische Sonneninitiierte war, ist es nicht ohne weiteres möglich, zu denen, die zu irgendeiner Zeit leben und eine besondere Mission haben, sogleich in einer verständlichen Sprache zu reden. Eine so hohe Individualität wie der große Sonneninitierte, der in seiner Individualität ein ewiges Dasein führt, von dem mit Recht gesagt wurde - um anzudeuten den Ewigkeitscharakter dieser Individualität -, daß man von ihm nicht anführen sollte Namen und Alter, nicht Vater und Mutter, ein solcher großer Führer des Menschheitsdaseins kann sich nur dadurch offenbaren, daß er etwas annimmt, wodurch er verwandt wird denen, welchen er sich offenbaren kann. So nahm, um dem Abraham die entsprechende Aufklärung zu geben, der Lehrer der Rishis, der Lehrer des Zarathustra, eine Gestalt an, in welcher er den Ätherleib trug, der aufbewahrt war von dem Stammvater des Abraham, denselben Ätherleib, der schon in dem Stammvater des Abraham, in Sem, dem Sohne Noahs, vorhanden war. Dieser Ätherleib des Sem war aufbewahrt worden, wie der Ätherleib des Zarathustra für Moses aufbewahrt worden war, und seiner bediente sich der große Eingeweihte des Sonnenmysteriums, um sich in einer verständlichen Art dem Abraham offenbaren zu können. Diese Begegnung des Abraham mit dem großen Eingeweihten des Sonnenmysteriums ist jene Begegnung, welche uns im Alten Testament geschildert wird als die Begegnung des Abraham mit dem Könige, mit dem Priester des höchsten Gottes, mit Melchisedek oder Malek-Zadik, wie man gewohnt geworden ist ihn zu nennen (1.Mose 14, 18-20). Das ist eine Begegnung von größter, von universellster Bedeutung, diese Begegnung des Abraham mit dem großen Eingeweihten des Sonnenmysteriums, der - nur um ihn sozusagen nicht zu verblüffen - in dem Ätherleib des Sem sich zeigte, des Stammvaters des semitischen Stammes. Und bedeutungsvoll wird in der Bibel auf etwas hingewiesen, was leider nur zu wenig verstanden wird, nämlich darauf, woher sozusagen dasjenige kommen kann, was Melchisedek dem Abraham zu geben in der Lage ist. Was kann Melchisedek dem Abraham geben? Er kann ihm geben das Geheimnis des Sonnendaseins, das natürlich Abraham nur in seiner Art verstehen kann, dasselbe, was hinter der Zarathustra-Offenbarung steht, worauf Zarathustra erst prophetisch hingewiesen hat.
Wenn wir uns die Tatsache vorstellen, daß Zarathustra seine bevorzugten Schüler auf das hinwies, was als Ahura Mazdao geistig hinter dem Sonnenlichtleib lebt, indem er sagte: Seht hin, dahinter steckt etwas, was jetzt noch nicht mit der Erde vereinigt ist, was aber einst in die Erdenevolution sich ergießen wird und auf die Erde heruntersteigen wird -, wenn wir anerkennen, daß Zarathustra nur prophetisch vorherverkünden konnte den Sonnengeist, den Christus, von dem er sagte: Er wird kommen in einem menschlichen Leibe -, dann werden wir sagen müssen, daß für denjenigen Menschen, der vorbereiten und später herbeiführen sollte die Inkarnation des Christus auf der Erde, sich noch größere Tiefen dieses Sonnengeheimnisses zeigen mußten. Das geschah dadurch, daß der Lehrer des Zarathustra selber bei jener Begegnung Einfluß nahm auf Abraham, sozusagen aus derselben Quelle seinen Einfluß brachte, aus der dann der Christus-Einfluß kommt. Das wird uns wieder in der Bibel symbolisch angedeutet, indem gesagt wird: Indem Abraham dem Melchisedek entgegengeht, bringt ihm dieser König von Salem, dieser Priester des höchsten der Götter, Brot und Traubensaft. «Brot und Traubensaft» wird später noch einmal ausgeteilt: Als das Geheimnis des Christus ausgedrückt werden soll für seine Bekenner bei der Einsetzung des Abendmahles, da geschieht es durch Brot und Traubensaft! Indem die Gleichheit des Opfers in so bedeutungsvoller Weise betont wird, wird darauf hingewiesen, daß es dieselbe Quelle ist, aus der Melchisedek schöpft, und woher aus der Christus schöpft.
Also es sollte ein Einfluß stattfinden von dem, was später auf die Erde niedersteigen sollte, auf dem Umwege dutch Melchisedek. Und dieser Einfluß sollte auf den großen Vorbereiter des späteren Ereignisses, auf Abraham, erfolgen. Und die Folge der Wirkung dieser Begegnung des Abraham mit Melchisedek war die, daß Abraham nun spürte: was ihn da antreibt, was er anspricht mit dem Namen Jahve oder Jehova als das Höchste, was er denken kann, das kommt aus derselben Quelle, aus der auch für alles höchste Erdenwissen das Bewußtsein des Initiierten kommt von dem alle Welten durchwebenden und durchlebenden höchsten Gott. Das war das Bewußtsein, das Abraham jetzt weitertragen konnte. - Ein anderes Bewußtsein ging in Abraham noch auf: das Bewußtsein, daß nun tatsächlich mit dem Blute der Generationen, das durch das Volkstum hinunterrinnt, etwas gegeben sein soll, was sich richtig nur vergleichen läßt mit dem, was in den Mysterien geschaut werden kann, wenn der hellseherische Blick sich hinausrichtet in die Geheimnisse des Daseins und die Sprache des Kosmos versteht.
Ich habe schon darauf aufmerksam gemacht, wie man in den Mysterien die Geheimnisse des Kosmos ausdrückt, indem man eine Sternensprache spricht und die Geheimnisse des Kosmos zum Ausdrucksmittel nimmt für das, was man sagen will. Es gab Zeiten, in denen die Mysterienlehrer das Auszudrückende in solche Worte, in solche Bilder kleideten, die hergenommen waren von der Konstellation der Sterne. Man sah gleichsam in den Wegen der Sterne, in denLagen derSterne zueinander die Bilder, durch die man ausdrücken wollte, was der Mensch geistig erlebt, wenn er sich zu dem Göttlich-Geistigen hinauferhebt.
Was hat man nun in der Mysterienweisheit gelesen in dieser Sternenschrift? Man hat darinnen gelesen die Geheimnisse der die Welt durchwebenden und durchlebenden Gottheit. Es waren die Ordnungen der Sterne der augenfällige Ausdruck der Gottheit. Man richtete den Blick in Weltenalle und sagte: Da kündet sich die Gottheit an! Und wie sie sich ankündet, das beschreiben uns die Ordnungen und Harmonien der Sterne. - So lebte sich für ein solches Anschauen der Weltengott aus in der Ordnung der Sterne.
Sollte sich auf eine besondere Art in der Mission des hebräischen Volkes dieser Weltengott ausleben, so mußte er sich in derselben Ordnung ausleben, die im Kosmos in den Sternenbahnen vorgezeichnet ist. Das heißt, es mußte sich durch das Blut der Generationen, in welchem ja das äußere Instrument der Jahve-Offenbarungen enthalten war, eine ähnliche Ordnung ausdrücken, wie sie sich ausdrückt in den Sternenbahnen. Mit anderen Worten: In der Nachkommenschaft des Abraham mußte etwas sein, was in der Generationenfolge, in der Blutsverwandtschaft, ein Spiegelbild dessen war, was Sternenschrift im Kosmos ist. Deshalb bekam Abraham die Verheißung: Deine Nachkommen sollen geordnet sein wie die Sterne am Himmel! - Das ist die richtige Auslegung des Satzes, der gewöhnlich heißt: «Deine Nachkommen sollen zahlreich sein wie die Sterne am Himmel», und womit nur die Vielzahl der Nachkommenschaft angedeutet wird (1.Mose 22, 17). Aber nicht die Vielzahl ist gemeint, sondern gemeint ist, daß in der Nachkommenschaft eine solche Ordnung herrschen solle, wie sie am Himmel in der Sprache der Götter wahrgenommen wurde in der Gruppierung der Sterne. Da sah man hinauf in eine solche Ordnung, wie sie sich darstellt in der Ordnung des Tierkreises. Und in der Stellung der Wandelsterne, der Planeten zum Tierkreis drückten sich jene Konstellationen aus, in denen man die Sprache fand, um die Taten der Götter, wie sie weben durch das Weltall, auszudrücken. Dieses feste Band also, das im Zodiakus und in dem Verhältnis der Planeten zu den zwölf Tierkreiszeichen sich darstellt, mußte sich ausdrücken in der Blutsverwandtschaft in der Nachkommenschaft des Abraham.
So haben wir in den zwölf Söhnen Jakobs, in den zwölf Stämmen des hebräischen Volkes die Abbilder der zwölf Zeichen des Tierkreises. Wie sich oben in den zwölf Tierkreisbildern die Sprache der Götter ausdrückt, so drückt sich Jahve aus in dem durch die Generationen herabfließenden Blute des jüdischen Volkes, das sich nach den zwölf Söhnen des Jakob in die zwölf Stämme teilte. Dasjenige, was sich in diese Konstellation des Tierkreises hineinordnet, bezeichnen wir mit dem Namen der Planeten, mit Venus, Merkur, Mond, Sonne und so weiter. Und wir haben gesehen, wie dasjenige, was sich im Laufe der Zeit im Lebensgange des hebräischen Volkes als Einzelabschnitte abspielt, in der Tat in gewisser Beziehung zu parallelisieren ist mit dem Weg der Planeten durch den Zodiakus: daß wir David, den königlichen Sänger, parallelisieren müssen mit Hermes oder Merkur, daß wir die Zeit der babylonischen Gefangenschaft, das heißt jene Konfiguration, welche die Jahve-Offenbarung etwa sechs Jahrhunderte vor unserer Zeitrechnung durch einen neuen Einschlag erhalten hat, parallelisieren dürfen mit dem Namen der Venus als einem Namen unseres Planetensystems. Das sollte dem Abraham angedeutet werden. So daß zum Beispiel die Art, wie eine Persönlichkeit wie David sich hineinstellt in die Stammesfolge, parallel geht dem, wie der Merkur zum Zodiakus steht. Der Stamm Juda zum Beispiel entspricht dem Sternbilde des Löwen, und das Hineingestelltsein des David in den Stamm Juda würde in der Geschichte des hebräischen Volkes dem entsprechen, was im Kosmos das Bedecken des Sternbildes des Löwen durch Merkur wäre. So kann man lesen an allen Einzelheiten, in der Blutfolge, in dem merkwürdigen Übertragen der Königs- oder Priesterwürde, in den Kämpfen oder Siegen des einen oder des anderen Stammes, in der ganzen hebräischen Geschichte, was die Bedeckung der einzelnen Sternbilder draußen im Weltenraume ist. Das lag in dem bedeutungsvollen Wort: Deine Nachkommen sollen geordnet sein wie die Harmonie der Sterne am Himmel. - Wir müssen nur nicht in den Urkunden, die auf Okkultismus gebaut sind, jene Trivialitäten sehen, welche so gern darin gesehen werden, sondern wir müssen voraussetzen, daß diese Urkunden von einer unendlichen Tiefe sind.
So sehen wir in der Tat, wie Ordnung vorhanden ist in dieser Generationenfolge, die uns dann im Matthäus-Evangelium geschildert wird. Wir sehen, daß uns dieser Evangelist andeutet, wie auf eine ganz besondere Weise das Blut jenes Leibes zusammengesetzt war, der zunächst aufnehmen sollte die Individualität des Zarathustra, damit diese Individualität des Zarathustra die Offenbarung des Christus auf der Erde herbeiführen konnte.
Was war also durch die zweiundvierzig Generationen hindurch von ‚Abraham bis auf Joseph erlangt worden? Das war erlangt worden, daß mit dem Letzten in der Generationenfolge eine Blutmischung zustande gekommen war, die sich nach den Gesetzen der Sternenwelt, der heiligen Mysterien vollzogen hatte. Und in dieser Blutmischung, welche die Zarathustra-Individualität brauchte, um das große Werk auszuführen, war eine innere Ordnung, eine Harmonie, die einer der schönsten, der bedeutsamsten Ordnungen des Sternensystems entsprach. So war die Blutmischung, die Zarathustra vorfand, ein Abbild des ganzen Kosmos. Dieses Blut, das da durch Generationen hindurch gebildet wurde, war so gemischt, wie die Ordnungen des Kosmos geregelt sind. Das alles liegt zugrunde jener bedeutsamen Urkunde, welche wir jetzt, wenn ich so sagen darf, in einer abgeschwächten Form in dem Evangelium nach Matthäus vor uns haben. Dieses tiefe Geheimnis von einem Volkswerden als Abbild eines kosmischen Werdens liegt dem zugrunde.
So fühlten diejenigen, welche zunächst etwas wußten von dem großen Mysterium Christi. Sie fühlten schon in dem Blut, welches dieser Matthäus-Jesus von Nazareth in sich hatte, ein Abbild des Kosmos, ein Abbild jenes Geistes, der im ganzen Kosmos waltet. Dieses Geheimnis drückten sie aus, indem sie sagten: In dem Blut, in welchem leben sollte das Ich, das dann Jesus von Nazareth war, lebte der Geist des ganzen Kosmos. Sollte also dieser physische Leib geboren werden, dann mußte er sein ein Abdruck des Geistes des ganzen Kosmos, des Geistes, der da waltet in der Welt. - Das war ursprünglich die Formel, daß die Kraft, die jener Blutmischung zugrunde lag, welche die des Zarathustra oder Jesus von Nazareth wurde, daß diese Kraft der Geist war unseres ganzen Kosmos, eben jener Geist, der ursprünglich, nach der Trennung der Sonne von unserer Erde, brütend dasjenige durchdrang, was sich herausgegliedert hatte in der Weltenevolution. Aus den schon erwähnten Münchener Vorträgen wissen wir: Wenn wir den Beginn der Genesis, das «Bereschit bara Elohim eth haschamajim we'eth ha'aretz», nicht mit den trivialen Worten der heutigen Zeit übersetzen wollen, die sich nicht mehr mit dem alten Sinn decken, sondern wenn wir den wahren Sinn heraussuchen, daß wir dann zu übersetzen haben: «In dem, was herübergekommen war aus dem Saturn-, Sonnenund Mondendasein, ersannen in kosmischer Tätigkeit die Elohim dasjenige, was sich nach außen offenbart, was sich im Inneren regt. Und über dem, was sich im Inneren regt, und durch das, was sich regt, herrschte das finstere Dunkel; aber es breitete sich aus da hinein, es brütete darüber, es durchdringend mit Wärme - ähnlich wie das Huhn das Ei - der schöpferische Geist der Elohim, Ruach-Elohim.» Was da als Geist brütete, das ist dasselbe, ganz dasselbe, was dann die Ordnungen bewirkte, welche man ausdrücken konnte in einer gewissen Weise durch die Konstellation der Sterne. So fühlten die ursprünglichen Eingeweihten des Christus-Mysteriums, daß die Blutmischung des Jesus von Nazareth ein Abbild dessen war, was Ruach-Elohim durch das Weltendasein hindurch wirkte. Und sie nannten daher das Blut, das auf diese Weise für das große Ereignis zubereitet worden ist, «geschaffen durch den Geist des Weltendaseins», durch denselben Geist, der in jener bedeutungsvollen Schilderung der Genesis, in dem «Bereschit bara...», genannt wird Ruach.
Dieser heilige Sinn, der wahrhaftig größer ist als jeglicher andere, triviale Sinn, liegt zunächst als der höhere Sinn dem zugrunde, was genannt wird «die Empfängnis aus dem heiligen Geiste des Weltenalls». Das liegt dem zugrunde, was enthalten ist in dem Wort: «Und die Gebärerin dieses Wesens war erfüllt von der Kraft dieses Geistes des Weltenalls» (Matth.1,18). Wir müssen nur die ganze Größe eines solchen Mysteriums empfinden, und wir werden dann schon finden, daß in dieser Art, die Sache darzustellen, etwas unendlich Höheres liegt als in alledem, was exoterisch in der Conceptio immaculata, in der «Unbefleckten Empfängnis» gegeben ist. Man braucht ja nur zwei Dinge in der Bibel sich selbst gegenüberzustellen, wenn man die wahre Absicht der Bibel erkennen und von einer trivialen Ausdeutung der Unbefleckten Empfängnis abkommen will. Das eine ist dies: Wozu würde der Schreiber des Matthäus-Evangeliums die ganze Reihe der Generationen von Abraham bis auf Joseph aufstellen, wenn er etwa sagen wollte, daß mit dieser ganzen Generationenfolge die Geburt des Jesus von Nazareth nichts zu tun habe? Er bemüht sich darzustellen, wie das Blut von ‚Abraham bis auf Joseph heruntergeleitet wird, und dann sollte er sagen, daß mit diesem Blut in Wahrheit das Blut des Jesus von Nazareth nichts zu tun habe? Und die andere Tatsache ist, daß Ruach-Elohim, der in der Bibel der Heilige Geist genannt wird, in der hebräischen Sprache weiblichen Geschlechts ist, ein Femininum ist, was doch wohl auch in irgendeiner Weise in Betracht kommen muß. — Wir werden darauf noch weiter zu sprechen kommen; jetzt wollte ich nur ein Gefühl dafür hervorrufen, wie groß die Gedankenkonzeption ist, die diesem Mysterium bei seinem Ausgangspunkt zugrunde liegt.
Was da beim Ausgangspunkt unserer Zeitrechnung sich abgespielt hat, und was nur die Weisen kannten, die wirklich in die Geheimnisse des Weltendaseins eingeweiht waren, das wurde zunächst ausgedrückt in aramäischer Sprache in der Urkunde, welche dem Matthäus-Evangelium zugrunde liegt. Und nicht nur durch den Okkultismus, sondern auch durch rein philologische Forschung ist es möglich, zu beweisen, daß diese Urkunde, welche dem Matthäus-Evangelium zugrunde liegt, bereits im Jahre 71 existiert hat. Das wahre Zustandekommen der Evangelien können Sie in meinem Buche «Das Christentum als mystische Tatsache» dargestellt finden. Aber wenn man wirklich genau vorgeht, kann man selbst philologisch nachweisen, daß alles, was von einer späteren Konzeption des Matthäus-Evangeliums gesagt wird, nicht richtig ist; denn wir können nachweisen, daß bereits im Jahre 71 -also verhältnismäßig kurze Zeit nach dem Ereignisse von Palästina - eine aramäische Urschrift des Matthäus-Evangeliums vorhanden war. Aber weil ich hier nicht philologische Tatsachen, sondern nur geisteswissenschaftliche zu vertreten habe, will ich dabei nur auf eines hinweisen aus der talmudischen Literatur, die vollständig gesichert ist durch jüdische Gelehrte.
In der talmudischen Literatur finden wir eine Angabe, daß Rabbi Gamaliel II. mit seiner Schwester in einen Erbschaftsstreit verwickelt war, der dadurch entstanden war, daß im Jahre 70 sein Vater in einem Streit mit den Römern umgekommen war. Und es wird uns erzählt, daß Rabbi Gamaliel II. damals vor einem Richter stand, der nach allem, was uns die talmudische Literatur berichtet, ein Halbchrist war, ein sogenannter Judenchrist. Solche gab es schon in jenen Richterstellen, die von den Römern den Juden hingesetzt waren. Dabei ging nun etwas Merkwürdiges vor: Rabbi Gamaliel II. kämpft mit seiner Schwester um die Erbschaft, um das Vermögen seines Vaters. Und vor seinem Richter, der schon etwas vom Christentum weiß, macht er geltend, daß nach dem bei den Juden geltenden Gesetz nur der Sohn, nicht aber die Tochter erben könne, und daß ihm allein also die Erbschaft gehöre. Da hält ihm der Richter vor, daß ja die Thora abgesetzt sei in denjenigen Kreisen, innerhalb welcher er Richter sei, und da er Recht und Urteilsspruch bei ihm suche, so wolle er nicht bloß richten nach dem Gesetz der Juden, sondern nach dem Gesetz, das sich an die Stelle der Thora hingesetzt habe. Das alles war geschehen, wie schon gesagt, im Jahre 71, da der Vater des Gamaliel im Jahre 70 bei der Judenverfolgung umgekommen war. Nun fand Rabbi Gamaliel keinen anderen Ausweg mehr, als daß er den Richter bestach. Da machte der bestochene Richter am nächsten Tage ein Zitat, und zwar war das ein solches, das entlehnt war der aramäischen Urschrift des Matthäus-Evangeliums. Und was sagte der Richter? Der Christus «sei nicht gekommen, das Gesetz des Moses zu brechen, sondern es zu erfüllen!» (Matth. 5,17). So glaubte er damit sein Gewissen entlasten zu können, wenn er das Gesetz beugte, indem er sagte, er richte doch im Sinne des Christus, wenn er dem Gamaliel die Erbschaft zuspräche.
Daraus wissen wir, daß im Jahre 71 eine christliche Urkunde bestand, aus welcher Worte entlehnt wurden, welche heute im MatthäusEvangelium enthalten sind. Wir haben also dieses äußerliche Zeichen - es wird nämlich jene Stelle in aramäischer Sprache angeführt -, daß diese Urkunde, diese aramäische Urschrift des Matthäus-Evangeliums, damals mindestens teilweise vorhanden gewesen ist. Was die okkulte Forschung darüber zu sagen hat, das werden wir noch zu besprechen haben. Dies sollte jetzt nur angeführt werden, um zu zeigen: Wenn man schon die äußere Wissenschaft zu Hilfe zieht, darf man das nicht machen, was so oft gemacht wird, daß nämlich alles zusammengetragen wird, was die Herren gerade lesen können, während sie zum Beispiel die talmudische Literatur unberücksichtigt lassen, die außerordentlich bedeutsam ist für das, was man auch exoterisch über diese Dinge erkennen kann.
So sehen wir, daß wir auch äußerlich auf einem recht guten Boden stehen, wenn man das Matthäus-Evangelium verhältnismäßig früh ansetzt. Damit schon allein, möchte ich sagen, ist auch äußerlich ein gewisser Beweis geliefert, daß die Menschen, welche an der Abfassung des Matthäus-Evangeliums beteiligt waren, zeitlich nicht sehr weit entfernt von den Ereignissen in Palästina waren, so daß dadurch selbst exoterisch gesichert ist, daß man damals nicht einfach den Leuten ins Gesicht lügen konnte und sagen, es hätte also im Beginne unserer Zeitrechnung nicht der Christus Jesus gelebt, von dem wir sprechen. Denn es war nicht einmal ein halbes Jahrhundert darnach, so daß man noch zu Augenzeugen zu sprechen hatte und denen nicht Dinge sagen konnte, welche sich nicht zugetragen hatten. Das sind Dinge, die exoterisch wichtig sind, und wir wollen sie nur anführen zum Beleg für das Exoterische der Sache.
Wir haben also geschen, wie aus den Geheimnissen des Kosmos heraus in der Menschheitsevolution Veranstaltungen getroffen worden sind, um aus dem gleichsam filtrierten Blute des hebräischen Volkes, das die Ordnung des Weltalls selbst in sich aufgenommen hatte, einen Körper herzustellen, in welchem sich wieder inkarniert der große Eingeweihte Zarathustra. Denn von der Zarathustra-Individualität spricht das Matthäus-Evangelium; und keine andere Individualität als die Zarathustra-Individualität ist es, von der dieses Evangelium spricht. Nun dürfen wir uns nicht etwa denken, daß alles dies, was wir gleichsam aus den tiefsten Geheimnissen der Weltenevolution hervorheben, sich so ganz offen vor aller Augen abgespielt habe. Das war auch für die Zeitgenossen in ein tiefes Geheimnis gehüllt und nur den wenigsten Eingeweihten verständlich. Daher ist es begreiflich, daß ein so tiefes Schweigen herrscht über alles, was sich damals als das größte Ereignis der Menschheitsevolution zugetragen hat. Und wenn sich heute die Historiker auf ihre Urkunden berufen und sagen, daß diese Urkunden über dieses Ereignis schweigen, so muß uns das nicht verwundern, sondern ganz natürlich erscheinen.
Wenn wir jetzt charakterisiert haben, wie von der Zarathustra-Seite her dieses größte Ereignis unserer Menschheitsevolution vorbereitet wurde, so müssen wir uns jetzt noch andere vorbereitende Strömungen zu diesem großen Ereignis ein wenig vor die Seele führen. Vieles, vieles geschah in der Menschheitsevolution unmittelbar vorher und auch unmittelbar nachher, nachdem diese Ereignisse um Christus herum sich abgespielt hatten. Es ist dieses Ereignis im Grunde schon lange vorher vorbereitet worden. Wie es von äußerer Seite vorbereitet wurde, indem Zarathustra Moses und Hermes ausgesandt hat, indem von Melchisedek, von dem Sonnenmysterium selber, die äußere Hülle des Jesus von Nazareth vorbereitet wurde, so wurde ein anderes noch vorbereitet, gleichsam eine Nebenströmung dieser großen Strömung, die aber, wenn sie auch nur eine Nebenströmung ist, doch etwas zu tun hat mit der großen Hauptströmung, die vonZarathustra herkommt. Diese Nebenströmung bereitet sich langsam vor in jenen Stätten, die uns bezeichnet werden auch von der äußeren Geschichte dadurch, daß wit auf gewisse Sekten aufmerksam gemacht werden, welche eine besondere Seelenentwickelung anstrebten, und die uns von Philo als die «Therapeuten» beschrieben werden. Die Therapeuten waren Angehörige einer geheimnisvollen Sekte, die auf innerlichem Wege ihre Seelen zu reinigen suchten, um das herauszubringen, was durch den äußeren Verkehr und durch die äußeren Erkenntnisse verunreinigt wird, um sich dadurch in reine geistige Sphären zu erheben. Eine Abzweigung dieser Sekte der Therapeuten, in welcher jene Nebenströmung weiter vorbereitet wurde, waren die in Asien lebenden «Essäer» oder «Essener». Diese Menschen alle - Sie können eine kurze Beschreibung darüber in meinem «Christentum als mystische Tatsache» finden -, welche in diesen Sekten vereinigt waren, hatten eine gewisse gemeinsame geistige Leitung. Sowohl bei den Therapeuten wie auch bei den Essäern war eine gewisse geistige Leitung vorhanden. Und wenn wir diese geistige Leitung exoterisch kennenlernen wollen, müssen wir uns an das erinnern, was wir im vorigen Jahre bei den Vorträgen über das Lukas-Evangelium besprochen haben. Wir haben dabei angeführt das Geheimnis des Gautama Buddha, wie es in den orientalischen Schriften auch exoterisch behandelt wird, und wir haben gesagt, daß derjenige, der ein Buddha werden will im Laufe der Entwickelung, zunächst ein Bodhisattva werden müsse. Wir haben ausgeführt, wie derjenige, der aus der Geschichte als «Buddha» bekannt ist, auch zuerst ein Bodhisattva war und dann Buddha wurde. Bis zum neunundzwanzigsten Jahre seines physischen Seins als der Sohn des Königs Suddhodana war er noch ein Bodhisattva, und erst im neunundzwanzigsten Jahre ist er durch seine innere Seelenentwickelung vom Bodhisattva zum Buddha geworden. Der Bodhisattvas gibt es nun eine ganze Reihe in der Entwickelung der Menschheit; und jener Bodhisattva, der sechs Jahrhunderte vor unserer Zeitrechnung ein Buddha geworden war, ist einer von den Bodhisattvas, welche die Entwickelung der Menschheit leiten. Eine solche Individualität, welche aufsteigt von der Würde eines Bodhisattva zur Würde eines Buddha, inkorporiert sich später nicht wieder in einem physischen Leibe auf der Erde. Wir haben dann gesehen, wie sich der Buddha manifestiert hat bei der Geburt des Jesus des Lukas-Evangeliums, indem er sich mit diesem Jesus, den wir den Jesus der nathanischen Linie nannten, verband mit seinem ätherischen Leibe. Und wir haben gesehen, daß dies ein anderer Jesus ist als der, von dem wir beim Matthäus-Evangelium zunächst sprechen.
In diesem Buddhawerden des Königssohnes des Suddhodana haben wir zu sehen den Abschluß einer alten Entwickelung. In der Tat gehört diese Entwickelung, welche ihren Abschluß mit dem Buddhawerden jenes Bodhisattya erreicht, derselben Strömung an, der auch die heiligen Rishis der Inder angehören; aber diese erreichte mit dem Buddhawerden jenes Bodhisattva einen gewissen Abschluß. -— Wenn nun ein Bodhisattva zum Buddha wird, so tritt an seine Stelle sein Nachfolger. Das erzählt auch die alte indische Legende, indem sie sagt, daß der Bodhisattva, der herunterstieg, um als Sohn des Königs Suddhodana zur Buddhawürde aufzusteigen, vor seinem letzten Herabsteigen die Krone des Bodhisattva weitergab an seinen Nachfolger in den geistigen Reichen. Es gab also seit jenen Zeiten einen Nachfolger jenes Bodhisattva, der damals Buddha wurde. Und dieser neue Bodhisattva, der nun als Bodhisattva weiter wirkte, hatte eine besondere Aufgabe für die Menschheitsentwickelung. Ihm war besonders die Aufgabe zugefallen, geistig zu leiten jene Bewegung, welche sich im Therapeutentum, im Essäertum kundgab, so daß wir in jenem Bodhisattva, der der Nachfolger des Buddha wurde, anerkennen den geistigen Leiter der Therapeuten- und Essäergemeinden. Da wirkte sein Einfluß. Dieser Bodhisattva schickte sozusagen zur Leitung der Essäer unter der Regierung des Königs Alexander Jannai - ungefähr 125 bis 77 vor unserer Zeitrechnung - eine besondere Individualität in die Essäergemeinden hinein. Diese besondere Individualität leitete ungefähr ein Jahrhundert vor dem Erscheinen des Christus Jesus auf der Erde die Essäergemeinden. Diese Persönlichkeit ist dem Okkultismus gut bekannt, aber auch der äußeren talmudischen Literatur.
Es gab also ein Jahrhundert vor unserer Zeitrechnung, ein Jahrhundert vor der Erscheinung des Christus auf der Erde, eine Individualität, die nichts zu tun hat mit dem Jesus des Lukas-Evangeliums und nichts zu tun hat mit dem Jesus des Matthäus-Evangeliums, eine Persönlichkeit, die Lenker und Leiter war in den Essäergemeinden. Diese Persönlichkeit ist dem Okkultismus gut bekannt als eine Art von Vorläufer der Essäer für das Christentum; sie ist bekannt aber auch in der talmudischen Literatur unter dem Namen Jesus, der Sohn des Pandira, Jeshu ben Pandira. Diesen Jesus, Sohn des Pandira, über den üble jüdische Literaturen allerlei gefabelt haben, was dann in neuerer Zeit wieder aufgewärmt worden ist, diese Persönlichkeit, die eine edle und große Persönlichkeit war, darf man nicht verwechseln, wie es einige Talmudisten tun, mit dem Jesus von Nazareth, von dem wir sprechen. Wir kennen auch diesen essäischen Vorläufer des Christentums in dem Jesus, dem Sohn des Pandira. Und wir wissen, daß dieser Jeshu ben Pandira von denen, die damals in der essäischen Lehre Gotteslästerungen sahen, angeklagt worden ist der Gotteslästerung und Häresie, dann zuerst gesteinigt und, nachdem er gesteinigt worden war, an einem Baum aufgehängt worden ist, um zur Strafe auch noch die Schande hinzuzufügen. Das ist eine okkulte, aber auch eine in der talmudischen Literatur vorkommende Tatsache.
In diesem Jeshu ben Pandira haben wir eine Persönlichkeit zu sehen, die unter dem Schutze des Bodhisattva steht, welcher der Nachfolger jenes Bodhisattva ist, der als der Sohn des Königs Suddhodana später zum Buddha geworden ist. So liegen die Dinge ganz klar. Wir haben eine Art Vorbereitung, eine Nebenströmung der christlichen Hauptströmung in jener Strömung zu sehen, welche abhängig ist von dem Nachfolger des Buddha, von dem jetzigen Bodhisattva, der später der Maitreya Buddha werden wird und seine Sendboten in die Essäergemeinden hineingeschickt hat; sie lebte sich damals aus in dem Missionar, der in den Essäergemeinden das bewirkte, was wir in dem nächsten Vortrag kennenlernen werden.
So haben wir den Namen Jesus zu suchen bei der Individualität, von der uns das Matthäus- und das Lukas-Evangelium berichten; wir müssen den Namen Jesus aber auch ein Jahrhundert vor dem Beginn unserer Zeitrechnung in der Essäergemeinde suchen bei jener edlen Persönlichkeit, gegenüber der alles, was üble talmudische Literatur gefunden hat, Verleumdung ist, die angeklagt worden ist wegen Gotteslästerung und Häresie, die erst gesteinigt und nachher an einen Baum gehängt worden ist.
Fourth Lecture
Based on what we were able to explain yesterday, there is a significant difference between what can be called the knowledge of the spiritual world throughout the ages and the kind of knowledge of the divine-spiritual world that could be attained from the special nature and organization of the Hebrew people. We have pointed out that this Hebrew people already received a very special organization in their forefather Abraham or Abram, which consisted in the fact that a physical tool, a physical organ, was incorporated into the human organism in order, so to speak, through the means of sensory perception, to raise itself as far as possible to a certain—not just a premonition, but a knowledge—of the divine-spiritual. Knowledge of the divine-spiritual existed and exists everywhere and always. But this, as it were, eternal knowledge of the divine-spiritual is attained through the path of mystery initiation, through the path of initiation in general. We must distinguish between what can be achieved through a special human development, through artificial means, so to speak, within the evolution of humanity, and that knowledge of the spiritual world which is normal for a certain period of time, emerging, so to speak, as a special mission in human development. Thus, for the ancient Atlantean period, we could call astral-clairvoyant perception of the divine-spiritual the norm. But for the times in which the Hebrew people flourished, the normal, that is, the external, exoteric knowledge of the spiritual world is that which comes about with the help of a special physical organ through the power of knowledge that is bound to such a physical organ. And we have already pointed out that the people of Abraham came to this knowledge in such a way that they felt, as it were, the divine existence merged with their own inner being. It was therefore inner knowledge, the grasping of the divine in one's own innermost being, that had become possible through this organ.
But this grasping of the divine-spiritual within through this knowledge did not immediately become possible in such a way that the individual human being could say: I immerse myself in my own inner being; I seek to grasp this inner being as deeply as I can, and then I find the drop of divine-spiritual existence that can give me knowledge of the nature of what also permeates and interweaves the outer world in its divine-spiritual aspect. It was not like that at first. This only came about through the appearance, through the revelation of Christ within human evolution. For the ancient Hebrew people, it was only possible to experience the divine in the spirit of the people when the individual felt himself to be a member of the whole people, not a separate individuality. When they felt that they belonged to a descending line of generations through their blood, they felt that they were living in the national consciousness, in their blood, the consciousness of God or Yahweh. Therefore, if one wants to describe Yahweh accurately in a spiritual-scientific sense, one cannot say that he is the God of Abraham. That would only be an inaccurate description. Instead, one must say: He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; he is the entity that flows from generation to generation, revealing itself in the national consciousness in individual human beings, through individual human beings.
This is the difference and the great advance from the knowledge of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to the Christian knowledge, in that Christian knowledge recognizes in the individual human personality the same thing that ancient Hebrew knowledge could only attain through deepening into the folk spirit, into the spirit that flowed in the blood of the generations. Thus Abraham could say: Inasmuch as it is promised to me to be the founder of a people that will spread out in the generations descended from me, the God whom we acknowledge as the highest will live in the blood that flows through them; He reveals Himself to us in the consciousness of our people. This became the norm.
Now, throughout all ages, a higher recognition of the divine-spiritual is passing through: the recognition of the mysteries. This is not dependent on those other, special forms. During the time of the ancient Atlantean development, it was possible to look into the divine-spiritual foundation of existence through a certain astral-etheric clairvoyance; it was possible to develop one's inner being and attain a knowledge of mysteries or oracles. And even in the time when Hebrew knowledge was the norm, it was possible to ascend in certain places by recognizing the divine not in the body, as the Abrahamites did, but outside the body; one could ascend to the divine-spiritual from the point of view of the eternal by raising one's eternal nature to behold the divine-spiritual.
You can now easily imagine that this was necessary for Abraham. He learned in his own special way, through a physical organ, through physical knowledge, to know the divine-spiritual. In this way he came to know the guiding God of the world. If he wanted to place himself vividly in the overall path of development, it was infinitely important for him to recognize that the God who reveals Himself in the consciousness of the people is the same God who has been recognized in the mysteries throughout all ages as the creative and forming Deity. So Abraham had to be able to identify his God with the God of the mysteries. This was only possible under one very specific condition. Under one very specific condition, he had to be given the certainty that the same forces that speak in the mysteries in a higher way also speak in the consciousness of the people. If we want to understand this certainty, we must consider a fact of human evolution.
In my book “An Outline of Esoteric Science,” you can read that there were initiates in ancient Atlantis who were called oracle priests; the name is not important. I have also pointed out that one of these great initiates was the leader of all Atlantean oracles, the Sun initiate, in contrast to the subordinate oracle sites of Atlantis, which housed Mercury, Mars, Jupiter initiates, and so on. I have also pointed out that this great Sun initiate, the leader of the Sun Oracle, was also the great leader of the significant cultural colony that moved from the West to the East, from Atlantis to the interior of Asia, in order to radiate from there and inaugurate the post-Atlantean culture. This great initiate, who was already great at that time, withdrew to mysterious places in the interior of Asia. He first gave those great sages, whom we call the holy Rishis, the opportunity to be great teachers of their people. And it was he, this great, mysterious initiate, who also gave Zarathustra or Zoroaster his initiation.
However, Zarathustra and the Indian rishis were given different initiations, for they had different tasks. The rishis were given an initiation such that, as they developed their inner lives, they were able to express the great mysteries of existence as if by themselves. This made them the great leaders and teachers of the pre-Vedic, ancient Indian culture. For them, it was still something that had been created artificially, but in this way it was quite similar to the ancient Atlantean clairvoyance, which was distributed only individually among the seven rishis. Each of the seven rishis had his own specific area. Just as the various oracle sites had their own special areas, so each of the seven rishis had his own special task. And a council spoke when each of the seven Rishis said what he knew of the primordial wisdom of the world. They had received this from the great initiate of the sun, who had transplanted the ancient Atlantean wisdom from the West to the East and had passed it on in a special way to those who were to become the bearers of the post-Atlantean culture. In another way, he gave it to Zarathustra, so that Zarathustra could speak as I have also indicated.
The Rishis said: In order to attain the highest divine-spiritual, one must regard everything in the environment, everything that presents itself to the outer senses, as Maya or illusion; one must turn away from it and sink one's gaze completely inward: then a world other than the one before one arises within one. So, turning away from the illusory world of Maya and developing one's own inner self in order to ascend to the divine-spiritual spheres—that was the teaching of the ancient Indian Rishis. Zarathustra took a different view. He did not turn away from what manifests itself externally. He did not say: The outer is Maya or illusion, from which we must turn away. Instead, he said: This Maya or illusion is the revelation, the real garment of divine-spiritual existence. We must not turn away from it, but on the contrary, we must explore it. We must see in the sun-light body the outer fabric in which Ahura Mazda weaves and lives!
In a certain sense, Zarathustra's point of view was the opposite of that of the ancient Rishis. It is precisely this that made post-Indian culture so significant: it sought to impress upon the outer world what human beings can achieve through their spiritual activity. And we have also seen how Zarathustra transferred the best he had to give in the manner described to Moses and Hermes. In order for the wisdom of Moses to bear fruit in the right way and sprout as a seed, it had to be immersed in the folklore that had its roots in Abraham, the forefather of the Jewish people. For Abraham had first developed within himself the capacity to acquire a consciousness of Yahweh. But he had to know that the God who could reveal Himself to his innermost being through the physical powers of cognition spoke with the same voice as the eternal, all-pervading God of the mysteries, only that He revealed Himself in a limited way, namely in the way Abraham was able to recognize Him.
It is not readily possible for such a significant being as the great Atlantean sun initiate to speak immediately in an understandable language to those who live at any given time and have a special mission. Such a high individuality as the great sun initiate, who in his individuality leads an eternal existence, of whom it was rightly said—to indicate the eternal character of this individuality—that one should not mention his name or age, nor his father or mother, such a great leader of human existence can only reveal himself by taking on something that makes him related to those to whom he can reveal himself. Thus, in order to give Abraham the appropriate enlightenment, the teacher of the Rishis, the teacher of Zarathustra, took on a form in which he wore the etheric body that had been preserved by Abraham's forefather, the same etheric body that was already present in Abraham's forefather, in Shem, the son of Noah. This etheric body of Shem had been preserved, just as the etheric body of Zarathustra had been preserved for Moses, and the great initiate of the solar mystery made use of it in order to reveal himself to Abraham in a comprehensible way. This encounter between Abraham and the great initiate of the solar mystery is the encounter described to us in the Old Testament as the encounter between Abraham and the king, the priest of the highest God, Melchizedek or Malek-Zadik, as he has come to be called (Genesis 14:18-20). This is an encounter of the greatest, most universal significance, this encounter of Abraham with the great initiate of the mystery of the sun, who – so as not to startle him, so to speak – revealed himself in the etheric body of Shem, the progenitor of the Semitic tribe. And the Bible points meaningfully to something that is unfortunately too little understood, namely, where that which Melchizedek is able to give Abraham can come from, so to speak. What can Melchizedek give Abraham? He can give him the secret of the sun's existence, which Abraham can of course only understand in his own way, the same thing that lies behind the Zarathustra revelation, which Zarathustra first pointed to prophetically.
If we imagine the fact that Zarathustra pointed his favorite disciples to what lives spiritually behind the sun's light body as Ahura Mazdao, saying: Look, behind this there is something that is not yet united with the earth, but which will one day pour into the earth's evolution and descend upon the earth — if we acknowledge that Zarathustra could only prophesy the sun spirit, the Christ, of whom he said: He will come in a human body — then we will have to say that for the person who was to prepare and later bring about the incarnation of Christ on earth, even greater depths of this solar mystery had to be revealed. This happened because Zarathustra's teacher himself exerted influence on Abraham at that encounter, drawing his influence, so to speak, from the same source from which the Christ influence comes. This is symbolically hinted at again in the Bible when it says: When Abraham goes out to meet Melchizedek, this king of Salem, this priest of the highest of the gods, brings him bread and grape juice. “Bread and grape juice” are distributed again later: when the mystery of Christ is to be expressed for his followers at the institution of the Lord's Supper, it is done through bread and grape juice! By emphasizing the equality of the sacrifice in such a meaningful way, it is pointed out that it is the same source from which Melchizedek draws and from which Christ draws.
Thus, there was to be an influence from what was later to descend upon the earth, via the detour of Melchizedek. And this influence was to be exerted upon the great preparer of the later event, upon Abraham. And the result of Abraham's encounter with Melchizedek was that Abraham now felt that what drives him, what he addresses with the name Yahweh or Jehovah as the highest he can conceive, comes from the same source from which all the highest earthly knowledge comes, the consciousness of the initiated, from the highest God who permeates and lives through all worlds. This was the consciousness that Abraham could now carry forward. Another consciousness dawned on Abraham: the consciousness that now, with the blood of generations flowing down through the people, there must be something that can only be compared to what can be seen in the mysteries when the clairvoyant gaze is directed toward the secrets of existence and understands the language of the cosmos.
I have already pointed out how the mysteries express the secrets of the cosmos by speaking a language of the stars and using the secrets of the cosmos as a means of expression for what one wants to say. There were times when the mystery teachers clothed what they wanted to express in words and images taken from the constellations of the stars. They saw, as it were, in the paths of the stars and in the positions of the stars in relation to one another, the images through which they wanted to express what human beings experience spiritually when they rise up to the divine-spiritual.
What did people read in this star writing in the wisdom of the mysteries? They read the secrets of the deity that weaves through and lives through the world. The order of the stars was the obvious expression of the deity. People looked into all worlds and said, “There the deity announces itself! And how it announces itself is described to us by the orders and harmonies of the stars. Thus, for such a view of the worlds, the world god lived out in the order of the stars.
If this world god was to live out in a special way in the mission of the Hebrew people, he had to live out in the same order that is preordained in the cosmos in the paths of the stars. This means that through the blood of the generations, which contained the external instrument of Yahweh's revelations, a similar order had to be expressed as that expressed in the paths of the stars. In other words, there had to be something in Abraham's descendants that was a reflection of what the star script is in the cosmos, in the succession of generations, in the blood relationship. That is why Abraham received the promise: Your descendants shall be as numerous as the stars in the sky! This is the correct interpretation of the sentence that usually reads: “Your descendants shall be as numerous as the stars in the sky,” which only refers to the multitude of descendants (Genesis 22:17). But it is not the multitude that is meant, but rather that there should be such an order in the descendants as was perceived in the language of the gods in the grouping of the stars in the sky. There one looked up into such an order as is represented in the order of the zodiac. And in the position of the wandering stars, the planets in relation to the zodiac, those constellations were expressed in which one found the language to express the deeds of the gods as they weave through the universe. This fixed bond, which is represented in the zodiac and in the relationship of the planets to the twelve signs of the zodiac, had to be expressed in the blood relationship in the descendants of Abraham.
Thus, in the twelve sons of Jacob, in the twelve tribes of the Hebrew people, we have the images of the twelve signs of the zodiac. Just as the language of the gods is expressed above in the twelve zodiac images, so Yahweh expresses himself in the blood of the Jewish people flowing down through the generations, which divided itself into the twelve tribes according to the twelve sons of Jacob. We designate what fits into this constellation of the zodiac with the names of the planets: Venus, Mercury, Moon, Sun, and so on. And we have seen how what takes place in the course of time in the life of the Hebrew people as individual sections can in fact be paralleled in a certain way with the path of the planets through the zodiac: we must parallel David, the royal singer, with Hermes or Mercury; we may parallel the time of the Babylonian captivity, that is, the configuration that received a new impact through the revelation of Yahweh about six centuries before our era, with the name of Venus as a name of our planetary system. This was to be hinted to Abraham. So, for example, the way a personality like David fits into the tribal succession parallels the way Mercury relates to the zodiac. The tribe of Judah, for example, corresponds to the constellation of Leo, and David's placement in the tribe of Judah would correspond in the history of the Hebrew people to what would be the covering of the constellation of Leo by Mercury in the cosmos. Thus, one can read in all the details, in the bloodline, in the strange transfer of the royal or priestly dignity, in the struggles or victories of one tribe or another, in the entire Hebrew history, what the covering of the individual constellations out in the world space is. This was contained in the meaningful words: Your descendants shall be ordered like the harmony of the stars in the sky. We must not see in the documents based on occultism the trivialities that people are so fond of seeing in them, but we must assume that these documents are of infinite depth.
Thus we see in fact how order exists in this succession of generations, which is then described to us in the Gospel of Matthew. We see that this evangelist indicates to us how, in a very special way, the blood of that body was composed, which was first to receive the individuality of Zarathustra, so that this individuality of Zarathustra could bring about the revelation of Christ on earth.
So what had been achieved through the forty-two generations from Abraham to Joseph? What had been achieved was that, with the last in the succession of generations, a mixture of blood had come about which had taken place according to the laws of the starry world, the sacred mysteries. And in this mixing of blood, which the Zarathustra individuality needed in order to carry out the great work, there was an inner order, a harmony that corresponded to one of the most beautiful and significant orders of the star system. Thus, the mixing of blood that Zarathustra found was a reflection of the entire cosmos. This blood, which had been formed through generations, was mixed in the same way as the orders of the cosmos are regulated. All this lies at the basis of that significant document which we now have before us, if I may say so, in a weakened form in the Gospel according to Matthew. This deep mystery of a people becoming a nation as a reflection of a cosmic becoming lies at its basis.
This is how those who initially knew something of the great mystery of Christ felt. They already sensed in the blood that this Matthew Jesus of Nazareth had within him a reflection of the cosmos, a reflection of the spirit that reigns throughout the cosmos. They expressed this mystery by saying: In the blood in which the I that was then Jesus of Nazareth was to live, there lived the spirit of the whole cosmos. If this physical body was to be born, then it had to be an imprint of the spirit of the whole cosmos, of the spirit that reigns in the world. This was originally the formula that the power underlying the mixture of blood that became that of Zarathustra or Jesus of Nazareth was the spirit of our entire cosmos, the very spirit that, after the separation of the sun from our earth, permeated and nurtured that which had separated in the evolution of the world. From the Munich lectures already mentioned, we know that if we do not want to translate the beginning of Genesis, “Bereschit bara Elohim eth haschamajim we'eth ha'aretz,” with the trivial words of today, which no longer correspond to the ancient meaning, but if we seek out the true meaning, then we have to translate it as follows: “In that which had come over from the Saturn, Sun, and Moon existence, the Elohim conceived in cosmic activity that which reveals itself outwardly, that which stirs within. And above what stirred within, and through what stirred, there reigned a dark darkness; but there spread out into it, brooding over it, permeating it with warmth—similar to a hen brooding over an egg—the creative spirit of the Elohim, Ruach-Elohim.” What brooded there as spirit is the same, exactly the same, as what then brought about the orders that could be expressed in a certain way through the constellation of the stars. Thus, the original initiates of the Christ mystery felt that the mixing of the blood of Jesus of Nazareth was a reflection of what Ruach-Elohim was working through the world's existence. And so they called the blood that had been prepared in this way for the great event “created by the spirit of the world's existence,” by the same spirit that is called Ruach in that meaningful description in Genesis, in “Bereshit bara...”.
This sacred meaning, which is truly greater than any other, trivial meaning, lies first as the higher meaning underlying what is called “the conception from the Holy Spirit of the universe.” This underlies what is contained in the words: “And the mother of this being was filled with the power of this Spirit of the universe” (Matthew 1:18). We need only feel the full magnitude of such a mystery, and we will then find that in this way of presenting the matter there lies something infinitely higher than in all that is given exoterically in the Conceptio immaculata, in the “Immaculate Conception.” One need only compare two things in the Bible if one wants to recognize the true intention of the Bible and depart from a trivial interpretation of the Immaculate Conception. The first is this: Why would the writer of the Gospel of Matthew list the entire series of generations from Abraham to Joseph if he wanted to say that this entire succession of generations had nothing to do with the birth of Jesus of Nazareth? He takes pains to show how the blood of Abraham is passed down to Joseph, and then he is supposed to say that this blood has nothing to do with the blood of Jesus of Nazareth? And the other fact is that Ruach-Elohim, who is called the Holy Spirit in the Bible, is feminine in the Hebrew language, which must also be taken into consideration in some way. We will come back to this later; for now, I just wanted to give you a sense of how big the concept is that lies at the root of this mystery.
What took place at the beginning of our calendar, and what was known only to the wise men who were truly initiated into the mysteries of the world's existence, was first expressed in Aramaic in the document on which the Gospel of Matthew is based. And not only through occultism, but also through purely philological research, it is possible to prove that this document, which forms the basis of the Gospel of Matthew, already existed in the year 71. You can find the true origin of the Gospels described in my book “Christianity as Mystical Fact.” But if one proceeds with real precision, one can prove philologically that everything that is said about a later conception of the Gospel of Matthew is incorrect; for we can prove that already in the year 71—that is, relatively soon after the events in Palestine—an Aramaic original of the Gospel of Matthew existed. But because I am not here to present philological facts, but only those of spiritual science, I will refer to only one example from Talmudic literature, which is completely confirmed by Jewish scholars.
In Talmudic literature, we find a reference to Rabbi Gamaliel II being involved in an inheritance dispute with his sister, which arose because his father had been killed in a dispute with the Romans in 70. And we are told that Rabbi Gamaliel II stood before a judge who, according to everything that Talmudic literature tells us, was a half-Christian, a so-called Jew-Christian. Such people already existed in those judicial offices that had been set up by the Romans for the Jews. Something strange then happened: Rabbi Gamaliel II fought with his sister over the inheritance, over his father's fortune. And before his judge, who already knew something about Christianity, he asserted that according to Jewish law, only the son, but not the daughter, could inherit, and that therefore the inheritance belonged to him alone. The judge then pointed out to him that the Torah had been abolished in the circles in which he was a judge, and since he was seeking justice and judgment from him, he should not judge merely according to Jewish law, but according to the law that had replaced the Torah. All this happened, as already mentioned, in the year 71, when Gamaliel's father had been killed in the persecution of the Jews in the year 70. Now Rabbi Gamaliel found no other way out than to bribe the judge. The next day, the bribed judge made a statement, which was borrowed from the Aramaic original of the Gospel of Matthew. And what did the judge say? That Christ “had not come to break the law of Moses, but to fulfill it!” (Matthew 5:17). He believed that he could thus ease his conscience by bending the law, saying that he was judging in accordance with Christ when he awarded the inheritance to Gamaliel.
From this we know that in the year 71 there was a Christian document from which words were borrowed that are now contained in the Gospel of Matthew. We therefore have this outward sign—namely, that passage is quoted in Aramaic—that this document, this Aramaic original of the Gospel of Matthew, was at least partially available at that time. What occult research has to say about this we will have to discuss later. This should only be mentioned here to show that when one draws on external science, one must not do what is so often done, namely, gather together everything that one happens to be able to read, while ignoring, for example, the Talmudic literature, which is extremely important for what can be recognized exoterically about these things.
So we see that we are also on quite solid ground externally if we date the Gospel of Matthew relatively early. With that alone, I would say, we have external proof that the people who were involved in the writing of the Gospel of Matthew were not very far removed in time from the events in Palestine, so that even exoterically it is certain that one could not simply lie to people's faces and say that the Christ Jesus of whom we speak did not live at the beginning of our calendar. For it was not even half a century later, so that one still had to speak to eyewitnesses and could not tell them things that had not happened. These are things that are important exoterically, and we only mention them as proof of the exoteric nature of the matter.
We have seen how, out of the mysteries of the cosmos, events were brought about in human evolution in order to create, out of the filtered blood, as it were, of the Hebrew people, who had taken the order of the universe into themselves, a body in which the great initiate Zarathustra could incarnate again. For the Gospel of Matthew speaks of the Zarathustra individuality, and it is no other individuality than the Zarathustra individuality of which this Gospel speaks. Now we must not think that everything we are bringing to light, as it were, from the deepest secrets of world evolution, took place quite openly before the eyes of all. Even for the contemporaries, it was shrouded in a deep mystery and understandable only to the few initiates. It is therefore understandable that such profound silence reigns over everything that happened at that time as the greatest event in human evolution. And when historians today refer to their documents and say that these documents are silent about this event, we should not be surprised, but find it quite natural.
Now that we have characterized how this greatest event in the evolution of humanity was prepared from the side of Zarathustra, we must now consider other preparatory currents leading up to this great event. Much, much happened in the evolution of humanity immediately before and also immediately after these events surrounding Christ took place. This event had actually been prepared long before. Just as it was prepared from the outside by Zarathustra sending Moses and Hermes, by Melchizedek, by the Sun Mystery itself preparing the outer shell of Jesus of Nazareth, so another was prepared, as it were, a side current of this great current, which, even though it is only a side current, it still has something to do with the great main current that comes from Zarathustra. This side current is slowly preparing itself in those places that are also indicated to us by external history, in that we are made aware of certain sects that sought a special soul development and which are described to us by Philo as the “Therapeutae.” The Therapeutae were members of a mysterious sect who sought to purify their souls through inner means in order to bring forth what had been contaminated by external intercourse and external knowledge, thereby raising themselves to pure spiritual spheres. A branch of this sect of therapists, in which this secondary current continued to develop, were the “Essene” or “Essenes” living in Asia. All these people—you can find a brief description of them in my book Christianity as Mystical Fact—who were united in these sects had a certain common spiritual guidance. Both the Therapeuts and the Essenes had a certain spiritual guidance. And if we want to understand this spiritual guidance exoterically, we must remember what we discussed last year in the lectures on the Gospel of Luke. We mentioned the secret of Gautama Buddha, as it is also treated exoterically in the Oriental scriptures, and we said that anyone who wants to become a Buddha must first become a Bodhisattva in the course of evolution. We explained how the one who is known in history as “Buddha” was also first a Bodhisattva and then became Buddha. Until the twenty-ninth year of his physical existence as the son of King Suddhodana, he was still a Bodhisattva, and only in the twenty-ninth year did he become a Buddha through his inner soul development. There are now a whole series of Bodhisattvas in the development of humanity, and the Bodhisattva who became a Buddha six centuries before our era is one of the Bodhisattvas who guide the development of humanity. Such an individuality, which rises from the dignity of a Bodhisattva to the dignity of a Buddha, does not later reincarnate in a physical body on earth. We have seen how the Buddha manifested himself at the birth of the Jesus of Luke's Gospel by connecting himself with this Jesus, whom we called the Jesus of the Nathanic line, through his etheric body. And we have seen that this is a different Jesus than the one we initially speak of in the Gospel of Matthew.
In this becoming Buddha of the king's son of Suddhodana, we see the conclusion of an ancient development. In fact, this development, which reaches its conclusion with the becoming Buddha of that Bodhisattva, belongs to the same stream to which the holy Rishis of the Indians also belong; but this reached a certain conclusion with the becoming Buddha of that Bodhisattva. When a Bodhisattva becomes a Buddha, his successor takes his place. This is also told in the ancient Indian legend, which says that the Bodhisattva who descended to become the son of King Suddhodana in order to ascend to Buddhahood, passed on the crown of the Bodhisattva to his successor in the spiritual realms before his final descent. So since those times there has been a successor to the Bodhisattva who became Buddha at that time. And this new Bodhisattva, who now continued to work as a Bodhisattva, had a special task for the development of humanity. He was given the special task of spiritually guiding the movement that manifested itself in the Therapeuts and Essenes, so that we recognize in that Bodhisattva, who became the successor of Buddha, the spiritual leader of the Therapeutae and Essene communities. There his influence was at work. This Bodhisattva sent, so to speak, a special individuality into the Essene communities to lead the Essenes under the reign of King Alexander Jannai—approximately 125 to 77 BCE. This special individuality led the Essene communities for about a century before the appearance of Christ Jesus on earth. This personality is well known in occultism, but also in external Talmudic literature.
So, a century before our era, a century before the appearance of Christ on earth, there was an individual who had nothing to do with the Jesus of Luke's Gospel and nothing to do with the Jesus of Matthew's Gospel, a personality who was a leader and guide in the Essene communities. This personality is well known to occultism as a kind of precursor of the Essenes for Christianity; he is also known in Talmudic literature under the name Jesus, the son of Pandira, Jeshu ben Pandira. This Jesus, son of Pandira, about whom evil Jewish literature has fabricated all kinds of stories, which have been reheated in more recent times, this personality, who was a noble and great personality, must not be confused, as some Talmudists do, with the Jesus of Nazareth of whom we speak. We also know this Essene precursor of Christianity in Jesus, the son of Pandira. And we know that this Jeshu ben Pandira was accused of blasphemy and heresy by those who saw blasphemy in the Essene teachings at that time, and that he was first stoned and then, after being stoned, hung on a tree to add shame to his punishment. This is an occult fact, but one that also appears in Talmudic literature.
In this Jeshu ben Pandira, we see a personality who is under the protection of the Bodhisattva, who is the successor of that Bodhisattva who later became the Buddha as the son of King Suddhodana. So the facts are quite clear. We have a kind of preparation a side stream of the main Christian stream in that stream which is dependent on the successor of the Buddha, on the present Bodhisattva, who will later become the Maitreya Buddha and who sent his emissaries into the Essene communities; at that time, it lived out in the missionary who accomplished in the Essene communities what we will learn about in the next lecture.
Thus, we must seek the name Jesus in the individuality of which the Gospels of Matthew and Luke tell us; but we must also seek the name Jesus a century before the beginning of our era in the Essene community, in that noble personality against whom all the evil Talmudic literature is slander, who was accused of blasphemy and heresy, who was first stoned and then hung on a tree.