Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Background to the Gospel of St. Mark
GA 124

6 December 1910, Berlin

IV. The Symbolic Language of the Macrocosm in the Gospel of St. Mark

At the beginning of this lecture Dr. Steiner emphasised that those relatively new to the study of Spiritual Science would find many things difficult to understand. He added that unless the necessary efforts were made by these recent Members to master the elementary principles of Spiritual Science, erroneous ideas would be inevitable.

My book Christianity as Mystical Fact will have made it clear to all of you that if the Gospels are to be rightly understood, they must be regarded as treatises of Initiation. This means that in essence they are adaptations of rites and rituals of Initiation. Scripts of this nature indicated the path along which the candidate was led step by step to the higher worlds, how he must undergo certain experiences and awaken forces slumbering in his soul, how each higher stage was related to the one below, until at the stage of Initiation itself the spiritual world penetrated into his soul and revealed its mysteries. At this stage he gazed into the spiritual worlds and a vista of the Beings of the Hierarchies lay open before him. The content of these Initiation-scripts, then, was a description of the experiences which every candidate for Initiation had to undergo.

In pre-Christian times many human beings were initiated in the different centres of the Mysteries. Generally speaking the process was the same, although there were variations in details. The candidates were led stage by stage to the point where they were able to gaze into the spiritual world and the Beings of the Hierarchies were before them as spiritual—not physical—realities. That is what happened in pre-Christian times. But what did Christianity, what did the Christ Impulse signify for those who had been initiated in the ancient Mysteries? It signified that a Being, known in the physical world as Jesus of Nazareth, had revealed the secrets of the spiritual world in a new way, not in the way that had been customary in the pre-Christian Mysteries. A man who had been initiated according to the ancient rites was able to speak to others about the secrets of the spiritual worlds. But the Christ Event meant that something had come to pass whereby without having traversed the usual paths, Jesus of Nazareth was able to speak of these secrets through what happened at the Baptism in Jordan, when the Christ Being entered into him. From the moment when in an event of supreme historical significance, Jesus of Nazareth was thus initiated, the Christ Spirit spoke to those around Him of the secrets of the spiritual worlds. Christ made manifest on the physical plane, for all the world to see, something that in former times could be attained only in the secrecy of the Mysteries by those who were to be initiated: they could then go forth and speak to their fellow-men of the secrets of the spiritual worlds. We can imagine ourselves looking into sanctuaries of the ancient Mysteries and seeing how the aspirants were initiated by the Hierophants and were then able to look into the spiritual worlds and go forth to teach of them. All the rites of Initiation took place in the deepest secrecy of the temples; and outside the Mysteries there was no possibility of speaking at first hand about the spiritual worlds. But now, what had been enacted time and time again in the secrecy of the Mysteries was brought into the open in Palestine, presented there as an historical event, as the story of Jesus of Nazareth, which culminated in an Initiation of supreme significance in world-history. This was the Mystery of Golgotha. The supreme Mystery enacted as an historic fact before the eyes of all the world—this is how we must picture the connection of the Mystery of Golgotha with the Mysteries of pre-Christian times.

Now the directives for Initiation, although concerned in essentials with the same stages, differed in details among the peoples living in different parts of the Earth and these directives were adapted to the nature of the individuals living in different places at different times. Let us think of the soul of one of those generally called the Evangelists who participated in the writing of our Gospels. From their own occult training such men had some knowledge of the directives for Initiation among various peoples and in various Mysteries. They knew what experiences a man must undergo before he could proclaim the secrets of the spiritual worlds and of the Hierarchies. And now, through the events in Palestine and the Mystery of Golgotha, they had been made aware that what could previously be witnessed only by those who had attained Initiation in the Mysteries, had taken place openly on the stage of world-history and would enter more and more deeply into the hearts and souls of all men.

The Evangelists were not biographers in our sense of the word. They did not include in their writings details of no significance to the world which it is quite unnecessary for anyone to know. They were not the kind of biographers who ferret out every detail of a man's private affairs. They described the life of Christ by saying that in Jesus of Nazareth, in whom the Christ was present, something happened which had been witnessed again and again in the Mysteries but never as an historic event, concentrated into a few years. It was now an historic reality, yet it was a repetition of the temple-rituals.—The life of Jesus could therefore have been described by specifying the stages passed through in other circumstances during the process of Initiation.

The directives for Initiation in the ancient Mysteries are found again in the Gospels and indications are given there of the reason why what had formerly taken place in the deep secrecy of the temples had now been transferred to the great arena of world-history. And it is the writer of St. Mark's Gospel who, at the outset, states why he is in a position to write of an historic event which in fact fulfils a rule of Initiation though enacted on an infinitely greater scale. From the beginning he speaks of how humanity has developed in such a way that this great event might come to pass and Initiation might be transferred from the secrecy of the temple-sanctuaries to the arena of history. He proclaims that this is connected with an event foretold by the Hebrew prophets. For the Mystery of Golgotha had been foreseen and foretold by the true Initiates, among whom the Hebrew prophets may, in a certain sense, be included.

If we try to penetrate into the soul of a man such as the prophet Isaiah, the meaning of the words at the beginning of St. Mark's Gospel is approximately this: that a time will come when the souls of men will not be as they are at present. This time is already now being prepared for.—This was Isaiah's view in his own day. What did he really mean? The deeply impressive words of this prophet with which St. Mark's Gospel begins, are, as you know, usually rendered:

‘Behold, I send my messenger before thy face which shall prepare thy way before thee. The voice of one crying in the wilderness. Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.'1Dr. Steiner quoted the translation by Carl Weizsacker.

In these words the prophet Isaiah points to the greatest event in all world-history—the Mystery of Golgotha in Palestine. You know what trouble we have had when studying the other Gospels to make the most important passages to some extent intelligible in translation. What really matters is to render the turns of phrases in a way that will convey the profound meaning of the original language. The words should not merely lend themselves to theoretical interpretation but be able to arouse feelings similar to those aroused in men who understood the inherent character of the language in current use. Language at that time was not as abstract, dry and prosaic as it has now become. Its character as the means of verbal expression was such that in addition to the usual meaning of the words spoken the hearer was always aware of a richer significance and fullness of content and knew precisely what that content indicated. At that time a whole world of meaning was heard in the words. The ancient Hebrew language was particularly rich in this respect, even when the picture used was drawn from the realm of the senses. Phrases such as ‘prepare the way’ or ‘make his paths straight’ are pictures derived entirely from the sense-world—as if a way, or a path, were being prepared with spades and shovels. But it was a peculiar feature of Hebrew—a language of outstanding grandeur among the others—that behind these expressions which were applied to outer things, spiritual worlds could be apprehended with great exactness. Fanciful interpretations were unheard of and the procedure was unlike that adopted by our modern scholars when they read all sorts of implications into the works of poets. Arbitrary interpolations were quite impossible. This was partly because in the ancient Hebrew language the vowels were not marked in the script, and by varying them, world-secrets could be revealed in the sounds themselves. In those days men had a true feeling for all this.

In Greek—the language of the Gospel texts—this was no longer the case to the same extent. All the same, far better renderings than those produced by most translators of the Gospels would have been possible, even without occult knowledge. What has happened is that for the most part one translator has just copied another without any searching philological study of the passages in the Greek texts. Later on I will give you definite examples of errors that have been made. I do not want to interrupt our study to-day and will try, not on a philological basis but with the help of knowledge derived from spiritual-scientific investigations, to clarify the most significant passage occurring at the beginning of the Gospel of St. Mark. The following is a prophecy of Isaiah, showing what the event of Palestine was to mean.

The Greek text is as follows:

Ἰδοὺ, ἀποστέλλω τὸν ἄγγελόν μου πρὸ προσώπου σου, ὃς κατασκευάσει τὴν ὁδόν σου.
Φωνὴ βοῶντος ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ, Ἑτοιμάσατε τὴν ὁδὸν Κυρίου, εὐθείας ποιεῖτε τὰς τρίβους αὐτοῦ.

(Idou egō apostellō ton angelon mou pro prosōpou sou, hos kataskeuasei tēn hodon sou emprosthen sou,
Phōnē boōntos en tē erēmō: Hetoimasate tēn hodon Kyriou, eutheiās poieite tās tribous autou.)

It is essential to realise from the beginning that the word Angelos (‘angel’ or ‘messenger’) was used in those ancient times only in the sense in which we use it when, in speaking of the Hierarchies, we are referring to the Beings of the hierarchical rank immediately above man. When the words τόѵ ἂγγελόѵ occur, we must realise that a Being of this rank is meant; otherwise the whole sense of the passage will be lost. Spiritual Science alone can provide the basis for understanding such a passage. But once understood it can be a foundation for what occultism has to say about the Christ-event. What is the fundamental significance of the Christ Impulse? We have expressed it as follows.—Through the Christ Impulse the human soul became conscious for the first time that an Ego, an ‘I’, was to find a place within it, a self-conscious ‘I’ through which in the further course of Earth-evolution there must be revealed all the secrets formerly revealed by the astral body through natural clairvoyance.

In the epoch of post-Atlantean culture preceding our own, men were still endowed, to some extent, with faculties of clairvoyance which enabled them to see into the spiritual world. In certain abnormal conditions of soul the secrets of the spiritual world streamed into them and they were able to gaze into the realms of the Hierarchies. Vision of the Hierarchy of the Angels persisted the longest and was the most frequent. The Angels were known as Beings belonging to the rank immediately above man. In the times of ancient clairvoyance men were not aware that they themselves possessed a faculty capable of leading them into the spiritual worlds; they regarded this possibility as a grace vouchsafed to them from without, as the implanting of spiritual powers in their souls. Hence the Prophets could point to the future, saying: “The time will come when man will be conscious of his ‘I’ and know that it is by the self-conscious ‘I’ that the secrets of the spiritual worlds will be unveiled. Man will be able to say: I penetrate into the secrets of the spiritual world through the power of the ‘I’ within me.”

But preparation was necessary before this stage could be reached. As the lowest rank of the Hierarchies, man had to be prepared by being sent an example of what he must become. The ‘Messenger’ or ‘Angel’ was to proclaim to man that he was to become an ‘I’ in the full sense of the word. And whereas the mission of earlier Angels had been to reveal the spiritual world, it was now the mission of a particular Angel to carry the revelations to a further stage, to make known to man that he was to enter into full possession of the Ego, the ‘I’. The earlier revelations were of a different character, not intended for a self-conscious ‘I’.

Isaiah proclaimed that the time of the mystery of the ‘I’ was to come and that from the host of the Angels one would be deputed to announce this.—Only in this sense can we understand what is meant when it is said that the Angel, the Messenger, was ‘sent before’—that is to say, sent before man who was to become a self-conscious ‘I’. The one who had been ‘sent before’ was to come as a Being of the Hierarchy of Angels. No Angel had yet spoken to man as a self-conscious ‘I’. So this messenger of whom the prophet Isaiah speaks is to make men aware that they must prepare to make a place in their souls for the ‘I’, the fully independent ‘I’. This passage therefore draws attention to a great revolution in the development of the human soul: whereas hitherto men had always to go out of their bodies in order to reach the spiritual world, henceforward they would be able to remain within their own ‘I’ and draw forth from the ‘I’ itself the secrets of that world.

Let us compare a soul of remote antiquity with a soul living near the time of Christ. When a man of very early pre-Christian centuries strove to rise into the higher worlds he could not retain even the degree of self-consciousness so far developed. He was obliged to discard all consciousness of self and be transported into the world of the Hierarchies, the world of pure spirituality. His consciousness was entirely suppressed.—Such were the conditions in the early pre-Christian era.

What, then, was the situation of a man living in times when in order to enter the spiritual world it was no longer necessary for self-consciousness to be suppressed but when the stage had been reached for the development of the ‘I’? Even in the Atlantean epoch the ‘I’ was already present—in a certain sense; but complete assurance that the greatest secrets and mysteries could flow from the ‘I’ itself was brought by the Christ Impulse. That is why a man who had achieved the old type of Initiation felt that if he desired to penetrate into the spiritual world and receive its revelations, he must suppress a certain part of his soul and make other parts of it particularly active. The part of his inner being that was gradually to grow into the ‘I’ had to be suppressed, darkened, to become a desolate waste in the soul. On the other hand the astral body—the body which could make a certain degree of clairvoyance possible—must be fired into activity. And then the old clairvoyant visions lit up within it.

I said that the ‘I’ was in a certain sense already present, but could not be used to investigate the secrets of the spiritual world. The ‘I’ had to be suppressed, the astral body fired into activity. But more and more it became impossible to quicken the impulses in the astral body. In olden times one of man's most elementary powers was that he was able to suppress the ‘I’ and kindle the astral body into activity; the secrets of the spiritual world then streamed into him. But progress in evolution was actually achieved just because the astral body became more and more incapable of receiving the secrets of the spiritual world. Man was obliged to admit to himself that his astral body was becoming more and more incapable of attaining what human beings had once been able to attain with the old faculty of clairvoyance, and the ‘I’ within him was not strong enough yet to achieve anything itself.

It was the best clairvoyants who were the most strongly aware of something barren, something desolate in the soul. This was the ‘I’, to which no impulse had yet been given. They were aware, too, how impossible it was to reach the spiritual world through the ‘I’. This will give you an idea of the feelings and mood of a man living in the period just before the coming of Christ. Such a man was bound to say to himself that he could no longer unfold in his astral body the powers it once possessed: but as yet he had no alternative impulse, so that there was something barren in his soul, something that could not rise into the spiritual world.

When the time for the Christ Impulse was drawing near, certain methods of training were adopted with the object of acquainting men with that province of the soul which could not yet be filled with the spirit. An individual who aspired to gain entry into the higher worlds was told that he could not rise into those worlds in his astral body, that he must withdraw into that province within him where he would feel as though he had no contact at all with the external world.

This was the mood of soul in an aspirant for Initiation at the time of the Christ Impulse. He said to himself: I must abandon all hope of reaching the spiritual world through the powers of my astral body; the time for that is past and the ‘I’ is still not ready. But from something within me that is trying to emerge and to penetrate into the spiritual world, I can surmise—no more than surmise—that it is striving with might and main to receive the spiritual impulse.

This experience, known in those days to every seeker for the light of the spirit, was called ‘the way into the solitude of the soul’, or also, ‘the way into the solitude’. The messenger who was to prepare for the Christ-event had therefore to describe the way into the solitude to those who wished to hear about the approaching Impulse. He had himself to know the depths of solitude, to preach from actual experience of the solitude of the soul.

In your study of St. Mark's Gospel you will come to realise more and more clearly that certain lofty spiritual Beings through whom matters of vital importance in human evolution are to take place, look for their instruments in suitable beings of flesh and blood and then descend to live in the soul incarnated in such a body. The messenger of whom Isaiah spoke—who must not be thought of as a man in the ordinary sense—took possession of the soul of the reincarnated Elias—John the Baptist—lived in him and was destined to proclaim to men that the Christ Impulse was at hand.

Where, then, did the voice of this messenger resound? It resounded in what I have just described to you as. ‘the solitude of the soul’. In St. Mark's Gospel we read: ‘Hear the cry in the solitude of the soul’. ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω (tē erēmō) must not be translated as if the image of a ‘wilderness’ were meant in an external sense. ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω really means: in the solitude. The imagery used helps us to glimpse the spiritual world.

We shall have a truer understanding of this expression if we devote a little study to the meaning conveyed by another word, Kyrios, or Lord, as in the usual rendering of this passage. ‘Prepare ye the way of the Lord.’ The actual meaning is still discernible in the Greek but can be confirmed by comparison with ancient tradition. In the language of those early times the meaning of a word such as this was not as abstract and shallow as it is to-day. In the age of materialism men have become superficial in their attitude to language and no longer feel as they once did, that words are the bodies of soul-beings, soul-realities, that a whole world lives in the words. The most that can be done to-day is to try to revive something of this feeling, as I have attempted to do in the Mystery Play, The Portal of Initiation.

What men felt when they uttered the word Kyrios in circumstances such as those indicated, was that it was an image, a picture, of happenings in the inner life of the soul. They felt the ‘I’ rising upwards from the depths towards the surface of the soul as the appearance of a Lord and Master, the Director and Ruler of the soul-forces. Nowadays we speak of thinking, feeling and willing as servants of the soul. But within the soul there is a Lord, a Kyrios: the ‘I’ or Ego. In olden times man could not say: ‘I think’. He said: ‘It thinks’—or, ‘it feels, it wills in me.’

At the time when the Lord of the soul-forces, the ‘I’, appeared as Ruler, the result of this crucial change in the evolution of humanity was that man now said: ‘I think, I feel, I will.’ Hitherto the soul had lived in a certain subconscious state, the captive as it were of its own forces. Now, the Lord of those forces, the ‘I’, was at hand. This passage in St. Mark's Gospel does not refer to any personality or being but to the emergence of the ‘I’ as the Lord in the whole structure of the soul. ‘The Lord within the soul is at hand.’

This was also made known in the temples where preparation was in train for what was now to take place in mankind. In a mood of holy awe and reverence it was affirmed: Hitherto the soul has had within it only the forces of thinking, feeling and willing—they are its servants: but now the Lord, the Kyrios, is drawing near.—This mighty process will continue to unfold until the end of the Earth-period and its power will constantly increase. The impulse is given by Christ and His life marks the supreme moment in earthly time. The hour on the cosmic clock indicates the point when the ‘I’ becomes more and more powerful as Lord of the soul-forces. The goal will be attained when the Earth dies in the Cosmos and man rises to higher stages of existence.

Only if you are able to feel what this means can you have an idea of what was prophesied by Isaiah and repeated by John the Baptist. Both of them wished to call attention to the crucial event in the evolution of the human soul. But the word εὐθεἱαç (eutheiās) must not be translated ‘straight’, as is usual; the right rendering is ‘open’—that is to say, not only ‘straight’ but ‘open’, meaning that the paths along which the Kyrios comes to the human soul are clear. But man must himself do something to enable the Kyrios to take hold of the soul. The way must be made free, must be made open. In short, if the passage is to be translated at all intelligibly and at the same time kept fairly close to the conventional version, it would run somewhat as follows:

‘Mark well!’—‘behold’ is not really correct—‘I send my angel before the ‘I’ in you; he will prepare the way. Hear the cry in the solitude of the soul’—the cry for the Lord of the soul. (The word ‘soul’ is not actually used but was intuitively understood.) ‘Prepare the way of the Lord of the soul; labour to make the path open for him.’

These sentences give an approximate idea of what can be felt in the words of Isaiah. The Angel in the soul of John the Baptist used them once again.

What made this possible? To answer this question we shall have to give some thought to the nature of John the Baptist's own Initiation and to its effect in his soul.

You know from earlier lectures3See Macrocosm and Microcosm, notably lectures 1 and 3. A course of eleven lectures given in Vienna, March 1910. that a man can be initiated either by descending into the depths of his own soul or by being prepared in such a way that his soul passes out of the body and its forces pour into the Macrocosm. Among different peoples these two paths were adopted in very diverse forms. When a man wished to pour his soul into the Macrocosm, the twelve stages to be passed were symbolised, so to speak, by the twelve signs of the Zodiac. The souls flowed out in particular directions, to particular regions of the Macrocosm. Generally speaking, a very great deal was achieved, especially for the realisation of some particular purpose in world-evolution, when a soul had developed so far that it could receive all the forces originating from the cosmic secrets of a particular zodiacal constellation. The practice in all the ancient rites of Initiation was that a candidate should be initiated into the secrets of the Macrocosm in such a way that his soul flowed out in the direction, let us say, of Capricorn, or in the case of other candidates, in the directions of Cancer, Libra, Virgo, and so on. I have said repeatedly that there are twelve different possibilities of passing out into the Macrocosm, directions indicated symbolically by the twelve constellations of the Zodiac. If a candidate was unable at once to attain the highest Initiation, the Sun Initiation, but could achieve a partial Initiation only, his soul was directed to the secrets connected with one particular constellation. But his vision must become independent of everything material. This meant that either in the rites of the Mysteries or, as in the case of John the Baptist, by grace from above, the candidate's gaze was guided to a constellation when the Earth lay between him and the constellation—that is to say, by night. Physical eyes see the physical constellation only. But when vision can penetrate through the material Earth—which means that the constellation is masked by the material Earth—then what is seen is not the physical but the spiritual reality, that is to say, the secrets which the constellation expresses.

The vision of John the Baptist was trained in such a way that at night he could look through the material Earth into the constellation of Aquarius. When the Angel took possession of his soul he had attained the Aquarius Initiation. Thus John the Baptist was able to place all his faculties and all he knew and felt at the disposal of the Angel, in order that through the Angel the secrets connected with the Aquarius Initiation might be proclaimed and the announcement made of the coming of the ‘I’, the χὐριοç, the Lord of the soul-forces.

At the same time, however, the Baptist proclaimed that the time had come when this Aquarius Initiation must be replaced by another, which would make fully intelligible the approaching rulership of the ‘I’. Therefore he said to his intimate disciples: I am one who is able to place at the disposal of my Angel all the forces coming from the Aquarius Initiation: but after me must come one whose forces are derived from an even higher source.

If you follow the course of the Sun in the daytime from the constellation of Aries, through Taurus, Gemini and so on, to Virgo, you must follow its progress at night from Libra on to Aquarius and Pisces. This is the direction of the spiritual Sun. John had attained the Aquarius Initiation and announced that He who was to come after him would possess the powers of the Pisces Initiation—the Initiation that followed his own and was regarded as the higher. Hence John the Baptist declared to his disciples: Through the Aquarius Initiation I can place at the disposal of my Angel only those powers which enable him to proclaim the coming of the χὐριοç the Lord; but there will come One who has the powers symbolised by the Pisces Initiation; and into him the Christ Himself will enter!

With these words John the Baptist pointed to Jesus of Nazareth; and for this reason, tradition assigned to Christ Jesus the symbol of Pisces, the Fishes. Moreover because every outer event is a symbol for inner happenings, fishermen were assigned as helpers of the Pisces Initiate. All these happenings are external, historical events and at the same time profoundly symbolic of the spiritual secrets.

John proclaimed: A higher form of Initiation will be vouchsafed to mankind! He himself could give only the Initiation that comes from Aquarius and he called himself an Aquarian, a Water-man. We must realise more and more clearly that astronomical and cosmic secrets are connected with the images used to express the secrets of Man. John said: ‘I have baptised you with water!’ Baptism with water lay within the power of those who had received from heaven the Initiation of Aquarius. The spiritual Sun progresses from Aquarius to Pisces (representing the progress from John the Baptist to Jesus of Nazareth) and when a being appeared in the world who had attained the Initiation of the Fishes and was therefore able to receive the spiritual impulse which must be the instrument of the Pisces Initiation—it was then possible for him to baptise, not only as John had baptised, with water, but in the higher sense described by John as ‘baptism with the Holy Ghost’.

In this lecture I have put a twofold conception before you. First: the words at the beginning of St. Mark's Gospel indicate processes in the historical evolution of humanity and speak of a higher Power—an Angel who speaks through the body of John the Baptist. Second: the passages in question relate to happenings in the heavens—the progress of the spiritual Sun from the constellation of Aquarius to the constellation of Pisces. Every line of St. Mark's Gospel contains something that can be read rightly only if in following the words we always have in mind both a human and a cosmic-astronomical meaning, and when we realise that there lives in man something that in its true significance can be found only in the heavens.

We must grasp the connection between the secrets of the Macrocosm and the secrets of human nature more exactly than is usual. At the end of this lecture I can do no more than hint at what lies behind this and I have only wished to give certain hints of these things. In studying St. Mark's Gospel we shall have to plumb depths of wisdom about which you will have to ponder for a very long time if hints are to lead to anything more. I will try to make clear to you in the following way how this Gospel should be read.

A rainbow appears to a child as something real in the sky and until it is explained to him, he thinks that he can touch and take hold of it with his hands. Later on he learns that a rainbow appears only when there is a certain combination of rain and sunshine; when the conditions of rain and sunshine change, the rainbow disappears. The rainbow is therefore not a reality in itself but only a mirage, an illusion; a combination of rain and sunshine is the reality.

Once we make a little progress on the path of occult knowledge we are likely to have an experience which will remind us of the sort of thing I have said about the rainbow, namely that ultimately there is in the external world no solid reality but only appearances which are sustained by factors outside themselves.—And do you know what this chimera is? It is man himself! Man himself is also such an appearance. If you take him as you see him with your physical senses as being reality, you are much mistaken. You are in fact surrendering to maya, to the great ‘non-being’. The word ‘maya’ is derived from mahat aya—mahat = great; ya = being; a = non, negation; hence maya = the great non-being.

On the path of occult development a man reaches the point where he begins to think of himself as something like the rainbow. He is a chimera, like everything that comes before his physical senses. Even the Sun seen as a physical globe is a chimera. When physical science describes it as a globe of gas in cosmic space, that is good enough for practical purposes; but anyone who takes the globe of gas to be a reality is becoming a victim of maya, of illusion, of non-being. The truth is that the Sun is a meeting-place for Hierarchies of spiritual Beings, whose deeds come to expression in the warmth and light streaming from the Sun. The warmth and light themselves are an illusion; our other perceptions are also illusions. Normally we picture ourselves as having a heart in our breast; but that heart is nothing more than an appearance. What we see as a heart is rather like the rings we see around street lamps when we go out in the evening in an autumn mist; the rings are not really there but are the result of definite conditions. This is also true of the human heart. Imagine that this circle represents the vault of heaven and imagine various kinds of forces streaming in from different directions of the heavens and meeting at a particular point of intersection. In ultimate reality, where we think our heart is there is nothing but these heavenly forces that stream in and intersect. If you can somehow ‘think away’ everything except those instreaming forces, then the point of intersection actually is your heart. The same sort of thing is true of our other organs which are in reality only the outcome of intersecting cosmic forces.

Look at it from another point of view. When you move from one place to another you probably think that it is some impulse inside yourself that makes you move. If you do, then you are falling a victim to what we have called maya. The real fact is that there are forces streaming in from the Macrocosm which intersect, and thus evoke an illusion about the direction in which you are walking and the forces which make you walk. Down on Earth all that you really experience is the intersection of cosmic forces. If we want to get at the truth we have to find out what is going on in the Macrocosm and what the upper and lower cosmic forces are doing. Those forces create the effect of making us think we have a heart or a liver and talk as if we were going from place to place. If we want to express all this in terms of actual reality we should have to describe the movements of cosmic forces.

If we want to give an adequate description of the reality of the Baptism administered by John the Baptist, we should have to refer to what the cosmic forces—those symbolised in Aquarius—were requiring him to do. The ultimate decision had been taken in the great World Lodge and in consequence the necessary forces were sent into John. We must therefore read in the cosmic language accounts of what happened at a particular place on Earth. The writer of St. Mark's Gospel read in the heavens the processes corresponding to the events in Palestine. It is cosmic-astronomical events which he is describing, and so he says: Look at things in this way: here you have a wall on which you can see shadows playing, and if you want to know what ‘causes’ the shadows you must look upward to what is casting those shadows. I am giving you an account of what happened at the Jordan, but those happenings are really the means by which others are reflected on Earth. These things that I am describing come about through the interplay of macrocosmic forces active in the heavens.

The writer of this Gospel is therefore describing cosmic forces, phenomena and happenings in the heavens. And what he describes is the expression, the projection, the shadow-image cast by the happenings in the Macrocosm upon the little area of Palestine on the Earth. Only if we are quite clear about this will any real understanding of the greatness and significance of the Gospel of St. Mark be possible. We had first to form an idea of its contents and to understand what is said at the beginning, namely this: The prophet Isaiah foretold that the Lord of the soul-forces will come to men and that the ‘messenger’ will live in John the Baptist; he will prepare men for the approach of the Lord of the soul-forces.

This messenger had to take up his dwelling in the body of a man who had passed through the Aquarius Initiation. John could thus make possible on Earth the work of an individual such as Jesus of Nazareth; Jesus, on His side, had been prepared for the Pisces Initiation and through it was able to receive the Christ into himself.

Events on the Earth are the reflections of cosmic happenings, related to cosmic evolution as the rainbow is related to rain and sunshine. We must study rain and sunshine if we are to describe the true nature of the rainbow. And if we want to understand what lived in the heart of John the Baptist or in the heart of Jesus of Nazareth who became the vehicle of the Christ, we must study cosmic happenings. For the whole Universe was speaking to men in what took place in Palestine and on Golgotha. The Gospel of St. Mark as it stands merely provides the letters for accounts of mighty cosmic happenings. Whoever thinks otherwise is like someone who sees one set of ink-marks here and another there but has no conception of what the word ‘Lord’ signifies. The truth is that what is recounted in this Gospel amounts only to the letters—and moreover even they are an outermost shell. We must rouse ourselves to understand to what the events in Palestine are pointing, as it were in a play of shadows.

Try to grasp what is meant by saying that earthly events are shadows of macrocosmic events and you will then have taken the first step towards a gradual understanding of St. Mark's Gospel—one of the greatest sacred records in the world.

Vierter Vortrag

Aus meinem Buche «Das Christentum als mystische Tatsache» konnten Sie alle entnehmen, daß die Evangelien, wenn man sie richtig verstehen will, in einer ganz gewissen Weise aufgefaßt werden müssen. Indem ich nun die Betrachtungen über die Evangelien in diesem Winter hier fortsetze, bemerke ich ausdrücklich, daß es ja nicht möglich ist, daß für die jüngeren Mitglieder sozusagen immer wieder vom Anfange angefangen wird, und daß daher gewiß manches in den Ausführungen, die da kommen werden, für jüngere Mitglieder schwer verständlich sein wird. Es ist bereits gelegentlich der Generalversammlung gesagt worden, wie notwendig es ist, daß die jüngeren Mitglieder an den Kursen teilnehmen, die eingerichtet worden sind, damit das Frühere immer nachgeholt werden kann, denn sonst könnten wir nicht weiterschreiten. Aber ich möchte dabei eines ganz besonders bemerken: Es scheint eben nicht durchführbar zu sein, daß die jüngeren Mitglieder wirklich energisch daran arbeiten, die Anfangspartien des geisteswissenschaftlichen Lebens nachzuholen. Deshalb wird es immer wieder und wieder vorkommen - ich will jetzt hypothetisch davon reden -, daß die jüngeren Mitglieder dieses oder jenes, was gewissermaßen den höheren Gebieten der Geisteswissenschaft angehört und gewisse Voraussetzungen macht, unverständlich finden werden und sich deshalb ein ganz sonderbares Urteil über Geisteswissenschaft bilden werden. Das liegt dann an den entsprechenden Mitgliedern, und nicht an dem, was gemeint ist.

In meinem Buche «Das Christentum als mystische Tatsache» ist gezeigt worden, daß wir die Evangelien im wesentlichen aufzufassen haben als Einweihungsbücher. Das heißt, daß diese Evangelien im Grunde genommen nichts anderes sind als in gewisser Art umgeschriebene, alte Einweihungsritualien. Was wird in solchen alten Einweihungs- oder Initiationsvorschriften gestanden haben? In ihnen war vorzugsweise enthalten, wie der Kandidat für die Schulung zu den höheren Welten stufenweise seinen Weg hinaufgeführt werden sollte, wie er nach und nach gewisse innere Erlebnisse, gewisse Erlebnisse seiner Seele durchzumachen hatte, wie er die in seiner Seele schlummernden Kräfte zur Erweckung zu bringen hatte; wie sich eine höhere Stufe an eine niedere angliederte, bis zu jener Stufe der Initiation hinauf, auf welcher hereinbricht in die Seele des zu Initiierenden die geistige Welt, auf welcher an ihn herankommen die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt. Dann kann er also hineinschauen in diese geistige Welt, kann zum Beispiel schauen die verschiedenen Wesenheiten der einzelnen Hierarchien, wie wir sie im Laufe der Zeit aufgezählt und auch in mancherlei Zusammenhängen charakterisiert haben. Was also der Einzuweihende zu tun hat, war der Inhalt solcher Einweihungsbücher.

Wenn wir nun die vorchristlichen Zeiten verfolgen, so finden wir, daß zahlreiche Menschen in den verschiedenen Mysterienstätten eingeweiht wurden - nicht immer in der ganz gleichen, aber im wesentlichen in derselben Art - und hinaufgeführt wurden die Stufen bis zu jenem Punkt, wo sie hineinschauen konnten in die geistige Welt, wo sie die Wesenheiten der einzelnen Hierarchien geisthaft - im Gegensatz zu leibhaft - vor sich haben konnten. Das war so in den vorchristlichen Zeiten. Was bedeutet das Christentum gegenüber diesen Eingeweihten der alten Mysterien? Was bedeutet ihnen gegenüber der Christus-Impuls? Er bedeutet, daß eine Wesenheit, die äußerlich für die Wahrnehmung des physischen Planes bekannt war als Jesus von Nazareth, nicht auf dem gewöhnlichen Wege der alten Mysterien, nicht so wie es in den vorchristlichen Zeiten immer üblich war, die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt offenbarte, sondern in einer andern Art. Eine Persönlichkeit, die im Sinne der alten Einweihungsritualien initiiert worden war, konnte, wenn das große Ereignis, das ich eben charakterisiert habe, an ihrer Seele vorbeigegangen war, hinaustreten zu den andern Menschen und sprechen von den Geheimnissen der geistigen Reiche. Nun war aber mit dem Christus-Ereignis etwas da, wodurch die Persönlichkeit des Jesus von Nazareth von den Geheimnissen der geistigen Reiche sprechen konnte, ohne auf dem von altersher üblichen Wege dazu geführt worden zu sein. Denn diese Persönlichkeit des Jesus von Nazareth wurde dazu geführt dadurch, daß sie bei der sogenannten Jordan-Taufe in sich empfing den Christus-Geist. Von dem Augenblick an, da diese Persönlichkeit bei der Jordan-Taufe, also in einem historischen Ereignis, sozusagen weltgeschichtlich eingeweiht wurde, von diesem Moment an sprach der Christus-Geist — aber in einer viel höheren Weise - von den Geheimnissen der geistigen Reiche zur Umwelt. Es war also mit dem Christus etwas da auf dem physischen Plan, offen für alle Welt, was vorher nur in den Tiefen der Mysterien bis zu einem gewissen Grade eben für die Einzuweihenden erreichbar war, so daß sie dann hinausgehen konnten, um von den Geheimnissen der geistigen Reiche zu ihren Mitmenschen zu reden. Wenn wir uns die Sache bildlich vorstellen wollten, könnten wir sagen: Wir blicken hinein in die alten Mysterientempel und sehen, wie von dem Hierophanten die Persönlichkeiten eingeweiht wurden, so daß sie hineinschauen konnten in die geistigen Reiche und dann hinausgehen und lehren konnten von der geistigen Welt. Das alles entwickelte sich immer in dem tiefsten Geheimnis der Mysterientempel. Und in der Außenwelt, außerhalb der Mysterien, war so etwas wie ein Hinaufgelangen zu der Möglichkeit, von den geistigen Reichen zu sprechen, nicht dagewesen. Jetzt war das, was oft und oft in den Tiefen der Mysterien geschehen war, gleichsam herausgetragen nach Palästina, stellte sich dar als weltgeschichtliches Ereignis, als die Entwickelung des Jesus von Nazareth, stellte sich dar als weltgeschichtliche Initiation in dem Mysterium von Golgatha. Also das Mysterium wie hinausgetragen in die Weltgeschichte, hingestellt als historische Tatsache vor aller Welt - so haben wir den Zusammenhang des Mysteriums von Golgatha mit den Mysterien der alten heiligen Tempel aufzufassen.

Nun waren diese Einweihungsvorschriften, wenn sie auch im wesentlichen dieselben Stufen überall enthielten, doch bei den verschiedenen Völkern an den verschiedenen Orten der Erde durch dieses oder jenes im einzelnen verschieden, angepaßt den menschlichen Individualitäten nach Zeit und Raum. Versetzen wir uns einmal mit dem, was wir jetzt eben gesagt haben, in die Seele einer derjenigen Persönlichkeiten, die, wie man sie gewöhnlich nennt, als Evangelisten beteiligt sind an der Niederschrift unserer Evangelien. Solche Persönlichkeiten kannten durch ihre eigene okkulte Schulung in einer gewissen Weise die Einweihungsvorschriften dieser oder jener Völker, dieser oder jener Mysterien. Sie wußten, was man durchzumachen hatte, um hinaufzugelangen zu der Möglichkeit, die Geheimnisse der geistigen Reiche und der geistigen Hierarchien zu verkünden. Und jetzt hatten sie wahrgenommen durch die Ereignisse von Palästina und durch das Mysterium von Golgatha, daß dasjenige, was man sonst nur sehen konnte, wenn man ein Eingeweihter der Mysterientempel war, sich draußen auf dem großen Plan der Weltgeschichte abgespielt hatte für alle Menschen und sich nun immer mehr und mehr einbürgern sollte in die Herzen und Gemüter aller Menschen.

Die Evangelisten waren nicht Biographen in unserem Sinne, wo man das in die Biographien schreibt, was die Welt eigentlich nichts angeht und was kein Mensch von irgendeiner wirkenden Persönlichkeit zu wissen braucht. Sie waren keine Biographen, die jede Privatangelegenheit aufstöberten, sondern sie waren in dem Sinne Beschreiber des Christus-Lebens, daß sie sagten: Da hat sich mit dem Jesus von Nazareth, in dem der Christus gewesen ist, etwas zugetragen, was wir immer wieder und wieder gesehen haben in den Mysterien, dort aber nicht als historisches Ereignis zusammengezogen auf einzelne Jahre. Hier dagegen ist es historisches Ereignis geworden, aber es ist eine Wiederholung der Tempelritualien. Wir könnten also das Jesus-Leben beschreiben, wenn wir angeben die Stufen, die sonst bei den Einweihungen durchgemacht wurden.

Deshalb nehmen sich die Evangelien aus wie sozusagen in Weltgeschichte umgesetzte Einweihungsvorschriften. Wir finden die Einweihungsvorschriften der alten Mysterien wieder in den Evangelien, aber so, daß in einer gewissen Weise der Grund angegeben wird, warum das, was sich früher in den Tiefen der Tempel zugetragen hat, herausgetreten ist auf den großen Plan der Weltgeschichte. Das finden wir in einer gewissen Weise motiviert. Und man darf sagen, derjenige Evangelist, der gleich mit dieser Begründung beginnt, der gleich von Anfang an sagt, warum er eigentlich in die Lage gekommen ist, von einem welthistorischen Ereignis zu schreiben, das eine ins Große umgesetzte Einweihungsvorschrift erfüllt, das ist der Schreiber des Markus-Evangeliums. Er spricht von Anfang an aus, wie die Menschheit sich entwickelt hat, damit dieses große Ereignis eintreten konnte, daß die Einweihung aus den Tempeltiefen hinausgetragen werden konnte auf den Plan der Weltgeschichte. Er macht von vornherein darauf aufmerksam, daß es zusammenhängt mit einem über alle Maßen wichtigen Ereignis der ganzen Menschheitsentwickelung, das insbesondere die hebräischen Propheten den Menschen vorausgesagt haben. Denn was eingetreten ist in Palästina als Mysterium von Golgatha, das haben die wahren Eingeweihten - und zu denen gehören in einem gewissen Sinne die hebräischen Propheten - vorausgesehen und vorausgesagt.

Wenn wir uns versetzen in die Seele eines solchen Menschen wie der Prophet Jesajas, von dem gerade das Markus-Evangelium ausgeht, dann haben wir in seinen Worten etwa das Folgende gegeben. Er sagt: Es wird eine Zeit kommen, in der es in den menschlichen Seelen anders ausschauen wird als jetzt; aber diese Zeit bereitet sich jetzt schon vor. — Dies meinte Jesajas zu seiner eigenen Zeit. Was also wollte der Prophet Jesajas sagen? Sie wissen ja, daß das Markus-Evangelium gleich beginnt mit der Anführung der gewaltigen Worte dieses Propheten. Sie kennen diese Worte, wie sie gebräuchlich sind, und wie sie im Markus-Evangelium etwa in der folgenden Weise angeführt werden. Ich will eine übliche Übersetzung dieser Worte nehmen, wie sie in der Carl Weizsäckerschen Übersetzung stehen.

«Siehe, ich sende meinen Boten vor dir her, der soll dir den Weg bereiten. Hört, wie es ruft in der Wüste: bereitet den Weg des Herrn, macht eben seine Pfade.»

So stehen sie in einer als außerordentlich gut für die deutsche Evangelienliteratur geltenden Übersetzung.

Diese Worte des Jesajas sind in der Tat diejenigen, durch die der Prophet hinweist auf das große Ereignis der Weltgeschichte in Palästina, auf das Mysterium von Golgatha. Sie wissen, wieviel Mühe wir gehabt haben bei der Betrachtung der andern Evangelien, um die maßgebenden Stellen in einer einigermaßen verständigen Weise in unser Deutsch hereinzubringen. Es handelt sich ja bei diesen Dingen nicht darum, daß man eine lexikale Übersetzung gibt, sondern daß man die betreffenden Wendungen so herüberbringt, daß der tiefe, bedeutungsvolle Sinn, der gemeint ist, uns aus den deutschen Worten ebenso entgegentönen kann, nicht nur für unsere theoretische Auffassung, sondern auch für unser ganzes Fühlen, wie er entgegentönte denen, die die ganze Eigenart der damaligen Sprechweise kannten. Denn die damalige Sprechweise war total anders als die heutige. Vor allem muß darauf aufmerksam gemacht werden, daß jene Sprechweise nicht so abstrakt, so nüchtern und philiströs war wie unser heutiger Sprachgebrauch; sondern die Sprechweise und die ganze Art und Weise des Ausdrucks war so, daß man immer einen reicheren Sinn, eine reichere Bedeutung, eine gewisse Inhaltsfülle heraushörte neben dem unmittelbaren Wortsinn, und doch aber wieder in eindeutiger Weise wußte, was diese Inhaltsfülle war. Wesentlich ist zu erfassen, daß man viel mehr eine Welt hörte aus den Worten, als heute die Menschen gewöhnt sind bei dem zu hören, was man sagt. Nun ist es gerade eine Eigentümlichkeit der alten hebräischen Sprache, ungeheuer reich in dieser Beziehung zu sein, hinter den Worten geradezu ganze Welten zu verbergen, während man ein Bild brauchte, das ganz und gar bloß von der Sinneswelt genommen war. Solche Ausdrücke wie «bereitet den Weg» oder «macht eben die Pfade», das sind Bilder, die von der Sinneswelt genommen sind - wie man einen Weg bereitet mit Schaufeln und Spaten. Wenn man so etwas aussprach, war es eine Eigentümlichkeit dieser gegenüber allen anderen besonders großartigen Sprache, daß hinter diesen Ausdrücken, die äußerlich auf etwas angewendet wurden, eben ganze geistige Welten steckten — aber in eindeutiger Weise, so daß man nicht in beliebiger Art auslegen kann, wie es zum Beispiel unsere modernen Gelehrten mit den Dichtern tun, indem sie alles mögliche hineinlesen. Man konnte nicht in beliebiger Weise alles mögliche in die Dinge hineingeheimnissen. Das beruhte zum Teil darauf, daß in der althebräischen Sprache die Möglichkeit vorhanden war, durch das persönliche Gebrauchen der ja in der Schrift nicht ausgedrückten Vokalisierung im Laute ganze Weltengeheimnisse zu geben. Es war ein Gefühl vorhanden für solche Weltengeheimnisse.

Im Griechischen - in dieser Sprache haben wir ja zunächst den Text der Evangelien - ist dies schon nicht mehr in so starkem Maße der Fall. Dennoch wäre es noch immer möglich, auch ohne Okkultismus aus dem Griechischen viel bessere Übersetzungen aus den betreffenden Dingen herauszuholen, als es von denen geschehen ist, welche die Evangelien übersetzt haben. Denn im Grunde genommen hat immer nur einer den andern abgeschrieben, ohne daß man auch nur philologisch darangegangen wäre zu prüfen, wie es sich mit der Sache verhält, wenn man den griechischen Text vor sich hat. Ich werde Ihnen an einzelnen Beispielen später zeigen, der Vollständigkeit wegen, wie man Fehler gemacht hat und so weiter. Heute will ich aber unsere Betrachtungen damit nicht aufhalten, sondern ich will versuchen, nicht philologisch, sondern mit Zuhilfenahme dessen, was man aus der geistigen Forschung wissen kann, einiges Wesentliche aus dem Beginn des Markus-Evangeliums Ihnen vor Augen zu führen. So möchte ich zunächst einmal die so maßgebende Stelle anführen, durch die aus der Prophetie des Jesajas gezeigt werden soll, was kommen soll mit dem Ereignis von Palästina, damit Sie herausfühlen können, was damit gemeint ist.

Der griechische Text heißt ja:

Ἰδοὺ, ἀποστέλλω τὸν ἄγγελόν μου πρὸ προσώπου σου, ὃς κατασκευάσει τὴν ὁδόν σου.
Φωνὴ βοῶντος ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ, Ἑτοιμάσατε τὴν ὁδὸν Κυρίου, εὐθείας ποιεῖτε τὰς τρίβους αὐτοῦ.

(Idou egō apostellō ton angelon mou pro prosōpou sou, hos kataskeuasei tēn hodon sou emprosthen sou,
Phōnē boōntos en tē erēmō: Hetoimasate tēn hodon Kyriou, eutheiās poieite tās tribous autou.)

Es kommt nun vor allen Dingen darauf an, daß wir uns klar sind, daß das Wort Angelos, Bote oder Engel, in diesen alten Zeiten nur in dem Sinne gebraucht worden ist, wie wir es im Sinne unserer Hierarchien-Darstellung brauchen, also als Bezeichnung für solche Wesenheiten, die in der Hierarchie, wenn man von oben nach unten geht, dem Menschen unmittelbar vorangehen. Man muß es fühlen, wenn hier steht τὸν ἄγγελόν, daß da eine Wesenheit gerade aus dieser Stufe der Hierarchien gemeint ist. Fühlt man das nicht, so kann man die ganze Stelle überhaupt nicht verstehen. Deshalb kann auch nur die Geisteswissenschaft die Grundlage bilden zum Verständnis einer solchen Sache. Wenn wir sie aber richtig verstehen, können wir uns dadurch eine Grundlage schaffen für das, was der Okkultismus über das Christus-Ereignis zu sagen hat. Denn was ist das Wesentliche des Christus-Impulses? Wir haben es so gesagt: Es ist durch den Christus-Impuls das volle Bewußtsein erst dafür in die Menschenseele gekommen, daß in der menschlichen Seele ein Ich Platz greifen soll, ein selbstbewußtes Ich, und daß aus diesem selbstbewußten Ich heraus nach und nach im Verlaufe der folgenden Erdenentwickelung alle die Geheimnisse kommen müssen, die früher durch eine Art natürlichen Hellsehens aus dem astralischen Leib heraus gekommen sind.

Es ist vorangegangen der Zeit, in der wir leben, diese andere Zeit, in der die Menschen noch bis zu einem gewissen Grade in der nachatlantischen Kultur ein natürliches Hellsehen gehabt haben, durch das sie hineinblicken konnten in die geistige Welt. Da strömten in gewissen abnormen Zuständen der Seele die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt herunter; da sahen die Menschen hinauf in die Hierarchien. Natürlich am meisten und am längsten sahen sie zu derjenigen Hierarchie, die dem Menschen am allernächsten steht, zu der Hierarchie der Engel. Als unmittelbar über dem Menschen stehende Wesenheiten sahen sie die Engel. Von sich selbst nahm der Mensch in diesen Zeiten alten Hellsehens noch nicht wahr, daß er in sich selber etwas hatte, was ihn hinaufführen sollte in die geistige Welt. Er mußte es ansehen als eine ihm von äußeren Mächten erwiesene Gnade, als ein Hereinschicken der geistigen Mächte in die Seele. Daher konnten die Propheten in der folgenden Art hinweisen auf die Zukunft: Es wird die Zeit kommen, da wird der Mensch sein Ich fühlen; da wird er wissen, daß es das selbstbewußte Ich ist, woraus die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welten heraussprießen sollen. Alles muß in der Zeit kommen. Aber die Zeit wird kommen, wo der Mensch sagen kann: Wenn ich mein Ich in mir habe, so dringe ich aus der Kraft des Ich heraus hinauf in die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt.

Das mußte aber vorbereitet werden. So mußte also sozusagen die unterste Stufe der Hierarchien, der Mensch, vorbereitet werden, indem dem Menschen dasjenige geschickt wird, was er noch nicht ist, damit er sich vorbereiten kann zu dem, was er werden soll. Der Bote, der Engel mußte dem Menschen verkünden, daß er ein Ich werden soll im vollen Sinne des Wortes. Und während nun die früheren Engel die Aufgabe hatten, die geistige Welt zu zeigen, mußte jetzt ein besonderer Engel die besondere Aufgabe erhalten, etwas weiter zu gehen mit den Öffenbarungen an die Menschen, mußte ihnen sagen, daß sie in ihr Ich hineindringen sollen, während die früheren Engel so offenbart hatten, wie es nicht für ein Ich bestimmt war.

So macht Jesajas darauf aufmerksam: Es wird die Zeit des IchGeheimnisses kommen, und aus der allgemeinen Schar der Engel wird einer abgeordnet werden, der euch dann zeigen wird, daß dieses IchGeheimnis kommen wird. — So nur können wir verstehen, was es heißt, daß der Engel, der Bote vorangeschickt werden soll. Vor wem also wird denn dieser Bote vorangeschickt? Er wird vorangeschickt vor dem Menschen, der zu seinem selbstbewußten Ich kommen soll, und er soll kommen als eine Wesenheit aus der Hierarchie der Angeloi, die im allgemeinen noch nicht so zum Menschen gesprochen hatte, daß vorausgesetzt wurde, der Mensch sei ein selbstbewußstes Ich. Dieser Bote also, von dem der Prophet Jesajas spricht, soll kommen und die Menschheit aufmerksam machen, daß sie sich vorbereiten soll, in ihrem Innern, in ihrer Seele einen Platz zu schaffen für das Ich, für die volle Geltendmachung des Ich. Es soll also mit dieser Stelle im wesentlichen hingedeutet werden auf den großen Umschwung in der Entwickelung der menschlichen Seele, daß die Menschen, nachdem sie früher sozusagen immer aus sich selber heraus mußten, um in die geistige Welt hineinzukommen, von jetzt ab in ihrem Ich verbleiben können und aus dem Ich selber herausholen können die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt.

Vergleichen wir einmal eine alte Seele mit einer Seele aus der Zeit des herannahenden Christus-Impulses. Stellen wir uns vor Augen einen Menschen der vorchristlichen Zeit, besonders früherer Jahrhunderte. Wenn er hinaufgelangen wollte in die höheren Welten, so konnte er das nicht mit der Aufrechterhaltung des Selbstbewußtseins, soweit es schon entwickelt war. Er mußte es geradezu entäußern, mußte kommen in einen Selbst-entäußerten Zustand, mußte aufgehen in die Welt der Hierarchien, in die Welt der Geistigkeit selber. Sein Bewußtsein wurde herabgestimmt. Das war ein altes Gefühl der früheren, vorchristlichen Zeit.

In welcher Lage war nun ein Mensch, der schon nicht mehr so recht in der Zeit lebte, wo es das Richtige war, daß man mit Selbstentäußerung sich in die geistige Welt hineinfinden konnte, sondern der in der Zeit lebte, wo man sich in die Stufe versetzt finden konnte, das Ich zu entwickeln? Vorhanden war das Ich ja schon in der atlantischen Zeit; aber daß daraus die volle Sicherheit für die größten Geheimnisse quellen konnte, das wurde erst durch den Christus-Impuls gebracht. Gerade aus diesem Grunde fühlte ein Mensch der alten Einweihung etwa so, daß er sagte: Wenn ich in die geistige Welt kommen will, wenn ich mir die Offenbarungen aus der geistigen Welt erwerben soll, so muß ich eine gewisse Stelle in mir unterdrücken, und ich muß andere Stellen in meiner Seele besonders lebendig machen.

Was mußte er unterdrücken? Und was mußte er besonders lebendig machen? Was allmählich zum Ich heranwachsen sollte, das mußte er unterdrücken, das mußte sozusagen dunkler und dumpfer werden in seiner Seele. Darauf durfte er gar keine Rücksicht nehmen, das mußte etwas Ödes, etwas Leeres in ihm werden. Dagegen der astralische Leib, also der Leib, der Hellsichtigkeit in einem gewissen Grade geben konnte, mußte ganz besonders entflammt werden. Dann rückten in den astralischen Leib die alten hellseherischen Beobachtungen herein.

Ich sagte, das Ich war schon in einem gewissen Grade da. Aber man konnte es nicht brauchen, wenn man die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt erforschen wollte. Das Ich mußte unterdrückt und der astralische Leib entflammt werden. Aber das Entflammen der Impulse im Astralleib ist immer unmöglicher geworden. In den alten Zeiten gehörte es zu den elementarsten Eigenschaften des Menschen, daß er sein Ich unterdrücken und den Astralleib in Tätigkeit versetzen konnte, so daß die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt in ihn hineinströmten. Darin bestand aber gerade die Fortentwickelung, daß der Astralleib immer unfähiger wurde, in sich herein zu bekommen die Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt. Der Mensch mußte sich etwa sagen: Mein Astralleib wird immer unfähiger, um das zu erreichen, was früher die Menschen in der alten Hellsichtigkeit erreicht haben; aber was in mir ist, mein Ich, das will auch noch nicht recht heraus, das kann sich noch nicht aufraffen, aus sich etwas zu erreichen.

Und die allerbesten Hellseher empfanden am allermeisten etwas Wüstes, etwas Ödes in der Seele. Das war das Ich, dem noch kein Impuls gegeben war. Und daneben empfanden sie die Unmöglichkeit, sich durch das Ich in die geistige Welt hinaufzuversetzen. Daraus können Sie die Stimmung entnehmen, in der jemand war zur Zeit des herannahenden Christus-Impulses, der einen Einblick tun wollte in die geistige Welt. Ein solcher mußte sich sagen: In meinem Astralleib kann ich nicht mehr das entwickeln, was früher möglich war; mein Ich kann aber noch keinen Impuls aufnehmen; das ist noch etwas Wüstes in meiner Seele, das kann nicht in die geistige Welt hinauf.

Da wurden dann angewendet gewisse Methoden, gewisse Trainierungen zur Zeit des herannahenden Christus-Impulses, die darin bestanden, daß man Bekanntschaft machen lernte mit dem, was noch nicht vom Geist erfüllt sein konnte. Wer in die höheren Welten hinauf wollte, der wurde darauf verwiesen, daß man ihm sagte: Werde dir klar: mit deinem Astralleib kannst du nicht hinauf; du mußt vor allen Dingen eintreten in die Stelle deines Inneren, wo du dich als Mensch so fühlst, als ob du gar keinen Zusammenhang hättest mit der Außenwelt.

So war die Stimmung in der Zeit des herannahenden ChristusImpulses für den, der die Einweihung suchte. Und jeder, der die Einweihung suchte, mußte sich klarmachen: In bezug auf meinen Astralleib muß ich darauf verzichten, in die geistige Welt hinaufzukommen, denn die Zeit ist vorüber, um durch den Astralleib hineinzukommen in die geistige Welt. Das Ich ist dazu noch unvorbereitet. Aber an dem, was eben heraus will und eindringen will in die geistige Welt, wo es den Impuls aufnehmen will, an dem kann ich erkennen — mehr als erkennen kann ich nicht -, daß etwas da ist, was mit aller Kraft und Macht hinstrebt zu dem geistigen Impuls!

Diese Seelenerfahrung eines jeden, der in jener Zeit den Weg zum Geisteslicht suchte, nannte man den Weg in die Einsamkeit der Seele oder auch den Weg in die Einsamkeit. Was mußte der Bote also tun, der vorbereiten sollte auf das Christus-Ereignis? Er mußte den Leuten, die etwas wissen wollten von dem herannahenden Impuls, sagen, wie der Weg ist in die Einsamkeit. Er mußte die Einsamkeit gründlich kennen. Er mußte ein Prediger sein für die Einsamkeit der Seele.

Immer mehr und mehr werden Sie kennenlernen gerade an der Hand des Markus-Evangeliums, daß in gewissen Fällen die großen geistigen Wesenheiten, durch welche die wichtigen Angelegenheiten der Menschheitsentwickelung geschehen sollen, sich ihre Werkzeuge aussuchen in fleischlichen Wesenheiten, wenn diese dazu geeignet sind, und eine Inkarnation nehmen, um in der Seele zu wohnen, die im Fleische verkörpert ist. Jener Bote, von dem Jesajas gesprochen hat, der nicht in ganz gewöhnlichem Sinne als ein Mensch aufgefaßt werden darf, nahm Besitz von der Seele des wiederinkarnierten Elias, lebte darin und war der Bote, der die Menschen aufmerksam machen sollte auf den herannahenden Christus-Impuls. Und aus der Seele Johannes des Täufers sprach der Bote dann, auf den Jesajas hingewiesen hatte.

Wo also ertönt die Stimme des Boten? In dem, was ich Ihnen jetzt eben charakterisiert habe als die Einsamkeit der Seele. Da können wir dann lesen, daß im Markus-Evangelium steht: Höret das Rufen in der Seeleneinsamkeit. ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω (tē erēmō) dürfen wir nicht einfach übersetzen, als ob es bloß äußerlich gemeint sei, mit dem Bilde der Wüste; sondern da ist ein Bild hingestellt, durch das wir die ganze geistige Welt wahrnehmen sollen. ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω heißt eigentlich: in der Einsamkeit.

Nun müssen wir, um den Ausspruch weiter zu verstehen, uns ein wenig befassen mit der eigentlichen Bedeutung, wie sie selbst noch spurenweise im Griechischen vorhanden ist, wie sie aber festgestellt werden kann, wenn man mit dem Griechischen die Urtradition zusammenhält, mit der Bedeutung dessen, was man fühlte bei dem Worte Kyrios oder Herr; was hier gewöhnlich übersetzt ist mit: «Bereitet den Weg des Herrn.» Ein solches Wort hatte nicht jene abstrakte, philiströse Bedeutung in dem alten Sprachschatz, in der alten Ausdrucksweise, wie es heute hat. In der Zeit des Materialismus sind die Menschen besonders in bezug auf die Sprache Philister geworden und haben nicht mehr in der Sprache das, was man nennen kann Körper seelischer Wesenheiten, daß man eine ganze Welt fühlt bei den Worten, wie in alten Zeiten. Man kann heute derartiges höchstens wieder aufs neue versuchen. So habe ich es versucht in der «Pforte der Einweihung» darzustellen, wie es möglich sein wird, Welten fühlen zu können.

Was fühlte man bei dem Worte Kyrios, wenn man es aussprach in solchem Zusammenhange wie in dem angedeuteten? Man fühlte, daß damit nur das Bild gemeint sei für das, was im Menschen vorgeht, was für den Menschen im innerlichen Seelenleben sich ergibt. Man fühlte das Auftauchen des aus den Untergründen der Seele heraufkommenden und immer mehr und mehr an die Oberfläche drängenden Ich als das Erscheinen eines Herrn und Herrschers, als den Richtunggebenden unter den Seelenkräften — so wie wir heute sagen: Der Mensch hat Denken, Fühlen und Wollen; diese verschiedenen Seelenkräfte sind sozusagen die Diener der Seele. Aber einen Herrn gibt es in der Seele, einen Kyrios: das Ich. Das drückt sich dadurch aus, daß wir nicht nur sagen: Es denkt in uns. — In alten Zeiten konnte man nicht sagen: Ich denke -, sondern da sagte man: Es denkt. - Und in bezug auf Fühlen und Wollen sagte man ebenso: Es fühlt, und es will da drinnen.

In der Zeit nun, als der Herr der Seelenkräfte, das Ich, sich geltend machte, da wurde dieser große Umschwung in der Menschheitsentwickelung so gefühlt, daß man jetzt sagte: Ich denke, ich fühle, ich will. -— So waren in früheren Zeiten die Seelen gleichsam in einer gewissen Weise in einem unterbewußten Zustand, gefangen, untergetaucht in die dienenden Kräfte. Jetzt nahte der Herr der Seelenkräfte, das Ich. Es ist mit dieser Stelle zunächst gar nicht irgendeine Persönlichkeit oder Wesenheit gemeint, sondern nur das Auftauchen des Ich als des Herrn in dem ganzen Gefüge der Seele: Der Herr innerhalb der Seele kommt!

Das wurde auch in denjenigen Tempeln verkündet, die vorbereiten sollten auf das, was da vorgehen konnte mit der Menschheit. Mit heiliger Scheu und heiliger Ehrfurcht wurde es verkündet: Bisher waren die Seelen so, daß sie nur dienende Kräfte in sich hatten: Denken, Fühlen und Wollen. Jetzt aber naht der Herr, der Kyrios innerhalb der menschlichen Seele. Dies Große geht vor, freilich nach und nach erst entwickelt es sich — bis ans Ende der Erdenzeit, wo es dann immer mächtiger und mächtiger werden wird. Aber es kommt. Und der Christus bringt zuerst den Impuls. Es ist die große Stunde im Werdegang der Weltenuhr, wo der Christus lebt. Da steht die Weltenuhr in dem Zeichen, wo das Ich immer mächtiger aufgehen wird als der Herr der Seelenkräfte. Und es wird am Ziel angelangt sein dann, wenn die Erde herunterfallen wird im Kosmos und der Mensch zu höheren Stufen hinaufsteigt.

Nur wenn man so fühlt, wie man damals fühlen mußte, kann man eine Vorstellung davon bekommen, was Jesajas sagen wollte und was Johannes der Täufer wieder aufnahm. Hingewiesen sollte werden auf das große Ereignis der Menschenseele, auf die Fortentwickelung der Menschenseele. Dann müssen wir aber auch das Wort eddeiag (eutheias) nicht übersetzen mit «eben», wie es gewöhnlich abstrakt übersetzt wird, sondern mit «offen», nicht nur gerade, sondern offen, so daß sie gangbar werden, die Wege. Also der Kyrios kommt daher, nimmt seine Richtung auf die menschliche Seele. Aber der Mensch muß etwas dazu tun, damit der Herr die menschliche Seele wirklich ergreifen kann. Es muß der Weg frei gemacht werden, muß offen gemacht werden. Kurz, wollen wir die betreffende Stelle so übersetzen, daß irgend etwas damit anzufangen sein soll, so müßte eigentlich übersetzt werden, wenn wir uns ein wenig an das Traditionelle halten:

«Bemerke» - «Siehe» ist schon nicht mehr das Richtige -, «ich sende vor dem Ich in dir meinen Engel; der soll die Richtung vorbereiten.

Höret das Rufen» — «Seele» steht nicht da, das wußte aber ein jeder - «in der Seelen-Einsamkeit» - jenes Rufen, das verlangt nach dem Herrn der Seele -: «Bereitet die Richtung des Seelen-Herrschers; arbeitet, daß offen ist ihm der Weg» — oder die Bahn.

In diesem Wortgefüge haben Sie ungefähr, was eine Vorstellung von dem gibt, was man fühlen kann in den Worten des Jesajas. Diese Worte und was in diesem Wortgefüge liegt, das hatte wiederaufgenommen der Engel, der Angelos in der Seele Johannes' des Täufers. Warum konnte er das? - Da müssen wir ein wenig eingehen auf die Art und Weise, wie Johannes der Täufer selber eingeweiht war, wie die Initiation in der Seele Johannes’ des Täufers wirkte.

Aus früheren Darstellungen wissen Sie, daß der Mensch entweder eingeweiht werden kann durch Hinuntersteigen in das Innere der eigenen Seele, oder daß er erweckt werden kann für ein Heraustreten der Seele, für ein Freiwerden vom Leib und für ein Ergießen der Seelenkräfte in den Makrokosmos. Diese zwei Wege sind bei den verschiedenen Völkern in der verschiedensten Weise eingehalten worden. Wenn der Mensch seine Seele ergießen wollte in den Makrokosmos, so waren die dabei durchzumachenden zwölf Stufen sozusagen markiert durch die zwölf Zeichen des Tierkreises, indem seine Seelenkraft ausfloß nach bestimmten Stellen, nach bestimmten Richtungen des Makrokosmos. Nun war im allgemeinen schon außerordentlich viel erreicht, namentlich zu einem bestimmten Zweck der weltgeschichtlichen Entwickelung war etwas Bedeutsames erreicht, wenn irgendeine Seele so weit entwickelt war, daß sie alle die Kräfte des Makrokosmos in sich empfangen konnte, die von solchen Weltgeheimnissen herrührten, welche im Sinne eines einzigen Sternbildes waren. Das war nämlich überhaupt bei den alten Einweihungsriten so, daß der eine zum Beispiel eingeweiht wurde in die Geheimnisse des Makrokosmos, so daß sein Seelen-Ausfließen in das Makrokosmische sich hinbewegte in der Richtung des Steinbocks, bei andern in der Richtung des Krebses, der Waage, der Jungfrau und so weiter. Ich habe wiederholt betont, daß es zwölf verschiedene Möglichkeiten gibt, in das Makrokosmische auszufließen, die symbolisch angedeutet werden mit den zwölf Zeichen des Tierkreises. Sollte nun jemand die Inittation erreichen durch Austließen der Seele in den Makrokosmos, und sollte er nicht gleich die höchste, die Sonnen-Initiation erreichen, sondern gewissermaßen eine Partial-, eine Teil-Initiation, so wurde sein Seelenblick, sein Seelenlicht hingelenkt auf die Geheimnisse, die zu finden waren im Zusammenhange mit einem gewissen Sternbilde. Dazu mußte aber sein Blick unabhängig werden von dem Materiellen, das heißt, es wurde dafür gesorgt — entweder bei den Mysterienriten oder, wie beim Täufer Johannes, durch eine Gnade von oben -, daß des Betreffenden Blick hingeleitet wurde auf ein Sternbild - so aber, daß er zwischen sich und dem betreffenden Sternbild die Erde hatte. Das heißt, in der Nacht mußte sein Blick gelenkt werden durch die Erde hindurch nach dem Sternbild hin. Wenn man ein Sternbild sieht mit den physischen Augen, so sieht man das physische Sternbild. Wenn man aber hindurchsehen kann durch das Materielle der Erde, wobei also das physische Sternbild bedeckt ist mit dem Materiellen der Erde, so sieht man nicht das Physische, sondern das Geistige, das heißt die Geheimnisse, welche das Sternbild ausdrückt.

Johannes’ des Täufers Blick wurde so geschult, daß er in der Nacht schauen konnte durch die materielle Erde hindurch auf das Sternbild des Wassermanns. Er hatte also jene Initiation gehabt, als der Angelos von seiner Seele Besitz nahm, die man die Wassermann-Initiation nennt. So konnte der Täufer Johannes — mit allem, was er selber wußte, was er selber fühlte - dem Angelos alle Fähigkeiten zur Verfügung stellen, damit durch den Angelos ausgesprochen werden konnte alles, was die Wassermann-Initiation war, und was es gab als Hinweis darauf, daß die Herrschaft des Ich, des xVoiog, des Herrn in der Seele kommen werde. Das gab die Wassermann-Initiation.

Gleichzeitig aber wies der Täufer Johannes darauf hin, daß auch die Zeit gekommen war, wo diese Wassermann-Initiation sozusagen an einem Übergang steht, wo sie durch eine andere ersetzt werden muß, damit man völlig verstehe die herannahende Herrschaft des Ich. Deshalb sagte er zu seinen intimen Schülern: Ich bin der, der imstande ist, seinem Engel alle die Kräfte zur Verfügung zu stellen, die aus der Wassermann-Initiation kommen. Nach mir aber muß Einer kommen, der die nachherigen Kräfte seinem Engel zur Verfügung stellen kann.

Wenn Sie das Fortschreiten der Sonnenrichtung bei Tag nehmen vom Sternbild des Widders durch den Stier, die Zwillinge und so weiter bis zur Jungfrau hin, so müssen Sie das Vorschreiten in der Nacht von der Richtung der Waage, des Wassermannes zum Sternbild der Fische hin nehmen; das ist die Richtung zur geistigen Sonne. Johannes hatte die Wassermann-Initiation empfangen, und er wies darauf hin, daß der, welcher da kommen wird, die Initiation der Fische haben werde, das heißt diejenige Initiation also, die folgen muß auf die Johannes-Initiation, und die als eine höhere angesehen wurde. Deshalb sagte Johannes der Täufer zu seinen intimen Schülern: Ich kann meinem Engel durch die Wassermann-Initiation nur die Kräfte zur Verfügung stellen, daß er verkünden kann, daß der Herr, der xVo10g, kommt; es wird aber einer kommen, der die Kräfte hat, welche durch die Initiation mit dem Sternbild der Fische symbolisiert sind. Und der wird aufnehmen den Christus!

Damit wies Johannes der Täufer hin auf den Jesus von Nazareth. Und darum haben die alten Traditionen dem Christus Jesus das Symbol der Fische gegeben. Und weil alles, was äußerlich geschieht, Symbol für innere Vorgänge ist, obwohl es auch äußerlich geschieht, darum werden als Gehilfen dem Fisch-Initiierten Fischer zugeteilt. Das alles sind zugleich äußerliche, historische Ereignisse und zugleich für die geistigen Geheimnisse tief symbolische Handlungen.

Und eine höhere Weihe wird über die Menschheit kommen! sagte Johannes. Er konnte nur die Weihe geben, die aus dem Wassermann, dem Wassermenschen, kommt. Und Johannes bezeichnete sich als Wassermensch. Das ist ganz klar. Nur werden wir immer mehr und mehr sehen müssen, wie mit den Bildern, die für die menschlichen Geheimnisse gebraucht werden, ebenso astronomische, kosmische Geheimnisse zusammenhängen. Ich habe euch mit Wasser getauft, sagte Johannes. Die Wassertaufe war allerdings das, was in der Gewalt derjenigen war, die vom Himmel herunter die Initiation des Wassermanns erhalten hatten. Indem aber die geistige Sonne in der entgegengesetzten Weise fortschreitet wie die physische - denn während die physische Sonne fortschreitet vom Sternbild der Jungfrau zum Sternbild der Waage, schreitet die geistige Sonne vor, im Sinne des Fortschreitens von Johannes dem Täufer zu Jesus von Nazareth, von dem Wassermann zu den Fischen -, indem jemand auftritt in der Welt mit der Initiation der Fische und imstande ist, diejenigen geistigen Kräfte, denjenigen geistigen Impuls aufzunehmen, für den Werkzeug sein muß diese Initiation der Fische; da ist es möglich, daß nicht nur getauft wird, wie Johannes taufte, sondern daß im höheren Sinne getauft wird, wie es von Johannes bezeichnet wird als die Taufe mit dem Heiligen Geist.

Ich habe Ihnen in dem heutigen Vortrag in einer gewissen Beziehung ein Zweifaches vorgeführt. Einmal, daß mit den Worten, die hier im Markus-Evangelium in Betracht kommen, Vorgänge der Menschheitsentwickelung gemeint sind, auch historische Vorgänge, indem wohl gesprochen wird von einer höheren Macht, die nicht einmal Mensch ist, sondern ein Angelos, die aber spricht durch den Leib des Johannes des Täufers. Auf der andern Seite habe ich gezeigt, daß mit den Darstellungen, die gegeben werden, Vorgänge am Himmel gemeint sind, nämlich das Vorrücken der geistigen Sonne vom Sternbilde des Wassermanns zum Sternbild der Fische. Das Markus-Evangelium enthält in der Tat in jeder Zeile etwas, was man nur dann lesen kann, wenn man bei dem Verfolgen der Worte immer im Auge hat zugleich einen menschlichen Sinn und einen kosmischen, astronomischen Sinn, und wenn wir uns klar sind, daß im Menschen etwas lebt, was in seiner wahren Bedeutung nur am Himmel zu finden ist.

Da muß man allerdings den Zusammenhang der makrokosmischen Geheimnisse mit den Geheimnissen der Menschennatur etwas genauer begreifen. Ich kann heute am Schluß nur andeuten, was dahinter steckt. Ich habe heute in dieser Richtung überhaupt nur Ahnungen geben wollen. Denn wir werden in Untiefen hineintauchen müssen beim Markus-Evangelium, über die Sie sehr lange zu denken haben werden, wenn Sie sie zu mehr als nur Ahnungen erheben wollen. Aber wie das Markus-Evangelium zu lesen ist, das möchte ich durch folgendes klarmachen.

Sie alle kennen den Regenbogen. Der Regenbogen steht zum Beispiel für das Kind als eine Realität am Firmament. Das Kind wird zunächst glauben, wenn man es ihm nicht erklärt hat, daß es den Regenbogen mit den Händen greifen kann, daß es ihn anfassen kann. Später lernt dann der Mensch, daß im Grunde genommen dieser Regenbogen gar nicht von sich abhängt, sondern nur entsteht, wenn eine gewisse Konstellation des Regens mit dem Sonnenschein vorhanden ist; und wenn Regen und Sonnenschein in andere Verhältnisse zueinander kommen, dann verschwindet er auch wieder. Er ist also keine Realität, er ist nur ein Scheinbild; die Wirklichkeit sind Regen und Sonnenschein in bezug auf den Regenbogen.

Wenn der Mensch auf dem Wege der okkulten Entwickelung ein wenig vorwärts rückt, dann gibt es etwas, was er ganz von selbst vergleicht mit dem Regenbogen, indem er sagt: Es ist eigentlich im Grunde genommen gar nichts Wahres, sondern nur ein Schein, der zusammengehalten wird durch äußere Dinge. - Wissen Sie, was dieser Schein ist? Der Mensch selber! Der Mensch ist nur ein Scheinbild. Und nimmt man ihn mit den physischen Sinnen als Realität, so gibt man sich einer Illusion hin; dann gibt man sich der Maya hin, dem großen Nichtsein. Denn Maya, zusammengesetzt aus mahat aya mahat = groß, ya = Sein, a = nicht, Verneinung, also aya = das Nichtsein — ; mahat aya heißt «das große Nichtsein».

Auf dem Wege der okkulten Entwickelung kommt der Mensch dazu, daß er sich mit etwas vergleicht wie dem Regenbogen. Der Mensch ist nur ein Scheingebilde. Und Scheingebilde ist alles, was an die physischen Sinne herantritt. Auch die Sonne als physischer Weltenkörper ist ein Scheinbild. Was die physische Wissenschaft als Gasball im Weltenraume beschreibt, das ist für die praktischen Zwekke ganz gut. Aber wer es als Wirklichkeit nimmt, der gibt sich der Maya, der Täuschung, dem großen Nichtsein hin. Was wahr ist, das ist, daß dort ein Sammelplatz für geistige Hierarchien ist, deren Taten sich ausdrücken in der Wärme und dem Licht, und die uns in Wärme und Licht zufließen von der Sonne. Was wir als Wärme und Licht wahrnehmen, das ist Schein. Aber so ist alles Schein. Da glaubt der Mensch, er habe ein Herz in der Brust. Aber das Herz ist ein Scheingebilde, nicht mehr. Das ist so ähnlich, wie wenn wir im Herbstnebel abends auf die Straßen gehen und sehen gewisse Ringe um die Laternen herum; aber diese Ringe sind auch nichts Wirkliches, sondern bewirkt durch ganz bestimmte Kräfte. So ist auch das menschliche Herz bewirkt durch ganz gewisse Kräfte. Das können Sie sich etwa in folgender Weise vorstellen. Nehmen Sie an, der Kreis stelle dar das Himmelsgewölbe; dann strömen von der einen Seite in uns herein eine Art von Kräften, und von der andern Seite kommen andere Kräfte herein: diese Kräfte schneiden sich. In Wahrheit ist im Menschen da nichts vorhanden, wo er sein Herz glaubt, als Kräfte, die vom Himmel hereinströmen und sich schneiden. Denken Sie sich alles übrige hinaus, und nur Kräfte, die so zusammenkommen, wie es beim Regenbogen ist: und das Resultat ist das menschliche Herz. So ist es mit den übrigen Organen auch: es sind Schnittkräfte, die entstehen durch das Sichschneiden der betreffenden Weltenkräfte.

Organs

Wenn Sie von einer Stelle bis zu einer andern gehen, und Sie sagen: In mir sind die Impulse, daß ich von hier bis dorthin gehe -, dann sagen Sie etwas, was in dieser Weise der Maya angehört. Warum? Weil vom Makrokosmos Kräfte kommen, die sich hier unten schneiden und durch den Schnitt hervorrufen ein Scheingebilde in bezug auf die Richtung und die Kräfte des Gehens. Was hier unten aufeinandergefolgt ist, das ist nur ein Schnitt der kosmischen Kräfte. Und wenn wir das Wahre wissen wollen, so müssen wir fragen: Was geschieht im Makrokosmos? Was bewirken die kosmischen Kräfte, die oberen und die unteren? - Sie bewirken das in uns, was so aussieht, als ob wir ein Herz haben, eine Leber und so weiter, oder das, was so ausschaut, daß wir sagen: Ich gehe von dort nach dort. Wollen wir es in Wahrheit beschreiben, so müssen wir die kosmischen Kräfte beschreiben.

Wollen wir beschreiben, was Johannes der Täufer tat, indem er die Leute taufte, so müssen wir beschreiben, was der Makrokosmos ihm befahl, das heißt die Kräfte, die symbolisiert sind durch die Kräfte des Wassermannes. Die wurden einmal beschlossen in der großen Weltenloge und hineingesandt in die Kräfte des Johannes. So müssen wir in der Weltensprache lesen, was an einem bestimmten Ort geschah. So las der Schreiber des Markus-Evangeliums für das, was in Palästina geschah, die betreffenden Vorgänge am Himmel. Er beschreibt astronomische Vorgänge und sagt: Faßt die Dinge so auf: wenn hier eine Wand ist, worauf ein Schattenspiel sichtbar ist, so müßt ihr, wenn ihr den wahren Grund dafür kennenlernen wollt, hinschauen auf das, was eigentlich gespiegelt wird in den Schatten. Ich beschreibe, was am Jordan geschehen ist, was jedoch nur das Werkzeug für etwas anderes war; denn in Wahrheit beschreibe ich, was durch die astronomischen Kräfte aus dem Makrokosmos hereinwirkt auf die Erde!

Kosmische Kräfte beschreibt der Schreiber des Markus-Evangeliums. Überall sind es Himmelserscheinungen. Und was er beschreibt, das ist der Ausdruck, die Projektion, das Schattenbild, welches die ganzen Vorgänge im Makrokosmos herunterwerfen auf das kleine Erdengebiet Palästina. Das müssen wir uns klarmachen, wenn wir nur ein wenig eindringen wollen in die ganze Größe und Bedeutung dieser Urkunde des Markus-Evangeliums. Aber wir mußten uns zuerst eine Ahnung verschaffen von dem, was da eigentlich vorliegt. Wir mußten einmal verstehen, daß im Beginn des Markus-Evangeliums gesagt wird: Der Prophet Jesajas hat vorhergesagt, daß der Herr der Seelenkräfte für den Menschen kommen wird, und daß der Bote leben wird in Johannes dem Täufer, der die Menschen vorbereiten wird auf das Herannahen dieses Herrschers der Seelenkräfte. - Dieser Bote mußte Platz nehmen in einem Leib, der einer Menschenseele angehörte, die mit den Kräften des Wassermanns inituert war. So konnte er in die Wege leiten, was zu tun war auf der Erde durch eine Persönlichkeit wie Jesus von Nazareth, die sich dazu vorbereitet hatte, daß sie die Fische-Initiation empfangen und dadurch den Christus aufnehmen konnte.

Was auf der Erde geschieht, sind die Spiegelungen kosmischer Vorgänge, die sich zu den kosmischen Verhältnissen verhalten wie der Regenbogen zu Regen und Sonnenschein, so daß wir Regen und Sonnenschein studieren müssen, wenn wir den Regenbogen beschreiben wollen. Und wenn wir wissen wollen, was in dem Herzen Johannes’ des Täufers, oder des Jesus von Nazareth war, der die Wohnstätte des Christus wurde, so müssen wir kosmische Vorgänge studieren. Denn die ganze Welt sprach sich für die Menschen aus in dem Ereignis der Vorgänge in Palästina und auf Golgatha. Und wer das Markus-Evangelium anders liest, als daß es ihm nur die Buchstaben gibt für große Weltenvorgänge, der steht auf keinem andern Standpunkt als der, welcher sagt: hier ist eine Gruppe solcher Striche, dort ist eine Gruppe anderer Striche — der aber nicht darauf hinweist, worauf das Wort Herr hinweist, der nur auf die schwarzen Striche hinweist. In dieser Weise wird allerdings einfach in unserer Zeit das Markus-Evangelium beschrieben. Denn was im Markus-Evangelium erzählt wird, das ist nur das Alleräußerste der Buchstaben. Man muß aufrücken, um das zu verstehen, worauf die Vorgänge in Palästina hinweisen sollten wie in einem Schattenspiel.

Versuchen Sie dahinter zu kommen, was es heißt: Irdische Vorgänge sind ein Schattenbild makrokosmischer Vorgänge -, und Sie werden den ersten Schritt getan haben, um eine der größten Urkunden der Welt, das Markus-Evangelium, nach und nach verstehen zu können.

Fourth Lecture

From my book Christianity as Mystical Fact, you have all learned that if one wants to understand the Gospels correctly, they must be interpreted in a very specific way. As I continue my reflections on the Gospels here this winter, I would like to point out that it is not possible to start from the beginning again and again for the younger members, and that therefore some of the explanations that will follow will certainly be difficult for them to understand. It has already been said occasionally at the General Assembly how necessary it is for the younger members to take part in the courses that have been set up so that they can catch up on what has been done previously, for otherwise we could not proceed. But I would like to make one point in particular: it does not seem feasible for the younger members to work really energetically to catch up on the early stages of spiritual scientific life. Therefore, it will happen again and again — I am speaking hypothetically now — that younger members will find this or that, which belongs to the higher realms of spiritual science and requires certain prerequisites, incomprehensible and will therefore form a very strange opinion of spiritual science. This is then the fault of the members themselves and not of what is meant.

In my book Christianity as Mystical Fact, I have shown that we must essentially understand the Gospels as books of initiation. This means that these Gospels are basically nothing more than old initiation rituals rewritten in a certain way. What would have been contained in such old initiation or initiation rules? They mainly contained instructions on how the candidate for training in the higher worlds was to be led step by step along his path, how he was to undergo certain inner experiences, certain experiences of his soul, how he was to awaken the powers slumbering in his soul, how one higher stage was to be linked to a lower one, up to that stage of initiation at which the spiritual world bursts into the soul of the initiate, at which the secrets of the spiritual world come to him. Then he can look into this spiritual world and see, for example, the various beings of the individual hierarchies, as we have enumerated them in the course of time and also characterized them in various contexts. What the initiate had to do was the content of such initiation books.

If we now trace pre-Christian times, we find that numerous people were initiated in various mystery centers—not always in exactly the same way, but essentially in the same way—and were led up the steps to the point where they could look into the spiritual world, where they could see the beings of the individual hierarchies spiritually, as opposed to physically. That was the case in pre-Christian times. What does Christianity mean to these initiates of the ancient mysteries? What does the Christ impulse mean to them? It means that a being who was outwardly known on the physical plane as Jesus of Nazareth did not reveal the secrets of the spiritual world in the usual way of the ancient mysteries, as was always customary in pre-Christian times, but in a different way. A personality who had been initiated in the sense of the old initiation rituals could, when the great event I have just described had passed by their soul, step out among other people and speak of the secrets of the spiritual realms. But with the Christ event, something came into being that enabled the personality of Jesus of Nazareth to speak of the mysteries of the spiritual realms without having been led to do so in the traditional way. For this personality of Jesus of Nazareth was led to do so by receiving the Christ Spirit within himself at the so-called baptism in the Jordan. From the moment this personality was initiated, so to speak, into world history at the baptism in the Jordan, that is, in a historical event, from that moment on, the Christ Spirit spoke to the world about the mysteries of the spiritual realms, but in a much higher way. So with Christ there was something on the physical plane, open to the whole world, which had previously been accessible only to a certain degree in the depths of the mysteries, to those who were initiated, so that they could then go out and speak to their fellow human beings about the mysteries of the spiritual realms. If we wanted to imagine this visually, we could say: We look into the ancient mystery temples and see how the hierophants initiated the personalities so that they could look into the spiritual realms and then go out and teach about the spiritual world. All this developed in the deepest secrecy of the mystery temples. And in the outer world, outside the mysteries, there was no such thing as an ascent to the possibility of speaking about the spiritual realms. Now what had often and often happened in the depths of the mysteries was, as it were, carried out into Palestine, presented as a world-historical event, as the development of Jesus of Nazareth, presented as a world-historical initiation in the mystery of Golgotha. So the mystery, as it were carried out into world history, presented as a historical fact before the whole world—this is how we must understand the connection between the mystery of Golgotha and the mysteries of the ancient sacred temples.

Now, although these initiation rules contained essentially the same stages everywhere, they differed in detail among the various peoples in different parts of the world, adapted to human individualities in time and space. Let us now place ourselves, with what we have just said, in the soul of one of those personalities who, as they are commonly called, participated as evangelists in the writing of our Gospels. Through their own occult training, such personalities knew in a certain way the initiation rules of this or that people, of this or that mystery. They knew what one had to go through in order to attain the possibility of proclaiming the secrets of the spiritual realms and the spiritual hierarchies. And now, through the events in Palestine and through the mystery of Golgotha, they had perceived that what could otherwise only be seen by those who were initiates in the mystery temples had taken place out there on the great stage of world history for all human beings, and was now to become more and more established in the hearts and minds of all people.

The evangelists were not biographers in our sense of the word, where one writes in biographies what is of no concern to the world and what no one needs to know about any influential personality. They were not biographers who dug up every private matter, but rather they were describers of the life of Christ in the sense that they said: Something happened to Jesus of Nazareth, in whom Christ was present, which we have seen again and again in the mysteries, but not there as historical events condensed into individual years. Here, on the other hand, it has become a historical event, but it is a repetition of the temple rituals. We could therefore describe the life of Jesus if we indicate the stages that were otherwise gone through during the initiations.

That is why the Gospels appear as initiation rules translated into world history, so to speak. We find the initiation rules of the ancient mysteries again in the Gospels, but in such a way that, in a certain sense, the reason is given why what happened earlier in the depths of the temple has emerged onto the great stage of world history. We find this motivated in a certain way. And we can say that the evangelist who begins with this explanation, who says right from the start why he is actually in a position to write about a world-historical event that fulfills an initiation rule translated into the great, is the writer of the Gospel of Mark. From the outset, he explains how humanity has developed so that this great event could take place, so that the initiation could be carried out from the depths of the temple onto the stage of world history. He points out from the outset that this is connected with an event of immeasurable importance for the entire development of humanity, which the Hebrew prophets in particular had foretold to mankind. For what happened in Palestine as the mystery of Golgotha was foreseen and foretold by the true initiates, among whom the Hebrew prophets belong in a certain sense.

If we put ourselves in the soul of a man such as the prophet Isaiah, from whom the Gospel of Mark originates, we find the following in his words. He says: A time will come when things will look different in human souls than they do now; but this time is already being prepared. — This is what Isaiah meant in his own time. So what did the prophet Isaiah want to say? You know that the Gospel of Mark begins with the quotation of this prophet's powerful words. You know these words as they are commonly used, and how they are quoted in the Gospel of Mark in the following manner. I will take a common translation of these words, as they appear in Carl Weizsäcker's translation.

“Behold, I send my messenger before you, who shall prepare your way. Listen to the voice crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.”

This is how they appear in a translation considered to be exceptionally good for German Gospel literature.

These words of Isaiah are indeed those through which the prophet points to the great event in world history in Palestine, to the mystery of Golgotha. You know how much effort we have put into considering the other Gospels in order to render the decisive passages into our German in a reasonably intelligible way. For it is not a matter of giving a lexical translation, but of rendering the relevant expressions in such a way that the deep, meaningful sense that is intended resonate with us from the German words, not only for our theoretical understanding, but also for our entire feeling, just as it resonated with those who knew the whole peculiarity of the way of speaking at that time. For the way of speaking at that time was totally different from today's. Above all, it must be pointed out that the way of speaking at that time was not as abstract, sober, and philistine as our usage today; rather, the way of speaking and the whole manner of expression were such that one always heard a richer meaning, a certain fullness of content alongside the immediate meaning of the words, and yet knew clearly what this fullness of content was. It is essential to understand that one heard much more of a world in the words than people today are accustomed to hearing in what is said. Now it is precisely a peculiarity of the ancient Hebrew language to be immensely rich in this respect, to conceal entire worlds behind words, while one needed an image that was taken entirely from the sensory world. Expressions such as “prepare the way” or “make the paths straight” are images taken from the sensory world—like preparing a path with shovels and spades. When one uttered such a thing, it was a peculiarity of this language, which was particularly magnificent compared to all others, that behind these expressions, which were outwardly applied to something, there were whole spiritual worlds — but in an unambiguous way, so that one cannot interpret them in any way one likes, as our modern scholars do with poets, for example, by reading all sorts of things into them. One could not arbitrarily read all sorts of things into things. This was partly due to the fact that in the ancient Hebrew language it was possible to convey whole world secrets through the personal use of vocalization in sounds, which were not expressed in writing. There was a feeling for such world secrets.

In Greek—the language in which we first have the text of the Gospels—this is no longer the case to such a great extent. Nevertheless, even without occultism, it would still be possible to get much better translations from the Greek than those who translated the Gospels have done. For basically, one person simply copied another without even attempting a philological examination of the matter at hand when they had the Greek text in front of them. For the sake of completeness, I will show you later, with individual examples, how mistakes were made and so on. Today, however, I do not want to hold up our considerations with this, but I want to try, not philologically, but with the help of what can be known from spiritual research, to bring to your attention some essential points from the beginning of the Gospel of Mark. First, I would like to quote the decisive passage from the prophecy of Isaiah, which is supposed to show what is to come with the events in Palestine, so that you can understand what is meant by it.

The Greek text reads:

Ἰδοὺ, ἀποστέλλω τὸν ἄγγελόν μου πρὸ προσώπου σου, ὃς κατασκευάσει τὴν ὁδόν σου.
Φωνὴ βοῶντος ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ, Ἑτοιμάσατε τὴν ὁδὸν Κυρίου, εὐθείας ποιεῖτε τὰς τρίβους αὐτοῦ.

(Idou egō apostellō ton angelon mou pro prosōpou sou, hos kataskeuasei tēn hodon sou emprosthen sou,
Phōnē boōntos en tē erēmō: Hetoimasate tēn hodon Kyriou, eutheiās poieite tās tribous autou.)

It is now of utmost importance that we understand that the word Angelos, messenger or angel, was used in ancient times only in the sense that we use it in our description of the hierarchies, that is, as a designation for those beings who, in the hierarchy, when one goes from top to bottom, immediately precede human beings. When we read τὸν ἄγγελόν here, we must feel that a being from precisely this level of the hierarchies is meant. If you do not feel this, you cannot understand the whole passage at all. That is why only spiritual science can form the basis for understanding such a thing. But if we understand it correctly, we can thereby create a basis for what occultism has to say about the Christ event. For what is the essence of the Christ impulse? We have said it this way: it is through the Christ impulse that full consciousness has come into the human soul that an I, a self-conscious I, should take hold in the human soul, and that out of this self-conscious I, in the course of the following earth evolution, all the mysteries must gradually emerge that previously came out of the astral body through a kind of natural clairvoyance.

This other time preceded the time in which we live, a time in which human beings still possessed, to a certain degree, a natural clairvoyance in the post-Atlantean culture, through which they could look into the spiritual world. In certain abnormal states of the soul, the secrets of the spiritual world streamed down; human beings looked up into the hierarchies. Of course, they saw most and longest into the hierarchy closest to human beings, the hierarchy of angels. They saw angels as beings standing directly above human beings. In those times of ancient clairvoyance, human beings did not yet perceive that they had something within themselves that would lead them up into the spiritual world. They had to regard it as a grace bestowed upon them by external powers, as the spiritual powers being sent into their souls. That is why the prophets were able to point to the future in the following way: The time will come when human beings will feel their I; then they will know that it is the self-conscious I from which the secrets of the spiritual worlds will spring forth. Everything must come in its time. But the time will come when man will be able to say: When I have my I within me, I rise out of the power of the I into the mysteries of the spiritual world.

But this had to be prepared. So the lowest level of the hierarchies, the human being, had to be prepared, so to speak, by being sent what he is not yet, so that he can prepare himself for what he is to become. The messenger, the angel, had to announce to the human being that he is to become an I in the full sense of the word. And while the earlier angels had the task of showing the spiritual world, a special angel now had to be given the special task of going a little further with the revelations to human beings, of telling them that they should penetrate into their I, whereas the earlier angels had revealed things in a way that was not intended for an I.

Isaiah draws attention to this: The time of the mystery of the I will come, and one will be sent from the general host of angels to show you that this mystery of the I will come. Only in this way can we understand what it means that the angel, the messenger, is to be sent ahead. So before whom is this messenger to be sent? He is to be sent before the human being who is to come to his self-conscious ego, and he is to come as a being from the hierarchy of the Angeloi, who had not yet spoken to human beings in such a way that it was assumed that human beings were self-conscious egos. This messenger, of whom the prophet Isaiah speaks, is to come and make humanity aware that it must prepare itself to create a place within itself, within its soul, for the I, for the full assertion of the I. This passage essentially points to the great turning point in the development of the human soul, namely that human beings, who previously had to come out of themselves, so to speak, in order to enter the spiritual world, can now remain in their I and draw the secrets of the spiritual world out of their I.

Let us compare an old soul with a soul from the time of the approaching Christ impulse. Let us imagine a person from pre-Christian times, especially from earlier centuries. If he wanted to ascend to the higher worlds, he could not do so by maintaining his self-consciousness as far as it had already developed. He had to renounce it completely, had to enter a state of self-renunciation, had to merge into the world of hierarchies, into the world of spirituality itself. His consciousness was lowered. That was an ancient feeling from earlier, pre-Christian times.

What was the situation of a human being who no longer really lived in the time when it was right to find one's way into the spiritual world through self-renunciation, but who lived in a time when one could find oneself in the stage of developing the I? The ego already existed in the Atlantean era, but it was only through the Christ impulse that it became a source of complete certainty about the greatest mysteries. Precisely for this reason, a person of the old initiation felt something like this: if I want to enter the spiritual world, if I am to acquire the revelations from the spiritual world, then I must suppress a certain part of myself and make other parts of my soul particularly alive.

What did he have to suppress? And what did he have to make particularly alive? He had to suppress what was gradually growing into the I; it had to become darker and duller in his soul, so to speak. He had to pay no attention to it; it had to become something barren, something empty within him. On the other hand, the astral body, that is, the body that could give clairvoyance to a certain degree, had to be particularly inflamed. Then the old clairvoyant observations entered the astral body.

I said that the ego was already there to a certain degree. But it could not be used if one wanted to explore the secrets of the spiritual world. The ego had to be suppressed and the astral body inflamed. But inflaming the impulses in the astral body became increasingly impossible. In ancient times, it was one of the most elementary qualities of human beings that they could suppress their ego and activate the astral body so that the secrets of the spiritual world could flow into them. But this was precisely the further development that made the astral body increasingly incapable of receiving the secrets of the spiritual world. Human beings had to say to themselves: My astral body is becoming increasingly incapable of achieving what people in the old clairvoyance achieved; but what is within me, my ego, does not yet want to come out, cannot yet bring itself to achieve anything.

And the very best clairvoyants felt something desolate, something barren in their souls. That was the I that had not yet been given an impulse. And alongside this they felt the impossibility of raising themselves up into the spiritual world through the I. From this you can deduce the mood in which someone was at the time of the approaching Christ impulse who wanted to gain insight into the spiritual world. Such a person had to say to himself: In my astral body I can no longer develop what was possible in the past; but my ego cannot yet take up an impulse; there is still something desolate in my soul that cannot ascend into the spiritual world.

Certain methods, certain training exercises were then applied at the time of the approaching Christ impulse, which consisted in learning to become acquainted with what could not yet be filled with spirit. Those who wanted to ascend to the higher worlds were told: “Be clear about this: you cannot ascend with your astral body; above all, you must enter that place within yourself where you feel, as a human being, as if you had no connection with the outside world.

Such was the mood at the time of the approaching Christ impulse for those who sought initiation. And everyone who sought initiation had to realize: In relation to my astral body, I must renounce ascending into the spiritual world, for the time has passed for entering the spiritual world through the astral body. The ego is not yet prepared for this. But from what is striving to come out and enter the spiritual world, where it wants to receive the impulse, I can recognize — I can do no more than recognize — that there is something there that is striving with all its strength and power toward the spiritual impulse!

This soul experience of everyone who sought the path to the spiritual light at that time was called the path into the loneliness of the soul or also the path into loneliness. What, then, did the messenger who was to prepare people for the Christ event have to do? He had to tell those who wanted to know something about the approaching impulse what the path into solitude was like. He had to know solitude thoroughly. He had to be a preacher for the solitude of the soul.

You will learn more and more, especially from the Gospel of Mark, that in certain cases the great spiritual beings through whom the important events of human evolution are to take place choose their instruments from among fleshly beings, if these are suitable, and take on incarnation in order to dwell in the soul embodied in the flesh. That messenger of whom Isaiah spoke, who cannot be understood in the ordinary sense as a human being, took possession of the soul of the reincarnated Elijah, lived in it, and was the messenger who was to make people aware of the approaching Christ impulse. And from the soul of John the Baptist spoke the messenger to whom Isaiah had referred.

So where does the voice of the messenger sound? In what I have just characterized as the loneliness of the soul. We can then read in the Gospel of Mark: Hear the cry in the loneliness of the soul. We cannot simply translate ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω (tē erēmō) as if it were meant merely in an external sense, with the image of the desert; rather, an image is presented here through which we are to perceive the entire spiritual world. ὲν τῇ ὲpήμω actually means: in solitude.

Now, in order to understand the saying further, we must concern ourselves a little with its actual meaning, as it still exists in traces in Greek, but as it can be established when one holds Greek together with the original tradition, with the meaning of what was felt in the word Kyrios or Lord; which is usually translated here as: “Prepare the way of the Lord.” Such a word did not have the abstract, philistine meaning in the old vocabulary, in the old way of expression, as it has today. In the age of materialism, people have become particularly philistine in their use of language and no longer perceive in language what might be called the body of spiritual beings, so that one feels a whole world in words, as in ancient times. Today, one can at best try to revive this. I have attempted to show in The Gate of Initiation how it will be possible to feel worlds.

What did one feel when one uttered the word Kyrios in such a context as the one indicated? One felt that it was only meant to be an image for what goes on in human beings, what arises for human beings in their inner soul life. One felt the emergence of the I rising from the depths of the soul and pushing ever more strongly to the surface as the appearance of a lord and ruler, as the guiding force among the soul forces — just as we say today: Man has thinking, feeling, and willing; these different soul forces are, so to speak, the servants of the soul. But there is a lord in the soul, a Kyrios: the I. This is expressed by the fact that we do not just say: It thinks in us. In ancient times, one could not say: I think — instead, one said: It thinks. And in relation to feeling and willing, one said likewise: It feels, and it wills there inside.

Now, at the time when the lord of the soul forces, the I, asserted itself, this great change in human evolution was felt so strongly that people now said: I think, I feel, I will. Thus, in earlier times, the souls were, as it were, in a certain sense in a subconscious state, trapped, submerged in the serving forces. Now the Lord of the soul forces, the I, was approaching. This does not initially refer to any personality or being, but only to the emergence of the I as the Lord in the entire structure of the soul: The Lord within the soul is coming!

This was also proclaimed in those temples that were to prepare for what was to happen to humanity. It was proclaimed with holy awe and reverence: Until now, souls were such that they had only serving forces within themselves: thinking, feeling, and willing. But now the Lord, the Kyrios, is approaching within the human soul. This great thing is happening, though it will develop gradually—until the end of the Earth's time, when it will become more and more powerful. But it is coming. And Christ brings the first impulse. It is the great hour in the history of the world clock when Christ lives. The world clock stands at the point where the I will rise ever more powerfully as the Lord of the soul forces. And the goal will be reached when the Earth falls down into the cosmos and human beings ascend to higher stages.

Only if one feels as one had to feel at that time can one get an idea of what Isaiah wanted to say and what John the Baptist took up again. Attention should be drawn to the great event of the human soul, to the further development of the human soul. Then, however, we must not translate the word eddeiag (eutheias) as “even,” as it is usually translated abstractly, but as “open,” not only straight, but open, so that the paths become passable. So the Kyrios comes, takes his direction toward the human soul. But man must do something so that the Lord can truly take hold of the human soul. The way must be cleared, it must be opened. In short, if we want to translate the passage in question in such a way that something can be done with it, we should actually translate it, if we stick a little to the traditional meaning, as follows:

“Notice” — ‘See’ is no longer correct — ”I send my angel before you; he shall prepare the way.

Hear the cry” — ‘soul’ is not there, but everyone knew that — ‘in the solitude of the soul’ — that cry which calls for the Lord of the soul — ‘prepare the way of the ruler of the soul; work to make the way open for him’ — or the path.

In this phrase, you have roughly an idea of what one can feel in the words of Isaiah. These words and what lies in this phrase were taken up again by the angel, the Angelos, in the soul of John the Baptist. Why was he able to do this? Here we must go into a little detail about the way in which John the Baptist himself was initiated, about how the initiation worked in the soul of John the Baptist.

From earlier descriptions, you know that a person can be initiated either by descending into the innermost depths of their own soul, or by being awakened to step out of their soul, to become free from the body, and to pour the soul forces into the macrocosm. These two paths have been followed in various ways by different peoples. If a person wanted to pour their soul into the macrocosm, the twelve stages they had to go through were marked, so to speak, by the twelve signs of the zodiac, in that their soul power flowed out to certain places, in certain directions of the macrocosm. Now, in general, an extraordinary amount had already been achieved, namely, something significant had been achieved for a specific purpose in world history when a soul had developed to such an extent that it could receive within itself all the forces of the macrocosm that originated from such world mysteries, which were in the sense of a single constellation. For in the ancient initiation rites, one person was initiated into the secrets of the macrocosm in such a way that his soul flowed out into the macrocosm in the direction of Capricorn, while in others it flowed in the direction of Cancer, Libra, Virgo, and so on. I have repeatedly emphasized that there are twelve different possibilities for flowing out into the macrocosm, which are symbolically indicated by the twelve signs of the zodiac. If someone were to attain initiation by letting his soul flow out into the macrocosm, and if he did not immediately attain the highest, solar initiation, but rather a partial initiation, then his soul's gaze, his soul's light, would be directed toward the mysteries to be found in connection with a certain constellation. To this end, however, his gaze had to become independent of the material world, that is, it was ensured — either through the mystery rites or, as in the case of John the Baptist, through a grace from above — that the gaze of the person concerned was directed toward a constellation, but in such a way that he had the Earth between himself and the constellation in question. This means that at night his gaze had to be directed through the earth toward the constellation. When you see a constellation with your physical eyes, you see the physical constellation. But when you can see through the material of the earth, whereby the physical constellation is covered by the material of the earth, you do not see the physical, but the spiritual, that is, the mysteries expressed by the constellation.

John the Baptist's gaze was trained so that he could see through the material earth at night to the constellation of Aquarius. He had therefore undergone the initiation when the Angelos took possession of his soul, which is called the Aquarian initiation. Thus, John the Baptist — with all that he himself knew and felt — was able to make all his abilities available to the Angelos, so that through the Angelos everything that was the Aquarian initiation could be expressed, and what existed as an indication that the rule of the ego, the xVoiog, the Lord in the soul, would come. That was the Aquarian initiation.

At the same time, however, John the Baptist pointed out that the time had also come when this Aquarian initiation was, so to speak, at a transition point where it had to be replaced by another so that people could fully understand the approaching reign of the ego. That is why he said to his intimate disciples: I am the one who is able to make available to his angel all the powers that come from the Aquarian initiation. But after me there must come one who can give his angel the powers that come after.

If you take the progression of the sun during the day from the constellation of Aries through Taurus, Gemini, and so on to Virgo, you must take the progression during the night from the direction of Libra, Aquarius, to the constellation of Pisces; that is the direction toward the spiritual sun. John had received the Aquarian initiation, and he pointed out that the one who was to come would have the initiation of Pisces, that is, the initiation that must follow the John initiation and was regarded as higher. That is why John the Baptist said to his close disciples: Through the Aquarian initiation, I can only give my angel the power to proclaim that the Lord, the xVo10g, is coming; but there will come one who has the powers symbolized by the initiation with the constellation of Pisces. And he will receive the Christ!

With this, John the Baptist pointed to Jesus of Nazareth. And that is why the ancient traditions gave Christ Jesus the symbol of the fish. And because everything that happens outwardly is a symbol of inner processes, even though it also happens outwardly, fishermen are assigned as helpers to those initiated into Pisces. All of these are at once outward, historical events and, at the same time, acts deeply symbolic of spiritual mysteries.

And a higher consecration will come upon humanity! said John. He could only give the consecration that comes from Aquarius, the water man. And John described himself as a water man. That is quite clear. Only we will have to see more and more how the images used for human mysteries are also connected with astronomical, cosmic mysteries. I have baptized you with water, said John. The baptism with water was, however, what was in the power of those who had received the initiation of Aquarius from heaven. But since the spiritual sun progresses in the opposite way to the physical sun — for while the physical sun progresses from the constellation of Virgo to the constellation of Libra, the spiritual sun progresses in the sense of the progression from John the Baptist to Jesus of Nazareth, from Aquarius to Pisces—when someone appears in the world with the initiation of Pisces and is able to take up those spiritual forces, that spiritual impulse, for which this initiation of Pisces must be the instrument—then it is possible that baptism is not only performed as John performed it, but that it is performed in a higher sense, as John describes it as baptism with the Holy Spirit.

In today's lecture, I have presented two things to you in a certain relationship. First, that the words that appear here in the Gospel of Mark refer to events in human evolution, including historical events, in that they speak of a higher power that is not even human, but an angelos, who speaks through the body of John the Baptist. On the other hand, I have shown that the descriptions given refer to events in the heavens, namely the advance of the spiritual sun from the constellation of Aquarius to the constellation of Pisces. The Gospel of Mark indeed contains in every line something that can only be read if, while following the words, one always keeps in mind both a human meaning and a cosmic, astronomical meaning, and if we are clear that something lives in human beings that can only be found in its true meaning in the heavens.

To do this, however, we need to understand a little more precisely the connection between the macrocosmic mysteries and the mysteries of human nature. Today, I can only hint at what lies behind this. Today, I have only wanted to give you a glimpse in this direction. For we will have to delve into the depths of the Gospel of Mark, which you will have to think about for a long time if you want to raise them to more than just intuitions. But I would like to clarify how the Gospel of Mark is to be read by means of the following.

You all know the rainbow. The rainbow stands, for example, for the child as a reality in the firmament. The child will initially believe, if it has not been explained to it, that it can grasp the rainbow with its hands, that it can touch it. Later, however, the human being learns that this rainbow does not depend on itself, but only comes into being when a certain constellation of rain and sunshine is present; and when rain and sunshine come into different relationships with each other, it disappears again. It is therefore not a reality, it is only an illusion; the reality is the rain and sunshine in relation to the rainbow.

When human beings advance a little on the path of occult development, there is something they compare quite naturally with the rainbow, saying: “It is actually nothing real, but only an illusion held together by external things.” Do you know what this illusion is? It is human beings themselves! Man is only an illusion. And if you take him as reality with your physical senses, you are giving yourself over to an illusion; you are giving yourself over to Maya, the great non-being. For Maya is composed of mahat aya mahat = great, ya = being, a = not, negation, thus aya = non-being — ; mahat aya means “the great non-being.”

On the path of occult development, human beings come to compare themselves to something like the rainbow. Human beings are only illusions. And everything that appeals to the physical senses is an illusion. Even the sun, as a physical body in the universe, is an illusion. What physical science describes as a ball of gas in space is quite adequate for practical purposes. But anyone who takes it as reality surrenders themselves to Maya, to deception, to the great non-existence. What is true is that there is a gathering place for spiritual hierarchies whose deeds are expressed in warmth and light, and which flow to us in warmth and light from the sun. What we perceive as warmth and light is an illusion. But everything is appearance. People believe they have a heart in their chest. But the heart is an illusion, nothing more. It is similar to when we walk down the street in the evening in the autumn fog and see certain rings around the streetlights; but these rings are not real either, they are caused by very specific forces. In the same way, the human heart is caused by very specific forces. You can imagine this in the following way. Suppose that the circle represents the vault of heaven; then a kind of force flows into us from one side, and other forces come in from the other side: these forces intersect. In truth, there is nothing in man where he believes his heart to be, except forces that flow in from heaven and intersect. Think away everything else and imagine only forces coming together as they do in a rainbow: the result is the human heart. The same is true of the other organs: they are intersecting forces that arise from the intersection of the relevant world forces.

Organs

When you go from one place to another and say, “I have the impulse to go from here to there,” you are saying something that belongs to Maya in this way. Why? Because forces come from the macrocosm that intersect here below and, through this intersection, give rise to an illusory image in relation to the direction and forces of walking. What follows one another here below is only an intersection of cosmic forces. And if we want to know the truth, we must ask: What happens in the macrocosm? What do the cosmic forces, the upper and lower ones, bring about? They bring about in us what looks as if we have a heart, a liver, and so on, or what looks as if we say, “I am going from there to there.” If we want to describe it truthfully, we must describe the cosmic forces.

If we want to describe what John the Baptist did when he baptized people, we must describe what the macrocosm commanded him to do, that is, the forces symbolized by the forces of the Water Man. These were once decided in the great world lodge and sent into the forces of John. Thus, we must read in the world language what happened at a certain place. Thus, the writer of the Gospel of Mark read the relevant events in the heavens for what happened in Palestine. He describes astronomical events and says: Understand things this way: if there is a wall here on which a shadow play is visible, then if you want to know the true reason for this, you must look at what is actually reflected in the shadows. I am describing what happened at the Jordan, but that was only the instrument for something else; for in truth I am describing what is working on the earth through the astronomical forces from the macrocosm!

The writer of the Gospel of Mark describes cosmic forces. Everywhere there are celestial phenomena. And what he describes is the expression, the projection, the shadow image that all the events in the macrocosm cast down upon the small area of Palestine. We must realize this if we want to penetrate even a little into the whole greatness and significance of this document of the Gospel of Mark. But first we had to gain some understanding of what was actually happening. We had to understand that at the beginning of the Gospel of Mark it is said: The prophet Isaiah foretold that the Lord of the soul forces would come for humanity, and that the messenger would live in John the Baptist, who would prepare people for the coming of this ruler of the soul forces. This messenger had to take place in a body that belonged to a human soul that was initiated with the forces of Aquarius. In this way, he could initiate what had to be done on earth through a personality such as Jesus of Nazareth, who had prepared himself to receive the Pisces initiation and thereby take in the Christ.

What happens on earth are reflections of cosmic processes that relate to cosmic conditions as the rainbow relates to rain and sunshine, so that we must study rain and sunshine if we want to describe the rainbow. And if we want to know what was in the heart of John the Baptist or Jesus of Nazareth, who became the dwelling place of Christ, we must study cosmic processes. For the whole world spoke out for humanity in the events that took place in Palestine and on Golgotha. And anyone who reads the Gospel of Mark differently than as merely giving him the letters for great world events stands on no other point of view than that which says: here is a group of such lines, there is a group of other lines — but which does not point to what the word Lord points to, which points only to the black lines. This is indeed how the Gospel of Mark is simply described in our time. For what is told in the Gospel of Mark is only the very outer shell of the letters. One must move up in order to understand what the events in Palestine were meant to point to, as in a shadow play.

Try to get behind what it means: earthly events are a shadow image of macrocosmic events — and you will have taken the first step toward gradually understanding one of the greatest documents in the world, the Gospel of Mark.