Background to the Gospel of St. Mark
GA 124
18 December 1910, Hanover
XII. Mystery Teachings in St. Mark's Gospel
In the course of the years we have spoken about the deeper meanings of the Gospels of St. Matthew, St. Luke and St. John, and here in Hanover, too, about the mysteries of Christianity. You will have realised that each of the Gospels provides a special means of penetrating to the core of the Christian message. It is almost truer to say of the Gospel of St. Mark than of the others that if it is to help us to gain some understanding of Christianity, we must make a certain basic assumption.
In studying this Gospel it is essential to be aware of how language was used as a means of expression in past ages of evolution. The ancient Hebrew language opens up a wide horizon in this respect. Those of you who were present at the lecture-course in Munich on Genesis, must have realised how necessary it was to give an adequate translation of particular words before the six or seven days’ work of creation could be understood, and how essential it is to re-create these ancient records in order to bring to light the inner, spiritual truths they indicate. In the Hebrew language the vowels and consonants were used very differently from anything that is customary to-day. What a man saw round about him was indicated in that ancient language by the consonants; the vowels expressed inner experiences of the soul and were indicated by dots only. In those early times, and even in the Greek language, a word in itself was an indication of a supersensible reality. Everyone knew that a spoken word containing certain sounds or syllables would arouse in the soul a whole series of mental pictures. A very great deal could be conveyed in a few words because all these factors were operating. We must always bear this in mind when we are studying the Gospel of St. Mark. We must not restrict ourselves to the actual words, because the words by themselves cannot lead us into the secrets and mysteries of that Gospel.
Let me give you one or two illustrations. In earlier times, language was a means for the expression of realities of soul and spirit. In our day it is a means for the expression of abstract thinking and this is very far removed from the living, pictorial thinking which alone can point the way into spiritual worlds. If we want to recover that kind of living thinking we must alter the forms of expression in our language accordingly. Language has become pedantic, useful only as an expression of abstract thinking; it has entirely lost the living quality which is able to lead into higher regions through the words of language and to unite the soul with the mysteries of the Universe. In the Rosicrucian Mystery Play, The Portal of Initiation, beginnings have been made to infuse real life into language. It is often a matter of subtle nuances. Our language is crude, lacks suppleness, and it is only with a struggle that it can be made to express the delicate aspects of spiritual life. That is why I tried to manipulate language in such a way as to point to secrets of existence. In the Mystery Play I made an attempt to use other means to express a great deal that words cannot express. In the Play a man is striving to take the first steps towards Initiation, to hear spiritual tones resounding in his soul. The Play describes the many deep experiences undergone by Johannes in the course of his development. His progress is such that through the bitterest but at the same time the most powerful inner experiences, he reaches the realm of Devachan in the spiritual world where he is to be introduced to the life and activity of the elemental beings there. Any attempt to express this in ordinary words could only result in abstractions. And so I tried to present living people, expressing in their own nature the mysteries of how light and darkness interweave. In this way I tried to make audible in actual sounds things which, expressed in the words of modern language, would have seemed unreal. One must listen intently to the sound of the words and feel how the right sound occurs at the right place, sensing where a sound is appropriate and where it is not. This is a kind of spiritual alchemy. And by such means it is possible to indicate the interweaving life and activity of the spiritual forces in the Universe.
In the Mystery Play, Johannes is welcomed in Devachan by Maria and her companions, Philia, Astrid and Luna. Philia is the poetic representation of the sentient soul, hence the sound I (ee) occurs twice and A once in her name. Luna is the expression of the consciousness-soul, hence U and A occur once in her name. Astrid, the expression of the intellectual or mind-soul has in her name first the sound A then I (ee). In this way a great deal can be expressed more truly than in words. If a feeling for such things could be aroused there is a great deal which I might be able to omit. You must learn to feel the significance of the U with its dull, deep ring, the lightness of the I (ee) and the delicate significance of the AI or EI, with the sense of wonder it awakens in the soul. This brings a kind of understanding different from anything to be gained through ordinary words. The sounds of language make it a most wonderful instrument, infinitely wiser than human beings, and it would be well for us to pay heed to its wisdom. Far from that, however, men are doing what they can to destroy it. If we want to have any understanding at all of earlier times with their peculiar forms of expression, we must penetrate into what was then living in the souls of men.
When we read the lines at the very beginning of St. Mark's Gospel we can feel how necessary it is to think in this way about language and its secrets. In Luther's translation, which in most respects is still the best—Weizsäcker's is far inferior—the passage from Isaiah reads: ‘Behold I send my Angel before thee who shall prepare thy way before thee. It is the voice of the preacher in the wilderness: ”Prepare the way of the Lord, make straight his path”.’
You would think that anyone who is honest with himself would have to admit that he can make nothing of this passage. To understand what it really means Spiritual Science must enable us to recognise what, according to Isaiah who was initiated in these mysteries, was to come to pass through the events of Palestine and the Mystery of Golgotha. In our day nobody is willing to admit that there are men who really can tell us something important about the most significant impulses in world-evolution. Consequently we have grotesque explanations of the Apocalypse and assertions that the writer had himself already experienced the happenings described. People talk about objective research but always start with the assumption that what they do not know cannot be known. In the words just quoted, Isaiah is giving voice to something he knew through Initiation, namely that an impulse of supreme importance is to be given to the evolution of humanity. Why did he, and all other Initiates, regard this event to which he was pointing as being of such significance? His picture of the evolution of humanity was true and he knew that in earlier times men possessed a natural clairvoyance, moreover that through the astral body they were able to see into the spiritual worlds. The astral body gradually lost the power of vision and became inwardly dark but man's progress lay in this very loss of astral clairvoyance. It was now to be made possible for the ‘I’ to function. Out of his Initiation-knowledge Isaiah might also have said: In those days men will speak only of their Ego and as long as that Ego is not filled with Christ it will be restricted to perception of the physical plane furnished by the senses and intellect. Men will be forsaken by the world of the spirit. But then Christ will come, bringing consolation, and human souls will be permeated more and more with the Christ Impulse so that they can again look upwards into the spiritual world. Before this is possible, however, they will experience the darkening of the astral body.
The very first beginnings of man's physical body came into being on Old Saturn, of his etheric body on Old Sun, of his astral body on Old Moon; and the Ego evolves on the Earth. Until the astral body lost its clairvoyant powers and became dark, the Ego had at first to work in the darkness. Before Earth-evolution began in the real sense a kind of recapitulation of the Moon-evolution took place. During that period man's astral body had developed to a stage where the activity of the whole Universe was mirrored within it. When the recapitulation of the Moon-evolution was completed the Ego began to enter into the process of evolution and Isaiah could say that Egohood would become more and more dominant on the Earth.
There were Beings who had reached the human stage on the Old Moon, others on Old Sun and Old Saturn. Man reached the human stage on the Earth. On the Old Moon the Angels reached the human stage and man has reached the human stage on the Earth. Consequently it devolved upon the Beings who were man's forerunners to make preparation for what man was to become on the Earth. The Angel-nature must penetrate into the astral body before the Ego can become active. Man's mission on Earth was prepared for by his forerunners—the Angels. Hence it is possible at certain times for an Angel to enter into a human personality. When this happens the Earth-man himself may well be maya, for a Being of higher rank is making use of his soul. The man is in truth the figure we see before us, yet he may be the sheath of some other Being. Thus it came about that the same Individuality who had once lived as Elijah and was reincarnated as John the Baptist became the vehicle of an Angel who spoke through him. In The Portal of Initiation a similar process takes place and another Being works in and through Maria:
Within our circle there is formed a knot
Of threads that Karma spins, world-fashioning.
Thy sufferings, my friend, are links in chains
Forged by the hand of destiny, whereby
The deeds of Gods unite with human lives.(The Portal of Initiation. Scene 3)
A deed of the Gods mingles with human life and creates human destiny.
Thus in John the Baptist a deed of the Heavens was united with human destiny. A divine Being, an Angel, worked in and through him. What John achieved was possible only because, while the man John was maya, another Being lived within him, having the mission to proclaim in advance what man's destiny on Earth was to be. Consequently, if we are to translate the passage in a way that helps us to understand what is actually expressed, the rendering would have to be something like this.—‘Take heed: the ‘I’ which is to appear in man's being sends in advance the Angel who prepares its way.’ The Angel is the Being who lived in the personality of John the Baptist, and the lesson to be learnt from Spiritual Science is that Moon Initiates must make preparation for Initiations that belong essentially to the Earth.
We must now consider how man's nature had developed up to the time of the Mystery of Golgotha. Think of what men must have felt when they looked back to those past ages when the astral body could see clairvoyantly into the spiritual world, and then, as incarnation followed incarnation, realised that this astral body was growing steadily darker. In earlier times, when they wanted to observe something in the spiritual world their astral bodies became luminous and radiant. But this gradually ceased and darkness in the astral body intensified until there was within man a state of isolation, a wilderness, ἔρημος. Even in Greek the expression is to be found. Then a voice awakens in the human soul, like a cry of longing for the ‘Lord’, for the ‘I’, to enter into the soul. This was the feeling accompanying the word χὐριοç, translated so baldly as ‘lord’. The soul was felt to consist of three forces: thinking, feeling and willing. Then a time came when the ‘I’, the kyrios, was to be received into the soul. This is what John the Baptist meant by the words: Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight!
Thus the quotation from Isaiah at the beginning of St. Mark's Gospel points to the wisdom-filled guidance of human evolution up to the time of the Mystery of Golgotha. This utterance of Isaiah also indicated what we now know about John the Baptist. I have described under what conÂditions he was able to become the vehicle of an Angel. A certain Initiation was necessary for this—the Initiation which enabled the man receiving it to reveal to other men that the time had now come for the ‘I’ to penetrate into the human soul.
This could be proclaimed only by one who had received the Initiation known since ancient times as the Aquarius Initiation in the terminology used in the Mysteries. The language of the heavens was used to express the great secrets of the spiritual world made known to men through InitiaÂtion. The language of the heavens alone is able to express what happens to the human soul when it is initiated into the great Mysteries. Such things cannot be described by human words. Men looked up to the stars, observed their relations to one another and said to themselves: if we can frame adequate expressions for what the stars reveal, that is the most fitting way to indicate the nature of the mysterious processes operating in a man during a particular Initiation.
No matter what name was used in the various civilisations, it was always the great Ahura Mazdao to whom men looked up: they looked up to that Divine Being and to his hierarchy in the Sun. Christ is the supreme Spirit of the Sun Beings. There are twelve different ways in which Initiation into the sacred Mysteries of the Sun can take place and to explain this in human words is hardly possible. But if we think of the Sun standing in one of the constellations and sending its rays through that constellation to the Earth, and if we consider how it is related to other stars, we have a kind of script which expresses the fact that a particular man is initiated into the Sun-Mysteries in a way that makes him an Aquarius Initiate.
Take, for instance, the seven holy Rishis. The symbol of their Initiation into the Sun-Mysteries is the picture of the Sun in Taurus. When the Sun stands in the sign of Taurus the spectacle presented in the firmament reveals the mystery of the particular Initiation of the Rishis. This Initiation took effect through the seven personalities who were the seven holy Rishis. This is also expressed in the fact that the Pleiades, a cluster of seven stars, shine from the same region of the heavens. That is moreover the region where the whole solar system entered into the Universe to which we belong. So in order to specify the various forms of Initiation into the Sun-Mysteries we can use expressions indicating the Sun's position in a particular constellation.
John the Baptist had necessarily to receive an Aquarius Initiation, the expression indicating that the Sun was standing in the constellation of Aquarius. Try to understand it in this way: On the day or light side of the Zodiac lie Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, then Libra. The constellations on the night or dark side of the Zodiac are Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pisces. Since the last two lie on the night side, the Sun's rays coming from them must not only traverse physical space but they must send the spiritual light of the Sun, which passes through the Earth, through spiritual space. Aquarius Initiates received this name because they were able to confer the water-baptism, that is to say, to enable men, while immersed in water, to be sustained by the power of the spiritual Sun.
It is the facts of the spiritual life here on Earth from which the names of the zodiacal constellations are derived, by transference to the heavens. Our so-called learned men, however, explain such things by saying that the names of the constellations in the heavens were given to certain personalities on Earth. The truth is just the opposite! Nowadays it is said that John the Baptist was called the ‘Water-man’ because that name had been derived from the constellation and applied to him. But that is really putting the cart before the horse. You will have heard of a certain savant's ironical attempt to establish that Napoleon was not an historical figure. The argument was that the name ‘Napoleon’ is easily derived from ‘Apollo’, the prefix N indicating comparative rank—therefore a kind of super-Apollo. Napoleon had six brothers and sisters and the star Apollo is included among the seven Pleiades. Napoleon's twelve Marshals are said to be the twelve signs of the Zodiac and Apollo's mother, Leto, becomes Napoleon's mother, Letitia ... and so on, in the same strain!
If we trace the course of the Sun in the heavens we find that as the physical Sun sets the spiritual Sun begins to rise. In its day or summer course the Sun progresses from Taurus to Aries, and so on; in its night or winter course it will reveal to us the secrets of the Initiation of Aquarius or Pisces. Physically, the Sun's course is from Virgo to Leo, Cancer, Gemini, Taurus, Aries; spiritually its course is from Virgo to Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn and Aquarius to Pisces. The spiritual counterpart of the course of the physical Sun is its passage from Aquarius to Pisces.
Consequently John could say: He must increase but I must decrease. My mission is one of which you will have a picture when the Sun passes from the sign of Aquarius to that of Pisces. I am an Aquarius Initiate and I am not worthy to give you the secrets of the Sun in Pisces. I am not worthy to unloose the shoe-latchet of the One I am to proclaim to you.
In these words John speaks of himself unambiguously as an Aquarius Initiate. Pictures in old calendars indicate the meaning of his words when he says: ‘The latchet of whose shoe I am not worthy to unloose’. In old pictures of the zodiacal constellations the Waterman is shown kneeling. His whole posture indicates the reverence he must feel for the Sun as it passes him by and rising in Pisces reveals what is to come. This is the picture of John the Baptist: the Sun passes on and he cannot detain it; he can only proclaim in advance what is to be.
The prophet Isaiah knew that when the Sun progressed to Pisces a new dispensation was to come. This progression signifies the advent of men or beings connected with the Pisces Initiation. That is why the sign for Christ Jesus in the earliest Christian times was the fish or two fishes still to be seen in the catacombs of Rome. Why did Jesus say to His disciples: ‘I will make you fishers of men’? John the Baptist prepared for the Pisces Initiation which the Nazarene had to undergo if the Christ was to descend into him. The events in Palestine, the most important in the whole process of world-evolution, are inscribed in wonderful signs in the Zodiac. What came to pass step by step in Palestine is explained in its depths not through any human script but through a heavenly script which must be consulted for any real understanding of a process so exalted that it is directly related to the Macrocosm. What the physical eye saw moving about Palestine in the flesh and blood of Jesus of Nazareth—was that all? If you remember the indications I have given, it was maya, illusion. Actually the whole spiritual power, the central spiritual power, of the Sun was present in the figure of Jesus of Nazareth moving about Palestine; the figure that appeared physically as Jesus of Nazareth was maya.
Everything Christ Jesus did was connected with macrocosmic events. Think of how often in St. Mark's Gospel it is said that Christ performed His acts of healing after the Sun had set or before it had risen. Thus we are told: In the evening, when the Sun had set, they brought to Him all manner of sick and possessed. (i, 32). Why were the sick and possessed brought to Him at just that time? Because the Sun had set and its forces were no longer working physically in Jesus, but spiritually; what He was to do was not connected with the physical forces of the Sun. The physical Sun had set, but the spiritual Sun-forces worked through His heart and body. And when He wanted to unfold His greatest and most powerful forces He had necessarily to exert them at a time when the physical Sun was not visible in the heavens. So also when we read: ‘Before the Sun had risen’—the words have a definite meaning. Every word in St. Mark's Gospel indicates great cosmic connections between processes in the universe and every step taken and every deed performed by Christ in the body of Jesus of Nazareth here on Earth. If you were to draw a map of the paths He trod and the deeds He performed and were then to study the corresponding processes in the heavens, the picture would be the same: processes in the heavens would seem to have been projected down to the Earth.
Whence did a man like Kepler derive the principles of his astronomy? In his life as Kepler he did not find the powers which enabled him to epitomise the fundamentals of astronomy in his three great laws. These three laws describe in words the movement of the planets around their fixed star. Kepler was able to discover them only because his enthusiasm caused certain memories to arise in him. In a previous incarnation he had been a pupil of the old Egyptian Mysteries. In him, and in many others too, those experiences rose up again as dim intuitions. Such men had in their life of soul much that was an expression of the harmony of the spheres. Kepler studied the wonderful constellations to be seen in the heavens during his life. He observed the conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter and Moon and through it sought to explain the star by which the Three Wise Men from the East were guided. Abstractions as appalling as the Kant-Laplace theory had not been devised in Kepler's day.
The Gospel of St. Mark gives expression to the wonderful harmony between the great Cosmos and what was to come to pass once on our Earth through the deeds of Christ Jesus and the Mystery of Golgotha. We cannot understand this Gospel unless we can decipher the writing of the stars and that requires insight into the secrets of the language of the heavens. When the Gospel says that the Sun had set, this does not indicate merely that the Sun was no longer shining but also that the spiritual Beings of the Sun-Hierarchy had moved into a world of stronger spiritual powers because they must now work through the Earth, through the physical substance of the Earth. All this was felt by men when they were told of what came to pass through Christ Jesus after the Sun had set. A whole world of meaning lay in the words.
I hope that these few indications will help us to penetrate more deeply into the secrets of the Gospels. Particularly through the study of St. Mark's Gospel the human soul can rise to an understanding of wonderful mysteries of cosmic happenings. Every word in that Gospel is of great significance.
Answers to Questions
What is the meaning of the temptation of Jesus by Satan? Are Satan and Lucifer identical? How can the highest of all Beings be tempted by one of a lower order?
Satan is Ahriman. In the Gospels of St. Luke and St. Matthew, Lucifer is meant; in the Gospel of St. Mark, Ahriman. An impressive description is given in that Gospel of how hideous animal forms make their appearance when a man enters the spiritual world in the usual way. There are people who believe that entrance to the spiritual world can be achieved by adopting some special diet and other material practices of a similar kind. But everything they then see, particularly when it takes the form of sublime figures of light, is only a reflection of their own self, an Ahrimanic deception. Both Lucifer and Ahriman are tempters; and Christ in human form showed how man must resist them when he begins to find his way into the spiritual world.
Shall we see in higher worlds those who belong to us?
Spiritual seeing is very different from physical seeing. In the spiritual sense we shall certainly see again those who belong to us. The fact that Mary Magdalene did not immediately recognise Jesus is an indication that the Risen Christ cannot be recognised by everyone; certain powers must first have been developed. These powers began to function in Mary Magdalene only when Christ spoke her name. Much of what Spiritual Science teaches is regarded as heretical, although the Gospels confirm it. The Risen Christ could be recognised only by clairvoyant sight.
Are not the contents of the Babylonian Tables and the Ten Commandments practically identical?
People who speak about similarities in such a case are not aware of the essentials. This is very evident in the case of the Sermon on the Mount. The Bible does not say: ‘yours is the kingdom of heaven’, but: ‘you will find the kingdom of heaven within yourselves’. The Ten Commandments too are fundamentally different from anything previously in existence. Hebraism and Christianity added the impulse of the ‘I AM’ to what was already contained in earlier religions. When such things are studied in depth they are extraordinarily enlightening.
How is the doctrine of reincarnation to be reconciled with the Bible?
It is not yet possible to understand the Bible fully. Each epoch has translated it in the way that suited itself. The Bible has nothing to fear from the doctrine of reincarnation. It used to be thought that every discovery of a new scientific truth constituted a danger to the Bible.
What is the relation between Christ and Lucifer?
It is not easy to explain this briefly. We have often spoken of how man has passed from incarnation to incarnation and how the Luciferic power took root in very early times in the astral body and Ahriman later on in the etheric body. With the coming of Christ all this acquired a new meaning. We are only at the beginning of Christian evolution. If the Gospels are understood they make it clear that Christ was obliged to deal with Lucifer and Ahriman. But there are very few who realise to-day that the stories of the Temptation differ in the Gospels of St. Matthew, St. Mark and St. Luke. Occultists know that there is not only a Luciferic temptation by way of man's desires, but also an Ahrimanic temptation—when a man carries his own passions out into the Macrocosm and sees all manner of animal figures and forms. The Gospel of St. Matthew describes a Luciferic temptation: in the Gospel of St. Mark, Jesus is ‘with the wild beasts’ of human nature. In all occult writings Lucifer is pictured as a serpent, Ahriman as a hound.
These stories of the Temptation point to deep mysteries. Just as the advent of the Luciferic and Ahrimanic powers was a necessity in order that man might become a free, independent being, so he must tear himself away from them again through the power of Christ in his soul. The spheres of Lucifer and Ahriman will gradually be reversed. Men will take the Christ Impulse into themselves, confronting Ahriman in the outside world. Up to now, and at present, the opposite has been the case. Such things can be studied in The Portal of Initiation. You should pay attention to the vowel sounds. These things are in accordance with an inner necessity. The verses in the first part change in the second into their opposite. This is intentional.
Question not recorded.
It is true that Jesus did not write anything. There is actually a theologian who discusses whether He could write at all!—In four hundred years people will call what is said nowadays about Copernicus and Galileo a modern form of mythology. Theosophists of all people should not talk about ‘Ptolemaic childishness’.
A question about the authenticity of the writings of Dionysius.
It is usual nowadays to regard the actual writer as more important than the spiritual originator and inspirer. (Rudolf Steiner here referred to his own experience in connection with Goethe's prose-hymn, Nature, the authorship of which had been disputed by some philologists.) Dionysius, the disciple of the Apostle Paul, actually wrote nothing down because in those days to have done so would have seemed unimportant. But his successors, who, as was customary in those times, were also called Dionysius, presented a faithful account of his teachings as handed down by tradition. These were the writings of the so-called pseudo-Dionysius.
To ‘believe in good faith’ is not enough; everyone should convince himself of the truth. People to-day have no conception of what is possible and what is impossible. Things become tragic in this respect when, for instance, the Bible is ruthlessly analysed by scholars. Erudition and nonsense often go hand in hand!
Can Christ Jesus appear to men on Earth?
In the way in which He appeared to St. Paul, this is possible. When this happens it is a kind of Initiation which can sometimes take place without previous training. From the middle of the twentieth century onwards many people will have this experience.
Zwölfter Vortrag
Sie wissen, daß wir innerhalb der Entwickelung unserer Deutschen Sektion im Laufe der Jahre gesprochen haben über die eigentlichen tieferen Untergründe des Matthäus-, Lukas- und Johannes-Evangeliums, und manches von dem, was über die Geheimnisse des Christentums zu sagen ist, wurde auch hier in Hannover ausgesprochen. Sie werden dabei gesehen haben, daß ein jedes der Evangelien besonderen Anlaß gibt, in die christliche Verkündigung hineinzudringen. Mehr fast als für die anderen Evangelien ist es notwendig, daß eine ganz bestimmte Voraussetzung gemacht wird, wenn man sich dem Verständnis des Christentums nähern will in Anlehnung an das MarkusEvangelium. Da muß man sich ganz und gar versenken in die Eigenart, wie in abgelaufenen Zeiten der Menschheitsentwickelung die Ausdrucksweise der Menschen gehandhabt worden ist. Es braucht nur auf einiges hingewiesen zu werden: daß vor allen Dingen die althebräische Sprache einen unendlich weiten Horizont eröffnet durch ihre Ausdrucksweise. Wer in München in dem Vortragszyklus über die Geheimnisse des Schöpfungswerkes gesehen hat, wie es notwendig war, Übersetzungen der einzelnen Worte zu geben, um das Sechs- oder Sieben-Tagewerk zu verstehen, der wird ein Gefühl bekommen haben davon, wie notwendig es ist bei diesen Urkunden aus alten Zeiten, sie aus dem ganzen Geist und der ganzen Seele der Dinge selber heraus sozusagen neu zu schaffen. Das ist es, worauf es ankommt. In der hebräischen Sprache wurden die Vokale und die Konsonanten anders gehandhabt, als es heute Gebrauch ist. Wenn die hebräische Sprache hinwies auf dasjenige, was der Mensch um sich herum sah, da hatte sie den Ausdruck dafür in den Mitlauten, den Konsonanten. Die Vokale sind durch bloße Punkte angedeutet, da sie der Ausdruck waren für das, was in der Seele lebte, für alles Innerliche. Selbstlaute hatte die hebräische Sprache für alles, was inneres Erleben war, Mitlaute für das, was äußere Anschauung war. Und das fühlte man lebendig mit. Und in jenen alten Zeiten, auch beim Griechischen, war mit dem Wort verbunden eine Art Erregung für eine übersinnliche Hinweisung, und zwar in eindeutiger Weise, so daß jeder wußte, wenn dies oder jenes Wort ausgesprochen wurde in diesen oder jenen Lauten, daß er in seiner Seele erregen mußte eine ganze Summe von Vorstellungen, die bei einem Worte ganz andere waren als bei einem anderen Worte. In wenig Worten konnte ungeheuer viel gesagt werden, weil das alles mitwirkte. Und dessen müssen wir uns insbesondere erinnern beim Markus-Evangelium. Nicht ans Wort dürfen wir uns da halten, durch das Wort allein können wir nicht hineinkommen in die Mysterien und Geheimnisse des Markus-Evangeliums.
Da möchte ich ein paar Hinweise geben. Die Sprache war also früher Ausdrucksmittel für Seelisch-Geistiges. In unserer Zeit ist sie Ausdrucksmittel für ein abstraktes Denken, das weit entfernt ist von dem lebendigen Bilddenken, das allein hinaufweisen kann in die geistigen Welten. Damit wir wiederum kommen zu einem solchen lebendigen Denken, müssen die Ausdrucksmittel unserer Sprache wiederum lebendig gemacht werden. Die Sprache ist aber philiströs, pedantisch geworden und nur für Abstraktes dienlich. Alles Lebendige, was durch die Worte der Sprache hinaufführen kann in höhere Regionen und die Seele verbinden kann mit den Geheimnissen des Weltalls, das ist ganz und gar verlorengegangen. Und da möchte ich andeuten, wie im Rosenkreuzer-Mysterium Anfänge gemacht sind von dem, was Lebendigmachen der Sprache sein will. Da kommt es manchmal auf kleine Nuancen im Ausdruck an. Unsere Sprache ist ja grob, ungelenkig, und man muß ringen mit ihr, um die Feinheiten des geistigen Lebens zum Ausdruck zu bringen. Deshalb versuchte ich durch die Handhabung der Sprache auf Geheimnisse des Daseins hinzuweisen. In dem Mysteriendrama «Die Pforte der Einweihung» sollte versucht werden, mit anderen Mitteln vieles zum Ausdruck zu bringen, was man mit Worten nicht sagen kann. Da strebt ein Mensch hinauf zu den ersten Stufen der Einweihung. Er strebt nach dem Erklingen der geistigen Töne in der eigenen Seele. Was Johannes durchmacht, ist in diesem Drama geschildert. Tiefe Seelenerlebnisse macht er durch, um seine Seele zu entwickeln. Er ist so weit, daß er durch die bittersten und zu gleicher Zeit größten und gewaltigsten Seelenerlebnisse hinkommt zu der geistigen Welt, ins Devachan, und er soll nun eingeführt werden in das Leben und Weben der elementarischen Wesenheiten des Devachan. Diese Geheimnisse des Lebens und Webens der elementarischen Wesenheiten in Worten auszudrükken, gibt immer einen abstrakten, groben Sinn. Und da versuchte ich es so zu machen, daß lebende Personen diese Geheimnisse durch ihr eigenes Wesen ausdrückten, wie Licht und Finsternis ineinander weben. So versuchte ich, das eigene Weben der Worte und Laute durch die Geheimnisse des Weltalls hindurch anzudeuten. Dadurch konnte man manches für das Ohr hörbar machen, was, in heutigen Worten ausgesprochen, abstrakt klingt. Man muß hinhorchen auf den Klang der Worte, wie da an rechter Stelle der rechte Laut steht. Man muß fühlen den Ort, wo er hingehört und wo er nicht hingehört. Das ist etwas wie eine geistige Alchemie. Und das Durcheinanderweben und -leben der geistigen Kräfte im Weltall kann man durch solche Mittel andeuten.
Maria empfängt den Johannes im Devachan mit ihren Gefährtinnen Philia, Astrid und Luna. Philia ist der poetische Repräsentant für die Empfindungsseele, darum erklingt in ihrem Namen zweimal das I und ein A. Luna ist der Ausdruck für die Bewußtseinsseele, darum ist ein U und ein A in ihrem Namen. Astrid, der Ausdruck für die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele, hat in ihrem Namen zuerst das A, dann das I. Da kann man ein Mannigfaltiges aussprechen, besser, als man es mit Worten vermag. Wenn man ein Gefühl dafür erwecken könnte, brauchte ich über viele Dinge nicht mehr zu sprechen. Aber man muß dahinter kommen, was es heißt: hier steht ein U - die Dumpfheit, das Tiefenartige des U muß man empfinden, ebenso die Helligkeit des I und die Verwunderung in die Seele gießende leise Hindeutung des Ai oder Ei. Das gibt eine andere Art des Verständnisses, als man es durch Worte gewinnen kann. Die Sprache ist wirklich in ihren Lauten ein ungeheuer wunderbares Instrument. Sie ist viel, viel gescheiter als die Menschen, und wir täten gut, hinzuhorchen auf ihre Weisheit. Die Menschen sind aber daran, sie zu verderben. Und wenn wir frühere Zeiten in ihrer eigentümlichen Ausdrucksweise überhaupt verstehen wollen, müssen wir uns versetzen in dasjenige, was in der Seele der betreffenden Menschen lebte.
Und da können wir schon, wenn wir einfach das Markus-Evangelium in den ersten Zeilen aufschlagen, die Notwendigkeit fühlen, so zu denken über die Sprache und ihre Geheimnisse. In der lutherischen Übersetzung, die ja noch in den meisten Fällen die beste ist Weizsäcker ist viel schlechter -, steht die Jesajasstelle: «Siehe, ich sende meinen Engel vor dir her, der da bereite deinen Weg vor dir. Es ist die Stimme eines Predigers in der Wüste: Bereitet den Weg des Herrn, machet seine Steige richtig!»
Man möchte meinen, daß derjenige, der diese Stelle liest, wenn er ein ehrlicher Mensch ist, sich gestehen müßte: Ich weiß nichts aus dieser Stelle zu machen. Um dasjenige, was wirklich dasteht, zu verstehen, ist notwendig, daß man durch Geisteswissenschaft eindringt in dasjenige, was im Sinne des Propheten Jesajas, der in diese Dinge eingeweiht war, geschehen sollte durch das Ereignis von Palästina und das Mysterium von’ Golgatha. Unsere Zeit findet ja schon dies unmöglich, daß es wirklich Menschen gibt, die über die wichtigsten Impulse, die in der Weltentwickelung liegen, Auskunft geben können. Das gibt unsere Zeit nicht zu. Daher die grotesken Erklärungen der Apokalypse, so daß man sagt, daß der Schreiber der Apokalypse diese Ereignisse, die er da beschreibt, eben schon erlebt hätte. Man redet von objektiver Forschung, aber man macht von vornherein die Voraussetzung: Es darf niemand etwas wissen, was man selber nicht weiß. Der Prophet Jesajas will aber in diesen Worten zum Ausdruck bringen etwas, was er durch seine Einweihung weiß. Er will sagen: Es wird etwas kommen in der Menschheitsentwickelung, was von eminenter, fundamentaler Bedeutung ist für diese ganze Menschheitsentwickelung. - Warum sah er - und mit ihm alle anderen Initiierten — dies Freignis, auf das er hinweisen wollte, als ein so bedeutungsvolles an? Er sah die Menschheitsentwickelung in rechter Weise an, er wußte: Die Menschen hatten früher ein elementares Hellsehen, sie sahen hinein in die geistigen Welten, sie konnten ihren Astralleib zum Schauen gebrauchen. Dieser Astralleib verlor dann aber die Kraft des Schauens und verfinsterte sich in sich selbst. Darin aber bestand der Fortschritt der Menschheit, daß sie diese hellsichtige Kraft des Astralleibes verlor. Sie sollte aber dafür immer mehr ihr Ich wirken lassen. Aus dem Wissen der Einweihung heraus hätte Jesajas sagen können: Die Menschen werden dann aber nur von ihrem Ich sprechen, und solange dieses Ich nicht erfüllt ist von dem Christus, ist es angewiesen auf dasjenige, was der Mensch nur über den physischen Plan mit den Sinnen und dem Verstand allein von der Welt zu sehen vermag. Sie werden verlassen sein von der Welt des Geistes. Aber dann wird ihnen Trost werden. Es wird kommen der Christus, und diese Seelen werden sich immer mehr durchdringen mit dem Impuls des Christus, so daß sie wiederum hinaufschauen können in die geistige Welt. Aber das werden sie erleben, daß vorher der Astralleib dunkel geworden ist.
Der Mensch hat die erste Anlage seines physischen Leibes auf dem Saturn erhalten, auf der alten Sonne erhielt er die Anlage zu seinem Ätherleib, auf dem alten Monde zu seinem Astralleib, und das Ich kommt auf der Erde zur Entwickelung. Bis dahin, wo der Astralleib in seiner hellsichtigen Kraft erloschen sein wird, wo er finster sein wird, muß dieses Ich sich zunächst in der Finsternis geltend machen. Bevor die eigentliche Erdenentwickelung begann, war eine Art Wiederholung der Mondenentwickelung. Da hat der Mensch seinen Astralleib entwickelt, so daß die Wirksamkeit der ganzen Welt bildhaft in seinem Astralleibe lebte. Bis dahin war also eine Wiederholung der Mondenentwickelung. Das Ich drängte sich dann hinein, und Jesajas sagt: Die Ichheit wird immer mehr Platz greifen auf der Erde.
Auf dem alten Monde gab es auch Wesenheiten mit der Menschennatur, auch auf Sonne und Saturn. Auf der Erde ist der Mensch Mensch. Der Engel war auf dem Monde Mensch, und der Erdenmensch ist der Nachfolger der Engel im Menschentum, so daß der Vorgänger des Menschen auf der Erde vorbereiten muß dasjenige, was mit dem Menschen geschehen soll. Das Engelhafte muß in den Astralleib hineinwirken, bevor das Ich hineinwirken kann. Soll die Erdenmission des Menschen vorbereitet werden, so muß das gesche hen durch den Vorgänger des Menschen, den Engel. Daher griff zu einer gewissen Zeit ein Angelos in eine Menschennatur ein. Der Erdenmensch kann, wenn so etwas stattfindet, eine Maya sein. Seiner Seele bedient sich ein höheres Wesen. Der Mensch ist in Wahrheit das, als was er vor uns steht, und er kann doch Hülle sein für eine andere Wesenheit. Und so kam es denn, daß dieselbe Individualität, die einstmals als Elias lebte und bei der Wiederverkörperung als Johannes erschien, in sich aufnahm eine Engelnatur, die sich durch ihn ausdrückte. In meinem Mysteriendrama «Die Pforte der Einweihung» findet ein solcher Vorgang statt. Da ist es so, daß durch die Maria hindurchwirkt eine andere Wesenheit:
Es formt sich hier in diesem Kreise
Ein Knoten aus den Fäden,
Die Karma spinnt im Weltenwerden.
O Freundin, deine Leiden
Sind Glieder eines Schicksalsknotens,
In dem sich Göttertat verschlingt mit Menschenleben.
Göttertat verschlingt sich mit Menschenleben und formt Menschenschicksal.
So war Himmeltat mit Menschenschicksal verbunden in Johannes dem Täufer. Ein göttliches Wesen, ein Engelwesen, wirkte durch ihn. Was er tat, konnte nur dadurch geschehen, daß der Mensch Johannes eine Maya war, daß in ihm innerlich ein Wesen lebte, das vorherverkünden sollte dasjenige, was den Menschen auf der Erde werden sollte. Und nun müssen wir übersetzen, wenn wir sachgemäß übersetzen wollen, so, daß wir uns hineinfühlen in dasjenige, was wirklich in diesen Worten ausgedrückt werden soll: Nehmet wahr: Das Ich, das erscheinen soll in der Menschenwesenheit, sendet vor dem Ich her den vorbereitenden Engel.
Gemeint ist der Engel, der in der Persönlichkeit Johannes’ des Täufers lebte. Der ist gemeint, und die ganze Lehre, die wir in der Theosophie kennenlernen vom Engel, liegt in diesem Satze: daß Mondeneingeweihte die Erdeneinweihungen vorbereiten müssen.
Nun müssen wir ein wenig hineinblicken in die menschliche Natur, wie sie sich gegen das Mysterium von Golgatha hin nach und nach entwickelt hat. Denken Sie, wie sich die Menschen haben fühlen können, wenn sie zurückgeschaut haben in die alten Zeiten, wo der Astralleib hellsichtig hineinschauen konnte in die geistige Welt; wie er dann immer dunkler und dunkler geworden ist. Die Menschen haben das von Inkarnation zu Inkarnation wahrnehmen können. Sie sagten sich: Früher, wenn sie etwas in der geistigen Welt wahrnehmen wollten, begannen sie mit dem Astralleib zu glänzen und zu leuchten. Dann hatte das immer mehr aufgehört, er wurde immer dunkler. Und dann war im Innern des Menschen eine dunkle Einsamkeit geworden, eine Wüste, ἔρημος — selbst noch im Griechischen findet das seinen Ausdruck. Und da wird in der Seele des Menschen eine Stimme wach wie ein Sehnsuchtsruf nach dem Herrn des Menschen, nach dem Ich, damit es wirklich einziehe in die Menschenseele. Das wurde gefühlt bei dem Worte χὐριοç, was mit dem flachen Worte «Herr» übersetzt ist. Man fühlte die Seele aus drei Kräften bestehend: Denken, Fühlen und Wollen. Dann kam die Zeit, wo das Ich, der χὐριοç, hereingenommen werden sollte. Das wollte Johannes zum Ausdruck bringen, als er sagte: Bereitet den Weg des Herrn! Macher seine Steige richtig!
Da haben Sie die ganze weisheitsvolle Lenkung der Menschheitsentwickelung zu dem Mysterium von Golgatha hin als einen Ausspruch des Jesajas am Anfang des Markus-Evangeliums. Und zu gleicher Zeit ist uns in diesem Ausspruch des Jesajas über Johannes dasjenige gesagt, was wir über ihn wissen. Ich habe gesagt, wie er beschaffen sein mußte, damit er einen Angelos aufnehmen konnte. Dazu war notwendig eine gewisse Einweihung. Diejenige Einweihung, die dazu notwendig war, gab einem solchen Menschen zu gleicher Zeit die Möglichkeit, andern Menschen zu zeigen: jetzt ist wirklich die Zeit da, welche die Zeit des Hereinbrechens des Ich ist.
Der das sagen konnte, das mußte derjenige Initiierte sein, welcher im Sinne der Initiationssprache der Wassermann-Initiierte seit alter Zeit war. Man bezeichnet die großen Geheimnisse der geistigen Welt, in die die Menschen hineinverflochten werden, dadurch, daß sie initiiert werden, in der Sprache des Himmels. Man mußte wählen die Schrift des Himmels, wenn man ausdrücken wollte, was mit der Menschenseele vorgeht, wenn sie eingeweiht wird in die großen Mysterien. Man kann das nicht mit menschlichen Worten ausdrücken. Und da sagte man: Oben am Himmel stehen in den Verhältnissen zueinander die Sterne. Wenn wir sie anschauen und aus diesen Verhältnissen der Sterne zueinander Ausdrucksformen bilden, dann können wir ausdrücken die Geheimnisse, die mit dem Menschen vorgehen bei einer solchen Initiation.
Zu dem großen Ahura Mazdao schauten die Menschen immer hinauf - gleichgültig, welchen Namen sie ihm gaben in den verschiedenen Kulturen. Sie schauten hinauf zu der göttlichen Wesenheit und ihrer Hierarchie in der Sonne. Der Christus ist der große Geist, der der Sonne zugrundeliegenden Wesen. Es gibt zwölf verschiedene Arten, in die heiligen Sonnen-Mysterien eingeweiht zu werden, und dies auszudrücken mit irdischen Worten ist kaum möglich. Aber wenn wir ins Auge fassen, wie die Sonne vor einem Sternbild steht und durch dieses ihre Strahlen der Erde zusendet und in Beziehung steht zu den anderen Sternen des Himmels, da haben wir eine Art Schrift, die Ausdruck sein kann dafür: Dieser Mensch ist eingeweiht so in die Sonnen-Mysterien, daß wir in ihm vor uns haben einen Eingeweihten des Wassermanns.
Nehmen wir an die sieben heiligen Rishis. Sie waren so eingeweiht in die Sonnen-Mysterien, daß uns das Sinnbild für ihre Einweihung das Stehen der Sonne im Sternbild des Stieres ist; und was wir schauen können am Firmament, wenn die Sonne im Sternbild des Stieres steht, das gibt tatsächlich das Mysterium der eigentümlichen Einweihung der Rishis, und diese Einweihung wirkte hindurch durch die sieben Persönlichkeiten, die die sieben heiligen Rishis waren. Das kommt dadurch zum Ausdruck, daß vom selben Orte herglänzt das Siebengestirn, die Plejaden. Das ist der Ort, an dem unser ganzes Sonnensystem in unser Weltall hineingekommen ist. So kann man die Einweihung in die verschiedenen Arten der Sonnen-Mysterien ausdrücken dadurch, daß man die Ausdrucksformen nimmt von dem Stehen der Sonne in einem Sternbild.
Die Einweihung des Johannes mußte eine solche sein, daß sie eine Wassermann-Einweihung war, die Ausdruck war für das Stehen der Sonne im Sternbild des Wassermanns. Um das ein wenig zu verstehen, denken Sie daran, daß auf der Lichtseite des Zodiakus liegen: Widder, Stier, Zwillinge, Krebs, Löwe, Jungfrau, dann Waage. Dann kommen die Sternbilder, die auf der Winter- oder Nachtseite des Zodiakus liegen: Skorpion, Schütze, Steinbock, Wassermann und Fische. Wassermann und Fische liegen auf der Winter- oder Nachtseite des Zodiakus. Was heißt das? Ja, wenn da die Sonnenstrahlen fallen, müssen sie nicht bloß durch den physischen Raum fallen, sondern so, daß sie das geistige Licht der Sonne, welches durch die Erde durchgeht, durch den geistigen Raum schicken. Die Wassermann-Eingeweihten bekamen den Namen Wassermann-Eingeweihte deshalb, weil diejenigen, die so eingeweiht waren, imstande waren, die Wassertaufe zu verleihen, sich hinabzubeugen mit demjenigen, das diese geistige Sonnenkraft ihnen gab, mit ihr unterzutauchen unter das Wasser.
Die Namen für die Tierkreisbilder sind von den Tatsachen des geistigen Lebens, die hier auf der Erde geschehen sind, hinaufgetragen an den Himmel. Jetzt machen diese sonderbaren Käuze, unsere Wissenschafter, es so, daß sie, um solche Dinge zu erklären, sagen, man hätte eben die Namen der Sternbilder herabgetragen und mit ihrem Namen gewisse Persönlichkeiten auf der Erde belegt. Gerade das Umgekehrte ist der Fall. Heute sagen ja die Leute, Johannes der Täufer wurde Wassermann genannt, weil man den Namen des Sternbildes des Wassermanns auf ihn übertragen hätte. Was heute die weisen Gelehrten machen, ist wirklich dasselbe, als ob man einen Esel mit dem Kopf nach dem Wagen anschirren wollte. Bekannt ist ja auch der ironische Versuch eines Gelehrten, die Person Napoleons als nicht historisch hinzustellen. Es wird da gezeigt, wie leicht es ist, den Namen Napoleon von Apollo herzuleiten, das vorgesetzte N würde nur eine Art Komparativ des Namens bedeuten, gleichsam eine Art Über-Apollo. Die Geschwisterzahl sechs stimmt bei beiden, und der Stern Apollon wird zu den sieben Plejaden gezählt. Die zwölf Marschälle Napoleons sind die zwölf Sternbilder des Tierkreises. Die Mutter des Apoll, Läto, die des Napoleon Lätitia und so weiter.
Zeichnen wir uns den Himmelsbogen der Sonne, so entdecken wir: Während die physische Sonne heruntergeht, rückt ihr geistiges Gegenbild herauf. So müssen wir zeichnen den Tages- oder Sommerbogen der Sonne, da geht die Sonne vom Stier zum Widder und so weiter, und den Winter- oder Nachtbogen der Sonne, durch den wir bezeichnen können die Geheimnisse der Initiation des Wassermann und der Fische. Physisch geht es von der Jungfrau zu Löwe, Krebs, Zwillingen, Stier, Widder, geistig geht es von der Jungfrau zu Waage, Skorpion, Schütze, Steinbock, Wassermann und Fischen. Das geistige Gegenbild des physischen Sonnenganges ist der Gang der Sonne vom Wassermann zu den Fischen.

So konnte Johannes sagen: Er muß zunehmen, ich muß abnehmen. Meine Mission ist eine solche, daß ihr ein Bild davon bekommt, wenn die Sonne aus dem Sternbild des Wassermanns zum Sternbild der Fische geht. Ich bin Eingeweihter des Wassermanns, und ich bin nicht würdig, euch zu geben das Geheimnis der Sonnen-Fische. Ich bin nicht würdig, demjenigen die Schuhriemen zu lösen, den ich euch ankündigen soll.
In diesen Worten des Johannes haben wir sozusagen den handgreiflichen Beweis, wie er sich bildhaft als Wassermann-Eingeweihter charakterisiert. In den Bildern der alten Volkskalender ist ausgedrückt, was die Worte des Johannes bedeuten: Ich bin nicht würdig, ihm die Riemen seiner Schuhe zu lösen. Sehen Sie sich die alten Tierkreisbilder an, da kniet der Wassermann. Da hat er in der Gebärde, wie es nötig ist, Ehrfurcht vor dem zu haben, der als die vorbeigehende Sonne, die hinaufgeht den Tierkreis zu den Fischen, das Kommende anzeigt. Das ist ein Bild für Johannes den Täufer. - Die Sonne geht weiter, er kann sie nicht halten, er kann sie nur vorausverkünden.
Der Prophet Jesajas wußte, wenn die Sonne weitergeht zu den Fischen, dann wird etwas anderes kommen. Menschen oder Wesen, die mit der Fisch-Einweihung zusammenhängen, das ist das Vorrükken der Sonne zu den Fischen. Daher auch das alte Zeichen für den Christus Jesus in den ältesten nachchristlichen Zeiten: die Fische. Man findet dieses Zeichen noch heute vielfach in den Katakomben Roms, die beiden Fische oder ein Fisch. Warum sagte Jesus zu den Jüngern: Ich will euch zu Menschen-Fischern machen? Johannes bereitet vor die Fisch-Initiation, die der Nazarener haben muß, damit er den Christus in sich aufnehmen kann. Dasjenige, was in Palästina geschehen ist als das größte Ereignis der ganzen Weltentwickelung, ist am Tierkreis in wunderbaren Zeichen eingeschrieben. Was sich wirklich Schritt für Schritt in Palästina zugetragen hat, ist in seinen Tiefen nicht durch Menschenschrift erklärt, sondern durch eine Himmelsschrift, die man zu Rate ziehen muß, wenn wir es in Wirklichkeit erkennen wollen, da es eben so erhaben ist, daß es in unmittelbarer Beziehung zum Makrokosmos steht. - War denn alles, was ein physisches Auge hat wandeln sehen in Palästina, in Fleisch und Blut des Jesus von Nazareth? Das war, wenn das alles zusammengenommen wird, was ich angedeutet habe, eine Illusion, eine Maya. In Wirklichkeit lebte in dieser Gestalt des Jesus von Nazareth, der da umherwandelte in Palästina, die ganze geistige Zentralkraft, Mittelpunktskraft der Sonne. Die wandelte in Palästina herum, und die äußere physische Erscheinung des Jesus war eine Maya. Daher hing alles, was er tat, zusammen mit den großen Ereignissen des Makrokosmos. Beachten wir folgendes: Wir finden überall im Markus-Evangelium die Tatsache erwähnt, daß der Christus heilte, als die Sonne untergegangen war, oder bevor die Sonne aufgegangen war. Wenn da steht im Markus-Evangelium I, 32: «Am Abend aber, da die Sonne untergegangen war, brachten sie zu ihm allerlei Kranke und Besessene» -, warum brachten sie da die Kranken und Besessenen? Weil die Sonne untergegangen war, weil die Kraft der Sonne nicht mehr physisch wirkte, weil die Kraft der Sonne in ihm geistig wirkte, und weil das, was er tun sollte, nicht zusammenhängt mit der physischen Sonnenkraft. Die physisch wirkende Sonne war untergegangen, aber die geistige Sonnenkraft wirkte durch sein Herz, durch seinen Leib. Und wenn er seine größten und gewaltigsten Kräfte entwickeln wollte, mußte er den Impuls dazu suchen, solange die Sonne nicht physisch am Himmel stand. Und wenn da steht: Bevor die Sonne aufgegangen war, — so hat das auch seine besondere Bedeutung. Jedes Wort im Markus-Evangelium schildert große kosmische Beziehungen zwischen den Vorgängen im Weltenall und jedem Schritt, jeder Tat des Christus im Leibe des Jesus von Nazareth hier auf der Erde. Wenn man eine Karte, wie eine geographische Karte, bilden wollte von seinen Wegen und Taten und dann die Himmelsvorgänge studieren würde, da würde man dasselbe Bild bekommen. Gleichsam herunterprojiziert auf die Erde würden sich die Himmelsvorgänge ausnehmen.
Woher nahm ein Mensch wie Kepler dasjenige, was er in seiner Astronomie geben konnte? Kepler nahm die Kräfte, um die Grundlage für diese Astronomie in seine drei großen astronomischen Gesetze zusammenzufassen, nicht aus dem, was er zunächst als Kepler war. Die drei Gesetze sind Ausdrücke der Wandelung der Planeten um ihren Fixstern. Sie konnten nur gefunden werden aus einem gewissen Enthusiasmus des Kepler heraus, durch den gewisse Erinnerungen in ihm auftauchten. Er war in einer vorhergehenden Inkarnation Schüler der altägyptischen Mysterien. Das tauchte auf in ihm und in manchen andern Menschen wiederum wie dunkle Instinkte. Solche Menschen hatten vieles in ihrem Seelenleben, was Ausdruck war von etwas, was die Sphärenharmonie selber ist. Kepler suchte zeit seines Lebens nach den wunderbaren Konstellationen der Gestirne am Himmel. Er blickte auf die Konjunktion von Saturn, Jupiter und Mond, und er suchte zu erklären dadurch den Stern, der den drei Weisen aus dem Morgenlande leuchtete. Die Menschen damals haben noch nicht daran gedacht, solche schauderhaften Abstraktionen zu ersinnen, wie die KantLaplacesche Theorie.
Im Markus-Evangelium haben wir die wunderbare Harmonie zwischen dem, was einmal auf unserer Erde geschehen sollte durch die Taten des Christus Jesus und durch das Mysterium von Golgatha und dem großen Kosmos draußen. Und nur wenn wir die Sternenschrift entziffern können, können wir das Markus-Evangelium verstehen. Dazu müssen wir eindringen in die Sprachgeheimnisse des Himmels. Und wenn es im Markus-Evangelium heißt: Die Sonne ist untergegangen, — so will das nicht nur sagen, die Sonne scheint eben nicht mehr, sondern es soll dadurch ausgedrückt werden die Tatsache: Alle die Geistwesen der Sonnenhierarchie haben sich in eine Welt stärkeren Geistes begeben, weil sie durchwirken müssen durch die Erde, durch die physische Substanz hindurch. All das Große, was darin ausgedrückt werden sollte, fühlte man nach, wenn man sagte: Es geschah etwas durch den Christus Jesus, wenn die Sonne untergegangen war oder beim Untergang der Sonne. Eine ganze Welt lag in solchen Worten darin.
So sollen uns die wenigen Hinweise dazu dienen, im Laufe der Zeit nach und nach immer tiefer einzudringen in die Geheimnisse der Evangelien. Und gerade an der Hand des Markus-Evangeliums können der Menschenseele wunderbare Mysterien des kosmischen Geschehens aufgehen. Ein jedes Wort im Markus-Evangelium ist von eminentester Bedeutung.
Fragenbeantwortung
Was bedeutet die Versuchung Jesu durch Satan? Ist Satan und Luzifer identisch? Und wie kann der Höchste versucht werden durch einen unter ihm Stehenden?
Satan ist Ahriman. Bei Lukas und Matthäus ist Luzifer gemeint, bei Markus Ahriman. Nur Markus spricht vom Satan. In grandioser Weise ist bei Markus geschildert, wie durch das Erscheinen häßlicher Tiergestalten der Mensch auf normale Weise in die geistige Welt eintritt. Es gibt Menschen, die glauben, durch gewisse Diät und durch sonstige materielle Vorgänge in die geistige Welt kommen zu können. Doch alles, was sie dann sehen, gerade wenn es die erhabensten Lichtgestalten sind, und wenn es noch so grandios erscheinen mag, ist doch nur Spiegelung des eigenen Selbst, ahrimanische Täuschung. Gewiß ist sowohl Luzifer wie Ahriman eine Versuchung für den Menschen, und der Christus im menschlichen Leibe mußte zeigen, wie man widerstcht, wenn man anfängt, in die geistige Welt hineinzukommen.
Werden wir unsere Angehörigen wiedersehen in den höheren Welten?
Sehen im Geiste ist anders aufzufassen als physisches Sehen. Im geistigen Sinne ist ein Wiedersehen gewiß. Daß Maria von Magdala Jesus nicht gleich erkannte, weist darauf hin, daß der auferstandene Christus nicht von jedem erkannt werden kann; man muß eben gewisse Kräfte entwickelt haben. Maria bekommt diese besondere Gabe erst durch den Anruf. Es wird von den geisteswissenschaftlichen Lehren vieles als ketzerisch aufgefaßt, was gerade durch die Evangelien bewiesen werden kann. Nur mit dem hellsichtigen Auge konnte der Auferstandene erkannt werden.
Ist nicht der Inhalt der babylonischen Tafel fast derselbe wie der Inhalt der zehn Gebote?
Die Leute, die von Ähnlichkeiten sprechen, wissen nicht, worauf es ankommt. Am besten zeigt sich das bei der Bergpredigt. Es heißt in der Bibel zum Beispiel nicht: Denn das Himmelreich ist ihrer -, sondern: Denn sie werden in sich finden die Reiche der Himmel. - In dieser Beziehung sind auch die zehn Gebote grundverschieden von allem, was früher da war. Was durch den Hebräismus und das Christentum hinzukommt zu dem, was schon in älteren Religionssystemen vorhanden war, ist der Ich-bin-Impuls. Wenn man auf solche Dinge eingeht, sind sie ungeheuer lehrreich.
Wie verträgt sich die Wiederverkörperungslehre mit der Bibel?
Es ist heute noch nicht möglich, die Bibel ganz zu verstehen. Jede Zeit hat sie so übersetzt, wie es ihr gerade paßte. Die Bibel har von der Wiederverkörperungslehre nichts zu fürchten. Man glaubte früher auch jedesmal, die Bibel sei gefährdet, wenn eine neue wissenschaftliche Wahrheit gefunden wurde.
Wie verhält es sich mit dem Zusammenhang zwischen Christus und Luzifer?
Es ist nicht so leicht, kurz darüber zu sprechen. Wir haben oft davon geredet, daß der Mensch von Inkarnation zu Inkarnation gegangen ist und daß verhältnismäßig früh die luziferische Macht in dem astralischen Leib verankert ist, Ahriman später im Ätherleib. Mit dem Erscheinen des Christus Jesus gewinnen alle diese Dinge eine andere Bedeutung. Wir stehen erst im Anfang der Christus-Entwickelung. Der Christus hat zu tun gehabt mit Luzifer und Ahriman; wenn man die Evangelien versteht, wird man das finden. Wer findet aber heute, daß die Versuchungs-Geschichten bei Matthäus, Markus und Lukas verschieden sind? Der Okkultist weiß, daß es nicht nur eine Versuchung des Luzifer durch Begierden, sondern auch eine durch Ahriman gibt - wenn man nämlich seine eigenen Leidenschaften in den Makrokosmos hinausträgt, indem man allerlei Gestalten sieht. Das Matthäus-Evangelium schildert eine luziferische Versuchung. Bei den Tieren der eigenen Menschennatur weilt Jesus im Markus-Evangelium. — In allen okkulten Schriften wird Luzifer geschildert als Schlange, Ahriman als Hund.
Diese Versuchungsgeschichten weisen auf tiefe Mysterien hin. So wie diese Mächte kommen mußten, um den Menschen selbständig zu machen, so muß er sich wieder losreißen durch den Christus in seiner Seele. Nach und nach werden sich Luzifer und Ahriman in ihr Gegenteil verwandeln. Den Christus-Impuls wird der Mensch in sich aufnehmen und den Ahriman draußen haben; früher und jetzt ist es umgekehrt. Solche Dinge können studiert werden in dem Drama «Pforte der Einweihung». Achten Sie auf den Gleichklang der Vokale. Es liegt in diesen Dingen eine innere Notwendigkeit. Die Verse im ersten Teil verwandeln sich im zweiten Teil in ihr Gegenteil; das ist Absicht.
Frage nicht notiert.
Es ist ein Faktum, daß Jesus nichts geschrieben hat. Ein Theologe diskutiert darüber, ob er überhaupt schreiben konnte. -— Nach vier Jahrhunderten wird man auch von einer neuzeitlichen Mythologie sprechen, im Hinblick darauf, wie man heute von Kopernikus und Galilei spricht. Für Theosophen schickt es sich schlecht, von der «Ptolemäischen Kinderei» zu sprechen.
Frage nach der Echtheit der Dionysischen Schriften.
Es ist heutzutage üblich, die Schreiber für wichtiger zu halten als die geistigen Urheber (Rudolf Steiner verweist in diesem Zusammenhang auf seine Erfahrung als Goethe-Forscher mit dem Prosa-Hymmus: «Über die Natur», dessen Autorschaft von philologischer Seite als fraglich hingestellt wird). Der Apostelschüler Dionysios hat nichts niedergeschrieben, weil das dazumal als frivol galt. Aber seine Nachfolger, die nach dem damaligen Brauch auch wieder Dionysios genannt wurden, haben seine Lehre nach getreuer Tradition in den sogenannten pseudo-dionysischen Schriften aufgezeichnet.
Es genügt nicht, gutgläubig zu sein, sondern man sollte sich von der Wahrheit überzeugen. Man hat heute gar keinen Begriff davon, was möglich und was unmöglich ist. Tragisch wird die Sache bei der Bibelforschung, indem man sie so zerfasert. Gelehrsamkeit und Unsinn passen oft so ganz zusammen.
Kann der Christus Jesus Menschen auf Erden erscheinen?
In der Art, wie er dem Paulus erschienen, ist das möglich. Es ist dann eine Einweihung, die auch manchmal ohne vorhergehende Schulung eintreten kann. Von der Mitte unseres zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts an wird für viele Menschen diese Erfahrung eintreten.
Twelfth Lecture
You know that in the course of the development of our German Section over the years, we have spoken about the actual deeper foundations of the Gospels of Matthew, Luke, and John, and much of what can be said about the mysteries of Christianity has also been spoken here in Hanover. You will have seen that each of the Gospels gives special cause to delve into the Christian proclamation. More than for the other Gospels, it is necessary to make a very specific assumption if one wants to approach an understanding of Christianity based on the Gospel of Mark. One must immerse oneself completely in the peculiarity of how people expressed themselves in past ages of human development. It suffices to point out a few things: above all, the ancient Hebrew language opens up an infinitely broad horizon through its mode of expression. Anyone who has seen the lecture series in Munich on the mysteries of the work of creation, and how it was necessary to provide translations of individual words in order to understand the six or seven days of creation, will have gained a sense of how necessary it is, in the case of these ancient documents, to recreate them, so to speak, from the whole spirit and soul of the things themselves. That is what matters. In the Hebrew language, the vowels and consonants were used differently than they are today. When the Hebrew language referred to what people saw around them, it expressed this in the consonants. The vowels are indicated by mere dots, since they were the expression of what lived in the soul, of everything internal. The Hebrew language had vowels for everything that was inner experience, and consonants for everything that was external perception. And one felt this vividly. In those ancient times, even in Greek, words were associated with a kind of excitement for a supernatural reference, and in such a clear way that everyone knew when this or that word was pronounced in these or those sounds, that it had to arouse in their souls a whole sum of ideas that were completely different for one word than for another. An enormous amount could be said in just a few words because everything was working together. And we must remember this especially when reading the Gospel of Mark. We must not cling to the words, for through the words alone we cannot enter into the mysteries and secrets of the Gospel of Mark.
I would like to give a few pointers here. In the past, language was a means of expressing the soul and spirit. In our time, it is a means of expression for abstract thinking, which is far removed from the living thinking in images that alone can point us upward to the spiritual worlds. In order for us to return to such living thinking, the means of expression of our language must be made alive again. But language has become philistine, pedantic, and useful only for abstractions. Everything living that can lead us through the words of language to higher regions and connect the soul with the mysteries of the universe has been completely lost. And here I would like to suggest how, in the Rosicrucian mystery, the beginnings have been made of what it means to bring language to life. Sometimes it comes down to small nuances in expression. Our language is coarse, inflexible, and one has to struggle with it in order to express the subtleties of spiritual life. That is why I tried to point to the mysteries of existence through my use of language. In the mystery drama The Gate of Initiation, an attempt was made to express by other means much of what cannot be said in words. A person strives upward toward the first stages of initiation. He strives to hear the spiritual tones in his own soul. What John goes through is described in this drama. He undergoes profound soul experiences in order to develop his soul. He has reached the point where, through the most bitter and at the same time greatest and most powerful soul experiences, he arrives at the spiritual world, in Devachan, and is now to be introduced into the life and weaving of the elemental beings of Devachan. To express the secrets of the life and weaving of the elemental beings in words always gives an abstract, crude meaning. And so I tried to make living people express these secrets through their own being, like light and darkness weaving together. In this way, I tried to hint at the inner weaving of words and sounds through the secrets of the universe. This made it possible to make audible to the ear many things that sound abstract when expressed in today's words. One must listen to the sound of the words, how the right sound is in the right place. One must feel where it belongs and where it does not belong. It is something like spiritual alchemy. And the interweaving and intermingling of spiritual forces in the universe can be hinted at by such means.
Mary receives John in Devachan with her companions Philia, Astrid, and Luna. Philia is the poetic representative of the sentient soul, which is why the name contains two I's and one A. Luna is the expression of the consciousness soul, which is why there is a U and an A in her name. Astrid, the expression of the intellectual or emotional soul, has the letter A first in her name, then the letter I. This allows one to express a multitude of things better than words can. If one could awaken a feeling for this, I would no longer need to speak about many things. But one must understand what it means: here stands a U—one must feel the dullness, the depth of the U, as well as the brightness of the I and the quiet hint of the Ai or Ei, which fills the soul with wonder. This gives a different kind of understanding than can be gained through words. Language is truly an incredibly wonderful instrument in its sounds. It is much, much smarter than humans, and we would do well to listen to its wisdom. But humans are in the process of corrupting it. And if we want to understand earlier times in their unique mode of expression, we must put ourselves in the place of those people and feel what lived in their souls.
And there, when we simply open the Gospel of Mark in the first lines, we can already feel the necessity of thinking in this way about language and its mysteries. In the Lutheran translation, which is still the best in most cases (Weizsäcker's is much worse), the passage from Isaiah reads: “Behold, I send my angel before thee, who shall prepare thy way before thee. It is the voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight!”
One would think that anyone who reads this passage, if they are an honest person, would have to admit: I don't know what to make of this passage. In order to understand what is really written here, it is necessary to penetrate through spiritual science into what, in the sense of the prophet Isaiah, who was initiated into these things, was to happen through the events in Palestine and the mystery of Golgotha. Our age finds it impossible to believe that there are really people who can give information about the most important impulses in world evolution. Our age does not allow this. Hence the grotesque explanations of the Apocalypse, which say that the writer of the Apocalypse had already experienced the events he describes. People talk about objective research, but they make the assumption from the outset that no one can know anything that they themselves do not know. But the prophet Isaiah wants to express something in these words that he knows through his initiation. He wants to say: Something will come in human evolution that is of eminent, fundamental importance for the whole of human evolution. Why did he—and with him all the other initiates—see this event, to which he wanted to draw attention, as so significant? He viewed human development in the right way; he knew that people used to have elementary clairvoyance, they could see into the spiritual worlds, they could use their astral body to see. But this astral body then lost its power of vision and became darkened within itself. The progress of humanity consisted in losing this clairvoyant power of the astral body. In its place, humanity was to allow its ego to become increasingly active. From the knowledge of initiation, Isaiah could have said: But then people will speak only of their ego, and as long as this ego is not filled with Christ, it is dependent on what people can see of the world through the physical plane with their senses and intellect alone. They will be abandoned by the spiritual world. But then they will find comfort. Christ will come, and these souls will become more and more imbued with the impulse of Christ, so that they will once again be able to look up into the spiritual world. But they will experience that the astral body has become dark before that.
Human beings received the first elements of their physical body on Saturn, the elements of their etheric body on the old Sun, and the elements of their astral body on the old Moon. The I develops on Earth. Until the astral body has lost its clairvoyant power and become dark, the I must first assert itself in darkness. Before the actual development of the Earth began, there was a kind of repetition of the development of the Moon. There, human beings developed their astral body so that the activity of the whole world lived pictorially in their astral body. Until then, there was a repetition of the development of the Moon. The I then pushed its way in, and Isaiah says: The I will take up more and more space on Earth.
On the old moon there were also beings with human nature, as well as on the sun and Saturn. On earth, man is man. The angel was man on the moon, and the earth man is the successor of the angels in humanity, so that the predecessor of man on earth must prepare what is to happen to man. The angelic must work into the astral body before the I can work into it. If the earthly mission of man is to be prepared, this must be done by man's predecessor, the angel. Therefore, at a certain time, an angel intervened in human nature. When something like this happens, the earthly human being can be a Maya. A higher being makes use of his soul. Man is in truth what he appears to be, and yet he can be a shell for another being. And so it came about that the same individuality that once lived as Elijah and appeared in reincarnation as John took into itself an angelic nature that expressed itself through him. In my mystery drama The Gate of Initiation, such a process takes place. There, another being works through Mary:
Here in this circle
A knot is forming from the threads
That karma spins in the becoming of the world.
O friend, your sufferings
Are links in a knot of destiny
In which the deeds of the gods are intertwined with human lives.
The deeds of the gods are intertwined with human lives and shape human destiny.
Thus, heavenly deeds were connected with human destiny in John the Baptist. A divine being, an angelic being, worked through him. What he did could only happen because the human being John was a maya, because there lived within him a being who was to foretell what was to become of human beings on earth. And now, if we want to translate correctly, we must translate in such a way that we feel our way into what is really meant by these words: Take note: the I that is to appear in human beings sends the preparatory angel before it.
This refers to the angel who lived in the personality of John the Baptist. That is what is meant, and the whole teaching we learn in theosophy about angels lies in this sentence: that lunar initiates must prepare the Earth initiations.
Now we must look a little into human nature as it gradually developed toward the mystery of Golgotha. Think how people must have felt when they looked back to ancient times, when the astral body could see clearly into the spiritual world; how it then became darker and darker. People were able to perceive this from incarnation to incarnation. They said to themselves: In the past, when they wanted to perceive something in the spiritual world, they began to shine and glow with their astral body. Then this gradually ceased, and it became darker and darker. And then a dark loneliness arose within the human being, a desert, ἔρημος — even in Greek this finds its expression. And then a voice awakens in the soul of man like a longing cry for the Lord of man, for the I, so that it may truly enter into the human soul. This was felt in the word χὐριοç, which is translated with the flat word “Lord.” One felt that the soul consisted of three forces: thinking, feeling, and willing. Then came the time when the I, the χὐριοç, was to be taken in. This is what John wanted to express when he said: Prepare the way of the Lord! Make his paths straight!
Here you have the whole wise guidance of human evolution toward the mystery of Golgotha as a saying of Isaiah at the beginning of the Gospel of Mark. And at the same time, this saying of Isaiah about John tells us what we know about him. I have said what he had to be like in order to be able to receive an angel. This required a certain initiation. The initiation that was necessary for this gave such a person the ability to show other people that the time had truly come for the I to break forth.
The one who could say this had to be the initiate who, in the language of initiation, had been an Aquarian initiate since ancient times. The great mysteries of the spiritual world, into which human beings are woven through initiation, are described in the language of heaven. It was necessary to choose the script of heaven if one wanted to express what happens to the human soul when it is initiated into the great mysteries. This cannot be expressed in human words. And so it was said: Up in the sky, the stars stand in relation to one another. When we look at them and form expressions from these relationships between the stars, then we can express the mysteries that take place within human beings during such an initiation.
People always looked up to the great Ahura Mazdao, regardless of what name they gave him in different cultures. They looked up to the divine being and its hierarchy in the sun. Christ is the great spirit underlying the sun. There are twelve different ways of being initiated into the sacred mysteries of the sun, and it is hardly possible to express this in earthly words. But when we consider how the sun stands before a constellation and sends its rays to the earth through it, and how it relates to the other stars in the sky, we have a kind of script that can express this: this person is so initiated into the mysteries of the sun that we have before us an initiate of Aquarius.
Let us take the seven holy Rishis. They were so initiated into the mysteries of the sun that the symbol of their initiation is the position of the sun in the constellation of Taurus; and what we can see in the firmament when the sun is in the constellation of Taurus actually reveals the mystery of the peculiar initiation of the Rishis, and this initiation worked through the seven personalities who were the seven holy Rishis. This is expressed by the fact that the seven stars, the Pleiades, shine from the same place. This is the place where our entire solar system entered our universe. Thus, the initiation into the various types of solar mysteries can be expressed by taking the forms of expression from the position of the sun in a constellation.
The initiation of John had to be such that it was an Aquarian initiation, expressing the position of the sun in the constellation of Aquarius. To understand this a little, remember that on the light side of the zodiac are Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, and then Libra. Then come the constellations that lie on the winter or night side of the zodiac: Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces. Aquarius and Pisces lie on the winter or night side of the zodiac. What does that mean? Yes, when the sun's rays fall there, they do not merely fall through physical space, but in such a way that they send the spiritual light of the sun, which passes through the earth, through spiritual space. The Aquarius initiates were given the name Aquarius initiates because those who were thus initiated were able to confer the baptism of water, to bend down with the one who gave them this spiritual sun power, to submerge themselves with him under the water.
The names for the signs of the zodiac were carried up to the heavens from the facts of spiritual life that took place here on Earth. Now these strange oddballs, our scientists, explain such things by saying that the names of the constellations were simply carried down and assigned to certain personalities on Earth. The opposite is true. Today, people say that John the Baptist was called Aquarius because the name of the constellation Aquarius was transferred to him. What wise scholars do today is really the same as trying to harness a donkey with its head facing the cart. The ironic attempt by a scholar to portray Napoleon as a non-historical figure is well known. It shows how easy it is to derive the name Napoleon from Apollo, with the prefix N meaning only a kind of comparative of the name, a kind of super-Apollo, as it were. Both had six siblings, and the star Apollo is counted among the seven Pleiades. Napoleon's twelve marshals are the twelve constellations of the zodiac. Apollo's mother is Leto, Napoleon's is Latitia, and so on.
If we draw the arc of the sun in the sky, we discover that as the physical sun descends, its spiritual counterpart rises. So we must draw the day or summer arc of the sun, where the sun moves from Taurus to Aries and so on, and the winter or night arc of the sun, through which we can designate the mysteries of the initiation of Aquarius and Pisces. Physically, it goes from Virgo to Leo, Cancer, Gemini, Taurus, Aries; spiritually, it goes from Virgo to Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces. The spiritual counterpart of the physical course of the sun is the course of the sun from Aquarius to Pisces.

Thus John could say: He must increase, I must decrease. My mission is such that you will understand it when the sun passes from the constellation of Aquarius to the constellation of Pisces. I am an initiate of Aquarius, and I am not worthy to give you the secret of the Sun-Fish. I am not worthy to untie the sandal straps of the one whom I am to announce to you.
In these words of John, we have, so to speak, tangible proof of how he characterizes himself figuratively as an initiate of Aquarius. The images in the old folk calendars express what John's words mean: I am not worthy to untie the straps of his sandals. Look at the old zodiac images, where Aquarius is kneeling. There he is, in the gesture required to show reverence for the one who, as the passing sun rising in the zodiac toward Pisces, indicates what is to come. This is an image of John the Baptist. The sun continues on its way; he cannot hold it back, he can only announce its coming.
The prophet Isaiah knew that when the sun moves on to the fish, something else will come. People or beings connected with the fish initiation—that is the advance of the sun to the fish. Hence the ancient symbol for Christ Jesus in the earliest post-Christian times: the fish. This symbol can still be found today in many places in the catacombs of Rome, either as two fish or as a single fish. Why did Jesus say to his disciples, “I will make you fishers of men”? John is preparing for the fish initiation that the Nazarene must undergo in order to receive Christ within himself. What happened in Palestine as the greatest event in the entire development of the world is inscribed in the zodiac in wonderful signs. What really happened step by step in Palestine cannot be explained in its depths by human writing, but by a heavenly writing that must be consulted if we want to recognize it in reality, since it is so sublime that it stands in direct relation to the macrocosm. Was everything that the physical eye saw happening in Palestine the flesh and blood of Jesus of Nazareth? When everything I have indicated is taken together, it was an illusion, a maya. In reality, the entire spiritual central force, the center of the sun, lived in the form of Jesus of Nazareth who walked around in Palestine. It wandered around Palestine, and the outer physical appearance of Jesus was a maya. Therefore, everything he did was connected with the great events of the macrocosm. Let us note the following: We find mentioned everywhere in the Gospel of Mark that Christ healed when the sun had set or before the sun had risen. When it says in Mark 1:32, “And when evening came, they brought to him all who were sick and those who were possessed with demons,” why did they bring the sick and those possessed with demons? Because the sun had set, because the power of the sun was no longer physically effective, because the power of the sun was working spiritually in him, and because what he was to do was not connected with the physical power of the sun. The physically active sun had set, but the spiritual power of the sun was working through his heart, through his body. And if he wanted to develop his greatest and most powerful forces, he had to seek the impulse to do so while the sun was not physically in the sky. And when it says, “Before the sun had risen,” this also has a special meaning. Every word in the Gospel of Mark describes great cosmic relationships between the events in the universe and every step, every deed of Christ in the body of Jesus of Nazareth here on earth. If one wanted to draw a map, like a geographical map, of his paths and deeds and then study the events in the heavens, one would get the same picture. The events in the heavens would appear as if projected down onto the earth.
Where did a man like Kepler get what he was able to give in his astronomy? Kepler did not take the forces to summarize the basis for this astronomy in his three great laws of astronomy from what he was initially as Kepler. The three laws are expressions of the movement of the planets around their fixed stars. They could only be found through a certain enthusiasm in Kepler, through which certain memories emerged in him. In a previous incarnation, he had been a student of the ancient Egyptian mysteries. This emerged in him and in some other people as dark instincts. Such people had much in their soul life that was an expression of something that is the harmony of the spheres itself. Kepler spent his entire life searching for the wonderful constellations of the stars in the sky. He looked at the conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and the moon, and sought to explain the star that shone for the three wise men from the East. People at that time had not yet thought of devising such terrifying abstractions as the Kant-Laplace theory.
In the Gospel of Mark, we have the wonderful harmony between what was to happen on our earth through the deeds of Christ Jesus and through the mystery of Golgotha, and the great cosmos outside. And only when we can decipher the writing of the stars can we understand the Gospel of Mark. To do this, we must penetrate the language secrets of heaven. And when the Gospel of Mark says, “The sun has set,” it does not just mean that the sun is no longer shining, but it is meant to express the fact that all the spirit beings of the solar hierarchy have entered a world of higher spirit because they must work through the earth, through the physical substance. All the greatness that was to be expressed in this could be felt when one said: Something happened through Christ Jesus when the sun had set or at sunset. A whole world lay in such words.
These few hints should serve us to gradually penetrate more deeply into the mysteries of the Gospels as time goes on. And it is precisely through the Gospel of Mark that wonderful mysteries of cosmic events can be revealed to the human soul. Every word in the Gospel of Mark is of the utmost importance.
Questions And Answers
What does Jesus' temptation by Satan mean? Are Satan and Lucifer the same? And how can the highest be tempted by someone below him?
Satan is Ahriman. Luke and Matthew refer to Lucifer, Mark to Ahriman. Only Mark speaks of Satan. Mark describes in a grandiose manner how human beings enter the spiritual world in the normal way through the appearance of ugly animal figures. There are people who believe that they can enter the spiritual world through certain diets and other material processes. But everything they see, even if it is the most sublime figures of light, and however magnificent it may appear, is only a reflection of their own selves, an Ahrimanic deception. Certainly, both Lucifer and Ahriman are temptations for human beings, and Christ in the human body had to show how to resist when one begins to enter the spiritual world.
Will we see our loved ones again in the higher worlds?
Seeing in the spirit is to be understood differently from physical seeing. In the spiritual sense, a reunion is certain. The fact that Mary Magdalene did not immediately recognize Jesus indicates that the risen Christ cannot be recognized by everyone; one must have developed certain powers. Mary only receives this special gift through the call. Much of what can be proven by the Gospels is considered heretical by spiritual science teachings. Only with clairvoyant eyes could the risen Christ be recognized.
Isn't the content of the Babylonian tablet almost the same as the content of the Ten Commandments?
People who speak of similarities do not know what is important. This is best illustrated by the Sermon on the Mount. For example, the Bible does not say, “For theirs is the kingdom of heaven,” but “For they will find the kingdom of heaven within themselves.” In this respect, the Ten Commandments are also fundamentally different from everything that came before. What Hebrew culture and Christianity added to what was already present in older religious systems is the “I am” impulse. When one delves into such things, they are immensely instructive.
How does the doctrine of reincarnation fit in with the Bible?
It is not yet possible to understand the Bible completely. Every age has translated it as it suited it. The Bible has nothing to fear from the doctrine of reincarnation. In the past, people always believed that the Bible was endangered whenever a new scientific truth was discovered.
What about the connection between Christ and Lucifer?
It is not easy to speak briefly about this. We have often said that human beings have passed from incarnation to incarnation and that the Luciferic power became anchored in the astral body relatively early, and Ahriman later in the etheric body. With the appearance of Christ Jesus, all these things take on a different meaning. We are only at the beginning of the Christ evolution. Christ had to deal with Lucifer and Ahriman; if you understand the Gospels, you will find this. But who today finds that the stories of temptation in Matthew, Mark, and Luke are different? The occultist knows that there is not only a temptation by Lucifer through desires, but also one through Ahriman—namely, when one carries one's own passions out into the macrocosm by seeing all kinds of figures. The Gospel of Matthew describes a Luciferic temptation. In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus dwells among the animals of his own human nature. — In all occult writings, Lucifer is depicted as a serpent, Ahriman as a dog.
These stories of temptation point to deep mysteries. Just as these powers had to come in order to make human beings independent, so must they break free again through Christ in their souls. Little by little, Lucifer and Ahriman will be transformed into their opposites. Human beings will take the Christ impulse into themselves and have Ahriman outside; formerly and now it is the other way around. Such things can be studied in the drama “The Gate of Initiation.” Pay attention to the harmony of the vowels. There is an inner necessity in these things. The verses in the first part are transformed into their opposites in the second part; this is intentional.
Question not noted.
It is a fact that Jesus wrote nothing. A theologian discusses whether he was even able to write. — After four centuries, people will also speak of a modern mythology, in the same way that we speak today of Copernicus and Galileo. It is inappropriate for theosophists to speak of “Ptolemaic childishness.”
Question about the authenticity of the Dionysian writings.
Nowadays, it is common to consider the writers more important than the spiritual authors (Rudolf Steiner refers in this context to his experience as a Goethe researcher with the prose hymn “Über die Natur” (On Nature), whose authorship is considered questionable by philologists). The apostle's disciple Dionysius did not write anything down because this was considered frivolous at the time. But his successors, who were also called Dionysius according to the custom of the time, recorded his teachings in the so-called pseudo-Dionysian writings in accordance with faithful tradition.
It is not enough to be credulous; one must be convinced of the truth. Today, we have no concept of what is possible and what is impossible. This fragmentation makes biblical research a tragic endeavor. Scholarship and nonsense often go hand in hand.
Can Christ Jesus appear to people on earth?
In the way he appeared to Paul, it is possible. It is then an initiation that can sometimes occur without prior training. From the middle of our twentieth century onwards, many people will have this experience.