Excurses on the Gospel of Mark
GA 124
Part I
17 October 1910, Berlin
A Retrospect
It seems well that on resuming our activities in the Berlin Group we should look back for a little at what has passed through our souls since our work began at this time last year.
You will remember that about a year ago on the occasion of the General Conference of the German Section, I lectured on the “Sphere of the Bodhisattvas.” With this lecture we introduced to the world a subject that principally occupied us in our Group-meetings, throughout the following Winter our studies were associated with the Christ-problem, more especially in its connection with the Gospel of Matthew. We have carried these studies further in many ways, particularly in connection with the Gospels of John and of Luke, and when dealing with them we indicated that at some future date we hoped to go more deeply into this Christ-problem in a course of lectures to be associated mainly with the Gospel of Mark.
These studies of the Christ-problem did not consist merely in giving explanations of the Gospels. We spoke most fully, most radically, of what Spiritual Science had to say concerning the events that took place in Palestine. It has to be explained that there are no external, historical records dealing with these events. What is of the deepest importance in the accounts of the Event of Christ is not found in any book or record, but it stands in the eternal spiritual records, and can be deciphered by clairvoyant consciousness in the Akashic Chronicle. We have often made known to you what has been revealed to us there. Our position towards the Gospels is this: we make known what spiritual investigation tells us, and then we compare this with the events related in the Gospels or in other parts of the New Testament. In every case we found that we first learnt to read these documents aright, because before reading them we had penetrated to the secrets connected with the Events of Palestine; that it is precisely because we had investigated these events without having been prejudiced through having previously read any records concerning them, that our appreciation, I may say our reverence, for them was so greatly enhanced.
When we look not only to the nearest, the narrowest and most fleeting interests of our community, but when we recognise that the whole development of modern culture longs for a new understanding of the documents dealing with Christianity, we feel we are summoned by spiritual science not only to satisfy our own understanding regarding the Events of Palestine, but also to translate what we have to say concerning them into present day language for the sake of all humanity. In order to do this it is not enough that we should confine ourselves to what the present century has contributed towards an understanding of the problem and the figure of Christ. If this satisfied present day demands for knowledge there would not be so many who are, incapable of harmonising their desire for truth with what is taught in Christian circles and has been accepted for centuries, but which contradicts in one way or another what has been imparted to us concerning the Events of Palestine. All this shows that a new understanding and new conclusions with regard to Christian truths are necessary to the education of to-day.
Now among many other means that aid us in deciphering Christian truths there is one that is specially fruitful in our field of research. It consists in our being able to extend our vision, and also our world of feeling and perception beyond the horizon which has limited man's view of the spiritual world in past centuries. How our horizon can be extended can he put before you very simply and intimately in a few words.
In Goethe, to take one of the greatest minds of western civilisation, we have, as we all know, the mind of a Titan; and many of our studies have shown us how deeply the spiritual view entered into his personality. These studies have led us to know how we can rise to spiritual heights by sharing in the composition of Goethe's soul. But however well we may know Goethe, however deeply we may enter into what he has to give us, there is one thing we do not find in him, and this we must have if our vision is to he widened in the right way and our horizon expanded to satisfy our most urgent spiritual needs. Nowhere do we find in Goethe any indication that the things we are able to know to-day, dawned in him. These things can become fruitful for us when we accept them. They are ideas concerning man's spiritual development, the reception of which first became possible in the nineteenth century through the liberation of certain spiritual documents containing the fruits (Errungenschaften) of oriental life. From these we receive many ideas that in no way prevent our understanding the problem of Christ, but may, if rightly received, actually lead us to a true and full appreciation of Christ Jesus. Therefore I believe that a study of the Christ-problem cannot be introduced better than by a careful explanation of the mission of those great spiritual individuals who, from time to time, have made a deep impression on evolution, and are described by the name “Bodhisattva,” a name derived from oriental philosophy.
Ideas dealing with the Bodhisattvas have not existed for any length of time in the spiritual life of the West, and it is only when we realise what these beings are that we are able to rise to a true understanding of what the Christ has been, is, and can continue to be to mankind.
From this you see how wide is the circle of spiritual development that has to become fruitful to man before he really understands what it is so necessary he should understand concerning the education, culture, and spiritual life within which he lives. From another point of view it is important that we cast our spiritual eyes, when this is possible, over recent centuries and note the difference between a man at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and one of a century earlier; that we realise how very little was known in Europe a hundred years ago of Buddha and Buddhism. This last, if not actually the aim of our endeavours is the impulse and also the object of our present studies, and gives tone to the feeling that fills our souls when stirred by its great spiritual truths. The thing that matters most is not what one or another desires to know, but the warmth of feeling, the power of perception, the nobility of will that rises within our souls when the great truths of humanity strike these souls. More important in our Group than the words themselves is the tone and the waves of feeling that are present when certain words ring through space. These feelings and perceptions are of many kinds. The most important of them that should rise in our souls is that of reverence; such reverence as must needs develop in us towards the knowledge of great spiritual truths; the feeling that the nature of these great truths is such that we must approach them in humble reverence; that we cannot think to grasp such mighty facts with any hurriedly acquired ideas or with a few quickly won conceptions!
I have often made use of the example that we cannot depict a tree graphically by making a picture of it from one side only, but we must walk around it and draw it from various sides. Only by combining these different pictures do we gain a general impression of what the tree is like. This comparison should impress on our souls the way to approach great spiritual facts. We cannot make progress in any real or apparent knowledge of the highest things if we view them from one side only. Whether absolute truth regarding the appearance of anything can or cannot be reached, we should all the same never lose the humble feeling that all our ideas are acquired from one point of view only. When filled with this emotion we gladly and willingly take into ourselves feelings and perceptions from any side that enables us to illumine the great facts of existence from the most varied directions. The age in which we live makes this necessary, and in our time the need will grow ever greater for observing things from every possible side. Therefore we no longer shut ourselves off from other opinions, other paths leading to the highest things, that may differ from those of our own civilisation. Indeed we have endeavoured in recent years, within what Western cultural development had to offer, to uphold those principles that lead to true humility in respect of knowledge. I have never ventured (and indeed this is deeply impressed on my soul, for audacity was never possible in this connection) to present a system or a survey of those great events comprised within the term—the “Christ-Problem.” I have always said: “We approach this event now from one point of view,” and again, “We approach it now from another point of view,” and have always insisted that the problem is not thereby exhausted, but that our one desire is to carry on the work calmly and patiently.
The reason for studying the different Gospels is that it enables us to consider the Christ-problem from four points of view, and we find in fact that the four Gospels do present us with these four view points, and that in them the maxim is set before us:—Thou shalt not approach this—the mightiest problem—hurriedly, or view it from one side; it must be approached from the four spiritual directions of the heavens at least, and when thou hast approached it from these four heavenly directions which can he named after the four evangelists—Matthew, Mark, Luke and John—thou canst then hope it may gradually draw nearer and nearer to thee. And it will approach thee, so that thou needst never say of thyself, thou art cut off from the greatest of all truths without which the human soul, in its inmost depth, cannot live, neither shalt thou say that any one form of truth which thou hast been able to grasp is the whole truth.
Thus all our studies of the past Winter were intended gradually to arouse a feeling of intellectual modesty. In fact, without such a feeling we cannot advance in spiritual life. Incidentally, everything has been done in these studies to impress repeatedly on you the first requirements for progress in spiritual knowledge, and no one who has followed attentively the, lectures given here week by week, can say that we have not constantly pointed out the basic condition of this advance in spiritual knowledge.
Advance in spiritual knowledge is one of the impulses lying at the foundation of our movement. What does advance in spiritual knowledge mean for our souls? It satisfies the deepest, most humanly-worthy longings of our souls, it gives that without which a man who is conscious of his human worth, cannot live. It also gives this knowledge in ways that correspond to the intellectual requirements of the present day. Advance in knowledge brings illumination to us concerning those things which a man cannot investigate with his ordinary senses, but only with those senses which belong to him as a spiritual being, not as a physical being.
The great questions concerning man's position in the physical world and what lies beyond it, the truths concerning life and death: all such questions spring from the deep needs of the human soul. Even if a man from various causes holds aloof from such questions, even if he is able to remain deaf to them for a time, so that he says:—“Science is unable to investigate such matters, the faculties for doing so are wanting in man;” yet the need of finding answers to these questions never leaves him permanently, neither does the true nature of his feelings towards such questions as the following:—
Whence comes that something in a child and in a growing youth, that is capable of education? Where does that go which is hidden within our souls when the bodily nature begins to fall and die? In short, the question as to man's connection with the spiritual world is the great question, and springs from the most human of desires. A man cannot live if these questions remain unanswered, unless he turns a deaf ear to them. But because they spring from so deep a need, because the soul cannot live in peace and contentment if it does not receive an answer to them, it is only natural that he should answer them in a somewhat trivial and comfortable manner. In spite of the fact that these questions (though denied by some) have to-day become burning questions for many, how numerous are the paths they point to us! One can say without exaggeration that of all the paths that open before man to-day when these great and puzzling questions arise within him, the way of spiritual science is the most difficult. Truly, we cannot say otherwise!
There may be many among you who consider some much discussed science difficult; who perhaps do not venture on it because they shrink from all that must be overcome if it is to be gone into thoroughly. It may seem that the path that we call the path of spiritual science is easier than the path leading to mathematics, to botany, or any other branch of natural science. All the same, if followed earnestly, this path is more difficult than that leading to any other science. We say this without any exaggeration. Why is it easier for you? Only because it stimulates the interest of every soul with tremendous force, and because it deals with what lies nearest to each. It is the most difficult of all the paths by which a man can enter the spiritual world to-day, yet one thing we must not forget: this path can lead us to what is highest in the life of the soul! Is it not natural that what leads to the highest should also be the most difficult? Yet: we must never allow ourselves to be frightened by the difficulties of the path, nor hide from our souls the necessity of these difficulties on the path of spiritual science.
Among the many necessities of this path, one is always specially mentioned here: that he who decides to follow this path must, in the first place, accept seriously what spiritual investigation has so far been able to offer concerning the secrets and facts of the spiritual world. We touch here on a very necessary chapter of our spiritual-scientific life. How many say light-heartedly:—“People speak here of a science that is unascertainable, of spiritual facts that one or another investigator, one or another initiate, has been able to elucidate or investigate. Would it not be much better if they simply showed us the way so that we might ourselves quickly enter that region from which one can see into the spiritual world? Why do they always say—‘This is how it looks, this is what one or another has seen!’ Why do they not tell us how we can attain this quickly for ourselves?” It is for very good reasons that the facts investigated concerning the spiritual world are first communicated in a general way before entering into what one might call “the methods of soul-training” which can lead the soul into spiritual regions. For something quite definite is gained by our applying ourselves reverently to the study of what the spiritual investigator has revealed from spiritual worlds. We have often said that the facts of the spiritual world must be sought and found by means of clairvoyant consciousness; but once these facts are discovered, once trained clairvoyance has observed them and communicated them to others, then these communications must be such that everyone, without having passed through any clairvoyant development, can test them, and can recognise the truth of them by his own unprejudiced logic and the feeling for truth that is in every soul. No true investigator of spiritual things, no man endowed with true clairvoyant consciousness, would communicate the facts of the spiritual world except in such a way that those who desired could test them without clairvoyance. But he would have to communicate these facts so that he conveyed the full value and importance of them to the human soul.
What value have the communications and presentations of spiritual facts to a human soul? The value is this; that the man who knows “how things are seen in the spiritual world” can order his life, his thoughts, feelings, and perceptions according to his relationship towards the spiritual world. In this sense every communication of spiritual facts is important—even if he to whom they are communicated, and who receives them, cannot himself investigate them clairvoyantly. Indeed, even for the investigator these facts first acquire “human worth” when he has brought them down into a sphere where he can express them in a form accessible to all. However much a clairvoyant may be able to investigate and see in the spiritual world, what he sees is of no value to him and to others so long as he is unable to bring it down into the ordinary sphere of men, and to express it in thought that can be grasped by sound logic and a natural feeling for truth. The clairvoyant must in fact first understand the matter himself if it is to be of any use to him. Its value begins where the possibility of logical proof begins.
We can prove what has just been said in a double way. Among the many valuable things connected with the spiritual truths and spiritual communications which a man can receive on the physical plane between birth and death, those without doubt are the most important which he can take with him through the gates of death. Or let us put it as a question in this way:—“How much remains to a man of all he has received here, and been able to make his own? What remains of all he has learnt concerning the spiritual world while leading an anthroposophical life?” Just as much remains to him as he has been able to understand, as he has been able to translate into the ordinary language of human consciousness.
Picture to yourselves a man who has perhaps made quite exceptional discoveries in the spiritual world through purely clairvoyant observation, but who has neglected to clothe these observations in language suited to the ordinary sense of truth of any age. Do you know what would happen to him? All his discoveries would be wiped out after death! Just as much of value would remain as it was possible for him to translate or formulate into any language that corresponded to a sound sense for truth.
It is certainly of the greatest importance that there should be clairvoyants capable of bringing over communications from the spiritual world and handing them on to others. This brings blessing to our day, for our age has need of wisdom and cannot advance unless it gets it. Such communications are necessary to the culture of the present time. If not recognised to-day, in fifty or a hundred years it will be the universal conviction of all mankind that culture cannot advance but must perish unless convinced of spiritual wisdom.
One thing is necessary for man if evolution is to advance—this is the acceptance by him of spiritual truth. Even if all spheres were conquered and intercourse with them established, humanity would still be faced with the death of civilisation if no spiritual wisdom had been acquired. This is undoubtedly true. The possibility of looking into the spiritual world must exist.
The facts of spiritual wisdom mean more to the individual after death than human progress upon earth. We must therefore ask in order to form a right conception of this—What has the clairvoyant to tell of the things he has investigated and brought into line with truth and sound logic? What more in the way of fruits does a man possess after death through having been able to look into the spiritual world, than those have whose karma in this incarnation makes it impossible for them to do so, and who therefore have to hear the results of spiritual research from others? How do spiritual truths perceived by an Initiate differ from those heard by a man who has only heard them, and not himself looked into the spiritual world? Does the Initiate understand them better than those to whom they have only been imparted?
As regards mankind in general perception of the spiritual world is of higher worth than non-perception. For one who is able to look into the spiritual world has intercourse with that world, he can teach not only men, but others, spiritual beings, and so further their development. Clairvoyant consciousness has therefore a quite special value, but for individuals knowledge only has value; and in respect of individual worth the clairvoyant does not differ from anyone else who only receives communications, and is himself unable to look into the spiritual world in any particular incarnation. Whatever we have received of spiritual truth is fruitful after death, no matter if we have beheld these truths ourselves or not.
In stating this, one of the greatest moral laws of the spiritual world and one most worthy of reverence is placed before our souls. Our present day morality is perhaps not fine enough fully to understand the ethics of this. Individuals gain no advantage through their Karma having made it possible for them to look into spiritual worlds, thereby gratifying their egoism, Everything we strive to gain for ourselves in our individual life must he gained on the physical plane, and in forms that accord with the physical plane. If a Buddha or a Bodhisattva stands higher among the hierarchies of the spiritual world than other human individuals this is because of his having passed through so many and varied incarnations an earth.
What I mean by the higher ethics, the higher moral teaching given out to us from the spiritual world is this:—No one should think for a moment that he gains an advantage over his fellow men through the development of clairvoyance. This is not at all the case. He gains no advantage in any egoistic sense. All that he gains is that he can be better than others. Anything that serves egoism is absolutely excluded from spiritual fields, it is held to be immoral. A man gains nothing for himself through spiritual illumination. What he gains is only as one who serves the world in general, not himself, and only in so far as he gains it also for others.
The position of the spiritual investigator with regard to his fellowmen is this:—If they wish to hear of of the discoveries he has made and to accept them, they can make the same progress through these discoveries as he has made himself, they can advance individually as far as he has advanced, which means:—spiritual things are of value only in the Spirit of humanity as a whole, not in any egoistic spirit.
There is a realm where a man is not moral merely from preference, but because immorality or egoism would not help. In this case it is easy to see something else, namely, that it is dangerous to enter the spiritual realm unprepared. Nothing of an egoistic nature will ever be won for the life after death through leading a spiritual life, but a man might easily desire something egoistic for this life on the physical plane through spiritual development. Although nothing of an egoistic nature can be gained for the spiritual world things can be desired which are in a sense egoistic.
Most of those who pursue a certain higher development will probably say:—“It is self-understood that I should endeavor to overcome egoism before gaining entrance to the spiritual world.” But I beg of you to believe, in no region of human development is deception so great as in that where men say—“I strive against egoism!” It is easy to say it, but whether one can do it, can really accomplish it, is quite another question. It is another question in the first place, because when we begin to practise certain soul activities that can lead us into the spiritual world, we meet ourselves in our true form. There are very few things which are experienced in true form in the outer world. We live interwoven in a net of ideas, will-impulses, moral perceptions, and customary actions that have their rise in the surrounding world, and we seldom ask:—“How would I act, how would I think regarding any matter if I did not feel constrained by my upbringing to think and act in such and such a way?”
If we answered these questions we would see that we are ordinarily very much worse than we suppose. Now, the result of carrying out those exercises that are intended to help us to rise to the spiritual world is that we outgrow all our surroundings, all that custom and education have woven round us. We become more sensitive, more soulful and spiritual, and ever more and more naked. The veils with which we have clothed ourselves, and to which we cling with our ordinary ideas and actions, fall from us. Hence we have the quite ordinary result of which I have often spoken:—Before beginning his spiritual development a man is perhaps a quite decently behaved person, who does not make any very stupid blunders in life. Then his spiritual development begins. While until now he was perhaps quite a modest man he now becomes arrogant, and does all sorts of stupid things. When spiritual development begins he loses his balance and his bearings. The reason for this is best seen by those who are familiar with the spiritual world. Two things are necessary in order to know where we are with regard to what approaches us from the spiritual world so that balance is maintained. We must not be made giddy by what comes to us from the spiritual world. In physical life our organism shields us from giddiness through the “sense of balance of which you have heard in anthroposophical lectures, the static-sense. And just as this gives to physical man power to hold himself upright (for if his organism does not function correctly a man becomes giddy and he falls down) there is something also in spiritual life by which he can regulate his position to the world. This he must be able to do. “Spiritual giddiness” results from the falling away from him of what formerly gave support, those acquired perceptions, all that is brought about in us by the inter-blending activities of the external world. We must now learn to depend on ourselves. It is easy for us to become arrogant when these outer supports fall away. Pride is situated in us naturally; only, till now it was not so apparent. How can we attain spiritual balance so that this giddiness does not occur? By devoting ourselves with patience and perseverance to what spiritual investigation has discovered and succeeded in putting into words that agree with the ordinary formula of logical veracity. It is not from choice that I emphasize again and again the need of studying what we call spiritual science or anthroposophy. I lay stress on it because it is not possible by any other means to acquire the solid supports necessary to a spiritual development. The diligent and earnest acceptance of the results of spiritual science is the antidote to spiritual giddiness and insecurity.
Many a one has fallen into spiritual insecurity through carrying out his development incorrectly; we know that though such a one may seem to have been very diligent, this is because he has failed to acquire certain things that flow from the well-head of spiritual science. This is why the facts of spiritual science should he studied from every side, and why all through last winter, while desiring ultimately to bring home to you the importance of the Event of Christ to man we returned ever and again to deal with the fundamental conditions of spiritual progress. A balanced soul is necessary to a man's progress; but other things are also necessary.
While the soul acquires certainty through the study of spiritual science something else brings us what is equally necessary. This is a certain degree of spiritual strength and courage. The courage necessary to spiritual progress is not required of us in ordinary life for this reason, that in ordinary life our innermost being is embedded in our physical and etheric body from the time we waken until we fall asleep, and in the night we can do nothing, we cannot spoil anything. Supposing an unevolved man were able to be active during sleep he could do a great deal of harm. But the forces active on our physical and etheric bodies, making us conscious—that is thinking and feeling men—are not the only forces at work in us. Other forces are also active there, forces on which divine spiritual Beings have worked all through the Saturn, Sun and Moon periods, and on into our own Earthly period. Here forces from higher realms are continually at work maintaining us. When we waken and draw within the physical and etheric bodies we give ourselves over immediately to these Divine spiritual forces which, for our welfare and blessing, guide and control our physical and etheric bodies from morning till evening. Thus the whole spiritual universe works within us. We can injure it in many ways, but can do very little to improve it.
Now you must realise that all spiritual development depends on our inner being—our astral body and ego—becoming free, that we become able to see, that is learn to become consciously clairvoyant of that which lives unconsciously within us from the time we fall asleep till we waken; and because it lives there unconsciously, can cause no harm. All the strength, all the power that is ours, through our being taken in hand on waking by what is securely bound to our physical and etheric bodies, falls away from us when we become independent of these bodies and begin to be clairvoyantly aware. All the strength and power of the world remains outside us. We have withdrawn from the powers which make us strong and provide us with a shield against the influences of the outer world. We have withdrawn from these supporting powers. The world, however, remains as it is, and because this is so we are faced with the whole power, the whole impact of the surrounding world. The strength we otherwise received directly from our physical body and etheric body must now be within us, so that we can endure and withstand the impact of the world. We must develop this power in our ego and astral body. This is done by following the rules you have received, and which are found in my book, “Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and how to attain it.” These rules are calculated to give that inner strength which formerly was imparted to us by higher Beings, and which fails when the external supports which enabled us to withstand the impact of the world fail, when we have ourselves discarded the support provided by our physical and etheric bodies.
Those who have not made themselves inwardly strong enough to be able to replace the supports laid aside with their physical and etheric bodies, by carrying out a true and serious soul-training, those, who above all, have not purified themselves from the qualities of the outer world we describe as “immoral,” may certainly acquire faculties which enable them to some extent to see into the spiritual world. But what is the result? They become what is called “hypersensitives,” they become super-sensitive, as if attacked from every side; they cannot endure what approaches them on all hands. One of the most important facts we have to recognise when striving for progress in spiritual knowledge is that we must strengthen ourselves inwardly by developing the noblest qualities of the soul.
What are these qualities of which we have been speaking and towards which we must strive?
As it is impossible to live in the spiritual world under the brand of selfishness, it is only natural that the banishment of egoism—of everything of the nature of “self” that would fain shelter behind what is spiritual—must form the preparation for spiritual life. The more earnestly this maxim is accepted, the better it is for spiritual progress. It cannot be accepted too earnestly.
Anyone concerned with such things often hears it said:—“I have not done this from egoism!” But when these words are about to pass a man's lips he should pause, he should not allow them to pass, he should rather say to himself:—Thou art really not in a position to say thou canst do something without a trace of egoism. This would be better, because more truthful, and truth in respect of self-knowledge is most important. In no domain does falsehood wreck such vengeance as in the domain of spiritual life. It were better for a man there to lay on himself the command to be truthful than speak in a vague way of “not being egoistic!” It would be better to be truthful and say:—“I acknowledge my egoism,” thus showing his desire at least to overcome it.
I can best express what is connected with the idea of spiritual truth in the following way. One might easily be of the opinion:—“There are people who tell of all kinds of things they have seen and experienced in the higher worlds; this is then spread abroad and is known by others. If one realises that these things are not true, ought one not to use every possible means to contradict them?” Certainly, there are points of view from which such contradiction is necessary. But for those, who as spiritual men are only concerned with the truth, there is always another thought, namely this:—Of the things brought from the spiritual world, only those that are true flourish and bear fruits for the world; what is untrue is most certainly unfruitful.
Expressed more trivially we might say:—However much people lie with regard to spiritual matters these lies have very short legs. The people who spread these lies have to acknowledge that nothing really fruitful comes from them. Truth alone bears fruits in the spiritual realm. This is where our individual spiritual development begins, where we realise and acknowledge our true position. That truth alone is fruitful—that it alone has power to affect anything, must dwell as vital impulse in all spiritual, in all occult movements. Truth is proved by its fruitfulness and by the blessings it brings to man. Untruths and lies are unfruitful. They have but one result which I only hint at, but cannot deal further with to-day—they react most powerfully upon those who originate them. We shall deal with the meaning of this important statement some other time.
As I said, I wished to-day to glance backwards over the work done during the past year; to recall the tone which as feeling-content filled and resounded in our souls.
In speaking of the work carried on outside our own group during the past year I may perhaps mention my own share which reached its culmination in the Rosicrucian Mystery Play we produced in Munich, “Die Pforte der Einwerhung,” the “The Portal of Initiation.” We shall speak at our next group-meeting of what was then attempted, at present I only wish to say that it was then possible to express in a more artistic, more individual form, what had otherwise been said in a more general way. When speaking here or elsewhere of the conditions of spiritual life we speak of these as they are right for every soul. But in doing so it is necessary to keep in view that each man is an independent Being, and each soul must be considered individually. This is why we were obliged to depict one soul in “The Portal of Initiation.” Therefore you must look on this Rosicrucian Mystery not as a hook of instruction, but as an artistic presentation of the preparation for initiation of one man.
We are not concerned here with the way this or that man progresses, but with the progress of him who in the play is called “Johannes Thomasius,” that is with the very individual form the preparation for initiation took in a particular man.
Thus, by approaching nearer to truth, we have arrived at two distinct points of view. First, where we described the whole course of progress, and then that where we penetrated to the very core of an individual soul. All the time we were inspired by the thought that we must draw near, and patiently await the truth from many sides, until these different aspects of the truth were linked together into a single perception. This attitude of reserve in respect of knowledge we desire most especially to acquire. Never let it be said that man cannot experience truth. He can experience it! Only he cannot know the whole truth all at once, but only one side of it. This makes one humble. True humility is a feeling that must be developed here within our group, so that from here it may pass out into the general culture of our day, and there make its influence felt. Our age has need of great modesty in all its activities.
In the spirit of this impulse we shall continue the work of explaining the Christ-problem so that here also we may experience how modesty in respect of knowledge (Erkenntnisbescheidenheit) can be attained, and may thereby progress ever further in the experiencing of truth.
Erster Vortrag
Es geziemt sich wohl, heute, da wir unsere Tätigkeit des Berliner Zweiges wieder beginnen, ein klein wenig zurückzublicken auf das, was durch unsere Seelen gezogen ist seit dem Zeitpunkte, da wir im vorigen Jahre in der gleichen Art die Arbeit des Berliner Zweiges begonnen haben.
Sie erinnern sich gewiß daran, daß ungefähr vor einem Jahre, anläßlich der damaligen Generalversammlung unserer Deutschen Sektion, im Berliner Zweige von mir der Vortrag gehalten worden ist über die Sphäre der Bodhisattvas. Es sollte mit dem Vortrage über die Mission der Bodhisattvas in der Welt eingeleitet werden, was uns dann im Verlaufe unserer Zweigversammlungen den vorigen Winter hindurch hauptsächlich beschäftigt hat: eine Betrachtung des Christus-Problems, und zwar im wesentlichen in Anknüpfung an das Matthäus-Evangelium. Wir haben ja solche Betrachtungen über das Christus-Problem in der verschiedensten Weise gepflogen in Anknüpfung an andere Evangelien, so an das Johannes-Evangelium und an das Lukas-Evangelium. Und wir haben darauf hingewiesen, daß wir in einer zukünftigen Zeit zu einer weiteren Vertiefung dieses Christus-Problems auch herantreten werden an eine Betrachtung, die im wesentlichen anzuknüpfen haben wird an das Markus-Evangelium.
Wir haben diese Betrachtungen in bezug auf das Christus-Problem nicht so gepflogen, daß wir eine bloße Erklärung der Evangelien versuchten. Es ist oftmals, ich möchte fast sagen, in einer radikalen Weise hier ausgesprochen worden: Was Geisteswissenschaft über die Vorgänge in Palästina zu sagen hat, das müßte auch gesagt werden können, wenn es gar keine äußeren historischen Urkunden über diese Vorgänge in Palästina gäbe. Denn im tiefsten Grunde maßgebend für die Schilderung der Christus-Vorgänge ist für uns nicht das, was in irgendeinem Buche, in irgendeiner Urkunde steht, sondern was in der ewigen, inneren, geistigen Urkunde steht, in der durch das hellseherische Bewußtsein zu entziffernden Akasha-Chronik. Was wir uns darunter vorzustellen haben, ist oftmals hier erwähnt worden. Und dann stellen wir uns zu den Evangelien so, daß wir das, was wir erst erkundet haben aus den geistigen Forschungen selbst heraus, vergleichen mit dem, was uns - sagen wir also in bezug auf die Ereignisse in Palästina — gegeben ist in den Evangelien oder in den andern Urkunden des Neuen Testamentes. Allerdings haben wir dann gefunden, daß wir sozusagen diese Urkunden erst dadurch lesen lernen, daß wir ohne sie in jene Geheimnisse eindringen, welche sich auf die Ereignisse von Palästina beziehen, und daß gerade dadurch, daß wir erst unbefangen von diesen Urkunden die entsprechenden Ereignisse erforschen, unsere Hochschätzung, unsere Anbetung, könnten wir sagen, gegenüber diesen Urkunden in einem ganz besonderen Grade wächst.
Aber wenn wir nicht bloß auf die nächsten, und zwar zeitweilig engsten Interessen unseres Zusammenseins sehen, sondern wenn wir darauf sehen, daß unsere ganze Zeitbildung, unsere Gegenwartskultur gewissermaßen ein neues Verständnis der Urkunden des Christentums verlangt, dann müssen wir uns klar darüber sein, daß wir durch die Geisteswissenschaft dazu berufen sind, nicht nur unsere eigenen Erkenntnisbedürfnisse gegenüber den Ereignissen von Palästina zu befriedigen, sondern daß wir berufen sind, aus der Geisteswissenschaft heraus in die Sprache der gegenwärtigen Kulturbedürfnisse zu übersetzen, was wir zu sagen haben über die Bedeutung des Christus-Ereignisses für die ganze Menschheitsentwickelung. Da genügt es aber nicht, wenn wir uns etwa beschränken würden auf das, was die bisherigen Jahrhunderte herbeigetragen haben zum Verständnisse des ChristusProblems und der Christus-Gestalt. Würde das für die Bildungsbedürfnisse der Gegenwart genügen, so gäbe es heute nicht so viele Menschen, welche ihr Wahrheitsbedürfnis nicht mehr in Einklang bringen können mit dem, was überliefert ist auf christlichem Gebiet, und die in der einen oder andern Beziehung sogar leugnen, was uns über die Ereignisse von Palästina berichtet und was jahrhundertelang geglaubt worden ist. Das alles kann uns darauf hinweisen, daß für die Zeitbildung notwendig geworden ist ein neues Verständnis, ein neues Erschließen gegenüber den christlichen Wahrheiten.
Nun gibt es neben vielem anderen, was uns der Erforschung der christlichen Wahrheiten näherbringen kann, vorzugsweise ein Mittel, das insbesondere fruchtbar werden kann auf unserem Forschungsfelde. Das besteht darin, daß wir den Blick erweitern, daß wir unsere Gefühls- und Empfindungswelt erweitern über die Horizonte hinüber, die in den verflossenen Jahrhunderten die Menschheit für die geistige Welt besessen hat. Wie wir unsere Horizonte erweitern können, das mag uns durch einen sehr einfachen und naheliegenden Hinweis vor die Seele treten.
Wir kennen alle - um zu dem uns nächsten großen Geist unserer abendländischen Kulturentwickelung zurückzugreifen — in Goethe einen titanischen Geist. Und viele unserer Betrachtungen haben uns gezeigt, welche Tiefe der geistigen Anschauung in der Persönlichkeit Goethes verborgen lag. Diese Betrachtungen haben uns auch dazu geführt zu erkennen, wie wir uns selber zu geistigen Höhen hinaufranken können, indem wir eindringen in das Gefüge der Goetheschen Seele. Aber wir mögen Goethe noch so gut kennenlernen, uns noch so sehr in das vertiefen, was er uns geben kann - eines können wir bei ihm noch nicht finden, was wir heute haben müssen, wenn unser Blick in richtiger Weise erweitert und unser Horizont über die notwendigsten geistigen Bedürfnisse hinaus reichen soll. Wir finden bei Goethe nirgends einen Hinweis darauf, daß ihm aufgegangen ist, was wir heute lernen können, was uns heute fruchtbar werden kann, wenn wir jene Begriffe geistiger Entwickelung der Menschheit in uns aufnehmen, die aufzunehmen erst möglich geworden ist durch die Erschließung der geistigen Dokumente im 19. Jahrhundert: wenn wir die Errungenschaften des orientalischen Lebens aufnehmen. Da erhalten wir mancherlei Begriffe, durch die wir keineswegs entfernt werden vom Verständnis des Christus-Problems, sondern durch die wir, wenn wir sie richtig aufnehmen, geradezu hingeführt werden zu einer richtigen und vollkommenen Schätzung des Christus Jesus. Daher wurde auch von mir geglaubt, daß eine Betrachtung des ChristusProblems durch nichts anderes besser eingeleitet werden kann als durch eine Auseinandersetzung über die Mission der großen geistigen Individualitäten der Menschheit, die von Zeit zu Zeit in besonders fühlbarer Weise einzugreifen haben in die Entwickelung, und die wir mit einem von der orientalischen Philosophie hergenommenen Begriff als die Bodhisattvas bezeichnen. Solche Begriffe wie zum Beispiel den der Bodhisattvas hatte man jahrhundertelang eben nicht in der abendländischen Geistesentwickelung. Und erst wenn man sich an ihnen orientiert hat, steigt man in entsprechender Weise hinauf zur Erkenntnis dessen, was der Christus für die Menschheit gewesen ist, sein kann und fortwährend sein wird.
So sehen wir, wie ein weiter Umkreis geistiger Entwickelung der Menschheit fruchtbar gemacht werden kann, um gerade das in würdiger Weise zu begreifen, was uns zu begreifen obliegt für jene Bildung und Kultur, für jenes Geistesleben, in dem wir mitten darinnen stehen. Und noch von einem andern Gesichtspunkt aus war es wichtig, daß wir immer, wo es nur möglich war, den geistigen Blick hinausschweifen ließen über die letzten Jahrhunderte, daß wir geltend machten den Unterschied zwischen einem Menschen von der Wende des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts und einem Menschen aus der Zeit des 18. oder 19. Jahrhunderts; und daß wir geltend machten, daß man von Buddha und Buddhismus zum Beispiel noch vor einem Jahrhundert in Europa recht wenig gewußt hat. Das letzte aber, was bei uns auf unserem Arbeitsgebiet, wenn auch nicht das Mittel unseres Strebens, so doch der eigentliche Impuls und auch der Zielpunkt unseres Strebens ist und worauf wir hinarbeiten, das ist doch zuletzt die Stimmung, das Gefühl, die Empfindung, die unsere Seele beschleicht, wenn sie berührt wird von den großen geistigen Wahrheiten. Denn nicht so sehr darauf kommt es an, was diese oder jene wissen wollen, sondern darauf, welche Wärme des Gefühls, welche Kraft der Empfindung, welcher Edelsinn des Wollens aus unserer Seele heraufsteigt, wenn die großen Wahrheiten der Menschheit an diese Seele schlagen. Und wichtiger in unsern Zweigen als das, was in den Worten inhaltlich gesagt werden kann, ist die Stimmung, die Gefühlswelle, die in einem unserer Zweige herrschen kann, wenn die Worte den Raum durchweben. Mancherlei Art sind diese Gefühle, diese Empfindungen. Und bei dem, was gerade jetzt hier vor unseren Seelen stehen soll, sollte die wichtigste, die bedeutsamste Empfindung die sein, welche sich allmählich notwendig in uns entwikkeln muß: Ehrfurcht vor der Erkenntnis der großen geistigen Wahrheiten, das Gefühl, daß diese großen geistigen Wahrheiten solcher Art sind, daß wir uns in scheuer Ehrerbietung ihnen nähern sollen, daß wir nicht glauben sollen, mit irgendeinem schnell zusammengezimmerten Begriff, mit ein paar rasch gewonnenen Vorstellungen eine große Tatsache umspannen zu können.
Oftmals ist von mir der Vergleich gebraucht worden, daß wir einen Baum, der vor uns steht, uns noch nicht vergegenwärtigen können, wenn wir ein Bild von ihm malen von einem Gesichtspunkt aus, sondern daß wir herumgehen und den Baum von verschiedenen Seiten malen müssen. Erst durch das Zusammenfassen dieser verschiedenen Bilder erreichen wir einen Gesamteindruck von dem, was der Baum ist. Dieser Vergleich soll uns aber insbesondere vor die Seele malen, wie wir uns den großen geistigen Tatsachen gegenüber zu verhalten haben. Wir sollten uns klar sein, wie wir gar nicht vorwärts schreiten können in irgendeiner wirklichen oder vermeintlichen Erkenntnis der höchsten Dinge, wenn wir immer nur von einer Seite an die Dinge herangehen. Und obzwar durchaus Wahrheit enthalten ist oder sein kann in dem Anblick einer Sache, sollen wir uns doch niemals des demütigen Gefühles entschlagen, daß alle unsere Vorstellungen nur von einem Gesichtspunkt aus aufgenommene Ansichten sind und sein können. Wenn wir uns mit diesem Gefühl durchdringen, werden wir gern und willig von überallher die Vorstellungen, die Empfindungen und Gefühle herholen wollen, welche es uns möglich machen, die großen Tatsachen des Daseins von den verschiedensten Seiten her zu beleuchten. Unsere Zeit macht das notwendig. Immer mehr und mehr wird sich das Bedürfnis in unserer Zeit entwickeln, die Dinge von den verschiedensten Seiten aus anzusehen. Daher schließen wir uns heute nicht mehr ab gegenüber irgendeiner andern Anschauung oder Meinung, gegenüber einem andern Weg zu den höchsten Dingen hin, als es unser eigener oder der unserer eigenen Kultur ist. Sogar innerhalb dessen, was die abendländische Kulturentwickelung selber geboten hat, haben wir versucht, im Laufe der letzten Jahre dieses Prinzip, das uns zur echten Erkenntnisdemut führen kann, aufrechtzuerhalten. Wir haben uns niemals vermessen - und ich darf wohl sagen: tief stand es mir in die Seele geschrieben, daß eine solche Vermessenheit an diesem Orte niemals möglich sein sollte -, ein System, einen Überblick einfach über das zu geben, was die großen Ereignisse, die wir mit dem Christus-Problem zusammenfassen, sein sollen. Sondern immer ist gesagt worden: Wir nähern uns von irgendeinem Gesichtspunkt aus; und ein anderes Mal wurde gesagt: Wir nähern uns von einem andern Gesichtspunkt aus. — Und immer ist darauf aufmerksam gemacht worden, daß wir das Problem deshalb doch nicht erschöpfen und daß wir ruhig und geduldig weiterarbeiten wollen.
Der Sinn der Anknüpfung an die verschiedenen Evangelien war der, daß wir Anlaß nahmen, von vier verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten aus das Christus-Problem zu betrachten, und daß wir dann fanden, daß in der Tat die vier Evangelien uns Anknüpfungen an die vier verschiedenen Gesichtspunkte bieten, und daß wir in den Evangelien selber vorgezeichnet fanden den Grundsatz: Du sollst nicht auf einmal, nicht auf einer Umschau dem gewaltigen Problem dich nähern, sondern du sollst dich wenigstens von den vier verschiedenen geistigen Hiimmelsrichtungen aus ihm nähern. Und du sollst hoffen: wenn du von diesen vier geistigen Himmelsrichtungen aus, die mit den Namen der vier Evangelisten, Matthäus, Markus, Lukas und Johannes, bezeichnet sind, an das Problem herankommst, dann wird es dir allmählich immer näher und näher treten. Und es wird dir so näher treten, daß du niemals von dir zu sagen brauchst, du seiest von der großen Wahrheit, ohne welche die menschliche Seele in ihrem tiefsten Innern nicht leben kann, ausgeschlossen, daß du aber auch niemals sagen wirst, irgendeine Gestalt der Wahrheit, welche du ergriffen hast, sei schon die ganze Wahrheit.
So war sozusagen dasjenige, was wir im Verlaufe des letzten Winters pflegen konnten, darauf angelegt, nach und nach in uns die Stimmung der Erkenntnisbescheidenheit hervorzurufen. Und ohne diese Stimmung der Erkenntnisbescheidenheit kommen wir in der Tat im geistigen Leben nicht weiter. Daher wurde auch gelegentlich dieser Betrachtungen immer alles getan, um die Grundbedingungen des geistigen Erkenntnisfortschrittes immer wieder und wieder zu betonen. Und wer aufmerksam von Woche zu Woche die Vorträge hier verfolgt hat, der wird nicht behaupten können, daß nicht überall auf die Grundbedingungen des geistigen Erkenntnisfortschrittes hingewiesen worden sei.
Geistiger Erkenntnisfortschritt — das ist ja einer der Impulse, die unserer ganzen geisteswissenschaftlichen Bewegung zugrundeliegen. Geistiger Erkenntnisfortschritt — was soll er unserer Seele? Er soll den tiefsten, den menschenwürdigsten Sehnsüchten und Bedürfnissen unserer Seele entgegenkommen, soll uns das geben, ohne das ein Mensch, der seine Menschenwürde voll empfindet, nicht leben kann. Und er soll es uns innerhalb unseres geisteswissenschaftlichen Feldes so geben, daß es den Erkenntnisbedürfnissen unserer Gegenwart entspricht. Was man mit den gewöhnlichen Sinnen nicht erforschen kann, dem der Mensch angehört nicht als Sinneswesen, sondern als geistiges Wesen, darüber soll uns jener Erkenntnisfortschritt Aufklärung bringen, der uns durch die Geisteswissenschaft geboten wird. Die großen Fragen über die Stellung des Menschen in der Sinneswelt, über das, was jenseits der Offenbarungen dieser Sinneswelt liegt, die Wahrheiten über das, was jenseits von Leben und Tod liegt — diesen Fragen entspricht doch ein tiefes, ja das menschlichste Bedürfnis der Seele. Wenn auch der Mensch durch allerlei Umstände die Fragen, welche sich auf solche Dinge beziehen, zurückdrängt, wenn er sich auch eine Weile dadurch zu beräuben vermag, daß er sich sagt: Das kann die Wissenschaft doch nicht erforschen, dazu fehlen dem Menschen die Fähigkeiten - auf die Dauer und für die wahre Gestalt der menschlichen Empfindungen schwindet doch nie das Bedürfnis nach Antworten auf diese Fragen. Woher das kommt, was wir sich heranbilden sehen im Verlaufe von Kindheit und Jugendentwickelung, wohin das geht, was wir in unserer Seele bergen, wenn die Leiblichkeit beginnt hinzuschwinden und abzusterben, kurz, wie der Mensch mit einer geistigen Welt zusammenhängt, das ist die große Frage, die einem menschlichsten Bedürfnis entspringt und ohne deren Beantwortung der Mensch nur dann sein kann, wenn er sich über seine menschlichsten Bedürfnisse betäubt.
Aber weil diese Frage einem so tiefen Bedürfnis entspringt, weil die Seele nicht in Ruhe und Befriedigung leben kann, wenn sie nicht eine Antwort auf diese Fragen erhält, ist es nur natürlich, daß der Mensch sozusagen auf leichte Art, auf eine bequeme Art sich Antworten auf diese Fragen verschaffen möchte. Und wie vielerlei Wege werden heute, trotzdem diese Fragen, wie manche leugnen möchten, besonders brennend geworden sind auf allen Menschheitsgebieten, wie vielerlei Wege werden heute gewiesen! Man darf wohl ohne Übertreibung sagen, daß von all den Wegen, die dem Menschen heute dargeboten werden, wenn diese großen Rätselfragen an ihn herantreten, der geisteswissenschaftliche Weg der schwierigste ist. Ja, man darf auch noch etwas anderes sagen. Es werden viele unter Ihnen sein, welche die eine oder die andere Wissenschaft, von denen in der Welt viel geredet wird, für schwierig halten, sich vielleicht auch nicht hineinwagen, weil es sie zurückschreckt, was da alles zu überwinden ist, um in eine solche Wissenschaft einzudringen. Es mag auch sein, daß der Weg, den wir den geisteswissenschaftlichen genannt haben, leichter erscheint als der Weg in die Mathematik, in die Botanik oder in einen andern Zweig der Naturwissenschaft. Dennoch ist, absolut genommen, dieser Weg selbst schwieriger als der Weg in irgendeine andere Wissenschaft hinein. Das kann ohne Übertreibung ausgesprochen werden. Warum wird er Ihnen nur leichter? Nur aus dem Grunde, weil er mit einer ungeheuren Wucht die seelischen Interessen aufregt und dem entspricht, was einer jeden Seele am allernächsten liegt. Wenn er der schwierigste ist von all den Wegen, die heute dem Menschen hinauf in die geistige Welt dargeboten werden, so sollen wir dabei doch ein anderes nicht vergessen: daß uns dieser Weg zu dem Höchsten in unserem Seelenleben führen soll. Ist es denn nicht natürlich, daß der Weg zum Höchsten auch der schwierigste sein muß? Dennoch sollen wir uns nie abschrecken lassen durch die Schwierigkeit des Weges, niemals die Seele verschließen vor der Notwendigkeit der Schwierigkeit des geisteswissenschaftlichen Weges.
Unter den mancherlei Notwendigkeiten des geisteswissenschaftlichen Weges wurde ja hier immer wieder die eine angeführt: daß der, welcher sich auf den geisteswissenschaftlichen Pfad begibt, zunächst in sorgfältiger Weise aufnehmen soll, was die Geistesforschung schon darzubieten vermag über die geistigen Geheimnisse, über die Tatsachen der geistigen Welt. Wir berühren damit ein ganz besonders notwendiges Kapitel unseres geisteswissenschaftlichen Lebens. Wie mancher möchte leichten Herzens sagen: Da redet man uns von einer unübersehbaren Geisteswissenschaft, von geistigen Tatsachen, die dieser oder jener Geistesforscher, dieser oder jener Erleuchtete, dieser oder jener Eingeweihte geschaut, erforscht hat. Wäre es nicht viel richtiger, wenn man uns einfach den Weg zeigte, wie man rasch selbst in die Regionen hinaufkommt, von denen aus man hineinblickt in die geistige Welt? Warum redet ihr immer wieder davon: So sieht es aus, so hat es dieser oder jener gesehen! Warum zeigt ihr nicht einen Weg, wie wir selber rasch hinaufsteigen?
Aus guten Gründen wird zuerst in einer breiten Weise das mitgeteilt, was aus der geistigen Welt an Tatsachen erforscht ist, bevor auf das eingegangen wird, was man nennen kann die Methoden der Seelenschulung, welche die Seele selbst hinaufführen können in die geistigen Regionen. Denn es wird etwas ganz Bestimmtes dadurch erreicht, daß wir zuerst im hingebungsvollen Studium dem obliegen, was die Geistesforscher aus den geistigen Welten geoffenbart haben. Wir haben betont, daß zwar die Tatsachen der geistigen Welt erforscht werden müssen, aufgefunden werden können nur durch das hellseherische Bewußtsein; aber wir haben ebenso oft betont: wenn die Tatsachen einmal gefunden sind, wenn irgendein geschultes Hellseherbewußitsein diese Tatsachen in der geistigen Welt beobachtet hat und sie dann mitteilt, dann muß die Mitteilung so sein, daß auch jeder, der keine hellseherische Entwickelung durchgemacht hat, mit dem gesunden Wahrheitssinn, der in jeder Seele liegt, mit der wirklich unbefangenen Logik die Tatsachen nachprüfen, die Wahrheiten erkennen kann. Es wird kein wahrhafter Geistesforscher, kein mit hellseherischem Bewußtsein im rechten Sinne des Wortes begabter Mensch irgendeine Tatsache der geistigen Welt anders mitteilen als so, daß der, welcher wirklich will, diese Tatsache auch ohne Hellsehen prüfen könnte. Aber er wird sie auch so mitteilen, daß sie den vollen Wert, die volle Bedeutung für eine Menschenseele haben kann.
Welchen Wert haben die Mitteilungen geistiger Tatsachen, die Vorstellungen geistiger Tatsachen für eine Menschenseele? Sie haben den Wert, daß ein Mensch, der weiß: so sieht es aus in der geistigen Welt - sich im Leben, in seinen Gedanken, Gefühlen und Empfindungen danach richten kann, sich orientieren kann, wie der Mensch im Verhältnis steht zur geistigen Welt. In diesem Sinne wertvoll ist eine jede Mitteilung geistiger Tatsachen auch dann, wenn der Betreffende, der sie erhält, sie nicht selber durch ein hellseherisches Bewußtsein erforschen kann. Ja, selbst für den Hellseher erlangt einen Menschenwert diese Tatsache erst dann, wenn er sie heruntergebracht hat in eine solche Sphäre, daß er sie in eine allen Menschen zugängliche Form prägen kann. Mag ein Hellseher noch so viel erforschen und sehen im Spirituellen, das ist ganz wertlos für ihn und für irgendeinen andern Menschen, solange er das Gesehene nicht heruntergebracht hat in die Sphäre der gewöhnlichen Erkenntnis und es in solche Begriffe und Vorstellungen prägt, daß der natürliche Wahrheitssinn und die gesunde Logik die Sache begreifen können. Ja, der Hellseher selbst muß erst die Sache begreifen, wenn sie für ihn einen Wert haben soll. Erst da beginnt der Wert, wo die logische Prüfung beginnt.
Wir könnten mit einem radikalen Ausdruck eine Art Kreuzprobe machen auf das, was jetzt gesagt worden ist. Unter manchem andern Wertvollen in bezug auf die geistigen Wahrheiten und die geistigen Mitteilungen wird Ihnen ohne Zweifel das wichtig erscheinen, was der Mensch mitnehmen kann durch die Pforte des Todes von dem, was er auf dem physischen Plan zwischen Geburt und Tod an solchen geistigen Wahrheiten aufgenommen hat. Oder gestalten wir die Frage so: Wieviel bleibt dem Menschen, der hier durch die Pflege spirituellen Lebens Mitteilungen empfangen hat über die geistige Welt, wieviel bleibt ihm von dem, was er so eingesehen hat, was er so sich zu eigen gemacht hat? Genau so viel bleibt ihm, als er verstanden hat, als er begriffen hat, als er in die Sprache des gewöhnlichen Menschheitsbewußtseins umgesetzt hat.
Stellen Sie sich einmal einen hellsichtigen Menschen vor, der vielleicht ganz besondere Entdeckungen in der geistigen Welt durch rein hellseherische Beobachtungen gemacht hat, der es aber versäumt hätte, diese Beobachtungen aus der geistigen Welt in eine Sprache zu kleiden, die für irgendein Zeitalter eine Sprache des gewöhnlichen menschlichen Wahrheitssinnes ist. Wissen Sie, was ihm oder was für ihn geschieht? Ausgelöscht sind alle diese Entdeckungen nach dem Tode. Just so viel bleibt nach dem Tode wertvoll und bedeutungsvoll, als umgesetzt, umformuliert ist in eine Sprache, die in irgendeinem Zeitalter einer Sprache des gesunden Wahrheitssinnes entspricht.
Gewiß ist es von größter Bedeutung, daß es hellseherische Menschen gibt, die Mitteilungen herausbringen können aus der geistigen Welt, die andere Menschen damit befruchten können. Das bringt Segen in unserer Zeit, weil unsere Zeit solche Weistümer braucht und sich nicht wird fortentwickeln können, wenn sie nicht solche Weistümer annimmt. Notwendig ist es, daß solche Mitteilungen an unsere Zeitkultur gemacht werden. Und wenn man das heute noch nicht einsieht, in einem halben oder einem ganzen Jahrhundert wird es doch allgemeine Menschheitsüberzeugung sein: Die Kultur kann nicht fortgehen ohne die Überzeugung vom Vorhandensein spiritueller Weistümer, und die Menschheit müßte kulturell zugrundegehen ohne die. Aufnahme spiritueller Weistümer. Es gibt etwas, was der Menschheit in der Zukunft notwendig ist, wenn sie sich fortentwickeln will, notwendiger als alle äußerlich sichtbaren Kulturmittel: das ist die Aufnahme spiritueller Weisheit. Und wenn alle Lüfte erobert würden für den Verkehr, der Menschheit müßte doch der Kulturtod in Aussicht gestellt werden, wenn sie keine geistigen Weistümer aufnehmen würde. So liegt die Sache ganz zweifellos. Es muß die Möglichkeit da sein, hineinzublicken in die geistige Welt.
Von anderem Wert aber als die Menschheitsfortschritte auf der Erde ist das, was die spirituellen Weistümer für die einzelnen Individualitäten nach dem Tode zu bedeuten haben. Da müssen wir, um uns eine rechte Vorstellung zu machen, einmal die Frage so stellen: Was hat denn der hellseherische Mensch von dem, was er hellsichtig erforscht hat und in eine Formel des gesunden Wahrheitssinnes, der gesunden menschlichen Logik gebracht hat, was hat er dadurch, daß er hineinsehen kann in die geistige Welt, nach dem Tode mehr an Früchten als derjenige, der durch sein Karma nicht die Möglichkeit hatte, schon in der entsprechenden Inkarnation selber hineinzusehen in die geistige Welt, und daher darauf angewiesen war, nur von andern zu hören über die Ergebnisse der Geistesforschung? Wie unterscheiden sich die geistigen Wahrheiten bei einem Eingeweihten und bei einem Menschen, der sie nur gehört hat und nicht hineinschauen kann in die geistige Welt? Ist der Eingeweihte besser daran als der, welcher diese Dinge nur empfangen konnte?
Für die allgemeine Menschheit hat das Hineinschauen in geistige Welten einen höheren Wert als das Nicht-Hineinschauen. Denn wer hineinschaut, tritt in Verkehr mit der geistigen Welt; er kann da nicht nur Menschen, sondern auch andere, geistige Wesen lehren und in ihrem Fortschritt fördern. So hat dieses hellsichtige Bewußtsein einen ganz besonderen Wert. Aber für das Individuelle hat nur das Wissen einen Wert, und in bezug auf den individuellen Wert unterscheidet sich der hellsichtigste Mensch nicht von dem, der nur die Mitteilungen empfangen hat und in einer entsprechenden Inkarnation nicht hineinschauen konnte in die geistige Welt. Fruchtbar nach dem Tode ist das, was wir als geistige Weisheit aufgenommen haben, gleichgültig, ob wir selbst sie geschaut haben oder nicht.
Damit haben wir eines der großen, so verehrungswürdigen ethisch-moralischen Gesetze der spirituellen Welt vor unsere Seele hingestellt. Allerdings ist vielleicht unsere heutige Zeitmoral nicht fein genug, um gerade dieses Ethos voll zu verstehen. Individuell, also im höheren Sinne den Egoismus befriedigend, erlangt keiner einen Vorsprung dadurch, daß ihm die Möglichkeit geboten ist durch sein Karma, hineinzuschauen in die geistige Welt. Alles, was wir für unser individuelles Leben erwerben wollen, müssen wir uns auf dem physischen Plan erwerben und auch in solche Formen bringen, die dem physischen Plan genügen. Und wenn ein Buddha oder ein Bodhisattva höher steht als andere menschliche Individualitäten in den Hierarchien der geistigen Welt, so ist es eben dadurch, daß sie durch soundsoviele Inkarnationen auf dem physischen Plan sich dieses Höhere angeeignet haben. Was ich meinte mit der höheren Ethik, der höheren Sittenlehre, die sich aus dem spirituellen Leben ergibt, das ist dies: Niemand sollte sich vorstellen, daß er durch eine hellseherische Entwickelung einen Vorsprung erlangt über seine Mitmenschen. Das ist gar nicht der Fall. Er erlangt keinen im egoistischen Sinne zu rechtfertigenden Fortschritt. Nur insofern erlangt er ihn, daß er den anderen mehr sein kann. Es ist das Unsittliche, dem Egoismus zu dienen, auf spirituellem Felde vollständig ausgeschlossen. Für sich kann der Mensch nichts erlangen durch eine spirituelle Erleuchtung. Was er erlangt, kann er nur erlangen als Diener der Welt im allgemeinen, und für sich nur, indem er es für andere mit erlangt.
So steht also ein Geistesforscher unter seinen Mitmenschen. Wollen sie hören, was er erforscht hat, und es aufnehmen, so erlangen sie dadurch einen gleichen Vorsprung mit ihm selber, kommen für ihr Individuelles genau so weit wie er. Das heißt, verwertbar ist das Spirituelle nur im allgemein menschlichen Geiste, nicht im egoistischen Geiste. Es gibt ein Gebiet, auf dem man nicht bloß deshalb moralisch ist, weil man es sich vornimmt, sondern weil einem das Unmoralischsein, das Egoistischsein nichts helfen würde. Dann aber ist es auch leicht, ein anderes einzusehen: daß es gefährlich ist, in die geistige Welt, in das spirituelle Gebiet unvorbereiter hineinzutreten. Niemals wird für das Leben nach dem Tode irgend etwas Egoistisches erreicht werden können durch das spirituelle Leben. Wohl aber kann der Mensch Egoistisches für dieses Leben, für das Leben auf dem physischen Plan wollen durch die spirituelle Entwickelung. Wenn man sozusagen für die geistige Welt auch nichts Egoistisches erringen kann, man kann für diese Welt irgend etwas erreichen wollen, was im Sinne des Egoismus liegt.
Die meisten Menschen, die eine gewisse höhere Entwickelung anstreben, werden nun gewiß sagen: Das ist ja ganz selbstverständlich, daß ich mich bemühe, unegoistisch zu sein, ehe ich den Eintritt in die höhere Welt erhalten will. - Aber glauben Sie es: Es gibt wohl kein Gebiet menschlicher Täuschung, auf dem eine Täuschung so groß sein kann als da, wo man sagt: Ich strebe unegoistisch! - Sagen kann man das leicht. Ob man es auch tun kann, es selbst wirklich vollziehen kann, das ist eine ganz andere Frage. Es ist vor allen Dingen deshalb eine andere Frage, weil, wenn man beginnt, in der Seele Verrichtungen zu pflegen, die in die geistige Welt hineinführen können, man sich dann erst selbst in seiner wahren Gestalt entgegentritt. Der Mensch lebt in der äußeren Welt in bezug auf sehr vieles nicht in seiner wahren Gestalt. Er lebt eingewoben in ein Netz von Vorstellungen, von Willensimpulsen und moralischen Empfindungen, in Handlungsusancen, die von der Umwelt gegeben sind, und selten wirft der Mensch die Frage auf: Wie würde ich handeln, wie würde ich denken über eine Sache, wenn ich mich nicht durch das, was mir anerzogen ist, veranlaßt fühlte, so oder so zu denken oder zu handeln? - Wenn der Mensch diese Frage sich beantworten würde, dann würde er sehen, daß er gewöhnlich viel, viel schlechter ist, als er annimmt.
Nun haben Verrichtungen, die darauf angelegt sind, daß der Mensch in die geistige Welt hinaufzusteigen lernt, zur Folge, daß man hinauswächst über alles, in was man einverwoben ist durch Gewohnheiten, durch Erziehung, durch alles, was um uns herum ist. Recht bald wächst man darüber hinaus. Man wird geistig-seelisch, empfindungsgemäß, immer nackter. Die Hüllen, die wir uns selber angelegt haben und an die wir uns halten bei unsern gewöhnlichen Empfindungen und Handlungen, sie fallen. Daher jene ganz gewöhnliche Erscheinung, die auch schon oft besprochen worden ist: Der Mensch, bevor er anfängt mit einer geistigen Entwickelung, ist vielleicht ein leidlich anständiger, vielleicht auch ein vernünftiger Mensch, der keine großen Dummheiten im Leben macht. Nun fängt er an mit einer geistigen Entwickelung. Während er vorher ganz bescheiden war und sich vielleicht auch gesagt hat: Ich bin doch ein ganz bescheidener Mensch! -, fängt er jetzt an, unter dem Einfluß der geistigen Entwickelung ein ganz hochmütiges Wesen zu zeigen, fängt an, allerlei Torheiten und Dummheiten zu begehen. Er verliert, wenn er in eine geistige Entwickelung hineinkommt, sozusagen Halt und Richtung. Warum das so ist, kann am besten derjenige sehen, der in einer geistigen Welt zu Hause ist. Denn zweierlei Dinge sind notwendig, um sich zurechtzufinden gegenüber dem, was aus der geistigen Welt an die Menschenseele herantritt, um das Gleichgewicht zu behalten: Man muß in der Lage sein, nicht schwindlig zu werden gegenüber dem, was aus der geistigen Welt an uns herantritt. Im physischen Leben schützt uns unsere Organisation vor dem Schwindligwerden durch das, was wir in den Anthroposophie-Vorträgen den Gleichgewichtssinn, den statischen Sinn genannt haben. Wie es für den leiblichen Menschen etwas gibt, wodurch er sich aufrechterhält — denn wenn die Organisation nicht ordentlich funktioniert, wird der Mensch schwindlig und fällt um -, so gibt es auch im geistigen Leben etwas, durch das sich der Mensch über seine eigene Lage zur Welt orientieren kann. Das muß er können. Das geistige Umfallen besteht eben darin, daß das nicht mehr vorhanden ist, was uns vorher stützt, was anerzogene Empfindungen sind, was das Gewebe der äußeren Welt bewirkt, so daß wir dann auf uns selber angewiesen werden. Die Stützen fallen weg, und dann ist die Gefahr nahe, daß wir schwindlig werden. Wir können dann leicht hochmütig werden, wenn die äußeren Stützen für uns wegfallen. Der Hochmut sitzt natürlich in uns, nur kam er vorher nicht zum Vorschein.
Wodurch erlangt man nun das geistige Gleichgewicht, so daß man nicht schwindlig wird? Dadurch, daß man entsagungsvoll, fleißig und emsig das aufnimmt, was die Geistesforschung erforscht hat und was in logische, dem gewöhnlichen Wahrheitssinn entsprechende Formeln umgeprägt worden ist. Nicht aus einer Willkür heraus wird immer wieder und wieder hier betont, daß es notwendig ist, das, was wir Geisteswissenschaft nennen, wirklich zunächst zu studieren. Es wird nicht etwa deshalb betont, damit ich hier recht oft reden kann, sondern aus dem Grunde, weil es durch kein anderes Mittel möglich ist, die festen Stützpunkte für eine geistige Entwickelung zu bekommen. Das hingebungsvolle, emsige Aufnehmen der geisteswissenschaftlichen Resultate ist das Gegenmittel gegen den geistigen Schwindel, gegen die geistige Unsicherheit. Und mancher Mensch, der durch eine unrichtig getriebene Entwickelung in geistige Unsicherheit hineinkommt — wenn es ihm auch erscheint, als ob er recht fleißig gewesen sei —, der sollte wissen, daß er es versäumt hat, das aufzunehmen, was aus dem Born der Geisteswissenschaft zunächst fließen kann. Das ist es, was wir brauchen, dieses Studium der geisteswissenschaftlichen Tatsachen von allen Seiten. Und deshalb war es, daß wir auch während des letzten Winters in unserem Zweige, als wir uns letzten Endes begreiflich machen wollten die Bedeutung des Christus-Ereignisses für die Menschheit, doch immer wieder darauf zurückkamen, die Grundbedingungen des geistigen Fortschrittes zu betonen.
Ein orientiertes Seelenleben braucht der Mensch zum Fortschreiten, aber außerdem noch etwas anderes. Während durch das Studium der Geisteswissenschaft Sicherheit für die menschliche Seele erlangt wird, wird durch ein zweites das gebracht, was wir ebenfalls nötig haben. Das ist eine gewisse geistige Stärke, ein gewisser Mut des geistigen Lebens. Solchen Mut, wie wir zum geistigen Fortschritt brauchen, brauchen wir im gewöhnlichen Leben nicht, deshalb nicht, weil unser innerstes Wesen, unser geistig-seelisches Menschenwesen ja eingebettet ist im gewöhnlichen wachen Tagesleben vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen in den physischen Leib und Ätherleib; und in der Nacht tun wir ja nichts und können nichts verderben. Wenn der Mensch auch schlafend handeln könnte, würde er als unentwickelter Mensch schlimme Dinge hervorbringen. Im physischen Leib und Ätherleib sind aber nicht bloß die Kräfte, die in uns wirksam sind, insofern wir bewußte oder auch nur denkende und fühlende Menschen sind, sondern auch jene Kräfte, an denen göttlich-geistige Wesenheiten gearbeitet haben durch die Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondenzeit hindurch bis in unsere Erdenzeit hinein. Da sind immerfort die Kräfte aus höheren Regionen tätig. Auf die stützen wir uns. Und wenn wir aufwachen und in den physischen Leib und Ätherleib einziehen, überliefern wir uns zugleich den göttlich-geistigen Kräften, die in unserem physischen Leib und Ätherleib zu unserm Heil und Segen darinnen sitzen und uns vom Morgen bis zum Abend durch das Tagesleben führen. So ist es: In uns wirkt die ganze göttlich-geistige Welt, und wir können an ihr im Grunde genommen vieles schlechter machen, aber nicht viel verbessern.
Aber nun denken Sie, daß alle geistige Entwickelung davon abhängt, daß wir frei bekommen unsern inneren Menschen, unsern Astralleib und unser Ich, daß wir sozusagen sehen, hellsichtig wahrnehmen lernen in dem, was unbewußt vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen lebt, und weil es unbewußt lebt, auch kein Unheil anrichten kann. Das muß bewußt in uns werden, was unbewußt ist in jenen Gliedern, in denen göttlich-geistige Kräfte darinnen sind. All die Stärke, die Kraft, die uns gegeben worden ist, indem wir beim Aufwachen gerade in die Hände genommen werden von dem, was in unserem physischen Leib und Ätherleib verankert ist, die fällt weg, wenn wir unabhängig werden vom physischen Leib und Ätherleib und anfangen, hellseherisch wahrzunehmen. Die ganze Kraft und Gewalt der Welt bleibt draußen. Wir haben uns herausgezogen aus denjenigen Kräften, die uns stark machen und ein Widerlager geben gegen die Welt, die von außen auf uns einwirkt. Wir haben uns aus den uns unterstützenden Kräften herausgezogen. Die Welt ist aber geblieben, wie sie ist, und der ganzen Gewalt, dem ganzen Anprall der Welt stehen wir deshalb doch gegenüber. Alle die Kraft, die uns sonst aus dem physischen Leib und Ätherleib kommt, müssen wir dann in uns selber haben, um den Anprall der Welt auszuhalten und Widerstand zu leisten. Alles das müssen wir in unserem Ich und Astralleib entwickeln. Das entwickeln wir durch diejenigen Regeln, die uns gegeben werden und die Sie finden in meiner Schrift «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?». Das ist alles darauf berechnet, unserem eigenen Innern jene Stärke zu geben, die uns vorher von höheren Wesen verliehen wurde und die wegfällt, wenn die äußeren Stützen wegfallen, jene Stärke, die uns widerstandsfähig machen kann gegenüber dem Anprall der Welt, auch wenn wir selbst die Unterstützungen beiseite geschoben haben, die uns unser physischer Leib und Ätherleib bieten.
Menschen, die sich nicht so innerlich stark machen, um die Kräfte, die sie abstreifen mit dem physischen Leib und Ätherleib, zu ersetzen durch wirklich hingebungsvolle Exerzitien der Seele, vor allen Dingen durch die Läuterung der Eigenschaft, die wir in der äußeren Welt als Unmoral bezeichnen, diese Menschen können zwar bis zu einem gewissen Grade Fähigkeiten erwerben, in die geistige Welt hineinzusehen. Aber was geschieht? Sie werden das, was man hypersensitiv nennen kann, sie werden überempfindlich. Sie werden, wie wenn sie von allen Seiten geistig gestochen würden, sie können nicht standhalten dem, was heranprallt von allen Seiten. Das ist eine derjenigen bedeutsamen Tatsachen, die man kennen muß, wenn man einen geistigen Erkenntnisfortschritt anstrebt: sich innerlich stark zu machen, indem man die edelsten, besten Eigenschaften der Seele wirklich ausbildet.
Welche Eigenschaften werden das sein nach dem, was wir eben gerade heute gesagt haben? - Wenn es sogar unmöglich ist, in der geistigen Welt im Zeichen des Egoismus zu leben, wenn uns da der Egoismus nichts hilft, so wird es nur natürlich sein, daß die Austreibung des Egoismus, alles dessen, was der willkürlichen Begehrung des Geistigen unterstellt ist, die Vorbereitung für das geistige Leben sein wird. Je würdiger und ernster man gerade diesen Grundsatz nimmt, desto besser ist es für einen geistigen Fortschritt. Man kann ihn nicht ernst und würdig genug nehmen. Wer mit diesen Dingen zu tun hat, kann es oft hören, daß irgend jemand ihm sagt: Dies habe ich nicht aus Egoismus getan! — Aber wenn dieses Wort über die Lippen will, dann sollte der Mensch Einhalt tun, sollte es nicht über die Lippen lassen, sondern er sollte sich sagen: Eigentlich bist du doch nicht so, daß du sagen kannst, du tust irgend etwas ohne eine Spur von Egoismus! — Das ist viel gescheiter, weil es viel wahrer ist. Und auf das Wahre namentlich in bezug auf die Selbsterkenntnis kommt es an. Auf keinem Gebiete rächt sich Unwahrheit so stark, wie auf dem Gebiet des spirituellen Lebens. Da sollte der Mensch die Forderung an sich stellen, lieber wahr zu sein, als sich in den Nebel hineinzureden: Du bist unegoistisch. — Lieber wahr sein und sich sagen: Gestehe ich meinen Egoismus, so habe ich wenigstens einen Impuls, ihn abzulegen.
Was mit diesem spirituellen Wahrheitsbegriff zusammenhängt, möchte ich am liebsten mit dem Folgenden sagen. Man kann recht leicht so urteilen: Da gibt es Leute, die behaupten, allerlei in den höheren Welten erfahren und gesehen zu haben; das wird dann verbreitet und tritt vor die Menschen hin. Wenn man einsieht, daß das nicht wahr ist, sollte man nicht alle Kräfte und Mittel einsetzen, um das zu bekämpfen? - Gewiß, es kann Gesichtspunkte geben, unter denen ein solcher Kampf notwendig ist. Für den aber, dem es als spiritueller Mensch um die Wahrheit zu tun ist, gibt es immer noch einen andern Gedanken, nämlich den, daß doch nur alles das, was Wahrheit ist, aus der spirituellen Welt heraus gedeiht und fruchtbar ist für die Welt, und daß dasjenige, was unwahr ist, ganz gewiß keine Fruchtbarkeit hat. Das heißt trivial ausgedrückt: Man mag noch so viel zusammenlügen in bezug auf spirituelle Dinge, diese Dinge haben recht kurze Beine. Von diesen Lügen sollte sich der, welcher sie aufbringt, sagen, daß er damit wirklich Fruchtbares nicht wirken kann. Fruchtbar auf spirituellem Gebiet ist allein die Wahrheit. Das beginnt bereits da, wo wir mit unserer eigenen spirituellen Entwickelung beginnen, wo wir anfangen sollten, uns wahr einzugestehen, wie wir eigentlich sind. Das ist etwas, was zugleich als Impuls in allen spirituellen, in allen okkulten Bewegungen leben muß: daß nur das Wahre ein Fruchtbares, ein Wirksames sein kann. Wahrheit ist durchaus etwas in der Welt, was sich durch seine Fruchtbarkeit, durch seinen Segen für die Menschheit selber rechtfertigt. Und die Lüge, die Unwahrheit ist etwas, was unfruchtbar und unwirksam ist. Das hat nur eine einzige Wirkung, die ich heute nicht weiter ausführen kann und darum nur andeuten will: Es fällt mit dem stärksten Anprall auf den Verbreiter der Unwahrheit selbst zurück. Das wird uns ein anderes Mal beschäftigen, was mit diesem bedeutungsvollen Satz gemeint ist.
So wollte ich Ihnen heute eine Art Rückblick geben auf das, was wir im letzten Jahre in unsern Zweigversammlungen getrieben haben, und noch einmal anklingen lassen, was als Stimmung, als Gefühlsgehalt die Seele durchziehen und den Raum erfüllen konnte.
Wenn wir nun auf die Arbeit, die außerhalb unseres Zweiges im letzten Jahr geleistet worden ist, nur in einer Beziehung blicken, so darf ich dabei vielleicht auf meinen Anteil selbst hinweisen, der sich zusammenschließt in dem von uns in München aufgeführten Rosenkreuzermysterium «Die Pforte der Einweihung». Mit diesem Mysterium hat etwas angestrebt werden sollen, worüber wir in den nächsten Zweigversammlungen sprechen werden. Jetzt soll nur so viel gesagt werden, daß es möglich war, gerade in dieser, man möchte sagen, mehr künstlerischen Form in einem individuellen Ausdruck das vorzuführen, was man sonst nur mehr im allgemeinen sagen kann. Wenn wir hier oder sonstwo sprechen von den Bedingungen des geistigen Lebens, so sprechen wir so, wie es für jede Seele richtig ist. Aber es ist notwendig, dabei immer im Auge zu behalten, daß jeder Mensch ein eigenes Wesen ist, ein individuelles Wesen, und daß individualisiert werden muß in bezug auf jede Seele. Deshalb war einmal das Bedürfnis vorhanden, sozusagen eine Seele an der Pforte der Einweihung zu zeigen. Betrachten Sie daher das Rosenkreuzermysterium nicht als eine Lehrschrift, sondern als künstlerische Darstellung der Vorbereitung zur Einweihung eines einzelnen Menschen. Es handelt sich nicht darum, wie dieser oder jener Mensch vorschreitet, sondern gerade der, welcher in dem Mysterium als Johannes Thomasius geschildert ist, also um die ganz individuelle Gestalt, welche die Vorbereitung zur Einweihung bei einem einzelnen Menschen annimmt.
So hätten wir gleichsam zwei große Standpunkte dadurch gewonnen, daß wir uns der Wahrheit nähern: einmal indem wir die großen Gesichtspunkte des Fortschrittes schildern, und dann indem wir in den Mittelpunkt einer einzelnen Seele hineingestiegen sind. Immer wird uns das beseelen, daß wir uns der Wahrheit von vielen Seiten nähern und geduldig abwarten müssen, bis sich uns die verschiedenen Ansichten über die Wahrheit zu einer Gesamtempfindung zusammenschließen. Diese Erkenntnisbescheidenheit wollen wir uns ganz besonders angelegen sein lassen. Sprechen wir nie davon, daß der Mensch die Wahrheit nicht erleben kann. Er kann sie erleben! Nur kann er nicht auf einmal die ganze Erkenntnis der Wahrheit haben, sondern nur immer eine Seite. Dadurch wird der Mensch bescheiden. Wahre Bescheidenheit wird auch ein Gefühl sein müssen, das sich erzeugt in unsern Zweigen, das von dort hinausgetragen werden soll in die übrige Zeitkultur der Gegenwart, um draußen zu wirken. Denn unsere Zeit braucht nach ihrer ganzen Beschaffenheit viel von dieser Erkenntnisbescheidenheit.
Im Sinne dieser Anregungen werden wir weiter arbeiten, das christliche Problem darzustellen, um auch daran zu erleben, wie man zu dieser Erkenntnisbescheidenheit gelangen und dadurch wieder im Erleben der Wahrheit immer weiter und weiter kommen kann.
First Lecture
Now that we are resuming the activities of the Berlin branch, it seems appropriate to look back a little on what has passed through our souls since we began the work of the Berlin branch in the same manner last year.
You will certainly remember that about a year ago, on the occasion of the general meeting of our German Section, I gave a lecture in the Berlin branch on the sphere of the Bodhisattvas. The lecture was intended to introduce the mission of the Bodhisattvas in the world, which was then the main topic of our branch meetings throughout last winter: a consideration of the Christ problem, essentially in connection with the Gospel of Matthew. We have, of course, engaged in such reflections on the Christ problem in various ways in connection with other Gospels, such as the Gospel of John and the Gospel of Luke. And we have pointed out that in a future time, in order to deepen our understanding of the Christ problem, we will also approach a consideration that will essentially have to be linked to the Gospel of Mark.
We have not engaged in these reflections on the Christ problem in such a way as to attempt a mere explanation of the Gospels. It has often been said here, I would almost say in a radical way, that what spiritual science has to say about the events in Palestine must also be able to be said even if there were no external historical documents about these events in Palestine. For what is ultimately decisive for our description of the events surrounding Christ is not what is written in any book or document, but what is written in the eternal, inner, spiritual document, in the Akashic Chronicle, which can be deciphered through clairvoyant consciousness. What we are to understand by this has often been mentioned here. And then we approach the Gospels in such a way that we compare what we have first discovered through spiritual research with what is given to us — let us say, in relation to the events in Palestine — in the Gospels or in the other documents of the New Testament. However, we have found that we only learn to read these documents, so to speak, by penetrating without them into the mysteries relating to the events in Palestine, and that precisely because we first investigate the corresponding events without prejudice to these documents, our high esteem, our worship, we might say, for these documents grows to a very special degree.
But if we look not only at the immediate and, for the time being, narrowest interests of our coexistence, but if we see that our entire contemporary culture demands, as it were, a new understanding of the documents of Christianity, then we must be clear that spiritual science calls us not only to satisfy our own need for knowledge about the events in Palestine, but that we are called upon to translate into the language of contemporary cultural needs what we have to say about the significance of the Christ event for the entire development of humanity. However, it is not enough to limit ourselves to what previous centuries have contributed to the understanding of the Christ problem and the Christ figure. If that were sufficient for the educational needs of the present, there would not be so many people today who can no longer reconcile their need for truth with what has been handed down in the Christian sphere, and who in one way or another even deny what has been reported to us about the events in Palestine and what has been believed for centuries. All this may indicate that a new understanding, a new approach to Christian truths, has become necessary for the formation of our times.
Now, among many other things that can bring us closer to the exploration of Christian truths, there is one means in particular that can be especially fruitful in our field of research. This consists in broadening our view, in expanding our world of feelings and perceptions beyond the horizons that humanity has possessed for the spiritual world in past centuries. How we can broaden our horizons may become clear to us through a very simple and obvious indication.
We all know—to refer to the great mind closest to us in the development of Western culture—that Goethe was a titanic spirit. And many of our observations have shown us the depth of spiritual insight that lay hidden in Goethe's personality. These observations have also led us to recognize how we can climb to spiritual heights ourselves by penetrating the structure of Goethe's soul. But no matter how well we get to know Goethe, no matter how deeply we immerse ourselves in what he can give us, there is one thing we cannot yet find in him that we must have today if our view is to be broadened in the right way and our horizons extended beyond the most basic spiritual needs. Nowhere in Goethe do we find any indication that he realized what we can learn today, what can be fruitful for us today if we take up those concepts of the spiritual development of humanity that have only become possible through the discovery of the spiritual documents in the 19th century: if we take up the achievements of Oriental life. There we gain many concepts which do not in any way distance us from understanding the Christ problem, but which, if we take them in correctly, lead us directly to a correct and complete appreciation of Christ Jesus. That is why I believed that there is no better way to approach the Christ problem than by examining the mission of the great spiritual individuals of humanity who from time to time intervene in a particularly tangible way in the course of evolution and whom we call bodhisattvas, a term borrowed from Eastern philosophy. Concepts such as that of the bodhisattvas were not part of Western spiritual development for centuries. And only when we have oriented ourselves to them can we ascend in a corresponding manner to the knowledge of what Christ has been, can be, and will continue to be for humanity.
Thus we see how a wide circle of spiritual development of humanity can be made fruitful in order to understand in a worthy way what we need to understand for that education and culture, for that spiritual life in which we stand in the midst. And from another point of view, it was important that we always, wherever possible, cast our spiritual gaze back over the last centuries, that we emphasized the difference between a person at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries and a person from the 18th or 19th century; and that we emphasized that, for example, a century ago in Europe very little was known about Buddha and Buddhism. But the last thing in our field of work, even if it is not the means of our striving, but rather the actual impulse and also the goal of our striving, and what we are working toward, is ultimately the mood, the feeling, the sensation that creeps into our soul when it is touched by the great spiritual truths. For it is not so much what this or that person wants to know that matters, but rather what warmth of feeling, what power of perception, what nobility of will rises from our soul when the great truths of humanity strike that soul. And more important in our branches than what can be said in words is the mood, the wave of feeling that can prevail in one of our branches when the words fill the room. These feelings, these sensations, are of many kinds. And in what is to stand before our souls right now, the most important, the most significant sensation should be that which must gradually develop within us: reverence for the knowledge of the great spiritual truths, the feeling that these great spiritual truths are of such a nature that we should approach them with shy reverence, that we should not believe that we can encompass a great fact with some hastily cobbled together concept, with a few quickly gained ideas.
I have often used the comparison that we cannot visualize a tree standing in front of us by painting a picture of it from one vantage point, but that we must walk around and paint the tree from different sides. Only by combining these different images do we gain an overall impression of what the tree is. This comparison should paint a picture in our minds of how we should behave toward great spiritual facts. We should be clear that we cannot make any real or supposed progress in understanding the highest things if we always approach them from only one side. And although there is or can be truth in the view of a thing, we should never abandon the humble feeling that all our ideas are and can only be views taken from one point of view. If we are imbued with this feeling, we will gladly and willingly seek from all sources the ideas, sensations, and feelings that enable us to illuminate the great facts of existence from the most diverse angles. Our time makes this necessary. In our time, the need to view things from the most diverse angles will develop more and more. Therefore, we no longer close ourselves off from any other view or opinion, from any other path to the highest things than our own or that of our own culture. Even within what Western cultural development itself has offered, we have tried in recent years to uphold this principle, which can lead us to genuine humility in knowledge. We have never presumed—and I may well say that it was deeply written in my soul that such presumption should never be possible in this place—to give a system, an overview of what the great events that we summarize with the Christ problem are supposed to be. Instead, we have always said: We are approaching it from one point of view; and another time we have said: We are approaching it from another point of view. And we have always pointed out that we are not exhausting the problem and that we want to continue our work calmly and patiently.
The purpose of linking the various Gospels was to give us an opportunity to look at the Christ problem from four different points of view, and then to find that the four Gospels indeed offer us links to the four different points of view, and that we found the principle outlined in the Gospels themselves: You should not approach the enormous problem all at once, at a glance, but you should approach it from at least the four different spiritual directions. And you should hope that if you approach the problem from these four spiritual directions, which are designated by the names of the four evangelists, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, it will gradually come closer and closer to you. And it will come so close to you that you will never need to say that you are excluded from the great truth without which the human soul cannot live in its deepest inner being, but you will also never say that any form of truth you have grasped is already the whole truth.
Thus, what we were able to cultivate during the course of last winter was, so to speak, designed to gradually evoke in us a mood of humility in our knowledge. And without this mood of humility in our knowledge, we cannot indeed make any progress in spiritual life. That is why, during these reflections, every effort was made to emphasize again and again the basic conditions for spiritual progress in knowledge. And anyone who has attentively followed the lectures here from week to week will not be able to claim that the basic conditions for spiritual progress in knowledge have not been pointed out everywhere.
Spiritual progress in knowledge — that is one of the impulses underlying our entire spiritual scientific movement. Spiritual progress in knowledge — what does it mean for our soul? It should meet the deepest, most human longings and needs of our soul; it should give us what a person who feels their human dignity fully cannot live without. And it should give it to us within the field of spiritual science in such a way that it corresponds to the cognitive needs of our time. What cannot be explored with the ordinary senses, what belongs to human beings not as sensory beings but as spiritual beings, should be clarified for us by the progress of knowledge offered to us by spiritual science. The great questions about the position of the human being in the sensory world, about what lies beyond the revelations of this sensory world, the truths about what lies beyond life and death — these questions correspond to a deep, indeed the most human need of the soul. Even if human beings, through all kinds of circumstances, suppress questions relating to such things, even if they are able to deprive themselves of them for a while by saying to themselves: “Science cannot investigate this; human beings lack the necessary abilities” — in the long run and for the true nature of human feelings, the need for answers to these questions never disappears. Where does what we see developing in the course of childhood and adolescence come from, where does what we harbor in our souls go when physicality begins to fade and die, in short, how is man connected to a spiritual world? This is the great question that arises from a most human need, and without an answer to this question, man can only be if they numb themselves to their most human needs.
But because this question springs from such a deep need, because the soul cannot live in peace and satisfaction if it does not receive an answer to these questions, it is only natural that human beings want to find answers to these questions in an easy, convenient way, so to speak. And how many paths are being pointed out today, despite the fact that these questions have become particularly pressing in all areas of human life, as some would like to deny! It is no exaggeration to say that of all the paths offered to people today when they are confronted with these great mysteries, the path of spiritual science is the most difficult. Yes, one may even say something else. There will be many among you who consider one or another of the sciences that are much talked about in the world to be difficult, and perhaps do not venture into them because they are put off by all that has to be overcome in order to penetrate such a science. It may also be that the path we have called spiritual science seems easier than the path into mathematics, botany, or another branch of natural science. Nevertheless, taken absolutely, this path is more difficult than the path into any other science. This can be said without exaggeration. Why does it seem easier to you? Only because it stirs up the soul's interests with tremendous force and corresponds to what is closest to every soul. If it is the most difficult of all the paths offered to human beings today for ascending into the spiritual world, we should not forget that this path is meant to lead us to the highest in our soul life. Is it not natural that the path to the highest must also be the most difficult? Nevertheless, we should never be deterred by the difficulty of the path, never close our souls to the necessity of the difficulty of the spiritual scientific path.
Among the many necessities of the spiritual scientific path, one has been mentioned here again and again: that those who embark on the spiritual scientific path must first carefully take in what spiritual research already has to offer about the spiritual mysteries, about the facts of the spiritual world. This brings us to a particularly necessary chapter in our spiritual scientific life. How many would like to say lightheartedly: They talk to us about an immense spiritual science, about spiritual facts that this or that spiritual researcher, this or that enlightened person, this or that initiate has seen and researched. Would it not be much more appropriate to simply show us the way to quickly ascend to the regions from which one can look into the spiritual world? Why do you keep talking about how it looks, how this or that person saw it? Why don't you show us a way to quickly ascend ourselves?
There are good reasons why the facts that have been researched in the spiritual world are first communicated in a broad way before going into what can be called the methods of soul training, which can lead the soul itself up into the spiritual regions. For something very specific is achieved by first devoting ourselves to the study of what spiritual researchers have revealed from the spiritual worlds. We have emphasized that although the facts of the spiritual world must be researched, they can only be found through clairvoyant consciousness; but we have emphasized just as often that once the facts have been found, once some trained clairvoyant consciousness has observed these facts in the spiritual world and then communicates them, the communication must be such that even those who have not undergone clairvoyant development can, with the healthy sense of truth that lies in every soul, with truly unbiased logic, verify the facts and recognize the truths. No true spiritual researcher, no person gifted with clairvoyant consciousness in the true sense of the word, will communicate any fact of the spiritual world in any other way than so that anyone who really wants to can verify this fact even without clairvoyance. But he will also communicate it in such a way that it can have its full value, its full meaning for a human soul.
What value do communications of spiritual facts, ideas of spiritual facts, have for a human soul? They have the value that a person who knows what the spiritual world is like can orient themselves in life, in their thoughts, feelings, and perceptions, and can orient themselves in relation to the spiritual world. In this sense, every communication of spiritual facts is valuable, even if the person receiving it cannot explore it himself through clairvoyant consciousness. Yes, even for the clairvoyant, this fact only acquires human value when he has brought it down into a sphere where he can shape it into a form accessible to all human beings. No matter how much a clairvoyant may explore and see in the spiritual realm, it is completely worthless to him and to any other human being as long as he has not brought what he has seen down into the sphere of ordinary knowledge and shaped it into concepts and ideas that the natural sense of truth and healthy logic can grasp. Yes, the clairvoyant himself must first understand the matter if it is to have any value for him. Value only begins where logical examination begins.
We could use a radical expression to do a kind of cross-check on what has now been said. Among many other valuable things in relation to spiritual truths and spiritual communications, you will undoubtedly consider important what a person can take with them through the gate of death from what they have absorbed on the physical plane between birth and death in terms of such spiritual truths. Or let us put the question this way: How much remains for the person who has received messages about the spiritual world through the cultivation of spiritual life, how much remains for him of what he has thus understood, what he has thus made his own? Exactly as much remains for him as he has understood, as he has grasped, as he has translated into the language of ordinary human consciousness.
Imagine a clairvoyant person who has made very special discoveries in the spiritual world through purely clairvoyant observations, but who has failed to clothe these observations from the spiritual world in a language that is the language of the ordinary human sense of truth for any age. Do you know what happens to him or what happens to him? All these discoveries are wiped out after death. Just as much remains valuable and meaningful after death as has been translated, reformulated into a language that corresponds to the healthy sense of truth in any age.
It is certainly of the utmost importance that there are clairvoyant people who can bring forth messages from the spiritual world that can enrich other people. This brings blessings to our time, because our time needs such guidance and will not be able to develop further if it does not accept such guidance. It is necessary that such messages be given to our contemporary culture. And if people do not yet understand this today, in half a century or a century it will be the general conviction of humanity: culture cannot continue without the conviction of the existence of spiritual truths, and humanity would be culturally ruined without them. Acceptance of spiritual truths. There is something that humanity will need in the future if it wants to continue developing, something more necessary than all outwardly visible cultural means: that is the acceptance of spiritual wisdom. And even if all the air were conquered for transportation, humanity would still face cultural death if it did not accept spiritual guidance. This is undoubtedly the case. There must be a possibility of looking into the spiritual world.
However, what the spiritual teachings mean for individual beings after death is of a different value than the progress of humanity on Earth. In order to form a correct idea of this, we must ask ourselves the question: What does the clairvoyant person gain from what he has clairvoyantly investigated and expressed in a formula of healthy truth-sense, of healthy human logic? What does he gain from being able to look into the spiritual world after death, compared to someone who, because of his karma, did not have the opportunity to see into the spiritual world in the corresponding incarnation and was therefore dependent on hearing about the results of spiritual research from others? How do the spiritual truths differ for an initiate and for a person who has only heard them and cannot see into the spiritual world? Is the initiate better off than the one who could only receive these things?
For humanity in general, looking into spiritual worlds has a higher value than not looking into them. For those who look into them come into contact with the spiritual world; there they can teach not only human beings but also other spiritual beings and promote their progress. Thus, this clairvoyant consciousness has a very special value. But for the individual, only knowledge has value, and in terms of individual value, the most clairvoyant person is no different from someone who has only received messages and, in a corresponding incarnation, was unable to look into the spiritual world. What we have absorbed as spiritual wisdom is fruitful after death, regardless of whether we have seen it ourselves or not.
With this, we have placed before our souls one of the great, venerable ethical and moral laws of the spiritual world. However, the morality of our time is perhaps not refined enough to fully understand this ethos. Individually, that is, in the higher sense of satisfying egoism, no one gains an advantage by being offered the opportunity through their karma to look into the spiritual world. Everything we want to acquire for our individual lives, we must acquire on the physical plane and also bring into forms that are suitable for the physical plane. And if a Buddha or a Bodhisattva stands higher than other human individuals in the hierarchies of the spiritual world, it is precisely because they have acquired this higher state through so many incarnations on the physical plane. What I meant by higher ethics, the higher moral teaching that arises from spiritual life, is this: no one should imagine that through clairvoyant development they can gain an advantage over their fellow human beings. That is not the case at all. They do not achieve any progress that can be justified in an egoistic sense. He only gains it insofar as he can be more to others. It is completely out of the question to serve egoism in the spiritual realm. Man cannot gain anything for himself through spiritual enlightenment. What he gains, he can only gain as a servant of the world in general, and for himself only by gaining it for others.
This is how a spiritual researcher stands among his fellow human beings. If they want to hear what he has discovered and accept it, they thereby gain the same advantage as he himself, and come just as far as he has in their individual development. This means that the spiritual can only be utilized in the general human spirit, not in the egoistic spirit. There is a realm in which one is moral not merely because one sets out to be so, but because immorality and egoism would be of no help. But then it is also easy to see something else: that it is dangerous to enter the spiritual world unprepared. Nothing selfish can ever be achieved for life after death through spiritual life. However, through spiritual development, human beings can desire selfish things for this life, for life on the physical plane. Even if, so to speak, nothing selfish can be achieved for the spiritual world, one can still desire to achieve something for this world that is in the sense of selfishness.
Most people who strive for a certain higher development will now certainly say: It is quite natural that I should strive to be unselfish before I want to enter the higher world. But believe me: there is probably no area of human deception in which deception can be as great as when one says: I strive to be unselfish! It is easy to say that. Whether one can do it, whether one can really accomplish it, is a completely different question. It is a different question above all because when one begins to cultivate activities in the soul that can lead into the spiritual world, one then encounters oneself in one's true form for the first time. In relation to many things, human beings do not live in their true form in the outer world. They live woven into a web of ideas, impulses of will, and moral feelings, into patterns of behavior that are given by the environment, and rarely do human beings ask themselves the question: How would I act, how would I think about something if I did not feel compelled by what I have been taught to think or act in this way or that? If people would answer this question, they would see that they are usually much, much worse than they assume.
Now, activities that are designed to help humans ascend into the spiritual world have the effect of causing them to outgrow everything they are interwoven with through habits, education, and everything around them. Quite soon, they grow beyond it. They become more and more naked in terms of their spirit, soul, and feelings. The shells we have created for ourselves and to which we cling in our ordinary feelings and actions fall away. Hence that very ordinary phenomenon which has often been discussed: before beginning spiritual development, a person is perhaps a reasonably decent, perhaps even a sensible person who does not do anything particularly stupid in life. Now he begins his spiritual development. Whereas before he was quite modest and perhaps even said to himself, “I am a very modest person,” he now, under the influence of spiritual development, begins to show himself to be a very arrogant being and starts committing all kinds of follies and stupidities. When he enters into spiritual development, he loses his footing and direction, so to speak. Why this is so can best be seen by those who are at home in the spiritual world. For two things are necessary in order to find one's way in relation to what approaches the human soul from the spiritual world, in order to maintain balance: One must be able to avoid becoming dizzy in the face of what approaches us from the spiritual world. In physical life, our organization protects us from becoming dizzy through what we have called the sense of balance, the static sense, in the lectures on anthroposophy. Just as there is something in the physical human being that keeps him upright — for if the organization does not function properly, the human being becomes dizzy and falls down — so there is also something in the spiritual life through which the human being can orient himself to his own position in the world. He must be able to do this. Spiritual collapse consists precisely in the fact that what previously supported us, what we have learned to feel, what the fabric of the external world brings about, is no longer there, so that we are then left to our own devices. The supports fall away, and then there is a danger that we will become dizzy. We can easily become arrogant when the external supports are taken away from us. Arrogance is naturally within us, but it did not come to the surface before.
How does one attain spiritual balance so that one does not become dizzy? By renouncing everything else and diligently and eagerly taking in what spiritual research has discovered and what has been transformed into logical formulas that correspond to the ordinary sense of truth. It is not out of caprice that we emphasize again and again that it is necessary to really study what we call spiritual science first. It is not emphasized so that I can talk about it frequently, but because there is no other means of obtaining a firm foundation for spiritual development. The devoted, diligent acceptance of the results of spiritual science is the antidote to spiritual dizziness and spiritual uncertainty. And many people who, through an incorrectly guided development, fall into spiritual uncertainty — even if it seems to them that they have been very diligent — should know that they have neglected to take in what can flow from the source of spiritual science. That is what we need, this study of spiritual scientific facts from all sides. And that is why, even during the last winter in our branch, when we finally wanted to understand the significance of the Christ event for humanity, we kept coming back to emphasizing the basic conditions for spiritual progress.
Human beings need an oriented soul life in order to progress, but they also need something else. While the study of spiritual science brings security to the human soul, something else is brought about by a second factor, which we also need. This is a certain spiritual strength, a certain courage of spiritual life. We do not need the kind of courage we need for spiritual progress in ordinary life, because our innermost being, our spiritual-soul nature, is embedded in ordinary waking life from the moment we wake up to the moment we fall asleep in the physical body and etheric body; and at night we do nothing and can do no harm. If human beings could act while asleep, they would do terrible things as undeveloped human beings. However, the physical body and etheric body contain not only the forces that are active in us insofar as we are conscious or even just thinking and feeling human beings, but also those forces on which divine-spiritual beings have worked throughout the Saturn, Sun, and Moon epochs and into our Earth epoch. The forces from higher regions are constantly at work. We rely on them. And when we wake up and enter the physical and etheric bodies, we simultaneously surrender ourselves to the divine-spiritual forces that reside in our physical and etheric bodies for our salvation and blessing and guide us through daily life from morning to evening. That is how it is: the entire divine-spiritual world is at work within us, and we can, in essence, do much worse, but not much better.
But now consider that all spiritual development depends on our gaining freedom for our inner human being, our astral body, and our I, that we learn, so to speak, to see, to perceive clairvoyantly in that which lives unconsciously from the moment we fall asleep until we wake up, and because it lives unconsciously, it cannot cause any harm. What is unconscious in those members in which divine-spiritual forces are present must become conscious within us. All the strength and power that has been given to us, in that we are taken up in the hands of what is anchored in our physical body and etheric body when we wake up, falls away when we become independent of the physical body and etheric body and begin to perceive clairvoyantly. All the power and force of the world remains outside. We have withdrawn ourselves from those forces that make us strong and give us a counterbalance against the world that acts upon us from outside. We have withdrawn ourselves from the forces that support us. But the world has remained as it is, and we are therefore still confronted with all the force, all the impact of the world. All the strength that otherwise comes to us from the physical body and etheric body must then be within us in order to withstand the impact of the world and offer resistance. We must develop all of this in our ego and astral body. We develop this through the rules that are given to us and which you will find in my book “How to Know Higher Worlds.” All of this is designed to give our own inner being the strength that was previously bestowed upon us by higher beings and that disappears when the external supports disappear, the strength that can make us resistant to the impact of the world, even if we ourselves have pushed aside the supports offered to us by our physical and etheric bodies.
People who do not make themselves strong enough within to replace the forces they shed with their physical and etheric bodies through truly devoted exercises of the soul, above all through the purification of the qualities we call immorality in the outer world, can acquire the ability to see into the spiritual world to a certain extent. But what happens? They become what we might call hypersensitive; they become overly sensitive. They feel as if they are being stabbed spiritually from all sides, unable to withstand what is coming at them from all directions. This is one of the important facts that must be known if one strives for spiritual progress: to become strong inwardly by truly developing the noblest and best qualities of the soul.
What qualities will these be, according to what we have just said? If it is impossible to live in the spiritual world under the sign of egoism, if egoism is of no help to us there, then it will only be natural that the expulsion of egoism, of everything that is subject to the arbitrary desires of the spirit, will be the preparation for spiritual life. The more worthy and serious one takes this principle, the better it is for spiritual progress. One cannot take it seriously and worthily enough. Those who have to do with these things often hear someone say: I did not do this out of egoism! — But when these words are about to pass the lips, one should stop oneself, should not let them pass, but should say to oneself: Actually, you are not such a person that you can say you are doing something without a trace of selfishness! — That is much wiser, because it is much truer. And what matters is the truth, especially in relation to self-knowledge. In no area does untruth take its revenge as strongly as in the area of spiritual life. There, people should demand of themselves to be true rather than talking themselves into the fog: You are unselfish. — Better to be true and say to yourself: If I admit my selfishness, then at least I have an impulse to get rid of it.
I would like to explain what this spiritual concept of truth means with the following example. It is easy to judge: there are people who claim to have experienced and seen all kinds of things in the higher worlds; this is then spread around and presented to people. If one realizes that this is not true, should one not use all one's strength and means to combat it? Certainly, there may be points of view from which such a fight is necessary. But for those who, as spiritual people, are concerned with the truth, there is always another thought, namely that only what is true flourishes from the spiritual world and is fruitful for the world, and that what is untrue certainly has no fruitfulness. To put it simply: no matter how much you lie about spiritual matters, these things have very short legs. Those who spread these lies should realize that they cannot achieve anything truly fruitful with them. Only the truth is fruitful in the spiritual realm. This begins where we start our own spiritual development, where we should begin to admit to ourselves how we really are. This is something that must live as an impulse in all spiritual and occult movements: that only the true can be fruitful and effective. Truth is definitely something in the world that justifies itself through its fruitfulness, through its blessing for humanity itself. And lies, untruths, are something that is unfruitful and ineffective. They have only one effect, which I cannot elaborate on today and therefore will only hint at: they rebound with the greatest force on the spreader of untruths themselves. We will deal with what is meant by this meaningful sentence another time.
So today I wanted to give you a kind of review of what we have been doing in our branch meetings over the past year, and once again touch upon the mood, the emotional content that has permeated the soul and filled the room.
If we now look at the work that has been done outside our branch over the past year in just one respect, I may perhaps point to my own contribution, which is summed up in the Rosicrucian mystery play “The Gate of Initiation” that we performed in Munich. This mystery play was intended to strive for something that we will discuss in the next branch meetings. For now, suffice it to say that it was possible, precisely in this, one might say, more artistic form, to present in an individual expression what can otherwise only be said in general terms. When we speak here or elsewhere about the conditions of spiritual life, we speak in a way that is right for every soul. But it is necessary to always keep in mind that every human being is a unique being, an individual being, and that individualization is necessary in relation to every soul. That is why there was once a need to show, so to speak, a soul at the gate of initiation. Therefore, do not regard the Rosicrucian mystery as a doctrinal treatise, but as an artistic representation of the preparation for the initiation of an individual human being. It is not a question of how this or that person progresses, but precisely of the person who is described in the mystery as Johannes Thomasius, that is, of the completely individual form that the preparation for initiation takes in an individual human being.
In this way, we have gained two great points of view by approaching the truth: first, by describing the great aspects of progress, and then by entering into the center of an individual soul. We will always be inspired by the fact that we must approach the truth from many sides and wait patiently until the various views on the truth merge into a unified perception. Let us take this humility of knowledge to heart. Let us never say that human beings cannot experience the truth. They can experience it! But he cannot have the whole knowledge of the truth at once, only one side at a time. This makes man humble. True humility must also be a feeling that arises within us, that is carried out from there into the rest of the contemporary culture in order to have an effect outside. For our time, in its entire nature, needs much of this humility of knowledge.
In the spirit of these suggestions, we will continue to work on presenting the Christian problem in order to experience how one can attain this humility of knowledge and thereby continue to progress further and further in the experience of truth.